Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 530764, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/530764
Research Article

A Study of Coupling Parameter Estimation Implemented by 4D-Var and EnKF with a Simple Coupled System

1Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Information Technology, State Oceanic Administration, National Marine Data and Information Service, Tianjin 300171, China
2Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542, USA
3Center for Climate Research and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
4Laboratory of Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
5Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA

Received 24 October 2014; Revised 5 January 2015; Accepted 5 January 2015

Academic Editor: Hiroyuki Hashiguchi

Copyright © 2015 Guijun Han et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Chen, M. A. Cane, S. E. Zebiak, R. Canizares, and A. Kaplan, “Bias correction of an ocean-atmosphere coupled model,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 2585–2588, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Peña and E. Kalnay, “Separating fast and slow modes in coupled chaotic systems,” Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 319–327, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Zhang, M. J. Harrison, A. Rosati, and A. Wittenberg, “System design and evaluation of coupled ensemble data assimilation for global oceanic climate studies,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 135, no. 10, pp. 3541–3564, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. Sugiura, T. Awaji, S. Masuda et al., “Development of a four-dimensional variational coupled data assimilation system for enhanced analysis and prediction of seasonal to interannual climate variations,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, vol. 133, no. 10, Article ID C10017, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. T. Singleton, A data assimilation study using a simple coupled ocean-atmosphere system [Ph.D. thesis], University of Maryland, College Park, Md, USA, 2011.
  6. G. Han, X. Wu, S. Zhang, Z. Liu, and W. Li, “Error covariance estimation for coupled data assimilation using a lorenz atmosphere and a simple pycnocline ocean model,” Journal of Climate, vol. 26, no. 24, pp. 10218–10231, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. M. Lewis and J. C. Derber, “The use of adjoint equations to solve a variational adjustment problem with advective constraints,” Tellus A, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 309–322, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. P. Courtier, J.-N. Thepaut, and A. Hollingsworth, “A strategy for operational implementation of 4D-Var, using an incremental approach,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 120, no. 519, pp. 1367–1387, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Rabier, H. Järvinen, E. Klinker, J.-F. Mahfouf, and A. Simmons, “The ECMWF operational implementation of four-dimensional variational assimilation. I: experimental results with simplified physics,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 126, no. 564, pp. 1143–1170, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Evensen, “Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 99, pp. 10143–10162, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  11. J. L. Anderson, “An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 129, no. 12, pp. 2884–2903, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. C. Lorenc, “The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP—a comparison with 4D-Var,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 129, no. 595, pp. 3183–3203, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. C. Yang, M. Corazza, A. Carrassi, E. Kalnay, and T. Miyoshi, “Comparison of local ensemble transform Kalman filter, 3DVAR, and 4DVAR in a quasigeostrophic model,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 693–709, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Miyoshi, Y. Sato, and T. Kadowaki, “Ensemble Kalman filter and 4D-Var intercomparison with the Japanese operational global analysis and prediction system,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 138, no. 7, pp. 2846–2866, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Zhang, F. Zhang, X.-Y. Huang, and X. Zhang, “Intercomparison of an ensemble Kalman filter with three- and four-dimensional variational data assimilation methods in a limited-area model over the month of June 2003,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 566–572, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. L. Steward, I. M. Navon, M. Zupanski, and N. Karmitsa, “Impact of non-smooth observation operators on variational and sequential data assimilation for a limited-area shallow-water equation model,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 138, no. 663, pp. 323–339, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Kalnay, H. Li, T. Miyoshi, S.-C. Yang, and J. Ballabrera-Poy, “4-D-Var or ensemble Kalman filter?” Tellus, Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 758–773, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Caya, J. Sun, and C. Snyder, “A comparison between the 4DVAR and the ensemble Kalman filter techniques for radar data assimilation,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 3081–3094, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Buehner, P. L. Houtekamer, C. Charette, H. L. Mitchell, and B. He, “Intercomparison of variational data assimilation and the ensemble Kalman filter for global deterministic NWP. Part I: description and single-observation experiments,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 1550–1566, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Buehner, P. L. Houtekamer, C. Charette, H. L. Mitchell, and B. He, “Intercomparison of variational data assimilation and the ensemble Kalman filter for global deterministic NWP. Part II: one-Month experiments with real observations,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 1567–1586, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. D. Annan, J. C. Hargreaves, N. R. Edwards, and R. Marsh, “Parameter estimation in an intermediate complexity earth system model using an ensemble Kalman filter,” Ocean Modelling, vol. 8, no. 1-2, pp. 135–154, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  22. D. Kondrashov, C. Sun, and M. Ghil, “Data assimilation for a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. Part II: parameter estimation,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 136, no. 12, pp. 5062–5076, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Zhang, “Impact of observation-optimized model parameters on decadal predictions: simulation with a simple pycnocline prediction model,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 38, no. 2, Article ID L02702, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Zhang, “A study of impacts of coupled model initial shocks and state—parameter optimization on climate predictions using a simple pycnocline prediction model,” Journal of Climate, vol. 24, no. 23, pp. 6210–6226, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Zhang, Z. Liu, A. Rosati, and T. Delworth, “A study of enhancive parameter correction with coupled data assimilation for climate estimation and prediction using a simple coupled model,” Tellus A, vol. 64, no. 1, Article ID 10963, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. X. Wu, S. Zhang, Z. Liu, A. Rosati, T. L. Delworth, and Y. Liu, “Impact of geographic-dependent parameter optimization on climate estimation and prediction: simulation with an intermediate coupled model,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 140, no. 12, pp. 3956–3971, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. X. Wu, S. Zhang, Z. Liu, A. Rosati, and T. L. Delworth, “A study of impact of the geographic dependence of observing system on parameter estimation with an intermediate coupled model,” Climate Dynamics, vol. 40, no. 7-8, pp. 1789–1798, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Ballabrera-Poy, E. Kalnay, and S. C. Yang, “Data assimilation in a system with two scales—combining two initialization techniques,” Tellus, Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 539–549, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. N. Lorenz, “Deterministic non-periodic flow,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 130–141, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Masutani, J. S. Woollen, S. J. Lord et al., “Observing system simulation experiments at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, vol. 115, no. 7, Article ID D07101, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. A. Robert, “The integration of a spectral model of the atmosphere by the implicit method,” in Proceedings of the WMO/IUGG Symposium on NWP, pp. 19–24, Japan Meteorological Society, Tokyo, Japan, 1969.
  32. R. Asselin, “Frequency filter for time integrations,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 487–490, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. S. Zhang, J. L. Anderson, A. Rosati, M. Harrison, S. P. Khare, and A. Wittenberg, “Multiple time level adjustment for data assimilation,” Tellus, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 2–15, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. I. M. Navon, “Practical and theoretical aspects of adjoint parameter estimation and identifiability in meteorology and oceanography,” Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, vol. 27, no. 1–4, pp. 55–79, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. C. Liu and J. Nocedal, “On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 503–528, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  36. M. Haarala, K. Miettinen, and M. M. Mäkelä, “New limited memory bundle method for large-scale nonsmooth optimization,” Optimization Methods & Software, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 673–692, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  37. N. Haarala, K. Miettinen, and M. M. Mäkelä, “Globally convergent limited memory bundle method for large-scale nonsmooth optimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 181–205, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. C. Pires, R. Vautard, and O. Talagrand, “On extending the limits of variational assimilation in nonlinear chaotic systems,” Tellus A, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 96–121, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Vlček and L. Lukšan, “Globally convergent variable metric method for nonconvex nondifferentiable unconstrained minimization,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 407–430, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  40. R. H. Byrd, J. Nocedal, and R. B. Schnabel, “Representations of quasi-Newton matrices and their use in limited memory methods,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 129–156, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  41. N. Karmitsa, “LMBM-FORTRAN subroutines for large-scale nonsmooth minimization: user's manual,” TUCS Technical Report 856, Turku Centre for Computer Science, Turku, Finland, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  42. A. Aksoy, F. Zhang, and J. W. Nielsen-Gammon, “Ensemble-based simultaneous state and parameter estimation with MM5,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 33, no. 12, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. J. L. Anderson, “An adaptive covariance inflation error correction algorithm for ensemble filters,” Tellus, Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 210–224, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. L. Anderson, “Spatially and temporally varying adaptive covariance inflation for ensemble filters,” Tellus, Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 72–83, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. H. Li, E. Kalnay, and T. Miyoshi, “Simultaneous estimation of covariance inflation and observation errors within an ensemble Kalman filter,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 135, no. 639, pp. 523–533, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. T. Miyoshi, “The gaussian approach to adaptive covariance inflation and its implementation with the local ensemble transform Kalman filter,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 1519–1535, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. J. L. Anderson and S. L. Anderson, “A Monte Carlo implementation of the nonlinear filtering problem to produce ensemble assimilations and forecasts,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 127, no. 12, pp. 2741–2758, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus