Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 763919, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/763919
Research Article

Assimilation of Chinese Doppler Radar and Lightning Data Using WRF-GSI: A Case Study of Mesoscale Convective System

1Key Laboratory of Arid Climatic Changing and Reducing Disaster of Gansu Province, College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, No. 222 TianShui South Road, Lanzhou City, Gansu 730000, China
2Key Laboratory for Mesoscale Severe Weather/MOE and School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, No. 22 Hankou Road, Nanjing city, Jiangsu 210093, China

Received 12 May 2014; Revised 9 September 2014; Accepted 15 September 2014

Academic Editor: Bala Subrahamanyam

Copyright © 2015 Yi Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Q. Xiao, Y. H. Kuo, J. Sun et al., “Assimilation of Doppler radar observations with a regional 3DVAR system: Impact of Doppler velocities on forecasts of a heavy rainfall case,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 768–788, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Gao and D. J. Stensrud, “Assimilation of reflectivity data in a convective-scale, cycled 3DVAR framework with hydrometeor classification,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1054–1065, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Gao, M. Xue, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, “A three-dimensional variational data analysis method with recursive filter for Doppler radars,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 457–469, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Z. Pu, X. Li, and J. Sun, “Impact of airborne doppler radar data assimilation on the numerical simulation of intensity changes of hurricane dennis near a landfall,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 3351–3365, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Sun and N. A. Crook, “Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part I: model development and simulated data experiments,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 1642–1661, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Sun and N. A. Crook, “Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part II: retrieval experiments of an observed Florida convective storm,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 835–852, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Tong and M. Xue, “Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 133, no. 7, pp. 1789–1807, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Gao and M. Xue, “An efficient dual-resolution approach for ensemble data assimilation and tests with simulated Doppler radar data,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 945–963, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Xue, M. Tong, and K. K. Droegemeier, “An OSSE framework based on the ensemble square root Kalman filter for evaluating the impact of data from radar networks on thunderstorm analysis and forecasting,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 46–66, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Zhang, C. Snyder, and J. Sun, “Impacts of initial estimate and observation availability on convective-scale data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 1238–1253, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Benjamin, “Assimilation of lightning data into RUC model convection forecasting,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Meteorological Applications of Lightning Data, Tucson, Ariz, USA, 2006, https://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_105079.htm.
  12. S. Benjamin, S. S. Weygandt, J. M. Brown et al., “From the radar-enhanced RUC to the WRF-based Rapid Refresh,” in Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, J3.4, Park City, Utah, USA, 2007.
  13. M. Hu, S. Weygandt, S. Benjamin et al., “Ongoing development and testing of generalized cloud analysis package within gsi for initializing rapid refresh,” in Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Aviation, Range and Aerospace Meteorology, American Meteorology Society, New Orleans, Lo, USA, 2008.
  14. M. Hu, “Assimilation of lightning data using cloud analysis within the Rapid Refresh,” in Proceedings of the 4th Conference on the Meteorological Applications of Lightning Data, p. 29, American Meteorology Society, Phoenix, Ariz, USA, January 2009, https://ams.confex.com/ams/89annual/techprogram/paper_150405.htm.
  15. S. S. Weygandt, S. Benjamin, and J. Brown, “Radar reflectivity-based initialization of precipitation systems using a diabatic digital filter within the Rapid Update Cycle,” in Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, American Meteorology Society, Park City, Utah, USA, 2007.
  16. T. N. Krishnamurti, J. Xue, H. Bedi, and et al, “Physical initialization for numerical weather prediction over the tropics,” Tellus B, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 53–81, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Yang, C. J. Qiu, and J. D. Gong, “Physical initialization applied in WRF-Var for assimilation of Doppler radar data,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 33, no. 22, Article ID L22807, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Y. Wang, Y. Yang, and C. Wang, “Improving forecasting of strong convection by assimilating cloud-to-ground lightning data using the physical initialization method,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 150, pp. 31–41, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  19. G. D. Alexander, J. A. Weinman, V. M. Karyampudi, W. S. Olson, and A. C. L. Lee, “The effect of assimilating rain rates derived from satellites and lightning on forecasts of the 1993 superstorm,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 127, no. 7, pp. 1433–1457, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D.-E. Chang, J. A. Weinman, C. A. Morales, and W. S. Olson, “The effect of spaceborne microwave and ground-based continuous lightning measurements on forecasts of the 1998 groundhog day storm,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 129, no. 8, pp. 1809–1833, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. I. S. Brenner, “The relationship between meteorological parameters and daily summer rainfall amount and coverage in West-Central Florida,” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 286–300, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. A. Gallus Jr. and M. Segal, “Impact of improved initialization of mesoscale features on convective system rainfall in 10-km Eta simulations,” Weather & Forecasting, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 680–696, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Papadopoulos, E. Serpetzoglou, and E. N. Anagnostou, “Improving convective precipitation forecasting through assimilation of regional lightning measurements in a mesoscale model,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 135, no. 7, pp. 715–725, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  24. E. R. Mansell, C. L. Ziegler, and D. R. MacGorman, “A lightning data assimilation technique for mesoscale forecast models,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 1732–1748, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. G. Benjamin, D. Dévényi, S. S. Weygandt et al., “An hourly assimilation-forecast cycle: the RUC,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 495–518, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Hu, M. Xue, and K. Brewster, “3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, tornadic thunderstorms. Part I: cloud analysis and its impact,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 675–698, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Papadopoulos, E. Serpetzoglou, and E. N. Anagnostou, “Evaluating the impact of lightning data assimilation on mesoscale model simulations of a flash flood inducing storm,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 715–725, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Geernaert, S. Businger, C. Jeffery, T. Dunn, R. Elsberry, and D. Macgorman, “Using novel lightning data and advanced modeling approaches to predict maritime cyclogenesis,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1091–1093, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. T. Pessi and S. Businger, “Relationships among lightning, precipitation, and hydrometeor characteristics over the North Pacific Ocean,” Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 833–848, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. O. Fierro, J. Gao, C. L. Ziegler, E. R. Mansell, D. R. Macgorman, and S. R. Dembek, “Evaluation of a cloud-scale lightning data assimilation technique and a 3DVAR method for the analysis and short-term forecast of the 29 june 2012 derecho event,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 183–202, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. Thompson, R. M. Rasmussen, and K. Manning, “Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme, part I: description and sensitivity analysis,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 519–542, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. B. S. Ferrier, “A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part I: description,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 249–280, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. B. S. Ferrier, W.-K. Tao, and J. Simpson, “A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part II: simulations of convective storms in different large-scale environments and comparisons with other bulk parameterizations,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1001–1033, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. Kessler, “On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations,” Meteorological Monographs, vol. 10, no. 32, p. 88, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  35. Y.-L. Lin, R. D. Farley, and H. D. Orville, “Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model,” Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1065–1092, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. E. J. Mlawer, S. J. Taubman, P. D. Brown, M. J. Iacono, and S. A. Clough, “Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave,” Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres, vol. 102, no. 14, pp. 16663–16682, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M.-D. Chou and M. J. Suarez, “A solar radiation parameterization for atmospheric studies,” NASA Tech. Memo 104606, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  38. Z. I. Janjić, “Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso model,” NCEP office note 437, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  39. G. L. Mellor and T. Yamada, “Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems,” Reviews of Geophysics & Space Physics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 851–875, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. T. G. Smirnova, J. M. Brown, and S. G. Benjamin, “Performance of different soil model configurations in simulating ground surface temperature and surface fluxes,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 125, no. 8, pp. 1870–1884, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. G. A. Grell and D. Dévényi, “A generalized approach to parameterizing convection combining ensemble and data assimilation techniques,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 29, no. 14, pp. 38-1–38-4, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. S. Gandin and A. H. Murphy, “Equitable skill scores for categorical forecasts,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 361–370, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus