Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1905076, 20 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1905076
Research Article

Retrieval of Land Surface Model State Variables through Assimilating Screen Level Humidity and Temperature Measurements

1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
2School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072, USA

Received 9 November 2015; Accepted 28 April 2016

Academic Editor: Francois Counillon

Copyright © 2016 Diandong Ren and Ming Xue. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Ren, 4DVAR retrieval of prognostic land surface model variables using advanced regional prediction system [Ph.D. thesis], School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Okla, USA, 2004.
  2. G. Boni, F. Castelli, and D. Entekhabi, “Sampling strategies and assimilation of ground temperature for the estimation of surface energy balance components,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 165–172, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J.-F. Mahfouf, “Analysis of soil moisture from near-surface parameters: a feasibility study,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1534–1547, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Noilhan and S. Planton, “A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 536–549, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. C. Andre, J. P. Goutorbe, and A. Perreir, “HAPEX MOBILHY: a hydrologic atmospheric experiment for the study of water budget and evaporation flux at the climatic scale,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 67, pp. 138–144, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. F. Bouttier, J.-F. Mahfouf, and J. Noilhan, “Sequential assimilation of soil moisture from atmospheric low-level parameters. Part I: sensitivity and calibration studies,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1335–1351, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Bouttier, J.-F. Mahfouf, and J. Noilhan, “Sequential assimilation of soil moisture from atmospheric low-level parameters. Part II: implementation in a mesoscale model,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1352–1364, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Bouyssel, V. Casse, and J. Pailleux, “Variational surface analysis from screen level atmospheric parameters,” in HIRLAM 4 Workshop on Variational Analysis in Limited Area Models, Toulouse, France, February 1998.
  9. D. Ren and M. Xue, “An improved force-restore model for land-surface modeling,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 43, pp. 1768–1782, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  10. J.-C. Calvet, J. Noilhan, and P. Bessemoulin, “Retrieving the root-zone soil moisture from surface soil moisture or temperature estimates: a feasibility study based on field measurements,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 371–386, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Ren, “Adjoint retrieval of prognostic land surface model variables for an NWP model: assimilation of ground surface temperature,” Central European Journal of Geosciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 83–102, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. U. Callies, A. Rhodin, and D. P. Eppel, “A case study on variational soil moisture analysis from atmospheric observations,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 212-213, no. 1–4, pp. 95–108, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Xue, K. K. Droegemeier, V. Wong, A. Shapiro, and K. Brewster, ARPS Version 4.0 User's Guide, Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Okla, USA, 1995.
  14. M. Xue, K. K. Droegemeier, and V. Wong, “The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—a multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction model. Part I: model dynamics and verification,” Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol. 75, no. 3-4, pp. 161–193, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Xue, K. K. Droegemeier, V. Wong et al., “The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS)—a multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction tool. Part II: model physics and applications,” Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol. 76, no. 3-4, pp. 143–165, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S.-Y. Hong and H.-L. Pan, “Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 124, no. 10, pp. 2322–2339, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Arakawa and V. Lamb, “Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model,” in Methods in Computational Physics, J. Chang, Ed., pp. 174–246, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  18. I. B. Troen and L. Mahrt, “A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 37, no. 1-2, pp. 129–148, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. M. Caldwell, T. E. Dawson, and J. H. Richards, “Hydraulic lift: consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants,” Oecologia, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 151–161, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. M. Ishikawa and C. S. Bledsoe, “Seasonal and diurnal patterns of soil water potential in the rhizosphere of blue oaks: evidence for hydraulic lift,” Oecologia, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 459–465, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Ren, M. Xue, and A. Henderson-Sellers, “Incorporating hydraulic lift into a land surface model and its effects on surface soil moisture prediction,” Journal of Hydrometeorology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1181–1191, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. Ren, “A modified Richards equation, its adjoint, and a new perspective on land data assimilation,” Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol. 92, no. 1-2, pp. 25–32, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Giering and T. Kaminski, “Recipes for adjoint code construction,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 437–474, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. X. Zou, F. Vandenberghe, M. Pondera, and Y. H. Kuo, “Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system,” Tech. Rep. NCAR/TN-435-STR, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  25. F.-X. LeDimet and O. Talagrand, “Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects,” Tellus, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Z. Wang, Variational data assimilation with 2-D shallow water equations and 3-D FSU global spectral models [Ph.D. thesis], College of arts and sciences, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Fla, USA, 1993.
  27. M. E. Gharamti and I. Hoteit, “Complex step-based low-rank extended Kalman filtering for state-parameter estimation in subsurface transport models,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 509, pp. 588–600, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Entekhabi, H. Nakamura, and E. Njaku, “Retrieval of soil moisture profile by combined remote-sensing and modeling,” in Passive Microwave Remote Sensing of Land-Atmosphere Interactions, B. J. Choudhury, Y. H. Kerr, E. G. Njoku, and P. Pampaloni, Eds., pp. 485–498, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  29. Q. Xu and B. Zhou, “Retrieving soil water contents from soil temperature measurements by using linear regression,” Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 849–858, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. M. Hoppe, H. Elbern, and J. Schwinger, “A variational data assimilation system for soil-atmosphere flux estimates for the Community Land Model (CLM3.5),” Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1025–1036, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. L. Anderson, “An adaptive covariance inflation error correction algorithm for ensemble filters,” Tellus Series A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 210–224, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. J. Hendricks Franssen and W. Kinzelbach, “Real-time groundwater flow modeling with the Ensemble Kalman Filter: joint estimation of states and parameters and the filter inbreeding problem,” Water Resources Research, vol. 44, no. 9, Article ID W09408, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. M. Dechant and H. Moradkhani, “Examining the effectiveness and robustness of sequential data assimilation methods for quantification of uncertainty in hydrologic forecasting,” Water Resources Research, vol. 48, no. 4, Article ID W04518, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. H. Moradkhani, C. M. Dechant, and S. Sorooshian, “Evolution of ensemble data assimilation for uncertainty quantification using the particle filter-Markov chain Monte Carlo method,” Water Resources Research, vol. 48, no. 12, Article ID W12520, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Qin, S. Liang, K. Yang, I. Kaihotsu, R. Liu, and T. Koike, “Simultaneous estimation of both soil moisture and model parameters using particle filtering method through the assimilation of microwave signal,” Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, vol. 114, no. 15, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Shi, K. J. Davis, F. Zhang, C. J. Duffy, and X. Yu, “Parameter estimation of a physically based land surface hydrologic model using the ensemble Kalman filter: a synthetic experiment,” Water Resources Research, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 706–724, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Rasmussen, H. Madsen, K. H. Jensen, and J. C. Refsgaard, “Data assimilation in integrated hydrological modeling using ensemble Kalman filtering: evaluating the effect of ensemble size and localization on filter performance,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 2999–3013, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Holtslag and B. A. Boville, “Local versus nonlocal boundary-layer diffusion in a global climate model,” Journal of Climate, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1825–1842, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Holtslag and C. Moeng, “Eddy diffusivity and counter-gradient transport in the convective atmospheric boundary layer,” Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 48, no. 14, pp. 1690–1698, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. A. J. Dyer, “A review of flux-profile relationships,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 363–372, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J.-F. Louis, “A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 187–202, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus