Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Meteorology
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 1276784, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1276784
Research Article

Numerical Simulations of Fog Events in Southern Portugal

1Instituto de Ciências da Terra, Polo de Évora, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal
2Instituto de Ciências da Terra, Polo de Évora, Departamento de Física, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal

Correspondence should be addressed to Carlos Policarpo

Received 3 June 2016; Revised 30 August 2016; Accepted 5 October 2016; Published 5 January 2017

Academic Editor: Panagiotis Nastos

Copyright © 2017 Carlos Policarpo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Gultepe, R. Tardif, S. C. Michaelides et al., “Fog research: a review of past achievements and future perspectives,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 164, no. 6-7, pp. 1121–1159, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. W. T. Roach, “Back to basics: fog: part 1—definitions and basic physics,” Weather, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 411–415, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. WMO, International Cloud Atlas, Volume I, Manual on the Observation of Clouds and Other Meteors, WMO-no. 407, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1975.
  4. W. Cotton and R. Anthes, Storm and Cloud Dynamics, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1989.
  5. P. J. Croft, R. L. Pfost, J. M. Medlin, and G. A. Johnson, “Fog forecasting for the southern region: a conceptual model approach,” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 545–556, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Bergot, M. Haeffelin, L. Musson-Genon et al., “Paris-Fog: des chercheurs dans le brouillard,” La Météorologie, vol. 62, pp. 1–10, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Teixeira and P. M. A. Miranda, “Fog prediction at Lisbon airport using a one-dimensional boundary layer model,” Meteorological Applications, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 497–505, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Müller, Numerical simulation of fog and radiation in complex terrain Results from COST-722 / 1-DEFOP [Ph.D. thesis], University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 2006.
  9. R. Tardif, “The impact of vertical resolution in the explicit numerical forecasting of radiation fog: a case study,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 164, no. 6-7, pp. 1221–1240, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Bergot, “Quality assessment of the Cobel-Isba numerical forecast system of fog and low clouds,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 164, no. 6-7, pp. 1265–1282, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Ivaldi, D. Clark, and D. Reynolds, “Upgrade and technology transfer of the San Francisco Marine Stratus Forecast System to the National Weather Service,” in Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Aviation Range and Aerospace Meteorology, P1.16, American Meteorological Society, Atlanta, Ga, USA, January 2006.
  12. M. Haeffelin, T. Bergot, T. Elias et al., “PARISFOG: shedding new light on fog physical processes,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 767–783, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. P. Lafore, J. Stein, N. Asencio et al., “The Meso-NH Atmospheric Simulation System—part I: adiabatic formulation and control simulations,” Annales Geophysicae, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 90–109, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Cuxart and M. A. Jimenez, “Deep radiation fog in a wide closed valley: study by numerical modeling and remote sensing,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 169, pp. 911–926, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Bari, T. Bergot, and M. El Khlifi, “Numerical study of a coastal fog event over Casablanca, Morocco,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 141, no. 690, pp. 1894–1905, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Bergot, J. Escobar, and V. Masson, “Effect of small-scale surface heterogeneities and buildings on radiation fog: large-eddy simulation study at Paris-Charles de Gaulle airport,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 141, no. 686, pp. 285–298, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Salgado, Interaccão solo—atmosfera em clima semi-árido [Ph.D. thesis], Universidade de Évora, 2006.
  18. M. J. Costa, R. Salgado, D. Santos et al., “Modelling of orographic precipitation over Iberia: a springtime case study,” Advances in Geosciences, vol. 25, pp. 103–110, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Salgado, P. M. A. Miranda, P. Lacarrère, and J. Noilhan, “Boundary layer development and summer circulation in Southern Portugal,” Tethys, no. 12, pp. 33–44, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Noilhan and S. Planton, “A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 536–549, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. V. Masson, “A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 357–397, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Belamari and A. Pirani, “Validation of the optimal heat and momentum fluxes using the ORCA2-LIM global ocean-ice model,” Marine EnviRonment and Security for the European Area—Integrated Project (MERSEA IP), Deliverable D4.1.3, 2007.
  23. D. Mironov, E. Heise, E. Kourzeneva, B. Ritter, N. Schneider, and A. Terzhevik, “Implementation of the lake parameterization scheme Flake into the numerical weather prediction model COSMO,” Boreal Environment Research, vol. 15, pp. 218–230, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Morcrette, “Description of the radiation scheme in the ECMWF model,” ECMWF Tech. Memo 165, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Cuxart, P. Bougeault, and J.-L. Redelsperger, “A turbulence scheme allowing for mesoscale and large-eddy simulations,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 126, no. 562, pp. 1–30, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Pinty and P. Jabouille, “A mixed-phase cloud parameterization for use in mesoscale non-hydrostatic model: simulations of a squall line and of orographic precipitations,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Cloud Physics, pp. 217–220, American Meteorological Society, Everett, Wash, USA, 1998.
  27. B. A. Kunkel, “Parameterization of droplet terminal velocity and extinction coefficient in fog models,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 23, pp. 34–41, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  28. EDIA, 2013, http://www.edia.pt/en/.
  29. M. Bader, G. S. Forbes, J. R. Grant, R. B. E. Lilley, and A. J. Waters, Images in Weather Forecasting, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995.
  30. J. Cermak and J. Bendix, “A novel approach to fog/low stratus detection using Meteosat 8 data,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 87, no. 3-4, pp. 279–292, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Stein, E. Richard, J.-P. Lafore, J.-P. Pinty, N. Asencio, and S. Cosma, “High-resolution non-hydrostatic simulations of flash-flood episodes with grid-nesting and ice-phase parameterization,” Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, vol. 72, no. 2–4, pp. 203–221, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. V. Masson, P. Le Moigne, E. Martin et al., “The SURFEXv7.2 land and ocean surface platform for coupled or offline simulation of earth surface variables and fluxes,” Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 929–960, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. R. Salgado and P. Le Moigne, “Coupling of the flake model to the surfex externalized surface model,” Boreal Environment Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 231–244, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. V. Masson, J.-L. Champeaux, F. Chauvin, C. Meriguet, and R. Lacaze, “A global database of land surface parameters at 1-km resolution in meteorological and climate models,” Journal of Climate, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1261–1282, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. USGS, 1997, https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/GTOPO30.
  36. K. H. Schlünzen, K. Conrady, and C. Purr, “Typical performances of mesoscale meteorology models,” in Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XXIV, D. G. Steyn and N. Chaumerliac, Eds., Springer Proceedings in Complexity, pp. 447–457, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar