Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Mathematical Physics
Volume 2009, Article ID 859710, 83 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/859710
Review Article

Time as a Quantum Observable, Canonically Conjugated to Energy, and Foundations of Self-Consistent Time Analysis of Quantum Processes

Laboratory of Time Analysis of Nuclear Processes, Institute for Nuclear Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukrain (NASU), 03028 Kiev, Ukraine

Received 4 July 2008; Revised 28 October 2008; Accepted 24 November 2008

Academic Editor: Ricardo Weder

Copyright © 2009 V. S. Olkhovsky. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Pauli, in Handbuch der Physik, S. Fluegge, Ed., vol. 5/1, p. 60, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1926.
  2. W. Pauli, General Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  3. H. Paul, “Über quantenmechanische Zeitoperatoren,” Annalen der Physik, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 252–261, 1962. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. E. Fick and F. Engelmann, “Quantentheorie der Zeitmessung,” Zeitschrift für Physik A, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 271–282, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. F. Engelmann and E. Fick, “Quantentheorie der Zeitmessung—II,” Zeitschrift für Physik A, vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 551–562, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. B. A. Lippmann, “Operator for time delay induced by scattering,” Physical Review, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 1023–1024, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Razavy, “Quantum-mechanical conjugate of the hamiltonian operator,” Il Nuovo Cimento B, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 271–308, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. T. T. Gien, “On the operators for time of motion and delay time induced by scattering,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 279–289, 1969. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  9. T. T. Gien, “Delay time and phase of the initial state,” Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 639–652, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. G. R. Allcock, “The time of arrival in quantum mechanics—I. Formal considerations,” Annals of Physics, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 253–285, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. D. M. Rosenbaum, “Super Hilbert space and the quantum-mechanical time operators,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 10, pp. 1127–1144, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. V. S. Olkhovsky and E. Recami, “Space-time shifts and cross-sections in collisions between relativistic wave packets,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 610–624, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. V. S. Olkhovsky and E. Recami, “About collision-process lifetimes and causality,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 814–826, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. V. S. Olkhovsky and E. Recami, “About a space-time operator in collision descriptions,” Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento, vol. 4, no. 24, pp. 1165–1173, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. V. S. Olkhovsky, “On the problem of time operator and collision duration,” Ukrainskiy Fizicheskaya Zhurnal, vol. 18, p. 1910, 1973. View at Google Scholar
  16. V. S. Olkhovsky, E. Recami, and A. J. Gerasimchuk, “Time operator in quantum mechanics—I: nonrelativistic case,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 263–278, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. E. Recami, “A time operator and the time-energy uncertainty relation,” in The Uncertainty Principle and Foundation of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 21–28, John Wiley & Sons, London, UK, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  18. E. Recami, “An operator for observable time,” in Proceedings of the 13th Winter School in Theoretical Physics, vol. 2, pp. 251–256, Wroclaw, Poland, 1976.
  19. A. S. Holevo, “Estimation of shift parameters of a quantum state,” Reports on Mathematical Physics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 379–399, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. A. S. Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory, vol. 1 of North-Holland Series in Statistics and Probability, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. V. S. Olkhovsky, “To the investigation of nuclear reactions and decays by analysis of their durations,” Soviet Journal of Particles and Nuclei, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 130–148, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  22. W. Jaworski and D. M. Wardlaw, “Time delay in tunneling: transmission and reflection time delays,” Physical Review A, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 2843–2854, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. V. S. Olkhovsky, “Nonstationary characteristics in study of nuclear reaction mechanism and kinetics and compound-nucleus properties,” Nukleonika, vol. 35, no. 1–3, pp. 99–144, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  24. V. S. Olkhovsky, “Time analysis of nuclear collisions and decays,” Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti. Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matemàtiche e Naturali, vol. 70, p. 21, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  25. V. S. Olkhovsky, “On time as a quantum-physical observable quantity,” in Mysteries, Puzzles, and Paradoxes in Quantum Mechanics, R. Bonifacio, Ed., vol. 461 of AIP Conference Proceedings, pp. 272–276, American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. V. S. Olkhovsky and E. Recami, “Recent developments in the time analysis of tunneling processes,” Physics Reports, vol. 214, no. 6, pp. 339–356, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. V. S. Olkhovsky, E. Recami, F. Raciti, and A. K. Zaichenko, “More about tunnelling times, the dwell time and the “Hartman effect“,” Journal de Physique I, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1351–1365, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. P. Busch, M. Grabowski, and P. J. Lahti, “Time observables in quantum theory,” Physics Letters A, vol. 191, no. 5-6, pp. 357–361, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. D. H. Kobe and V. C. Aguilera-Navarro, “Derivation of the energy-time uncertainty relation,” Physical Review A, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 933–938, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. Ph. Blanchard and A. Jadczyk, “Time of events in quantum theory,” Helvetica Physica Acta, vol. 69, no. 5-6, pp. 613–635, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. N. Grot, C. Rovelli, and R. S. Tate, “Time of arrival in quantum mechanics,” Physical Review A, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 4676–4690, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. V. S. Olkhovsky and A. Agresti, “Developments in time analysis of particles and photon tunnelling,” in Proceedings of the Adriatico Research Conference on Tunnelling and Its Implications (ICTP '96), pp. 327–355, World Scientific, Trieste, Italy, July-August 1996.
  33. V. S. Olkhovsky, “Time analysis of tunneling of particles and photons,” Physics of the Alive, vol. 5, pp. 19–37, 1997 (Russian). View at Google Scholar
  34. V. S. Olkhovsky, “Developments in examining time as a quantum-physical observable,” Physics of the Alive, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 17–29, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  35. V. S. Olkhovsky, “Recent developments on time as a quantum-physical observable quantity,” Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti. Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matemàtiche e Naturali, pp. 193–209, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. León, “Time-of-arrival formalism for the relativistic particle,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 4791–4801, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  37. R. Giannitrapani, “Positive-operator-valued time observable in quantum mechanics,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1575–1584, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  38. Y. Aharonov, J. Oppenheim, S. Popescu, B. Reznik, and W. G. Unruh, “Measurement of time of arrival in quantum mechanics,” Physical Review A, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 4130–4139, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. H. Atmanspacher and A. Amann, “Positive-operator-valued measures and projection-valued measures of noncommutative time operators,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 629–650, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  40. M. Toller, “Localization of events in space-time,” Physical Review A, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 960–970, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  41. J. Kijowski, “Comment on “Arrival time in quantum mechanics” and “Time of arrival in quantum mechanics”,” Physical Review A, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 897–899, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  42. V. Delgado, “Quantum probability distribution of arrival times and probability current density,” Physical Review A, vol. 59, no. 2-3, pp. 1010–1020, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. J. G. Muga, J. P. Palao, and C. R. Leavens, “Arrival time distributions and perfect absorption in classical and quantum mechanics,” Physics Letters A, vol. 253, no. 1-2, pp. 21–27, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. P. Kochański and K. Wódkiewicz, “Operational time of arrival in quantum phase space,” Physical Review A, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 2689–2699, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. D. H. Kobe, H. Iwamoto, M. Goto, and V. C. Aguilera-Navarro, “Tunneling time through a barrier using the local value of a “time” operator,” Physical Review A, vol. 64, no. 2, Article ID 022104, 8 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. J. G. Muga, I. L. Egusquiza, J. A. Damborenea, and F. Delgado, “Bounds and enhancements for negative scattering time delays,” Physical Review A, vol. 66, no. 4, Article ID 042115, 8 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. V. A. Olkhovsky, E. Recami, and J. Jakiel, “Unified time analysis of photon and particle tunnelling,” Physics Reports, vol. 398, no. 3, pp. 133–178, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. A. Góźdź and M. Dębicki, “Time operator and quantum projection evolution,” Physics of Atomic Nuclei, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 529–536, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. Z.-Y. Wang and C.-D. Xiong, “How to introduce time operator,” Annals of Physics, vol. 322, no. 10, pp. 2304–2314, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  50. V. S. Olkhovsky and E. Recami, “Time as a quantum observable,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 22, no. 28, pp. 5063–5067, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. V. S. Olkhovsky and E. Recami, “New developments in the study of time as a quantum observable,” International Journal of Modern Physics B, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1877–1897, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  52. M. Neumark, “Spectral functions of a symmetric operator,” Izvestiya Academii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 277–318, 1940 (Russian). View at Google Scholar
  53. N. I. Akhiezer and I. M. Glazman, Theory of Linear Operators in Hilbert Space, Pitman, Boston, Mass, USA, 1981. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  54. J. von Neumann, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1932.
  55. M. H. Stone, “Linear transformations in Hilbert space—III. Operational methods and group theory,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 172–175, 1930. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. D. ter Haar, Elements of Hamiltonian Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, NY, USA, 1971.
  57. P. M. Gopych and I. I. Zalyubovsky, “The exponentiality of main law of radioactive decay,” Soviet Journal of Particles and Nuclei, vol. 19, p. 785, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  58. M. Neumark, “Positive definite operator functions on a commutative group,” Izvestiya Academii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 237–244, 1943. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  59. R. Y. Chiao, P. G. Kwiat, and A. M. Steinberg, “Analogies between electron and photon tunneling: a proposed experiment to measure photon tunneling times,” Physica B, vol. 175, no. 1–3, pp. 257–262, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. A. Ranfagni, D. Mugnai, P. Fabeni, and G. P. Pazzi, “Delay-time measurements in narrowed waveguides as a test of tunneling,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 774–776, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. Th. Martin and R. Landauer, “Time delay of evanescent electromagnetic waves and the analogy to particle tunneling,” Physical Review A, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 2611–2617, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. A. M. Steinberg, “Conditional probabilities in quantum theory and the tunneling-time controversy,” Physical Review A, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. S. S. Schweber, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory, chapter 5.3, Row, Peterson, Evanston, Ill, USA, 1961. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  64. A. I. Akhiezer and V. B. Berestezky, Quantum Electrodynamics, Fizmatgiz, Moscow, Russia, 1959.
  65. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1975. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  66. L. Brillouin, Wave Propagation and Group Velocity, vol. 8 of Pure and Applied Physics, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1960. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  67. L. B. Felsen and N. Marcuvitz, Radiation and Scattering of Waves, chapter 1.5, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1973. View at MathSciNet
  68. D. Judge and J. T. Lewis, “On the commutator [LZ,φ],” Physics Letters, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 190, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  69. P. Carruthers and M. M. Nieto, “Phase and angle variables in quantum mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 411–440, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. A. S. Davydov, Quantum Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1976. View at MathSciNet
  71. A. S. Davydov, Quantum Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1982.
  72. E. H. Hauge and J. A. Støevneng, “Tunneling times: a critical review,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 917–936, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. Z. H. Huang, P. H. Cutler, T. E. Feuchtwang, E. Kazes, H. Q. Nguyen, and T. E. Sullivan, “Model studies of tunneling time,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 186–191, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. M. Büttiker, “Traversal, reflection and dwell time for quantum tunneling,” in Electronic Properties of Multilayers and Low Dimensional Semiconductors, J. Chamberlain, L. Eaves, and J. Portal, Eds., pp. 297–315, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  75. C. R. Leavens and G. Aers, “Tunneling times for one-dimensional barriers,” in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Related Methods, R. Behm, N. Garcia, and H. Rohrer, Eds., pp. 59–76, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  76. A.-P. Jauho, “Tunneling times in semiconductor heterostructures,” in Quantum Transport in Semiconductors, D. Ferry and C. Jacoboni, Eds., p. 179, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  77. A.-P. Jauho, “Tunneling times in semiconductor heterostructures: a critical review,” in Hot Carriers in Semiconductor Nanostructures: Physics and Applications, J. Shah, Ed., pp. 121–150, Academic Press, London, UK, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  78. M. Jonson, “Tunneling times quantum mechanical tunneling,” in Quantum Transport in Semiconductors, D. Ferry and C. Jacoboni, Eds., pp. 193–237, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  79. R. Landauer and Th. Martin, “Barrier interaction time in tunneling,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 217–228, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. G. Privitera, G. Salesi, V. S. Olkhovsky, and E. Recami, “Tunnelling times: an elementary introduction,” Rivista del Nuovo Cimento della Societa Italiana di Fisica, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1–55, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. M. Abolhasani and M. Golshani, “Tunneling times in the copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Physical Review A, vol. 62, no. 1, Article ID 012106, 7 pages, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory, Prentice-Hall, New York, NY, USA, 1952. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  83. E. P. Wigner, “Lower limit for the energy derivative of the scattering phase shift,” Physical Review, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 145–147, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  84. T. E. Hartmann, “Tunneling of a wave packet,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 3427–3433, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. J. R. Fletcher, “Time delay in tunnelling through a potential barrier,” Journal of Physics C, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. L55–L59, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. V. S. Olkhovsky, “About the time duration of scattering processes,” Il Nuovo Cimento B, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 178–182, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. R. Vedrinski, “Stationary approach to the definition of time delay in the scattering process,” Il Nuovo Cimento B, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 487–491, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. E. H. Hauge, J. P. Falck, and T. A. Fjeldly, “Transmission and reflection times for scattering of wave packets off tunneling barriers,” Physical Review B, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 4203–4214, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. R. Landauer and Th. Martin, “Time delay in wave packet tunneling,” Solid State Communications, vol. 84, no. 1-2, pp. 115–117, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. V. S. Olkhovsky, E. Recami, and A. K. Zaichenko, “Reply to the comments by leavens on Olkhovsky-Recami's approach to the “tunnelling time problem”: more about the time analysis of tunnelling processes,” Solid State Communications, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. T. Ohmura, “Wave packet theory of scattering. Time delay and spread,” Progress of Theoretical Physics. Supplement, no. 29, pp. 108–134, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  92. D. Sokolovski and L. M. Baskin, “Traversal time in quantum scattering,” Physical Review A, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 4604–4611, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. E. Pollak and W. H. Miller, “New physical interpretation for time in scattering theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 115–118, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. E. Pollak, “The significance of imaginary time in quantal reactive scattering,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 1111–1120, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. D. Sokolovski and J. N. L. Connor, “Negative probability and the distributions of dwell, transmission, and reflection times for quantum tunneling,” Physical Review A, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1500–1504, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. D. Sokolovski and J. N. L. Connor, “Quantum interference and determination of the traversal time,” Physical Review A, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 4677–4680, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. D. Mugnai and A. Ranfagni, “Instanton bounces as real physical processes,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. D. Mugnai and A. Ranfagni, “Complex classical trajectories in tunnelling: how instanton bounces can become real processes,” Il Nuovo Cimento D, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 541–551, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. H. W. Lee and M. O. Scully, “Wigner phase-space description of a Morse oscillator,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 4604–4610, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  100. H.-W. Lee and M. O. Scully, “The Wigner phase-space description of collision processes,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. J. G. Muga, S. Brouard, and R. Sala, “Transmission and reflection tunneling times,” Physics Letters A, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. S. Brouard, R. Sala, and J. G. Muga, “Systematic approach to define and classify quantum transmission and reflection times,” Physical Review A, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 4312–4325, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. C. R. Leavens and G. Aers, “Bohm trajectories and the tunnelling time problem,” in Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy III, R. Wiesendager and H.-J. Güntherodt, Eds., p. 105, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  104. A. I. Baz', “Lifetime of Intermediate States,” Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 4, pp. 182–188, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  105. A. I. Baz', “A quantum mechanical calculation of the collision time,” Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 5, p. 161, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  106. V. F. Rybachenko, “On particle penetration through a barrier,” Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 5, p. 484, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  107. M. Büttiker, “Larmor precession and the traversal time for tunneling,” Physical Review B, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 6178–6188, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. M.-Q. Chen and M. S. Wang, “Traversal time for quantum tunneling,” Physics Letters A, vol. 149, no. 9, pp. 441–444, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. V. Delgado, S. Brouard, and J. G. Muga, “Does positive flux provide a valid definition of tunnelling times?” Solid State Communications, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 979–982, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. C. R. Leavens, “The “tunneling time problem”: fundamental incompatibility of the Bohm trajectory approach with the projector and conventional probability current approaches,” Physics Letters A, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 88–94, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  111. M. Büttiker and R. Landauer, “Traversal time for tunneling,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, no. 23, pp. 1739–1742, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. M. Büttiker and R. Landauer, “Traversal time for tunneling,” Physica Scripta, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 429–434, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. M. Büttiker and R. Landauer, “Traversal time for tunneling,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 451–454, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  114. F. Raciti and G. Salesi, “Complex-barrier tunnelling times,” Journal de Physique I, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1783–1789, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. G. Nimtz, H. Spieker, and M. Brodowsky, “Tunneling with dissipation,” Journal de Physique I, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1379–1382, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. L. S. Schulman, “Ray optics for diffraction: a useful paradox in a path-integral context,” in The Wave-Particle Dualism, S. Diner, D. Fargue, G. Lochak, and F. Selleri, Eds., D. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  117. V. S. Olkhovsky, V. Petrillo, and A. K. Zaichenko, “Decrease of the tunneling time and violation of the Hartman effect for large barriers,” Physical Review A, vol. 70, no. 3, Article ID 034103, 4 pages, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. P. Krekora, Q. Su, and R. Grobe, “Effects of relativity on the time-resolved tunneling of electron wave packets,” Physical Review A, vol. 63, no. 3, Article ID 032107, 8 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. P. Krekora, Q. Su, and R. Grobe, “Critique of the Wigner tunneling speed and a proposed alternative,” Physical Review A, vol. 64, no. 2, Article ID 022105, 8 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. V. Petrillo and D. Janner, “Relativistic analysis of a wave packet interacting with a quantum-mechanical barrier,” Physical Review A, vol. 67, no. 1, Article ID 012110, 7 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  121. S. De Leo and P. P. Rotelli, “Dirac equation studies in the tunneling energy zone,” The European Physical Journal C, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 241–247, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. A. Hansen and F. Ravndal, “Klein's paradox and its resolution,” Physica Scripta, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1036–1042, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  123. V. L. Telegdi, “The Oskar Klein Centenary,” in Klein's Paradox Revisited, U. Lindström, Ed., pp. 112–121, World Scientific, Singapore, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  124. H. Nitta, T. Kudo, and H. Minowa, “Motion of a wave packet in the Klein paradox,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 966–971, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  125. N. Dombey and A. Calogeracos, “Seventy years of the Klein paradox,” Physics Report, vol. 315, no. 1–3, pp. 41–58, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  126. S. De Leo and P. P. Rotelli, “Barrier paradox in the Klein zone,” Physical Review A, vol. 73, no. 4, Article ID 042107, 7 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  127. V. S. Olkhovsky, E. Recami, and G. Salesi, “Superluminal tunneling through two successive barriers,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 879–884, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  128. S. Esposito, “Multibarrier tunneling,” Physical Review E, vol. 67, no. 1, Article ID 016609, 7 pages, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  129. V. S. Olkhovsky, E. Recami, and A. K. Zaichenko, “Resonant and non-resonant tunneling through a double barrier,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 712–718, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. S. Longhi, P. Laporta, M. Belmonte, and E. Recami, “Measurement of superluminal optical tunneling times in double-barrier photonic band gaps,” Physical Review E, vol. 65, no. 4, Article ID 046610, 6 pages, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  131. G. Nimtz, private communications.
  132. V. Petrillo and V. S. Olkhovsky, “Tunnelling time of a Gaussian wave packet through two potential barriers,” Central European Journal of Physics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 339–350, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  133. V. Petrillo and V. S. Olkhovsky, “Time asymptotic expansion of the tunneled wave function for a double-barrier potential,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 327–333, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  134. J. T. Lunardi and L. A. Manzoni, “Relativistic tunneling through two successive barriers,” Physical Review A, vol. 76, no. 4, Article ID 042111, 6 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. G. Gamow, “Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes,” Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 51, no. 3-4, pp. 204–212, 1928. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. R. W. Gurney and E. U. Condon, “Wave mechanics and radioactive disintegration,” Nature, vol. 122, no. 3073, p. 439, 1928. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  137. R. W. Gurney and E. U. Condon, “Quantum mechanics and radioactive disintegration,” Physical Review, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 127–140, 1929. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  138. B. Buck, A. C. Merchant, and S. M. Perez, “New look at α decay of heavy nuclei,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 65, no. 24, pp. 2975–2977, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. B. Buck, A. C. Merchant, and S. M. Perez, “decay calculations with a realistic potential,” Physical Review C, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 2247–2253, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  140. A. Sobieczewski, “Present view of stability of heavy and superheavy nuclei,” Physics of Particles and Nuclei, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 295, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  141. V. S. Olkhovsky, V. Petrillo, J. Jakiel, and W. Kantor, “Particle tunneling and scattering in a spherical three-dimensional potential with a barrier,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Current Problems in Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy, pp. 496–506, Kyiv, Ukraine, May-June 2006.
  142. V. S. Olkhovsky, V. Petrillo, J. Jakiel, and W. Kantor, “Particle tunneling and scattering in a three-dimensional potential with a barrier,” Central European Journal of Physics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 122–127, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  143. S. De Leo and G. C. Ducati, “Quaternionic diffusion by a potential step,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 47, no. 10, Article ID 102104, 9 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  144. S. De Leo and G. C. Ducati, “Quaternionic wave packets,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 48, no. 5, Article ID 052111, 10 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  145. S. De Leo, G. C. Ducati, and T. M. Madureira, “Analytic plane wave solutions for the quaternionic potential step,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 47, no. 8, Article ID 082106, 15 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  146. C. Doran and A. Lasenby, Physical Applications of Geomatric Algenra: Part 1: Non-Relativistic Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
  147. A. I. Baz', A. M. Perelomov, and Ya. B. Zel'dovich, Scattering, Reactions and Decays in Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, Israel, 1969.
  148. V. S. Olkhovsky, M. E. Dolinska, and S. A. Omelchenko, “The possibility of time resonance (explosion) phenomena in high-energy nuclear reactions,” Central European Journal of Physics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 223–240, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  149. V. V. Davydovsky and V. S. Olkhovsky, “The influence of the T-matrix energy structure on the decay law of a resonance state,” Ukrainian Journal of Physics, vol. 42, p. 1146, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  150. V. S. Olkhovsky and N. L. Doroshko, “Cross-sections and durations of the proton-nucleus scattering near a resonance distorted by the nonresonance background and their phase-shift analysis,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 483–486, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  151. A. D'Arrigo, N. L. Doroshko, N. V. Eremin et al., “Bremsstrahlung study of nuclear-reaction dynamics: the 16O+p reaction,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 549, no. 3, pp. 375–386, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  152. A. D'Arrigo, N. L. Doroshko, N. V. Eremin et al., “Delay-advance phenomenon observed by bremsstrahlung spectrum of the 12C+p collision,” Nuclear Physics A, vol. 564, no. 2, pp. 217–226, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  153. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1981.
  154. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1998.
  155. A. J. Kálnay, “Lorentz-covariant localized states and the extended-type position operator,” Boletin del IMAF, vol. 2, p. 11, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  156. A. J. Kálnay and B. P. Toledo, “A reinterpretation of the notion of localization,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 997–1007, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  157. J. A. Gallardo, A. J. Kálnay, B. A. Stec, and B. P. Toledo, “The punctual approximations to the extended-type position,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1008–1013, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  158. J. A. Gallardo, A. J. Kálnay, B. A. Stec, and B. P. Toledo, “Philips' Lorentz-covariant localized states and the extended-type position operator,” Il Nuovo Cimento A, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 393–398, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  159. J. C. Gallardo, A. J. Kálnay, and S. H. Risemberg, “Lorentz-invariant localization for elementary systems,” Physical Review, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 1484–1490, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  160. E. Recami and P. Caldirola, “Descrizione spazio-temporale di processi elementary, tavhioni e caysalita,” Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, vol. 49, p. 77, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  161. M. Baldo and E. Recami, “Comments about recent letters on spacelike states,” Letters to II Nuovo Cimento, vol. 2, p. 613, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  162. J. H. Fermor, “Quantum-mechanical tunneling,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1168–1170, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  163. K. W. McVoy, L. Heller, and M. Bolsterli, “Optical analysis of potential well resonances,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 245–258, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  164. A. Anderson, “Multiple scattering approach to one-dimensional potential problems,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 230–235, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  165. F. Cardone, S. P. Maidanyuk, R. Mignani, and V. S. Olkhovsky, “Multiple internal reflections during particle and photon tunneling,” Foundations of Physics Letters, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 441–457, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  166. S. P. Maidanyuk, V. S. Olkhovsky, and A. K. Zaichenko, “Multiple internal reflections method in the description of tunneling evolution of nonrelativistic particles and photons,” Journal of Physical Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–39, 2002 (Ukrainian). View at Google Scholar
  167. F. Cardone, R. Mignani, and V. S. Olkhovsky, “Are particle and photon tunneling and filling in barriers local or non-local phenomena?” Physics Letters A, vol. 289, no. 6, pp. 279–286, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  168. A. J. Leggett, “Macroscopic quantum systems and the quantum theory of measurement,” Progress of Theoretical Physics. Supplement, no. 69, pp. 80–100, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  169. D. Mugnai and A. Ranfagni, “Instanton bounces as real physical processes,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  170. A. Enders and G. Nimtz, “On superluminal barrier traversal,” Journal de Physique I, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1693–1698, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  171. A. Enders and G. Nimtz, “Zero-time tunneling of evanescent mode packets,” Journal de Physique I, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1089–1092, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  172. A. Enders and G. Nimtz, “Photonic-tunneling experiments,” Physical Review B, vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 9605–9609, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  173. A. Enders and G. Nimtz, “Evanescent-mode propagation and quantum tunneling,” Physical Review E, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 632–634, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  174. A. E. Bernardini, S. De Leo, and P. P. Rotelli, “Above barrier potential diffusion,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 19, no. 36, pp. 2717–2725, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  175. S. De Leo and P. P. Rotelli, “Above barrier Dirac multiple scattering and resonances,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 551–558, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  176. S. De Leo and P. P. Rotelli, “Tunnelling through two barriers,” Physics Letters A, vol. 342, no. 4, pp. 294–298, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  177. N. S. Krylov and V. A. Fock, “On two main interpretations of energy-time uncertainty,” Zhurnal Eksperimental noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, vol. 17, p. 93, 1947. View at Google Scholar
  178. V. A. Fock, “On the energy-time uncertainty and on an attempt to refute it,” Zhurnal Eksperimental noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, vol. 42, p. 1135, 1962. View at Google Scholar
  179. Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “Time in the quantum theory and the uncertainty relation for time and energy,” Physical Review, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 1649–1658, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  180. Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “Answer to Fock concerning the time energy indeterminacy relation,” Physical Review, vol. 134, no. 6B, pp. B1417–B1418, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  181. C. K. Carniglia and L. Mandel, “Phase-shift measurement of evanescent electromagnetic waves,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 1035–1043, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  182. S. Zhu, A. W. Yu, D. Hawley, and R. Roy, “Frustrated total internal reflection: a demonstration and review,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 601–607, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  183. A. M. Steinberg and R. Y. Chiao, “Tunneling delay times in one and two dimensions,” Physical Review A, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 3283–3295, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  184. H. Chew, D.-S. Wang, and M. Kerker, “Elastic scattering of evanescent electromagnetic waves,” Applied Optics, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 2679–2687, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  185. K. L. Chandiramani, “Diffraction of evanescent waves, with applications to aerodynamically scattered sound and radiation from unbaffled plates,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  186. V. V. Davydovsky, A. K. Zaichenko, and V. S. Olkhovsky, “New possibilities of one-particle alpha-decay model,” Yaderna Fizika, vol. 1, p. 28, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  187. V. V. Davydovsky, M. E. Dolinska, N. L. Doroshko, and V. S. Olkhovsky, “Recent developments in time analysis of nuclear processes and revealing of some new temporal phenomena,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Current Problems in Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy, Kyiv, Ukraine, June 2008, (to be printed).
  188. A. D'Arrigo, G. Giardina, A. Taccone, G. Hassani, and V. S. Olkhovsky, “A way to evaluate the level density, total width and compound-nucleus decay functions in the range of unresolved resonances,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 809–820, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  189. V. S. Olkhovsky, “Recent developments in joint energy and time analysis of nucleon-nucleus reactions at the range of isolated and overlapped resonance,” in International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, vol. 59 of Conference Proceedings, Part I, pp. 280–282, Italian Physical Society, Trieste, Italy, May 1997.
  190. V. S. Olkhovsky, “Influence of excited radioactive nuclei for results in large-scale nuclear Chronometry,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Physics at Border Lines, pp. 244–247, World Scientific, Lipari, Italy, May 2002.
  191. V. S. Olkhovsky, “Is it essential for nuclear chronometry of astrophysical processes to consider the decays of the excited radioactive nuclei,” Atti dell'Academia di Pericolanti, Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali, Università di Messina, vol. 76, p. 59, 1998. View at Google Scholar