Stability Criteria for Volterra Integrodynamic System

Yasmin, Nusrat; Younus, Awais; Ali, Usman; Mirza, Safia

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/365328

Advances in Mathematical Physics

On this page

Abstract Introduction Preliminaries References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 365328 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/365328

Stability Criteria for Volterra Integrodynamic System

Nusrat Yasmin,¹Awais Younus,¹Usman Ali,¹and Safia Mirza¹

Academic Editor: Ming Mei

Received28 Jul 2015

Revised16 Oct 2015

Accepted21 Oct 2015

Published11 Nov 2015

Abstract

We study conditions under which the solutions of linear Volterra integrodynamic system of the form are stable on certain time scales. We construct a number of Lyapunov functionals on time scales from which we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for stability of Volterra integrodynamic system and also we prove several results concerning qualitative behavior of this system.

1. Introduction

The theory of Volterra integrodifferential equation (VIDE) has been studied extensively by several researchers [1–5]. In [1], Becker investigates the variation of parameters formula for a VIDE and its adjoint. The interesting and useful aspects of VIDE have been shown in different articles of Burton and Mahfoud (see [2, 3, 6]). Elaydi, in [5], discusses the periodicity and stability of linear Volterra difference systems.

Time scale theory, introduced by Hilger [7] at the end of the twentieth century as a means to unify the discrete and the differential calculus, is now a well established subject. For an excellent introduction to the calculus and to the theory of dynamic equations on time scales we recommend the books [8, 9]. Volterra and Fredholm type equations (both integral and integrodynamic) on time scales become a new field of interest; for example, see [5, 10–22]. In [13], Adivar contributes to principle matrix and variation of parameter formula for VIDE. Recently, Lupulescu et al. [21] discuss the resolvent asymptotic stability and boundedness of VIDE and show that principle matrix and resolvent are equivalent to linear VIDE on time scales.

Constructing Lyapunov functionals for integrodifferential equations has been a very challenging task, even in the continuous case. Burton was the first one to construct such functionals and utilize them to qualitatively analyze solutions of integrodifferential equations. The study of integrodynamic equations on time scales provides deeper and comprehensive understanding of traditional integrodifferential equations and Volterra difference equations. This paper generalize some results of [4] for the continuous case (i.e., ) and all of them are new for the other time scales. We begin by stating some important facts and properties of time scales that we will be using during our analysis.

2. Preliminaries

Let be the space of -dimensional column vectors with a norm . Also, with the same symbol we will denote the corresponding matrix norm in the space of matrices. If , then we denote by its conjugate transpose. We recall that and the following inequality holds for all and .

By a time scale we mean any closed subset of . Since a time scale is not connected in general, we need the concept of jump operators. The forward jump operator is defined by , while the backward jump operator is defined by . In this definition, we put and . If , we say is a right-scattered point, while if , we say is a left-scattered point. Points that are right-scattered and left-scattered at the same time will be called isolated points. A point such that and is called a right-dense point. A point such that and is called a left-dense point. Points that are right-dense and left-dense at the same time will be called dense points. The set is defined to be if has a left-scattered maximum ; otherwise . The graininess function is defined by . Given a time scale interval , denotes the interval if and denotes the interval if . In fact, . Also, for , we define . If is a bounded time scale, then can be identified with .

Throughout this work, we assume that with bounded graininess; that is, .

If and , then we define the following neighborhoods of .

Let us consider some examples of time scales (see [8]).

Example 1. (i) If , is a time scale. Then we have , and for all . Hence, each point is isolated, for all , and .
(ii) Let . Then

Definition 2 (see [8]). A function is called regulated if its right-sided limits exist (finite) at all right-dense points in and its left-sided limits exist (finite) at all left-dense points in . A function is called rd-continuous if it is continuous at all right-dense points in and its left-sided limits exist (finite) at all left-dense points in .

Obviously, a continuous function is rd-continuous, and a rd-continuous function is regulated [8, Theorem ].

Definition 3 (see [8]). Let and . We define (provided it exists) with the property that, for every , there exists such thatfor all . We call the delta derivative (-derivative for short) of at . Moreover, we say that is delta differentiable (-differentiable for short) on provided that exists for all .

Now we recall some properties of the exponential function on time scales. For definition of the exponential function on time scales, see [8, Definition ]. A function is called positively regressive if for all . If is a positively regressive function and , then (see [8, Theorem ]) the exponential function is the unique solution of the initial value problem:The following properties of the exponential function holds:(i) and .(ii).(iii).(iv).

In particular, if is such that for all , we have if and if with .

For more details, see [8]. Clearly, never vanishes.

The next definitions are about shift and convolution of functions on time scales (see [23]).

Definition 4. For a given function , the solution of shifting problemis denoted by and it is called shift (or delay) of .

Example 5. For the regressive , satisfy the shift problem (4).

Definition 6. For given functions , their convolution is defined by

Furthermore, reader can see the existence and uniqueness of shift problem (4) and its properties in [23, Section ]. Next two results are needed for our proofs.

Lemma 7 (see [8, Theorem ]). Let , and assume that is continuous at , where with . Also assume that is rd-continuous on . Suppose that, for each , there exists a neighborhood of , independent of , such that Then one has

Lemma 8 (see [8, Theorem ]). Let . For rd-continuous functions , one has the following inequality:

Let us consider a linear Volterra integrodynamic system of the formwhere is continuous and a regressive matrix on , and is continuous and a regressive matrix on .

We develop the results about stability by using the Lyapunov second (direct) method. The principal idea of the second method is contained in the following physical reasoning: if the rate of change, , of the energy of an isolated physical system is negative for every possible state , except for a single equilibrium state (i.e., ), then the energy will continually decrease until it finally assumes its minimum value . In other words, a system that is perturbed from its equilibrium state will always return to it. This is intuitive concept of stability. The mathematical counterpart of the preceding statement is the following.

A solution of (9) will be denoted by if no confusion should arise. In the remainder of this paper when we say the zero solution of (9) we mean the zero solution of (9) with .

Definition 9. The zero solution of (9) is stable, if for every there exist such that, for any solution of (9), the inequality implies for .

Definition 10. The zero solution of (9) is asymptotically stable, if it is stable and attractive (i.e., if for any solution of (9), there exist such that implies as ).

Definition 11. The zero solution of (9) is unstable if there exists such that for any , if , then, for any solution of (9), there is with .

Let us consider new functions as follows:assuming of course that exists for .

Definition 12 (see [14]). A dynamic system is stable if and only if there exists a “Lyapunov functional,’’ that is, some scalar function of the state with the properties:(a), , when .(b), when .

3. The Scalar Equation

In this section, we consider the scalar case of Volterra equation (9); that is, and .

Theorem 13. Suppose that, for some ,Then the zero solution of (9) is stable if and only if .

Proof. Suppose that and consider the functional The derivative of along solution of (9) satisfies Using Lemma 8, it follows thatNow by (11) we have the following estimation:As is positive definite and , it follows that is stable.
Conversely, suppose on the contrary that ; that is, .
For for assumption (11) does not hold.
For consider the following functional:Similar to the previous calculation, we obtainwhich implies Now, any , with and so that if is a solution of (9), then we haveHence, As , which is the contradiction to the fact that the zero solution is stable. Hence, which completes our proof.

Corollary 14. If (11) holds and and bounded, then the zero solution of (9) is asymptotically stable.

Proof. By Theorem 13, it follows that . This implies that is in and is bounded. It follows from (11) and (9) that is bounded. Thus, as . The proof is complete.

Remark 15. Notice that condition (11) would not hold if is allowed to vanish at some point . Therefore, Theorem 13 cannot apply unless for all . In next result we consider (9) where may vanish at any .

We select a continuous function with and let so that (9) may be written as

Theorem 16. Suppose that (21) holds and there are constants , , , and with such that(i),(ii),(iii), for . Furthermore, suppose that there is a continuous function with and as . Then the zero solution of (23) is stable if and only if .

Proof. Suppose that and consider the functional The derivative of along a solution of (23) satisfies Using (i) and (iii), we may write Let ; we have to find so that if , this implies for all . Since for all , then Hence, On the other hand, (24) yieldsCombining (28) and (29) we obtainNow, as long as , we have for all provided that . Since (9) and (23) are the same equation, then the zero solution of (9) is stable.
Conversely, suppose on the contrary that ; that is, .
For for all assumption does not hold.
For consider the following functional:Then it follows that Now, given any , with and so that if is a solution of (9), we haveWe will show that is unbounded. If is bounded, then as is bounded, we have that is bounded; this implies that is in . Using Lemma 8, we haveThe last integral is the convolution of function with a function tending to zero. Thus, the integral tends to zero as and hence Since then, for sufficiently large , for some and all . This contradicts the fact that is in . Thus, is unbounded and the zero solution of (9) is unstable, which is the contradiction to the fact that the zero solution is stable. Hence, which completes our proof.

Example 17. For , , , consider the following Volterra integrodynamic equation:where Let us consider the following function:It is easy to see that and so that (38) may be written as equation It follows from (41) that Furthermore, for every Since for all , by using (45), we obtain that If we take for , then all the assumptions of Theorem 16 satisfy so that the zero solution of (38) is stable.

Our next result is about asymptotic stability of (9). Assume for the present time that and are continuously differentiable and that both

Theorem 18. Suppose that (21) holds and there are constants , , , , and with such that, for , one has(i),(ii) ,(iii) ,(iv) ,and then the zero solution of (9) is asymptotic stable. Furthermore, every solution of (9) is in .
In addition, if(v) ,(vi) , , and are bounded, then as and is in .

Proof. Stability of the zero solution is clear from Theorem 16; hence, for all . As , we have in . To show that the zero solution is asymptotically stable, we first observe from (iv) that is bounded and since is bounded, hence is bounded.
Now (9) yields that and, using (iv), that is bounded. Since is in and is bounded, it follows that as . Hence, the zero solution is asymptotically stable.
To show that is in and differentiate (23), we obtainLet , and consider the functional The derivative along a solution of (23) for satisfies and, substituting the value of from (23), we obtain That impliesBy (v), is bounded. Thus, by choosing and sufficiently large, we obtain As , we have in . To show , we differentiate (9) and obtain Since we have Thus, by (v) and (vi), is bounded and hence, by (49) and (56), is bounded; therefore, is bounded. As is in , we have as . This completes the proof.

4. The Vector Equation

We now extend the results of Section 3 to the system of Volterra equations; that is, . Owing to the greater complexity of systems over scalars, it seems preferable to reduce the generality of and .

Consider the system in which is constant matrix and is matrix of functions continuos on

We suppose that there is a symmetric matrix which satisfies the equation

Theorem 19. Suppose that (60) holds for some symmetric matrix and that there is a constant such that Then the zero solution of (59) is stable if and only if is positive definite.

Proof. We consider the functional The derivative of along a solution of (59) satisfies Using (60), we may write By Lemma 8, we obtain where . Now, if is positive definite, then for all and hence is positive definite and is negative definite and it follows that the zero solution of (59) is stable.
Conversely, suppose that the zero solution of (59) is stable but is not positive definite. Then there is such that .
If , then, along the solution of (59), we have It follows that, for some , . Thus, .
Hence, is not always positive for , and we may suppose that there is such that .
Let . Since the zero solution of (59) is stable, then there is and such that and for all . We may choose such that and .
Moreover, we have We have to show that is bounded away from zero. Suppose that it is not true; then, there is a sequence tending to infinity monotonically such that , a contradiction to . Thus, there is with so that , implying that as . This contradicts and completes the proof.

We now prove a complete instability result for the zero solution of (59). Suppose that is a positive definite symmetric matrix satisfying

Theorem 20. Suppose that (68) holds for some symmetric matrix and that there is a constant such that Then the zero solution of (59) is completely unstable.

Proof. Consider the functional The derivative of along a solution of (59) satisfies Similarly, as in Theorem 19, we obtain the following estimate:where . Choose so that . Then for all . As , we have If and , then This is complete instability. The proof is now complete.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

L. C. Becker, “Principal matrix solutions and variation of parameters for a Volterra integro-differential equation and its adjoint,” Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, no. 14, pp. 1–22, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
T. A. Burton and W. E. Mahfoud, “Stability criteria for Volterra equations,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 143–174, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
T. A. Burton, Volterra Integral and Differential Equations, Elsevier, 2nd edition, 2005.
T. A. Burton and W. E. Mahfoud, “Stability criteria for Volterra equations,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 143–174, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
S. Elaydi, “Periodicity and stability of linear Volterra difference systems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 483–492, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
T. A. Burton and W. E. Mahfoud, “Stability by decompositions for Volterra equations,” The Tôhoku Mathematical Journal, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 489–511, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
S. Hilger, Ein Maβkettenkalkül mit Anwendung auf Zentrmsmannigfalt-ingkeiten [Ph.D. thesis], University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 1988.
M. Bohner and A. Peterson, Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | MathSciNet
M. Bohner and A. Peterson, Advances in Dynamic Equations on Time Scales, Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA, 2003.
M. Adıvar and Y. N. Raffoul, “Existence results for periodic solutions of integro-dynamic equations on time scales,” Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, vol. 188, no. 4, pp. 543–559, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. Adivar, “Function bounds for solutions of Volterra integro dynamic equations on the time scales,” Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, vol. 7, pp. 1–22, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. Adıvar and Y. N. Raffoul, “Existence of resolvent for Volterra integral equations on time scales,” Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 139–155, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. Adivar, “Principal matrix solutions and variation of parameters for Volterra integro-dynamic equations on time scales,” Glasgow Mathematical Journal, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 463–480, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
J. J. DaCunha, “Stability for time varying linear dynamic systems on time scales,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 381–410, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
J. J. DaCunha, “Instability results for slowly time varying linear dynamic systems on time scales,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 1278–1289, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
S. Elaydi and S. Murakami, “Uniform asymptotic stability in linear volterra difference equations,” Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, vol. 3, pp. 203–218, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Hoffacker and C. C. Tisdell, “Stability and instability for dynamic equations on time scales,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 49, no. 9-10, pp. 1327–1334, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
B. Karpuz, “Volterra theory on time scales,” Results in Mathematics, vol. 65, no. 3-4, pp. 263–292, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet
T. Kulik and C. C. Tisdell, “Volterra integral equations on time scales: basic qualitative and quantitative results with applications to initial value problems on unbounded domains,” International Journal of Difference Equations, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 103–133, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar | MathSciNet
V. Lakshmikantham and M. R. M. Rao, Theory of Integro Differential Equations, Gordon & Breach, London, UK, 1995.
V. Lupulescu, S. K. Sotiris, and A. Younus, “Qualitative aspects of Volterra integro-dynamic system on time scales,” Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, no. 5, pp. 1–35, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Tisdell and A. Zaidi, “Basic qualitative and quantitative results for solutions to nonlinear, dynamic equations on time scales with an application to economic modelling,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 3504–3524, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
M. Bohner and G. Sh. Guseinov, “The convolution on time scales,” Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2007, Article ID 58373, 24 pages, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Nusrat Yasmin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

985

Downloads

1083

Citations