Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Mathematical Physics
Volume 2015, Article ID 652026, 18 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/652026
Research Article

On Relations between One-Dimensional Quantum and Two-Dimensional Classical Spin Systems

School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TW, UK

Received 31 August 2015; Accepted 1 November 2015

Academic Editor: Pierluigi Contucci

Copyright © 2015 J. Hutchinson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. J. Baxter, “One-dimensional anisotropic Heisenberg chain,” Annals of Physics, vol. 70, pp. 323–337, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  2. M. Suzuki, “Relationship among exactly soluble models of critical phenomena. I,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1337–1359, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Suzuki, “Relationship between d-dimensional quantal spin systems and (d+1)-dimensional Ising systems,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 56, pp. 1454–1469, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  5. M. Suzuki, Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Condensed Matter Physics, World Scientific, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Hutchinson, J. P. Keating, and F. Mezzadri, “Random matrix theory and critical phenomena in quantum spin chains,” Physical Review E, vol. 92, no. 3, Article ID 032106, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, “Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain,” Annals of Physics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 407–466, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. J. P. Keating and F. Mezzadri, “Random matrix theory and entanglement in quantum spin chains,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 252, no. 1–3, pp. 543–579, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. J. P. Keating and F. Mezzadri, “Entanglement in quantum spin chains, symmetry classes of random matrices, and conformal field theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 5, Article ID 050501, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, “Random matrix theory of a chaotic Andreev quantum dot,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 76, no. 18, pp. 3420–3423, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, “Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures,” Physical Review B, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 1142–1161, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. R. Zirnbauer, “Riemannian symmetric superspaces and their origin in random-matrix theory,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 4986–5018, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. S. Krinsky, “Equivalence of the free fermion model to the ground state of the linear XY model,” Physics Letters A, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 169–170, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Peschel, “On the correlation functions of fully frustrated two-dimensional Ising systems,” Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 339–344, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. K. Minami, “Equivalence between the two-dimensional Ising model and the quantum XY chain with randomness and with open boundary,” EPL, vol. 108, no. 3, Article ID 30001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. Iglói and P. Lajkó, “Surface magnetization and surface correlations in aperiodic Ising models,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 29, no. 16, pp. 4803–4814, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. M. Barma and B. S. Shastry, “Classical equivalents of one-dimensional quantum-mechanical systems,” Physical Review B, vol. 18, no. 7, article 3351, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, Wiley Online Library, 2007.
  19. X. G. Wen, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Systems from the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  20. T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. H. Lieb, “Two-dimensional Ising model as a soluble problem of many fermions,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 36, pp. 856–871, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. P. W. Kasteleyn, “Dimer statistics and phase transitions,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 287–293, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. E. H. Lieb, “Solution of the dimer problem by the transfer matrix method,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 2339–2341, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Hutchinson, Random matrix theory and critical phenomena [Ph.D. thesis], University of Bristol, 2014.