Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Mathematical Physics
Volume 2016, Article ID 7213197, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7213197
Research Article

Virtual Correlations in Single Qutrit

1Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutskii per. 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow Oblast 141700, Russia
2P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii Prospect 53, Moscow 119991, Russia

Received 19 June 2016; Revised 14 September 2016; Accepted 21 September 2016

Academic Editor: Giorgio Kaniadakis

Copyright © 2016 Alexey A. Strakhov and Vladimir I. Man’ko. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Schrödinger, “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik,” Naturwissenschaften, vol. 23, no. 48, pp. 807–812, 1935. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. C. H. Bennett and S. J. Wiesner, “Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 69, no. 20, pp. 2881–2884, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, no. 13, pp. 1895–1899, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. A. Steane, “Quantum computing,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 117–173, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. N. Linden, “Good dynamics versus bad kinematics: is entanglement needed for quantum computation?” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 4, Article ID 047901, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. P. W. Shor and J. Preskill, “Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 441–444, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Aschauer and H. J. Briegel, “Private entanglement over arbitrary distances, even using noisy apparatus,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 4, Article ID 047902, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, “Squeezed spin states,” Physical Review A, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 5138–5143, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Hald, J. L. Sørensen, C. Schori, and E. S. Polzik, “Spin squeezed atoms: a macroscopic entangled ensemble created by light,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 83, no. 7, pp. 1319–1322, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, “Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations,” Physical Review A, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 2046–2052, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, “Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction,” Physical Review A, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 3824–3851, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. V. Vedral, M. B. Plenio, M. A. Rippin, and P. L. Knight, “Quantifying entanglement,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 2275–2279, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. W. K. Wootters, “Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 2245–2248, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Peres, “Separability criterion for density matrices,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1413–1415, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  15. M. Horodecki and P. H. Horodecki, “Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions,” Physics Letters A, vol. 223, no. 1-2, pp. 1–8, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. K. Zyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, “Volume of the set of separable states,” Physical Review. A, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 883–892, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  17. J. Eisert and M. B. Plenio, “A comparison of entanglement measures,” Journal of Modern Optics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 145–154, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, “Computable measure of entanglement,” Physical Review A, vol. 65, no. 3, Article ID 032314, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. A. Man'ko and V. I. Man'ko, “Entanglement and other quantum correlations of a single qudit state,” International Journal of Quantum Information, vol. 12, no. 7-8, Article ID 1560006, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. M. A. Man'ko and V. I. Man'ko, “Properties of nonnegative Hermitian matrices and new entropic inequalities for noncomposite quantum systems,” Entropy, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 2876–2894, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. A. R. Kessel and N. M. Yakovleva, “Implementation schemes in NMR of quantum processors and the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm by using virtual spin representation,” Physical Review A, vol. 66, no. 6, Article ID 062322, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. E. O. Kiktenko, A. K. Fedorov, and V. I. Man'ko, “Teleportation in an indivisible quantum system,” Quantum Measurements and Quantum Metrology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. V. N. Chernega, O. V. Man'ko, and V. I. Man'ko, “Generalized qubit portrait of the qutrit-state density matrix,” Journal of Russian Laser Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 383–387, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. K. Fedorov, E. O. Kiktenko, O. V. Man'ko, and V. I. Man'ko, “Multilevel superconducting circuits as two-qubit systems: operations, state preparation, and entropic inequalities,” Physical Review A, vol. 91, no. 4, Article ID 042312, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. E. O. Kiktenko, A. K. Fedorov, A. A. Strakhov, and V. I. Man'ko, “Single qudit realization of the Deutsch algorithm using superconducting many-level quantum circuits,” Physics Letters A, vol. 379, no. 22-23, pp. 1409–1413, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Schliemann, J. I. Cirac, M. Kuś, M. Lewenstein, and D. Loss, “Quantum correlations in two-fermion systems,” Physical Review A, vol. 64, no. 2, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Zanardi, “Quantum entanglement in fermionic lattices,” Physical Review A, vol. 65, no. 4, Article ID 042101, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. K. Eckert, J. Schliemann, D. Bruß, and M. Lewenstein, “Quantum correlations in systems of indistinguishable particles,” Annals of Physics, vol. 299, no. 1, pp. 88–127, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, and K. Titimbo, “Entanglement of identical particles,” Open Systems & Information Dynamics, vol. 21, no. 1-2, Article ID 1440003, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  30. A. Reusch, J. Sperling, and W. Vogel, “Entanglement witnesses for indistinguishable particles,” Physical Review A, vol. 91, no. 4, Article ID 042324, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar