Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Mathematical Physics
Volume 2017, Article ID 1098169, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1098169
Research Article

Improved Finite Time in Eliminating Disagreement of Opinion Dynamics via Noise

1School of General Education, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Shouguang 262700, China
2School of Science, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Lipo Mo; moc.621@plmgnahieb

Received 25 May 2017; Revised 7 September 2017; Accepted 27 September 2017; Published 19 October 2017

Academic Editor: Antonio Scarfone

Copyright © 2017 Yong Ding and Lipo Mo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, “Statistical physics of social dynamics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 591–646, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. V. Proskurnikov and R. Tempo, “A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 43, pp. 65–79, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. P. Jia, A. MirTabatabaei, N. E. Friedkin, and F. Bullo, “Opinion dynamics and the evolution of social power in influence networks,” SIAM Review, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 367–397, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. M. H. DeGroot, “Reaching a consensus,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 69, no. 345, pp. 118–121, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. N. E. Friedkin and E. C. Johnsen, “Social influence networks and opinion change,” Advances in Group Processes, vol. 16, pp. 1–29, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  6. G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, and G. Weisbuch, “Mixing beliefs among interacting agents,” Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), vol. 3, pp. 87–98, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. U. Krause, “A discrete nonlinear and non-autonomous model of consensus formation,” in Communications in Difference Equations (Poznan, 1998), S. Elaydi, G. Ldas, J. Popenda, and J. Rakowski, Eds., pp. 227–236, Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, “Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation,” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5, no. 3, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. D. Blondel, J. M. Hendrickx, and J. N. Tsitsiklis, “On Krause's multi-agent consensus model with state-dependent connectivity,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2586–2597, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  10. S. Fortunato, “The Krause-Hegselmann consensus model with discrete opinions,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 15, article 1021, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. G. Toscani, “Kinetic models of opinion formation,” Communications in Mathematical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 481–496, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. S. Parongama and B. K. Chakrabarti, Sociophysics: An Introduction, Oxiford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2013.
  13. S. Galam, Sociophysics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  14. M. Mäs, A. Flache, and D. Helbing, “Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 6, no. 10, Article ID 1000959, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Grauwin and P. Jensen, “Opinion group formation and dynamics: Structures that last from nonlasting entities,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 85, no. 6, Article ID 066113, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. Carro, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, “The role of noise and initial conditions in the asymptotic solution of a bounded confidence, continuous-opinion model,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 151, no. 1-2, pp. 131–149, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. M. Pineda, R. Toral, and E. Hernández-García, “The noisy Hegselmann-Krause model for opinion dynamics,” The European Physical Journal B, vol. 86, article 490, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  18. W. Horsthemke and R. Lefever, Noise-Induced Transitions, vol. 15 of Springer Series in Synergetics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1984. View at MathSciNet
  19. J. García-Ojalvo and J. M. Sancho, Noise in Spatially Extended Systems, Institute for Nonlinear Science, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. L. Q. Zhou, X. Jia, and Q. Ouyang, “Experimental and numerical studies of noise-induced coherent patterns in a subexcitable system,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, Article ID 138301, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. R. Müller, K. Lippert, A. Kühnel, and U. Behn, “First-order nonequilibrium phase transition in a spatially extended system,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 2658–2662, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. G. Clerc, C. Falcon, and E. Tirapegui, “Additive noise induces front propagation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 14, Article ID 148302, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. Su, G. Chen, and Y. Hong, “Noise leads to quasi-consensus of Hegselmann–Krause opinion dynamics,” Automatica, vol. 85, pp. 448–454, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. W. Su, G. Chen, and Y. Yu, “Finite-time elinimation of disagreement of opinion dynamics via covert noise,” https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01732, 2016.