Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2009 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 372708 |

K. Ernits, K. Muska, M. Danilson, J. Raudoja, T. Varema, O. Volobujeva, M. Altosaar, "Anion Effect of Zinc Source on Chemically Deposited ZnS(O,OH) Films", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2009, Article ID 372708, 5 pages, 2009.

Anion Effect of Zinc Source on Chemically Deposited ZnS(O,OH) Films

Academic Editor: Steven Suib
Received19 Aug 2009
Accepted02 Dec 2009
Published09 Feb 2010


The study on the anion effect of different Zn sources—Zn, Zn, Zn, Zn and ZnS—on the chemical deposition of ZnS(O,OH) films revealed that the growth rate and composition of the ZnS(O,OH) layer depend on the instability constant (pK) value of the corresponding Zn-complex Zn in the chemical bath solution. In the region of the ZnS(O,OH) film's growth rate and ZnS concentration in films increased with the increasing pK value of the used Zn salt complex up to the pK value of the complex and decreased in the region where . The band gap values (around 3.6 eV in most cases) of deposited ZnS(O,OH) films did not depend on the Zn precursor's instability constant, the ZnS(O,OH) film from zinc nitrate containing bath has higher band gap energy ( = 3.8 eV). The maximum efficiency of CISSe and CZTSSe monograin layer solar cells was gained with ZnS(O,OH) buffer layer deposited from CBD solution containing Zn as Zn source, which provided the highest growth rate and ZnS concentration in the ZnS(O,OH) film on glass substrates.

1. Introduction

ZnS is beside CdS the second most investigated buffer layer material for CuInSe2 (CISe) type solar cells. ZnS is an attractive material mainly because of its wide band gap of 3.7 eV [1], which makes it more transparent in the short wavelength region between 350 and 550 nm compared to CdS with the band gap value of 2.4 eV [1]. A chemical bath deposition (CBD) is the most commonly used process for ZnS buffer formation on the top of a CISe type absorber. So far, the highest demonstrated CBD-ZnS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGSe) solar cell efficiency is 18.6% as reported by NREL [2], while the highest efficiency obtained with CdS is 19.9% [3]. The high-efficiency ZnS/CIGSe solar cells were prepared also by the Nakada process [4], where zinc sulphate was used as the zinc source, thiourea as the sulphur source and ammonia as the complexing agent.

The present work aimed to study the impact of Zn precursor anion on the CBD-ZnS film’s growth rate and properties. There are only few papers in the literature where the influence of different anion types in the ZnS deposition solution on thin film parameters was studied [57]. Eshuis et al. [5] pointed out that the chemical nature of used anions controls the growth rate, and morphology of ZnS particles. Several authors have studied CdS films deposited from different cadmium salts in ammonia solutions [810] and ZnO deposition from different zinc sources [11] as well. A change in the electrical resistivity, growth rate and particle size of the films with changes in chemical nature of anions in chemical bath solution was detected, but those changes did not lead to the changes in efficiencies of CISe solar cells [9]. Khallaf et al. [8] found that higher values of instability constants of the different cadmium complexes in the deposition solution led to the thinner CdS films. As the deposited CBD-ZnS films contain in addition to ZnS also Zn(OH)2 and ZnO, it is typical to mark them as ZnS(O,OH). In this study CBD-ZnS films were deposited from different Zn sources. The growth rate of the films along with compositional and optical properties presented together with photovoltaic characteristics of CuIn(S,Se)2 (CISSe), and Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) monograin layer (MGL) solar cells with CBD ZnS(O,OH) buffer layers.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. ZnS(O,OH) Film Deposition and Characterization

ZnS(O,OH) thin films were deposited on soda lime glass (SLG) substrates. Freshly prepared water solutions contained 0.32 M SC(NH2)2 (thiourea (TU), 7.5 M ammonia and 0.16 M Zn precursor salt: Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O (Zn(Ac)2), ZnCl2, ZnI2, Zn(NO3)2·4H2O, ZnSO4·7H2O. SLG substrates were cleaned with concentrated H2SO4 and rinsed with deionized (DI, 18 MΩ·cm) water. All the used chemicals were pro analysi grade from Merck. The CBD solutions were prepared by dissolution of the Zn salt and TU in DI water separately and the two solutions were mixed at 85°C by continuous stirring. After 5 minutes the NH3 solution was added and substrates were dipped into the bath solution. The deposition process was stopped after 30 minutes by lifting the substrates out of the CBD solution. The deposited films were annealed in a semi closed quartz tube in conditions of continuous vacuum pumping at 220°C for 10 minutes.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (HR-SEM Zeiss ULTRA 55) was used to measure the thickness of the films. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Kratos Axis Ultra DLD, monochromatic Al Kα radiation) was used to determine the Zn:S:O concentrations ratio in the films. Spectrophotometer with an integrating sphere (Jasco V-670 UV-VIS-NIR) was used to measure the optical transmission and to determine the optical band gaps of the ZnS(O,OH) films.

2.2. CuIn(Se,S)2 and Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 Solar Cell Preparation and Characterization

Monograin layer (MGL) CISSe and CZTSSe solar cells were prepared as published elsewhere [12, 13]. CBDs ZnS(O,OH) films were deposited on the CISSe and CZTSSe monograin membranes at the solution temperature of 85°C for 5 minutes.

Prepared solar cells were characterized by current-voltage measurements, which were carried out in the darkness and under illumination of 100 mW cm-2.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemical Route to ZnS(O,OH) Deposition and the Anion Effect

In the chemical bath solution, Zn-salt molecules decompose to ions and Zn2+ can form different complexes as follows:

We assume that the formation of solid (s) ZnS(O,OH) results through the decomposition of the following complexes in aqua deposition solutions by (2) and (3) as

Simultaneously to ZnS formation, zinc hydroxide can form in the ammonia containing solution as follows:

The deposited films were annealed in vacuum at 220°C for 10 minutes to dehydrate Zn(OH)2 (5):

(see [14]). The anions from the used zinc salts play a role in the growth of ZnS(O,OH) films as additional complexing agents, forming ) complexes besides [Zn(NH3)4]2+ and [Zn(OH)4]2+ in the chemical bath solution. complexes have different instability constants according to the anions (see Table 1). The instability constants were calculated for poorly dissociating complexes only; therefore, the instability constant for Zn(NO3)2 is not given.

Decomplexation reactions of Zn(L)1Calculation of equilibrium constant (K1) for the reactionInstability constant of Zn complex ion pK1 = logK1 (at 25°C)

Zn(OH)+ Zn2+ + OH 4.4
Zn(NH3)2+ Zn2+ + NH3 2.2
Zn(TU)2+ Zn2+ + TU 0.5
Zn(SO4)0 Zn2+ + 2.3
Zn(Ac)+ Zn2+ + A 1.6
Zn(Cl)+ Zn2+ + C
Zn(I)+ Zn2+ +
Zn(NO3)2 Zn2+ + Unstable compound

Square brackets in Table 1 imply the concentrations. A high value of the instability constant pK1 shows that the complex ion is easily formed, therefore the Zn(L)1 complex with OH- ion is the most stable complex in the series.

3.2. The Results of ZnS(O,OH) Films Measurements
3.2.1. The Cluster Size and Thickness of ZnS(O,OH) Films

SEM micrographs (presented elsewhere [16]) revealed that change in zinc sources affects the size of ZnS(O,OH) clusters and the film thickness grown on SLG. The ZnS(O,OH) film thickness depending on the instability constant values of corresponding complex ions is presented in Figure 1. The thickest films with the largest clusters grew from Zn(Ac)2 containing chemical solution. ZnS(O,OH) films with the smallest clusters grew from ZnCl2 and Zn(NO3)2 containing solutions. ZnS(O,OH) film thickness increases with the instability constant values in the region (a) where and decreases after the Zn[NH3]2+ complex line.

3.2.2. The Composition of ZnS(O,OH) Films

XPS compositional measurements revealed that the ZnS(O,OH) films contain Zn(OH)2 and ZnO besides ZnS. The concentration of ZnS in the ZnS(O,OH) films is given in Figure 2 (black stars). The obtained results show that the content of ZnS in ZnS(O,OH) film is dependent on the instability constant of the zinc precursor complex. The content of ZnS in the films increases with the value of instability constants of Zn complex in the region (a) and drops after the Zn[NH3]2+ complex line in region (b). This is the indication of low deposition rate of ZnS and high deposition rate of Zn(O,OH)2 in the region (b) where Zn complex is stronger than Zn[NH3]2+ complex.

XPS measurements revealed detectable amounts (below 1 mole %) of several impurities in ZnS(O,OH) films from Zn(NO3)2 (Cl), ZnI2 (Cd, Cl, N), and Zn(Ac)2 (N).

XPS measurements showed also that the annealing process in vacuum at 200°C for 10 minutes was not sufficient to dehydrate Zn(OH)2 completely. It was the most successful for the ZnS(O,OH) film with smallest clusters, deposited from chemical bath containing ZnCl2.

3.2.3. The Optical Transmission and Band Gaps of ZnS(O,OH) Films

The results of optical transmission measurements are brought in Figure 3 (squares). In region (a) films transmission decreases with increasing instability constant values and increases after the Zn[NH3]2+ complex line in region (b) where , probably due to the variations in film thickness.

The optical absorption coefficient (α) was deduced from the transmission and reflectance spectra, using the relation α = ln(), where as was calculated = · (1 – ) from the intensities of the transmitted () and reflected () lights. A plot of the value of (αν)2 against photon energy (ν) shows a straight line portion, and the intercept of this linear portion on the energy axis at (αν)2 equal to zero gives the band gap of the material. The values of optical band gap energy in Figure 3 are in the range of 3.6 eV, except 3.8 eV for the ZnS deposited from Zn(NO3)2. Similar results are described in [6] where higher band gap values (3.75–3.93 eV) were gained for CBD-ZnS films deposited from Zn(NO3)2 in comparison with those ones from ZnCl2 (3.66–3.78 eV) [6]. The results could be explained with different crystal structure of the ZnS films from Zn(NO3)2 and ZnCl2, since hexagonal ZnS has larger band gap for (3.67 eV [1], 3.74 eV [17],) than that of cubic ZnS (3.54 eV [1] and 3.66 eV [17]).

3.3. The Results of CuIn(SSe)2 and Cu2(ZnSn)(SSe)4 Solar Cells Measurements
3.3.1. Current-Voltage Characteristics of MGL Solar Cells

The values of open circuit voltages and fill factors were only very slightly affected by the variation of ZnS(O,OH) deposition precursor. Current densities of CBD-ZnS/Cu(In)Se2 monograin layer solar cells changed with instability constants of Zn-ligand complexes following the same law as that of the growth rate of ZnS(O,OH) films (Figure 4). Figure 4 shows that the CISSe and CZTSSe solar cells with ZnS(O,OH) films from ZnI2 with relatively high resistivity and high impurity content in the films have the lowest current densities. The solar cell efficiency curves follow the shape of current density curves (Figure 4). The dependence can be caused by the different thickness of ZnS(O,OH) films and the content of ZnS and impurities in the films. The only exceptions are solar cells with ZnS(O,OH) from Zn(NO3)2, which have the highest transmission and the largest band gap.

3.4. Discussions

The idea that anions from different zinc salts as Zn sources in the chemical solution for ZnS(O,OH) deposition can act as complexing agents and influence the deposition process was supported by experimental findings. The comparison of values of instability constants (see Table 1) shows that Zn(SO4)0 complex is stronger than Zn(NH3)2+ complex and the other Zn(L)1 complexes. This fact probably affects ZnS(O,OH) films growth in the way that the stronger Zn(SO4)0 complex drives (1) left (see Section 3.1), which results in lower ZnS deposition rates and smaller thicknesses. Lower deposition rates increase the time for the deposition process and can result in thinner films with poor coverage on the top of the absorber in solar cells. Poor coverage of the buffer layer can induce shunts in solar cells. From the solar cell results we can see that solar cells with thickest ZnS(O,OH) have highest current densities.

On the other hand, Zn(OH)42+ complex is stronger than Zn(NH3)2+ complex and drives (4) right (see Section 3.1), resulting in Zn(OH)2 rich films from ZnSO4 containing chemical bath solution. The variations of ZnS, ZnO and Zn(OH)2 content in CBD-ZnS change the material optical properties like transmission and also the value of band gap energy. The usage of ZnS with about 1 eV higher band gap energy (3.6 eV) as buffer material in solar cells instead of usually used CdS ( = 2.4 eV) can result in two effects in solar cell as follows.

(1)More light passes the buffer layer, increasing the light absorption in absorber layer, which increases the current densities of solar cells in the case of ZnS. (2)There might occur the so-called “spike” in solar cell p-n junction reducing current collection of the solar cell with ZnS buffer layer [18].

Additionally, ZnO with band gap energy around 3.2 eV in the buffer material can reduce both effects, opposite to Zn(OH)2 with higher band gap energy value than ZnS. Zn(OH)2 has generally lower transmission and it can reduce CBD-ZnS transmission, if not dehydrated from the film; therefore, ZnO is preferable over Zn(OH)2 as a coproduct in CBD-ZnS film. But the lattice constants of ZnS (a = 3.8 hexagonal and 5.4 cubic Å) match better with currently used absorber material (a = 5.4–5.8 Å) than ZnO (a = 3.2 Å); therefore, CBD-ZnS should contain mainly ZnS [19]. As a result, we can find that solar cells with ZnS(O,OH) buffer layer deposited from Zn(Ac)2, where the highest concentration of ZnS was found, had highest solar cell current densities and efficiencies.

4. Conclusions

The study on the anion effect of the Zn source for the chemical deposition of ZnS(O,OH) films revealed that the growth rate and composition of ZnS(O,OH) layer depend on the instability constant value of Zn complex in chemical bath solution. The ZnS(O,OH) film’s growth rate and ZnS concentration in films increased with the increasing value of Zn precursor’s instability constant up to the Zn[NH3]2+ complex but decreased after that. The analogous effect of chemical nature of anion was detected for solar cell current densities and efficiencies. The highest solar cell current densities and efficiencies were achieved with ZnS(O,OH) buffer layers with the highest growth rate and ZnS content, deposited from Zn(Ac)2. The only exception was solar cell with ZnS(O,OH) deposited from Zn(NO3)2 containing bath, which results in ZnS(O,OH) with the widest band gap (3.8 eV) and the highest transmission.


Financial supports of Estonian Ministry of Education and Research by Contract no. SF0140099s08 and Estonian Scientific Foundation under Contract no. 7678 are gratefully acknowledged.


  1. D. R. Lidle, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 78th edition, 1997-1998.
  2. D. Hariskos, S. Spiering, and M. Powalla, “Buffer layers in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells and modules,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 480-481, pp. 99–109, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. I. Repins, M. A. Contreras, B. Egaas et al., “19.9%-efficient ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 solar cell with 81.2% fill factor,” Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–239, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. Nakada, M. Mizutani, Y. Hagiwara, and A. Kunioka, “High-efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells with a CBD-ZnS buffer layer,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 67, no. 1–4, pp. 255–260, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Eshuis, G. R. A. van Elderen, and C. A. J. Koning, “A descriptive model for the homogeneous precipitation of zinc sulfide from acidic zinc salt solutions,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 505–512, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Antony, K. V. Murali, R. Manoj, and M. K. Jayaraj, “The effect of the pH value on the growth and properties of chemical-bath-deposited ZnS thin films,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 106–110, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Y. Zhao, J.-M. Hong, and J.-J. Zhu, “Microwave-assisted self-assembled ZnS nanoballs,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 270, no. 3-4, pp. 438–445, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. Khallaf, I. O. Oladeji, G. Chai, and L. Chow, “Characterization of CdS thin films grown by chemical bath deposition using four different cadmium sources,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 516, no. 21, pp. 7306–7312, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Altosaar, K. Ernits, J. Krustok, T. Varema, J. Raudoja, and E. Mellikov, “Comparison of CdS films deposited from chemical baths containing different doping impurities,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 480-481, pp. 147–150, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Ortega-Borges and D. Lincot, “Mechanism of chemical bath deposition of cadmium sulfide thin films in the ammonia-thiourea system,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 140, no. 12, pp. 3464–3473, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  11. E. Bacaksiz, M. Parlak, M. Tomakin, A. Özcelik, M. Karakiz, and M. Altunbas, “The effects of zinc nitrate, zinc acetate and zinc chloride precursors on investigation of structural and optical properties of ZnO thin films,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 466, no. 1-2, pp. 447–450, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Altosaar, A. Jagomägi, M. Kauk et al., “Monograin layer solar cells,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 431-432, pp. 466–469, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Altosaar, J. Raudoja, K. Timmo et al., “Cu2Zn1-xCdxSn(Se1-ySy)4 solid solutions as absorber materials for solar cells,” Physica Status Solidi A, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 167–170, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Handbook of Chemistry II, Izdatelstvo Himia, Moscow, Russia, 1965.
  15. J. J. Loure, Handbook of Analythical Chemistry, Izdatelstvo Himia, Moscow, Russia, 1965.
  16. K. Ernits, K. Muska, M. Kauk et al., “Chemical bath deposition of ZnS films using different Zn-salts,” in Proceedings of the E-MRS Spring Meeting Symposium, Strasbourg, France, June 2009, poster BP4-10. View at: Google Scholar
  17. Physics of AIIBVI Compounds, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1986.
  18. T. Minemoto, T. Matsui, H. Takakura et al., “Theoretical analysis of the effect of conduction band offset of window/CIS layers on performance of CIS solar cells using device simulation,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 67, no. 1–4, pp. 83–88, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. Ernits, Study of In2S3 and ZnS thin films deposited by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis and chemical deposition, dissertation, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia, 2009.

Copyright © 2009 K. Ernits et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles