Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2009 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 385673 |

W. Oueslati, M. Meftah, H. Ben Rhaiem, A. Ben Haj Amara, "Selectivity of Na-Montmorillonite versus Concentration of Two Competitive Bivalent Cations (, ): Quantitative XRD Investigation", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2009, Article ID 385673, 4 pages, 2009.

Selectivity of Na-Montmorillonite versus Concentration of Two Competitive Bivalent Cations (, ): Quantitative XRD Investigation

Academic Editor: Luigi Nicolais
Received13 Aug 2009
Accepted06 Oct 2009
Published20 Dec 2009


The goal of this paper is to examine, by quantitative XRD analysis, the effect of heavy metal cation concentrations (, ) on the selectivity phenomenon in the case of dioctahedral smectite (i.e., Na-montmorillonite). The quantitative XRD analysis is achieved using an indirect method based on the comparison of experimental XRD profiles to those calculated using structural models. The obtained results show that for strong metals concentrations (i.e., N), the host material presents heterogeneous structure characterized by interstratified hydration states between 1 W and 2 W (i.e., respectively, one and two water layer hydration state) attributed to cation. For low concentration, the values investigation indicates that montmorillonite remains saturated with characterized by homogeneous 1 W hydration state.

1. Introduction

Montmorillonite is a clay mineral characterized by its capacity to exchange cations in the interlamellar space with others present in external solutions. Indeed, it is a clay mineral with “T-O-T” layer consisting of an octahedral sheet sandwiched by two tetrahedral sheets [13]. Isomorphic substitutions in octahedral and/or tetrahedral sheets commonly make the clay platelets negatively charged, which is compensated by exchangeable cation. These characteristics were controlled by the cationic exchange capacity (CEC) properties. Several works [410] studied the case where the starting sample is in contact with solutions containing only one metallic cation (i.e., monovalent or bivalent) and show a different hydration behavior related to the nature of exchangeable cation. The selectivity exchange problem was defined by the presence of several metallic cations in solution, which is the most realistic case if we want to apply clay properties in the context of industrial waste storage. This aim was approached by several research tasks [1115]. Indeed, metal contamination is a persistent problem in many infected soils. The most commonly occurring metals are , , , , , , and [16].

The various studies [1722] related to the adsorption of heavy metals in clays indicated minor role of the CEC properties. Indeed, Alloway [23] shows that ionic exchange affinity increases with ionic valence and at the same charge value the cation with higher ionic radius was preferentially adsorbed (i.e., (0.12 nm) Cu2+(0.072 nm)).

In this paper, we will study by investigation CEC properties, the selective exchange process of Na-montmorillonite in contact with solutions containing a couple of heavy metal cations (i.e., and ) with variable concentrations. This study is coming in continuation with already established results in the case of reference samples (i.e., sample where exchangeable sites are saturated by one type of species) studied by Oueslati [10]. This work is divided into two complementary large shutters: qualitative and quantitative XRD analyses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

Montmorillonite fractions were prepared according to the classic protocol of extraction [24]. The 2 m fraction of montmorillonite (Wyoming, USA) was supplied by the Source Clay Minerals Repository Collection. Its half-cell structural formula, as obtained by electron microprobe, is: ()().

The Na saturated smectites were prepared by dispersing suitable amounts of the montmorillonite several times in 1 N NaCl solution. The excess of chloride was removed by washing the clay in distilled water and by subsequent dialysis. In order to study selectivity process, we dispersed Na-montmorillonite in solutions containing 0.5 Cu2+ and 0.5 Pb2+. To investigate the concentration effect, we precede by dilutions until weak normality values  N. An oriented preparation was prepared by depositing a clay suspension on to a glass slide [25, 26].

2.2. Experimental

The XRD patterns, of oriented and air-dried specimens, were obtained by reflection setting with a D8 Advance Bruker installation using Cu-K radiation and equipped with solid-state detector. Intensities were measured at an interval of 2 equal to 0.04° and 40–50 s counting time per step. The absolute precision of the Bragg angles was better than 2 0.01° over the whole angular range.

2.3. XRD Profile Modeling

Quantitative XRD analysis aims to determine structural parameters by comparing the experimental patterns with the theoretical intensities calculated from the matrix formalism given by Drits and Tchoubar [27]:

This method allowed us to determine the abundances (Wi), the mode of stacking of the different kinds of layers, and the mean number of layers per coherent scattering domain (CSD) [28, 29]. Within a CSD, the stacking of layers is described by a set of junction probabilities (). The relationships between these probabilities and the abundances (Wi) of the different types of layers are given by Drits and Tchoubar [27]. The XRD patterns were calculated using the z coordinates of Sakharov and Drits [30]. The origin of these coordinates was placed on the plane of surface Oxygen atoms [27]. The overall fit quality was assessed using the unweighted Rp parameter [31]:

Rp is mainly influenced by the most intense diffraction maxima, such as the 00l reflections, which contains essential information on the proportions of the different layer types and thickness.

3. Results

3.1. Qualitative XRD Investigation

We present in Figure 1 the different XRD patterns obtained from decreasing normality (i.e., 10-2 N→10-4 N) in the case of mixture containing 50% Cu(II), 50% Pb(II). We show supplementary reflection attributed to excess of salt in host solution identified by the Eva release software. We calculated for all experimental patterns the FWHM of the 001 reflection and the ξ parameter which was calculated as the standard deviation of the ×d(00) values for all measurable reflections over the 2–35°2θ angular range [5] (Table 1). In the case of 10-3 N and 10-4 N, the d001 values indicate quasi homogeneous 1W hydration state confirmed by a low FWHM and ξ parameter value (Table 1) [7]. For 10-2 N, we note heterogeneous hydration state characterized by an asymmetric 001 reflection profile with d001=12.53 Å. This interstratified character traduced by irrationality of reflection position is accompanied by an increase of FWHM and parameter values (Table 1).

Normalityd001FWHM (Å)Character


3.2. Quantitative XRD Investigation

To simulate the XRD pattern related to low normality (i.e.,  N) (Figure 1(a)), we suppose that the host materiel maintains her interlamellar cation (i.e, Na+) and the cationic exchange process is not triggered due to the low population number of exchangeable species in the solution. For this reason, we used structural theoretical model containing one layer type saturated by Na+ cation regularly stacked (Table 2).

SampleLayer Thickness (Å)Exch.CationZn (Å) (Å)WA WB CharacterM

 N12.4–15.4Pb2+ Interstratified6
 N12.3Na+ Homogeneous8

For 10-3 N, the best agreement between theoretical and experimental XRD patterns (i.e., %) was obtained using 96% of homogeneous (1W) hydration state (i.e., Na+ saturated phases) and 4% of interstratified (1 W-2 W) hydration state (i.e., Pb2+ saturated phases) stacked randomly (Figure 1(b)). This quantitative result was interpreted by a minor contribution of Pb2+ in the cationic exchange process due to its low abundance (Table 2).

For  N (Figure 1(c)), the 001 reflections are situated at 2θ° = 7.20 indicating probably a partially saturation of the CEC sample with Pb2+ cation. The best agreement (i.e., Rp = 7%) can be obtained by supposing presence of two types of layers saturated respectively by Pb2+ and Cu2+ stacked with segregation tendency (Table 2). For all studied samples, we note weak fluctuation of the number of layers per stack.

4. Conclusion

In this study we attempt to determine the effect of solution concentration on the natural selective exchange process for dioctahedral smectites. This problem is usually encountered if we want to apply clay properties in the context of industrial waste storage. We choose two competitive heavy metal cations (i.e., and ), since these cations occur frequently with variable concentration within household waste. The results obtained in this regards showed that: for low concentration and by using XRD profile investigation, we demonstrate that the clay remains saturated with Na+ cation and the clay CES (i.e., cationic exchange selectivity) is in favor of Na+ cation which is characterized by low hydration state. For high concentration, clay fixes the Pb2+ cations which are characterized by an interstratified hydration state (). This result is in accordance with sorption selectivity study in different soils [3234] which is demonstrated that, at variable pH solution, the selectivity soil order for some studied heavy metal cations (i.e., , , , and ) is usually in favor of cation.


  1. R. E. Grim, “Effect of initial water content on compressibility of remolded Ariake clays,” in Applied Clay Mineralogy, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lowl and Technology, Z. Hong, Ed., pp. 69–74, McGraw Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  2. G. W. Brindley and G. Brown, Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and Their X Ray Identification, Monograph 5, Mineralogical Society, London, UK, 1980.
  3. A. Viani, A. F. Gualtieri, and G. Artioli, “The nature of disorder in montmorillonite by simulation of X-ray powder patterns,” American Mineralogist, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 966–975, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  4. I. Bérend, J.-M. Cases, M. François et al., “Mechanism of adsorption and desorption of water vapor by homoionic montmorillonites: 2. The Li+, Na+, K+, Rb+ and Cs+- exchanged forms,” Clays & Clay Minerals, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 324–336, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Cases, I. Bérend, M. François, J. P. Uriot, L. J. Michot, and F. Thomas, “Mechanism of adsorption and desorption of water vapor by homoionic montmorillonite: 3. The Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+ exchanged forms,” Clays & Clay Minerals, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 8–22, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  6. E. Ferrage, C. Tournassat, E. Rinnert, and B. Lanson, “Influence of pH on the interlayer cationic composition and hydration state of Ca-montmorillonite: analytical chemistry, chemical modelling and XRD profile modelling study,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 2797–2812, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. Ferrage, B. Lanson, B. A. Sakharov, and V. A. Drits, “Investigation of smectite hydration properties by modeling experimental X-ray diffraction patterns—part I: montmorillonite hydration properties,” American Mineralogist, vol. 90, no. 8-9, pp. 1358–1374, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Ferrage, B. Lanson, N. Malikova, A. Plançon, B. A. Sakharov, and V. A. Drits, “New insights on the distribution of interlayer water in bi-hydrated smectite from X-ray diffraction profile modeling of 00l reflections,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 3499–3512, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. Ferrage, B. Lanson, B. A. Sakharov, N. Geoffroy, E. Jacquot, and V. A. Drits, “Investigation of dioctahedral smectite hydration properties by modeling of X-ray diffraction profiles: influence of layer charge and charge location,” American Mineralogist, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1731–1743, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. W. Oueslati, M. S. Karmous, H. Ben Rhaiem, B. Lanson, and A. Ben Haj Amara, “Effect of interlayer cation and relative humidity on the hydration properties of a dioctahedral smectite,” Zeitschrift fur Kristallographie, Supplement, vol. 2, no. 26, pp. 417–422, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  11. T. A. Jackson, “The biogeochemical and ecological significance of interactions between colloidal minerals and trace elements,” in Environmental Interaction of Clays, A. Parker and J. E. Rae, Eds., , pp. 93–205, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  12. R. S. Swift and R. G. McLaren, “Micronutrient adsorption by soils and soil colloids,” in Interactions at the Soil Colloid-Soil Solution Interface, G. H. Bolt, M. F. de Boodt, M. H. B. Hayes, and M. B. McBride, Eds., pp. 257–292, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  13. T. Sato, T. Watanabe, and R. Otsuka, “Effects of layer charge, charge location, and energy change on expansion properties of dioctahedral smectites,” Clays & Clay Minerals, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 103–113, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  14. G. Lagaly, “Surface and interlayer reactions: bentonites as adsorbents,” in Clays: Controlling the Environnement, G. J. Churchman, R. W. Fitzpatrick, and R. A. Eggleton, Eds., pp. 137–144, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  15. W. Oueslati, H. Ben Rhaiem, B. Lanson, and A. Ben Haj Amara, “Selectivity of Na-montmorillonite in relation with the concentration of bivalent cation (Cu2+, Ca2+, Ni2+) by quantitative analysis of XRD patterns,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 224–227, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. G. Tiller, “Heavy metals in soils and their environmental significance,” in Advances in Soil Science, vol. 9, pp. 113–142, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  17. R. W. Mooney, A. G. Keenan, and L. A. Wood, “Adsorption of water vapor by montmorillonite. II. Effect of exchangeable ions and lattice swelling as measured by X-ray diffraction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1371–1374, 1952. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. Méring and P. R. Glaeser, “Sur le rôle de la valence des cations échangeables dans la montmorillonite,” Bulletin de la Société Française de Minéralogie et Cristallographie, vol. 77, pp. 519–530, 1954. View at: Google Scholar
  19. G. Lagaly, “The layer charge of regular interstatified 2:1 clay minerals,” Clays and Clays Minerals, vol. 27, pp. 1–10, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  20. G. Lagaly, “Characterization of clays by organic compounds,” Clay Minerals, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  21. D. A. Laird, “Model for crystalline swelling of 2:1 phyllosilicates,” Clays & Clay Minerals, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 553–559, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  22. J. Cuadros, “Interlayer cation effects on the hydration state of smectite,” American Journal of Science, vol. 297, no. 8, pp. 829–841, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  23. B. J. Alloway, Heavy Metals in Soils, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK, 2nd edition, 1995.
  24. D. Tessier, Etude expérimentale de l'organisation des matériaux argileux. Hydratation, gonflement et structure au cours de la dessiccation et de la réhumectation, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Paris VII, Paris, France, 1984.
  25. J. Srodon, D. J. Morgan, E. V. Eslinger, D. D. Eberl, and M. R. Karlinger, “Chemistry of illite/smectite and end-member illite,” Clays & Clay Minerals, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 368–378, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  26. J. Cuadros and J. Linares, “Experimental kinetic study of the smectite-to-illite transformation,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 439–453, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. V. A. Drits and C. Tchoubar, X-ray Diffraction by Disordered Lamellar Structures: Theory and Applications to Microdivided Silicates and Carbons, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1990.
  28. J. Méring, “L'interférence des rayons-X dans les systèmes à stratification désordonnée,” Acta Crystallographica, vol. 2, pp. 371–377, 1949. View at: Google Scholar
  29. H. Ben Rhaiem, D. Tessier, and A. Ben Haj Amara, “Mineralogy of the <2 μm fraction of three mixed-layer clays from southern and central Tunisia,” Clay Minerals, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 375–381, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  30. B. A. Sakharov and V. A. Drits, “Mixed-layer kaolinte-montmorillonite: a comparison observed and calculated diffraction patterns,” Clays & Clay Minerals, vol. 21, pp. 15–19, 1973. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. A. Howard and K. D. Preston, “Profile fitting of powder diffraction patterns,” in Modern Powder Diffraction: Reviews in Mineralogy, D. L. Bish and J. E. Post, Eds., pp. 217–275, Mineralogical Society of America, Wahington, DC, USA, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  32. H. Farrah and W. F. Pickering, “The sorption of lead and cadmium species by clay minerals,” Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1417–1422, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  33. R. W. Puls and H. L. Bohn, “Sorption of cadmium, nickel, and zinc by kaolinite and montmorillonite suspensions,” Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1289–1292, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  34. R. N. Yong and Y. Phadungchewit, “pH influence on selectivity and retention of heavy metals in some clay soils,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 821–833, 1993. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2009 W. Oueslati et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.