Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2013 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 406065 |

Nadiir Bheekhun, Abd. Rahim Abu Talib, Mohd Roshdi Hassan, "Aerogels in Aerospace: An Overview", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 406065, 18 pages, 2013.

Aerogels in Aerospace: An Overview

Academic Editor: Zhimin Liu
Received02 May 2013
Revised10 Sep 2013
Accepted10 Sep 2013
Published11 Nov 2013


Aerogels are highly porous structures prepared via a sol-gel process and supercritical drying technology. Among the classes of aerogels, silica aerogel exhibits the most remarkable physical properties, possessing lower density, thermal conductivity, refractive index, and dielectric constant than any solids. Its acoustical property is such that it can absorb the sound waves reducing speed to 100 m/s compared to 332 m/s for air. However, when it comes to commercialization, the result is not as expected. It seems that mass production, particularly in the aerospace industry, has dawdled behind. This paper highlights the evolution of aerogels in general and discusses the functions and significances of silica aerogel in previous astronautical applications. Future outer-space applications have been proposed as per the current research trend. Finally, the implementation of conventional silica aerogel in aeronautics is argued with an alternative known as Maerogel.

1. Introduction

Aerogels are nanoporous light materials consisting of an open-cell network with numerous exceptional characteristics which intrigue the intuition of scholars in various areas of science and technology. Their range of applications is almost illimitable, tracing their way in different branches such as thermal and acoustical insulation, kinetic energy absorption, electronics, optics, chemistry, and biomedicine amongst others [15]. Within the classes of aerogels, silica aerogel, which is the porous nanostructured form of silica dioxide, exhibits the most fascinating properties such as low thermal conductivity (0.015 W/mK), low bulk density (0.1 g/cm3), optical transparency in the visible spectrum (99%), high specific surface area (1000 m2/g), low dielectric constant (1.0-2.0), low refractive index (1.05), low sound velocity (100 m/s), and hydrophobicity [68]. This unique combination of characteristics is due to their microstructures consisting of nanosized pores.

Considerable number of papers has been published during the past two decades showing not only the enthusiasm but also the scientific understanding of these nanostructures. Today, one of the most focusing areas is the modeling of the thermal behavior of granular- and fiber-based silica aerogel and its composites [913]. Despite all these efforts, silica aerogel has been applied only for scientific motives in the aerospace industry. NASA has conducted many astronautical missions using this type of aerogel as a hypervelocity particle capture and thermal insulator. The aviation world, both civil and military, can also be a promising market niche. For example, with the ever-increasing energy consumption and the rapidly growing interest from governments around the globe for renewable energy sources, high performance thermal insulation materials are required.

Why silica aerogel is not chosen as a candidate to resolve this problem? Why the applications remain unrealized in this sector? To the authors’ knowledge, there is no available literature that discusses the potential applications of silica aerogel in the aerospace sector with regards to commercialization. This paper highlights the evolution of aerogels in general and discusses the functions and significances of silica aerogel in previous astronautical applications. Future outer-space applications have been proposed as per the current research trend. Finally, the implementation of conventional silica aerogel in aeronautics is argued with an alternative known as Maerogel.

2. Evolution of Aerogels

Aerogel, nicknamed as the “blue smoke” or “frozen smoke” because of its cloudy appearance (see Figure 1), while believing that it is a recent invention of the nanotechnology due to its nanostructure features, is in fact a long-forsaken material developed by Samuel Stephens Kistler at his time at the College of the Pacific in Stockton, CA, USA. In 1931, he made his first publication on aerogels in nature [14] wherein he characterized an aerogel as a gel in which the liquid phase has been replaced by a gas in such a way that the solid network is being retained with only a slight or no shrinkage in the gel. The success of this process was based on one vital step of heating up the gel system in an autoclave above the critical temperatures and pressures of the liquid phase of the gel, which is known as supercritical drying. The resulted supercritical fluid was allowed to escape leaving behind a highly porous and extremely low-density material.

The first aerogel made by Kistler was silica aerogel using sodium silicate (water-glass) as the precursor of silica. Along time, he synthesized organic and metal oxides aerogels from alumina, tungsten oxide, ferric oxide, tin oxide, nickel tartrate, cellulose, nitrocellulose, gelatin, agar, egg albumen, and rubber [15]. He further extended his studies into the physical properties of silica aerogel, emphasizing on its structure, density, and thermal conductivity by varying the mechanical pressure and filling gases such as air, carbon dioxide, and chlorofluorocarbon [16].

As a result, silica aerogel was identified as the solid with the lowest heat conductivity at atmospheric pressure [18]. In 1950s, one of Kistler’s patents was allocated to Monsanto Corporation for large-scale production of silica aerogels for applications such as thickening agents and thermal materials under the trademark Santocel [19]. Later, he patented the first hydrophobic silica aerogels made by silylation with trichloromethylsilane to produce water repellents [20]. Unexpectedly, Masanto’s project came to an end ceasing all productions with the introduction of a relatively cheap fumed silica process using tetrachloride in 1960s. Since then, there were no interests in aerogels due to the tedious and time-consuming procedures involved in the synthesis of aerogels and the high manufacturing cost.

Consequently, commercialization lagged behind by a long time until in 1968 when a group of researchers headed by Teichner and Nicoloan in France reformulated a simpler preparation by applying the sol-gel chemistry to silica aerogel preparation thereby replacing waterglass used by Kistler with tetramethyl orthosilicate (TMOS), an alkoxysilane, which was then removed at supercritical conditions [21]. Aerogels of silica (SiO2), alumina (Al2O3), titania (TiO2), zirconia (ZrO2), magnesium oxide (MgO), and combinations of ZrO2-MgO, Al2O3-MgO, and TiO2-MgO were produced. While using that route, these oxides of aerogel were observed to exhibit higher values in terms of textural characteristics compared to the ones obtained through the original method. The surface area was also greater than their corresponding pure oxide aerogels [22]. This accomplishment triggered a new revolution in the science and technology world leading to intensive studies on this nanoage material. The first scientific application of aerogels was the Cherenkov radiation detector, developed by Cantin et al. in 1974. Subsequently, mass production started and several cubic meters of monolithic highly transparent tiles of silica aerogel were produced to equip the TASSO Cherenkov detector [23].

The first factory to produce blocks of silica aerogel using TMOS was established in Sweden but got devastated by an explosion due to a leak in the autoclave in the presence of methanol in 1984. The plant was rebuilt and is currently being operated by Airglass Corporation [24]. Because of its toxicity, TMOS was compelled to be replaced. Soon, Tewari and Hunt at Berkeley found tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) to be a safer reagent which would not alter the quality of the aerogels [25]. But the process was not safe yet to attain mass production. Hunt continued to investigate for improvements and came up with the idea of replacing the alcohol within the gel by liquid carbon dioxide before supercritical drying because CO2 is inflammable and requires a lower temperature and pressure to become supercritical [26]. This would reduce any hazard risks and increase the energy efficiency, hence resulting in a cheaper manufacturing cost. At the same time, BASF in Germany declared to have developed another CO2 replacement route via sodium silicate. They marketed the product as Basogel until 1996 [4].

In 1987, the introduction of helium pycnometry for measuring the skeletal density of aerogels provided data such that the density varies with the solvent concentration, pH, and densifying heat treatment [27]. At the end of the 80’s, Pekala at LLNL expanded the classes of aerogel by developing organic and carbon aerogels from an organic polymer, resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) using the sol-gel method [28]. Tillotson and Hrubesh developed monoliths of diaphanous silica aerogel with the lowest density, 0.003 g/cm3, and of porosity up to 99.8% using a two-step acid-base process which involved the substitution of the alcohol with an aprotic solvent, by distillation, causing gelation [29]. That was the first aerogel achievement in the 90’s.

NASA has been using tiles of these aerogels for space exploration since then. Later, it was found that, by heating up a RF aerogel to temperatures of several hundred degrees Celsius in an inert atmosphere (such as nitrogen or argon), the polymer which makes up the aerogel is dehydrated leaving behind an aerogel made of carbon. Unlike silica aerogel, carbon aerogel is a conductor of electricity. It was called the aerocapacitor and characterized as an “electrochemical doublecapacitor with high-power density and high-energy density” [30, 31].

Another key development was the subcritical drying method which was devised to produce low-density silica aerogels for thermal insulation [32]. The method involved a series of aging and pore chemical modification stages to prevent drastic gel shrinkage during the fast drying at ambient pressure. The density varies between 0.15 and 0.3 g/cm3 with a thermal conductivity of 0.02 W/mK at atmospheric conditions. Prakash et al. extended the ambient pressure drying (APD) method to further decrease the manufacturing cost of silica. A simple dip-coating process consisting of surface modification to induce reversible drying shrinkage was used [33]. The precursor was waterglass because of its low cost and nonflammability. The resulting aerogel was observed to have comparable density and porosity to that using the supercritical drying route. Since then, many articles were published ranging from synthesis to physical properties of silica aerogel using the APD method, indicating its advantages. However, the route alters and some approaches are more time-consuming than others because of the lengthy process of washing and exchanging solvents [3439].

Next was the rapid supercritical extraction (RSCE) which speeded up the supercritical heating. Experimented by John Poco at LLNL in 1996, this investigation consists of placing the sol-gel inside a pressurized mold in which the supercritical conditions were controlled in such a way to avoid unnecessary expansion and hence cracking [40, 41]. Considerable enhancement started taking place at the dawn of this millennium. In 2001, an easy, cheap, and effective method was developed by Gash and Tillotson to prepare metal oxide aerogels by using epoxide-doped gelation agents provided that the corresponding metal ions should have a valency of equal or greater than +3 in their formation oxidation state. The results were promising and blocks of microporous materials with high surface areas were produced [42]. One year later, Leventis et al. developed the ultralight mechanically modified aerogels, called X-aerogels by cross-linking diisocyanates into the microstructure of silica aerogels. The strength of the latter was multiplied by 300 whilst its specific compressive strength is approximately ten times that of steel [43]. His work was extended with the assistance of other researchers to investigate the polymer cross-linking with other types of aerogel such as transition metal oxides and organics which would further broaden the applications of aerogels [44]. X-aerogels have been accomplished through the addition of a polymer as a conformal coating on the silica skeleton.

On the other hand, semiconductors made of metal chalcogenide were reported in 2005 by Mohanan et al. They used a method which consisted of oxidation aggregation of metal chalcogenide nanoparticle building blocks coupled with supercritical drying. The resulting semiconductor had a high porosity and surface area, and the characteristic quantum-confined optical properties were identical to their nanoparticle components [45]. The next year was the invention of monolithic nanoporous metal foams which possess extremely low density and high surface area of 0.011 g/cm3 and 270 m2/g, respectively [46]. The metals selected were iron, cobalt, copper, and silver while other potential ones are still under research. Carbon nanotube aerogels were then invented in 2007 through a new synthesis method comprised of aqueous-gel precursors, followed by supercritical drying and freeze drying. The nanotubes can be made more robust by doping polyvinyl alcohol which would allow them to resist a weight of 800 times heavier than their original version. They are also excellent conductors of heat and electricity [47].

Filed in 2004 and patented in 2007, Halimaton presented her method to produce pure silica aerogel via a sol-gel method followed by supercritical carbon dioxide drying. However, she used an agricultural waste product, rice husk ash (RHA), as the source of the silica (see Figure 2). The commercial term is Maerogel standing for “Malaysian-made Aerogel” [48]. The texture and physical properties of the latter have been proved to be comparable to traditional silica aerogels (see Table 1).

PropertyConventional aerogelMaerogelComments

Apparent density0.003–0.35 g/cm30.03 g/cm3Commonly ~0.1 g/cm3 for conventional aerogels; Usually 0.03 g/cm3 for Maerogel
Internal surface area600–1000 m2/g700–900 m2/g
Mean pore diameter20 nm20.8 nmVaries with density
Particle diameter2–5 nm5 nmDetermined by electron microscopy
Thermal tolerance500°C500°CShrinkage begins gradually at 500°C
Melting point>1200°C>1200°C
Typical thermal conductivity0.015 W/mK0.02 W/mK
Coefficient of thermal expansion2.0–4.0 × 10−62.0–4.0 × 10−6Determined using ultrasonic techniques
Poisson’s ratio0.20.2Independent of density
Young’s modulus106–107 N/m2106–107 N/m2Insignificant compared to dense silica
Tensile strength16 kPa16 kPaFor density of 0.1 g/cm3
Fracture toughness0.8 kPa m0.50.8 kPa m0.5For density of 0.1 g/cm3
Index of refraction1.0–1.051.0–1.05
Dielectric constant~1.1~1.1For density of 0.1 g/cm3
Sound velocity100 m/s100 m/sFor density of 0.07 g/cm3

Maerogel is produced by first dissolving rice husk ash in aqueous sodium hydroxide at a Na2 : SiO2 ratio of 1 : 3.33, to produce a sodium silicate solution containing from 1 to 16% by weight of SiO2. Concentrated sulphuric acid is then added to the resulting water-glass solution to convert the sodium silicate to silica to obtain a silica hydrogel. Next is the aging process which will allow the gel structure to develop. This can be for a period of up to forty days. The water is then displaced with a C1 to C4 alcohol, preferably methanol or ethanol to get an alcogel. The latter is subjected to supercritical drying after the alcohol is being replaced by carbon dioxide to obtain an aerogel. The supercritical extraction is preferably carried out by placing the alcogel with additional alcohol in an autoclave fitted with a thermocouple and a temperature controller and slowly raising the temperature in the autoclave until the critical temperature and pressure are reached. The temperature may be increased, for example, at a rate of 50°C/h, for the time necessary to reach the critical temperature. After a certain time, the alcohol vapor is vented through a controlled leak by gradually reducing the pressure and temperature to atmospheric conditions. The temperature may be reduced over a period of, for example, twelve hours. The amount of additional alcohol should be such that there is sufficient alcohol in the autoclave for the critical pressure to be reached. The aerogels obtained are hydrophilic, having hydroxyl groups on their surface but can be converted to a hydrophobic form by replacing the hydroxyl groups with alkoxy groups. This may be achieved, for example, by passing methanol vapor over a heated sample of the aerogel. The methylation reaction is more advantageously to be carried out in a closed system in which the sample can be placed in a tube enclosed in an external furnace and extending between a flask containing boiling methanol and a condenser, which is connected back to the flask. The temperature of the furnace may be of the order of 250°C. The samples are preferably outgassed at a temperature of about 100°C under a reduced pressure of about 1.33 × 10−5 kPa for at least 15 hours both before and after the methylation process [48].

Other approaches were defined using RHA at either supercritical or ambient conditions. Tang and Wang provided a preparation but the value of the surface area was lower than that using TEOS/supercritical-ethanol drying. The aerogel was not transparent, rather it was white [49]. Following that, a route which used drying process at atmospheric pressure and a temperature of 40°C was developed by Li and Wang [50]. In this method, the hydrosol was modified by a small amount of TEOS which would greatly affect the pore structure and hence other physical properties. The porosity, surface area, pore volume, and average pore size were found to be directly proportional to the amount of TEOS added while the density was inversely proportional. An optimal amount of TEOS was however achieved [51].

In 2009, the first metal aerogel was made by Leventis et al. It was an iron aerogel created by smelting interpenetrating of resorcinol-formaldehyde and iron oxide xerogels (ambient-dried aerogels). They were “ferromagnetic and superparamagnetic” materials being rich in carbon and simultaneously magnetic and metallic [52]. Recently, a superior polymerized aerogel known as polyimide aerogel has been tailored at NASA’s Glenn Research Center in Ohio [53]. Polyimide gels are produced by cross-linking anhydride-capped-polyamic acid oligomers with aromatic triamine in solution and by chemically imidizing. The subsequent gels are then supercritically dried to form polyimide aerogels. These modified aerogels have densities as low as 0.14 g/cm3 and surface areas as high as 512 m2/g [54, 55]. The mechanical strength of this new class of aerogel is 500 times higher than the traditional silica and can provide bulk thermal and acoustical insulation. However, the thermal conductivity is increased by a certain factor because of its monolithic nature [53].

3. Properties of Silica Aerogels

The physical properties of an aerogel are highly dependent on its density and chemical composition. Hence, different synthesis methods will lead to dissimilar typical values for certain properties. This is illustrated in Table 1. In accordance with the scope of this article, an insight on the thermal, optical, and mechanical characterizations of silica aerogels has been provided.

3.1. Thermal Properties

The thermal conductivity of silica aerogels has forevermore been the focal topic of researchers since the beginning. Aerogels can be synthesized into multiple forms: monoliths, grains, powders, and films, conforming to the desired application. NASA has previously used monolithic silica aerogels for the thermal insulation for space applications [56]. The total thermal conductivity for monolithic aerogels is attributable to three heat transfer mechanisms: solid conduction via the solid backbone , gaseous conduction through the gas molecules in the porous structure , and radiation [57]. Convection can be neglected in aerogels due to their nanosized pores [58, 59]. The solid structure of aerogels is made up of only a small number of silica particles tortuously interlocked in a three-dimensional network with many dead-ends which therefore impedes the thermal transport [15]. Studies have shown that the heat transfer through the solid structure of an aerogel depends on its lattice structure, connectivity, and composition. Lu et al. equated the solid thermal conductivity with a factor depending on the interconnectivity of the particles and density [60]. A more convenient equation was provided by Bi and Tang et al., in which the solid thermal conductivity is derived by measuring the sound velocity in the aerogel [61] as follows: where is the density of aerogel, is the density of solid backbone, is the sound velocity in aerogel, is the sound velocity in solid backbone, and is the thermal conductivity of solid backbone. The latter is usually replaced by to simplify the calculation as it cannot be measured straightforwardly. However, this substitution may alter the result to some extent. Nevertheless, can be obtained by using the kinetic theory as follows: where is the volume specific heat, is the mean sound velocity of the solid backbone, and is the average inter-atomic spacing in solid backbone.

The heat transfer through the gaseous phase is dictated by the Knudsen effect which expresses the gaseous conduction in a porous medium as a function of the air pressure and the effective pore dimension [60]. The corresponding equation is as follows: where where is the Knudsen number, a characteristic quantity for the gaseous thermal conductivity in a porous system. is the mean free path of the gas molecules, is the characteristic length of pores, is the diameter of the gas molecules, is the porosity, is the thermal conductivity in free air, is the Boltzmann constant, is the temperature, is the gas pressure, and is a constant specific to the gas in the pores, usually between 1.5 and 2.0 [62].

The gaseous thermal conductivity in silica aerogels is directly proportional to the pressure and pore sizes and indirectly proportional to the density. Besides, the nanoscaled solid structure of aerogels has a significant effect on the gaseous thermal conductivity, particularly for pressures between 0.01 × 105 Pa and 100 × 105 Pa [63].

The impact of radiation on the overall thermal conductivity of aerogels can be substantial from ambient conditions to high temperatures (above 200°C) due to their low absorption for the infrared [10]. Radiative conductivity can be calculated by [60] where is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, is the mean index of refraction of aerogel, is the absolute temperature, is the mass specific extinction coefficient, and is the density of aerogel.

It is worthwhile to note that there is an alternative approach to evaluate the effective thermal conductivity of silica aerogel . It uses a concept where the heat transfer mechanisms are radiation and a combined solid and gas conduction. The solid and gas thermal conductivity is developed based on a periodic structure, whilst the radiative conductivity is calculated using the diffusion approximation theory and the Rosseland equation [58, 64, 65].

The common techniques to measure the thermal conductivities of silica aerogels are hot-wire probe [69], hot disk thermal constant analysers [70], and heat-flux meters [71] or using a laser-flash apparatus [72]. However, in these techniques, the heat distribution across the aerogel under study is not uniform. Zeng et al. [73] suggested a way out where a thin-film heater made of a 10 nm thick gold film can be used to disperse the heat evenly. Table 2 summarizes the different approaches to predict the thermal conductivity of silica aerogels.

ModelAuthorStructure representationMethodComments

EmpiricalLu et al. [60]
Wang et al. [67]
IgnoredVolume average as a function of density or porosityCannot be applied for aerogels with different microstructures

Analytical Wei et al. [10]
Lu et al. [65]
Wei et al. [10]
Cubic array of nanospherical structure Standard equivalent circuit method Cannot represent the randomness and complexity of aerogels
Jun-Jie et al. [66]3D random DLCA structureStandard equivalent circuit with improved analytical parallel-series modelDoes not require any empirical parameters as input

Numerical Spagnol et al. [68]
Zhao et al. [12]
Von Koch snowflake fractal structure and random DLCA structure Finite volume method based on the mesh division3D calculations are time consuming

3.2. Optical Properties

The transparency and translucency appearances of aerogels are primarily due to Raleigh scattering, which occurs when the heterogeneities in the solid gel network are much smaller than the wavelength of visible light. The amount of light scattered from an aerogel is dependent on these structural inhomogeneities which in turn can be controlled during the supercritical extraction which dictates the spatial arrangements of the gel network. Rayleigh scattering is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength, that is, the shorter the wavelength of the light, the more it scatters. Therefore, when an aerogel tile is placed against a dark background, it appears slightly bluish and demonstrates a yellowish coloration when exposed to bright surroundings [74, 75]. The second source of light scattering in the visible range is due to micrometer-size imperfections of the external aerogel surface which accounts for the blurry appearance of objects viewed through a piece of aerogel [76]. On the other hand, the scattering efficiency is a function of the size of the scattering center. Thus different wavelengths will scatter with varying magnitudes. Scattering is observed to be intensified when the size of the scattering center becomes similar to the wavelength of the incident light [76, 77]. As the wavelength increases and the spectrum shifts towards the infrared range, scatterings become less significant. This phenomenon permits heat radiation to pass through the aerogel thereby increasing its thermal conductivity [78]. Many times, the optical properties of aerogels are related with their thermal properties, especially when a transparent thermal insulation system is demanded. A number of studies have been undertaken to optimize the transparency of silica aerogel without sacrificing its thermal conductivity. Danilyuk et al. [79] found that monolithic aerogel prepared using the two-step sol-gel method is more transparent than the one synthesized through the one-step approach. Venkateswara Rao and Pajonk [80] added methyltrimethoxysilane(MTMS) as a coprecursor to produce monolithic durable hydrophobic silica aerogels with high direct optical transmittance and low diffusion of light. Adachi et al. [81] synthesized new tiles of silica aerogels by adding a new chemical solvent, dimethylformamide (DMF), to improve the optical transparency in the refractive index range, . The transmission length exceeded 40 mm at 400 nm wavelength which was twice the value obtained in a previous study [82]. Bhagat et al. showed that when low density TEOS-based silica aerogels is prepared using methanol as a solvent in combination with TEOS in a two-step sol-gel process, the optical transmission is improved to some extent [83]. On the contrary, if opacity is preferred, aerogel can be rendered opaque by integrating carbon or mineral powders into its structure which will absorb the infrared and hence reducing the radiation heat transfer [8486].

From the early age, transparent silica aerogel has been promoted as a hypervelocity particle capture for outer-space explorations because of its capacity of allowing easy detection of cosmic debris through its framework. Recently, Woignier et al. [87] investigated the effect of TEOS concentration and the addition of ammonia as a base catalysis on the optical transmission within the visible spectrum. It was found that aerogels with a higher concentration of TEOS have a wider transmission window than that with a lower TEOS concentration which affirms poor transparency in the visible range. When ammonia is added in the aerogel process, the transmission is extraordinarily enhanced in the visible range.

Another imperative optical property of silica aerogels is the index of refraction. It has been proven that the index of refraction, , increases with increasing density such that where (k gm−3) is the bulk density of aerogel [1].

It can therefore be anticipated that the refractive index for silica aerogel is very close to one, literally meaning that when light enters an aerogel, there is no reflective losses. A practical application which exploits this property is the Cherenkov detector which necessitates a medium with a refractive index close to one [88].

3.3. Mechanical Properties

Silica aerogels are known to be characteristically fragile and brittle because of the interparticle connections within the pearl-necklace-like fractal network, making them inapt for load bearing applications. Numerous investigations have been carried out to appreciate and characterize their mechanical properties, as shown in Table 3. Standard methods to characterize the silica aerogel mechanically include ultrasonic techniques, three-point bending, and uniaxial compression. The atomic force microscopy (AFM) is now commonly employed because of its capability of measuring the local elastic property of aerogels with only a small loading force. Concurrently, efforts are being concerted to improve the mechanical strength of aerogels by the addition of a second phase. One approach is through incorporating silica fibres into the aerogels. Tests have indicated that when 10% by weight of these fibres are introduced, the elastic modulus and strength are increased by 85% and 26%, respectively [89]. In addition, the compressive modulus and tensile strength of aerogels can be improved by three and five times correspondingly, if 5% by weight of carbon nanofibres are implemented into the lattice structure [90]. Liquid-phase cross-linking, vapor-phase cross-linking, fibre reinforcing, and reduced bonding can enhance the mechanical properties of aerogel as well [80, 91, 92]. X-aerogels have been proven to improve considerably the fractal properties of native aerogels under both quasi-static [43, 9397] and high-impact loading conditions [98, 99]. While their strength is superior to silica aerogels, their elasticity and flexibility properties are yet to be tailored for advanced aerospace applications such as structural components and thermal protection for small satellites, spacecraft, planetary vehicles, and habitats. Several cross-linking schemes to mechanically reinforce aerogels have been discussed in details in [100]. It is noteworthy to state that polymer reinforcement decreases the surface area of the silica aerogel by about half without altering the thermal conductivity radically [100].


Experimental Arvidson and Scull [111]Young’s modulus, proportional limit, and yield strengthA concentric, overlapping-cylinder, capacitance extensometer is used to measure the strain
Gronauer et al. [112]Young’s modulus Sound velocity measurements
Woignier and Phalippou [113]Young’s modulus, fracture strength, and toughnessThree-point flexural and three-point bending
Gross et al. [114]Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratioUltrasonic and static compression
Scherer et al. [115]Bulk modulusMercury porosimetry
Parmenter and Milstein [89]Hardness, compression, tension and shear on unreinforced and fiber-reinforced aerogelsVickers and Knoop hardness test, four-point bending, and a displacement-controlled Instron 1123 testing machine
Stark et al. [116]Young’s modulusAtomic force microscopy
Moner-Girona et al. [117]Hardness, Young’s modulus, and elastic parameterMicroindentation measurements using a Nanotest 550 Indenter
Martin et al. [118]Young’s ModulusUniaxial compression and acoustic velocity
Perin et al. [119]Elastic modulus and internal frictionIsostatic compression
Miner et al. [120]Young’s modulus and nonrecoverable strain for hygroscopic silica aerogelLow-range compression tester
Despetis et al. [121]Subcritical growth domain in hydrophilic silica aerogelDouble-cleavage-drilled-compression test (DCDC)
Takahashi et al. [122]Bending strengthThree-point bending

NumericalYang et al. [123]Creep behavior of ceramic fiber-reinforced silica aerogel Scanning electron microscope
Hasmy et al. [124]Wave-vector-dependent scattered intensity Cubic DLCA fractal structure model
Rahmani et al. [125]Densities of states and dynamic structure factors 3D cubic DLCA fractal structure model
Yang et al. [123]Creep behavior of ceramic fiber-reinforced silica aerogelPower-law creep model

Probably, the most notable application of silica aerogel in astronautics is to capture extraterrestrial materials. This is primarily because it does not constitute elements of great cosmochemical significance as well as inorganic contaminants and secondly owing to its grandiosity in trapping particles with high velocities. Yet, researchers are continually experimenting on this nanomaterial to improve its physical properties to develop a flawless kinetic shock absorber. Most of the time, the modification is made during the synthesis process as the aerogel mechanical characteristics highly depend on its bulk density [101, 102].

The mechanical and thermal properties of density-gradient aerogels for outer-space hypervelocity particle capture were analyzed by Du et al. (see Figure 3) [103]. Aerogels with densities ranging from 40 to 175 mg/cm3 were prepared using a tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and ethanol-water solution as the precursor and hydrofluoric acid as the catalyst via a supercritical drying sol-gel process. Layer-by-layer gelation, sol cogelation, and gradient-sol cogelation methods were used to prepare the density-gradient aerogels. The dynamic mechanical test showed that the Young’s moduli of the aerogels at −100°C and 25°C tend to decrease with decreasing the density with values from 4.6 × 105 to 1.9 × 105 Pa and from 5.0 × 105 to 2.1 × 105 Pa, respectively. The thermal analysis indicated that the thermal diffusion coefficients and the specific heat capacities decrease with decreasing the densities while the thermal conductivities do not change monotonically.

One weakness of aerogel as a hypervelocity capture particle could be its crack propagation which can eventually destroy the entire aerogel lattice when exposed for a long period of time. This is induced by the syneresis effect which is the continuation of the hydrolysis and condensation reactions after gelling which leads to the gel shrinkage [87, 101]. Hwang et al. observed a 10% linear shrinkage caused by syneresis during the gelation and aging procedures [104]. Woignier et al. [87] investigated the influence of the synthesis variables on the shrinkage of aerogel during preparation and delivered a good correlation on the mechanical properties with an aim to acquire an optimized aerogel for outer-space applications. It was revealed that the linear shrinkage decreases with the TEOS concentration and with increasing pH of hydrolysis solution. In addition, both elastic modulus and rupture strength of aerogels rise with a higher concentration of TEOS and hence density.

4. Astronautical Applications of Silica Aerogels

4.1. Hypervelocity Particle Capture

The preliminary studies conducted at the laboratory where unmolten remnants of silicate and aluminum projectiles were fired at high speed, 7 km/s, immediately indicated the superiority of aerogel as a hypervelocity particle capture compared to traditional dense collector media, including those exposed on the long-duration exposure facility (LDEF). The defects in these conventional collectors were their persistent melting, if not complete vaporization, which prevented any projectiles to be adhered. Hence, no analysis was possible. Researchers anticipated that this kinetic energy absorption characteristic to aerogel would boost the discoveries of extraterrestrial objects in low-Earth orbit [105].

Soon after, in September 1992, aerogels were sent on the Space Transport System (STS-47) to analyse their ability as a hypervelocity particle capture medium and endurance during launch and reentry. Five thermal insulated end covers were installed on the top of the Shuttle Get Away Special (GAS) payload canisters to hold the Sample Return Experiment (SRE) of capture cells equipped with panels of silica aerogel with dimensions of 10 cm × 10 cm × 1 cm and densities of the order 20 mg/mL. Each GAS SRE provided a net total capture surface area of 0.165 m2. The aerogels successfully survived the launch and reentry and returned without any apparent damages. Generally, the capability of a hypervelocity particle capture is evaluated by how fast it can decelerate the high-velocity impacted particles without destroying the latter while being trapped. At least four large hypervelocity particles were captured during this preliminary mission. Later on, more than two dozens of particles were caught from STS-60 and many from others such GAS canisters [106]. One of them was the orbital debris collection experiment on Mir.

Deployed on STS-76 on March 25, 1996, and directed by Langley Research Center, the Mir Environmental Effects Package (MEEP) was equipped with an Orbital Debris Collector (ODC) made up of approximately 0.63 m2 of highly porous low-density (0.02 g/cm3) silica aerogel arranged in two identical trays, Tray 1 pointing into the ram direction while Tray 2 in the opposite direction, to collect both man-made and natural hypervelocity particles in the low-Earth orbit. The ODC was then recuperated by STS-86 after 18 months at the Johnson Space Center.

A wide range of impacts, for example, coorbing flakes, human waste materials, and cosmic dust, were extracted from the aerogel collector to analyse their compositions using SEM-EDS and TEM, and henceforth their potential origins were suggested. Two primary classes of hypervelocity impact features were revealed: long, carrot-shaped tracks and shallow pits with typical length to diameter () of 20–40 and 0.5–5, respectively. The majority were carrot-shaped tracks coming from laboratory impacts, including the presence of trapped projectile residues at their stations while the pits did not contain any measurable residues and laboratory analog due to the high impact velocities causing melting or vaporization of the projectiles. Features of intermediate morphologies between these two boundaries suggested the existence of a transitional and evolution of sequence. The third group was shallower and irregular impact tracks with aspect ratio, , formed by low-velocity impacts of coorbiting flakes and liquid droplets, all human waste products, and the result of wastewater dumps. However, aerogel could not yield reliable dynamic data for each particle, including chronological information about the collisions. Nevertheless, the unique ability of aerogel to preserve and trap unmolten residues at relatively high velocities in low-Earth orbit was confirmed compared to traditional nonporous media; those threshold velocities for vaporization were much smaller than aerogel [105, 107].

The most successful aerogel-related mission that has unveiled many scientific discoveries is probably the Stardust Mission. Launched from the Kennedy Space Center in 1999, the function of the mission was to carry a hypervelocity particle collector which would meet up with a known outer solar system body (Comet 81P/Wild 2) to capture coma samples and interstellar dust to be brought on Earth for laboratory analysis [108110].

The collector, a “tennis-racket”-shaped metal frame, consisted of two grids facing in opposite direction, each of them containing one hundred and thirty cells of silica aerogel of different volumes (see Figure 4) [127]. One grid had cubes of dimensions approximately 4 cm × 2 cm × 3 cm to capture cometary particles, whilst the other grid contained aerogel tiles with dimensions 4 cm × 2 cm × 1 cm to seize interstellar materials [56]. When collection was required, the collector was detached from the protective sample return (SRC) and exposed. Compared to the missions stated above, the aerogel created for that assignment had a continuous gradient density profile, starting from 10 mg/cm3 at the impact surface to a higher value at the bottom depending on the type of the grid. The maximum densities were 50 mg/cm3 and 20 mg/cm3 for the cometary grid and interstellar grid, respectively. It was already recognized that the density depends on the ratio of the condensable silica of the solvent used in the aerogel precursor solution. That concept was exploited when the precursor solution for low-density aerogel was steadily mixed with the precursor solution density aerogel while constantly pumping the resultant mixture into a gradient density silica aerogel [128]. It could be anticipated that other density-dependent characteristics such as thermal, optical, acoustic, and dielectric of aerogel would vary as per the gradient profile [129]. The latter would prevent the nanopores of the silica aerogel from being damaged by the microscale particles. When the high-speed particles hit the aerogel, they first bumped into the low-density aerogel and, as they penetrated, the density of the aerogel increased simultaneously slowing them down. The kinetic energy was converted into mechanical and thermal energy, which in the end brought the speed to zero [130].

After the rendezvous with the comet in 2004, the collector was withdrawn to the SRC to protect the samples. Two years later, the Stardust capsule reemerged into the Earth’s atmosphere and landed successfully in Utah. Once again, aerogel proved its superiority of withstanding transition from atmospheric pressure to vacuum of space without any damage though the fact that it is brittle. This is due to the open-cell framework of aerogel which allows interstitial gases to flow out. The pathways of the impacted projectiles were clear and hence analysed since aerogel is transparent. Figure 5 shows that the comets had entered on the right-hand side and finally stopped through in the aerogel. These particles were the first materials obtained from a specified celestial body other than the Moon and were extracted delicately using a high-speed vibrating glass needle [131]. The discovery involved mainly high- and low-temperature minerals and unknown organics, leaving behind a deduction by the scientists at the Johnson Space Center that the constituents of comets were much more complex than other extraterrestrial objects, such as meteorites. Interstellar dusts were also found and extracted but none were able to be recognized [132135]. On February 14, 2011, a recycle version of Stardust, called Stardust-NExT, was sent into the space to analyse another comet, Tempel 1, which was previously visited during the Deep Impact mission in 2005 [136]. However, the primary objective of Stardust-NExT was to obtain high-resolution pictures of the nucleus using the NAVCAM camera for further analysis. The mission was successful [137, 138].

In 2003, another mission was proposed based on a similar concept as the Stardust Mission of capturing sample in the outer space, known as the Sample Collection of the Investigation of Mars mission (SCIM). It was levelled as a low-budget and low-risk program. This Mars Scout mission was designated to fly while collecting suspended dust through the upper Martian atmosphere in a silica aerogel collector which would then be directed back to the Earth to be analysed [139]. The dissimilarity between Stardust Mission and SCIM is that the latter needed to fly into the atmosphere which would cause substantial heating to the spacecraft during the capture of high speed particles. To overcome this problem, the silica aerogel collectors would be located at the aft end of the aeroshell where heat is minimal. The results of the preliminary experiments showed that the majority of the hypervelocity particles captured had preserved their physical and chemical features [140]. This mission was however precluded and was proposed again in 2006 which was again declined over the technology of Stardust. Jones investigated other potential aerogel-based collectors, for example, carbon, alumina, titania, germenia, zirconia, and niobia because of the abundance of silicate mineral present in our solar system [56]. In addition, the Raman spectrometer was proven to be a handful tool for the identification of the impact particles in aerogel [141].

Some years back, an operation known as the Material Exposure and Degradation Experiment (MEDET) was initiated in accord with ONERA, ESA, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES), and the University of Southampton to investigate the effects of the complex low-Earth orbit space environment on material properties and material degradation due to contamination while measuring the local microparticle flux. The MEDET suite was installed on board the European Technology Exposure Facility (EuTEF). The module was launched by the STS-122 on February 7, 2008 and retrieved by the STS-128 on September 11, 2009 [142, 143]. Aerogel was opted again as a passive detector to capture the micrometeoroids and orbital debris particles. Two transparent tiles of silica aerogels of size 30 × 25 × 45 mm3 were prepared via a sol-gel process followed by supercritical drying. The resulting bulk density was 0.087 ± 0.004 g/cm3. An expansive series of impacted particles including metals, glass, and mixed oxides ranging from one to several microns was extracted from the aerogels. A study is ongoing to analyze these matter, as mentioned by Woignier et al. [87].

During the capture process of a particle, a significant amount of its kinetic energy is converted to thermal energy thereby altering or destroying its structure. Recently, a study was carried out by Jones et al. [144] to measure the temperatures experienced by hypervelocity particles during their capture in aerogels. Aggregate projectiles made up of magnetic submicron hematite were employed. The concept used was when these particles are heated above their Curie temperature (675°C) during the penetration, they lose their magnetism. Hence, the particles were fired at different velocities to acquire different temperatures upon seizure in the aerogels. Their magnetizations were then observed using an atomic and magnetic force microscopy along with an electron paramagnetic resonance. It was found that the heating of these fine particles aggregates highly depends on the location in the capture track where they come to rest. The particles which were fired with velocities up to 6.6 km/s were still magnetic. Silica aerogel, with its highly porous and transparent characteristics, remains the ideal material for hypervelocity particle capture.

4.2. Thermal Insulation

NASA extended its research on aerogel in the field of thermal insulation because of its extremely low conductivity. Silica aerogel was firstly used as an insulator on the Mars Rover, Sojourner, as part of the Pathfinder mission in 1997. The aerogel was packed in composite boxes, called Warm Electronics Boxes (WEBs), to protect the primary battery pack of the Alpha Particle X-Ray Spectrometer (APXS) from extremely low temperatures. The operational range of the battery was set to be between −40°C to +40°C each day with a limit of +55°C for not more than five hours. A value of 21°C was successfully achieved [145]. Being efficacious, aerogel was chosen again in the Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity in 2003. Additional devices were installed in these robots, for example, Radioisotope Heater Units (RHUs) which would induce extra heat [146]. To avoid heat dissipation, aerogel was placed as a barrier to sustain a temperature variation of up to 100°C between the Martial day and night when the temperature is approximately +20°C and −99°C, respectively.

To increase the performance of the silica aerogel as an insulator, its composition was modified by doping graphite with necessary alteration in the drying process to ensure no cracking and shrinking [147]. Consequently, the transparent silica aerogel was converted into an opaque aerogel thereby inhibiting significant heat radiation thus minimizing its total heat transport. The aerogels were then shaped into relatively large panels. The two geologists, Spirit and Opportunity, were designated for a three-month operation, but the former roamed nearly seven years until March 2010 covering a total distance of 7.7 km. Opportunity, on the other hand, is still on the Martial soil and just began her in situ science investigation at “Whitewater Lake” with a Microscopic Imager (MI) mosaic, followed by the placement of the APXS [148]. The objective of the mission is to search for water on the Planet Mars [149]. Aerogel is therefore illustrated as an ultralight insulation material which not only resists relatively large temperature fluctuation but also has endurance in harsh environments.

In consequence, silica aerogels are being studied to be used in space suits which require materials with specific specifications to ensure the safety of astronauts in the harsh dust and extreme pressure and temperature conditions [150]. The actual extravehicular mobility unit (EMU) is divided into five classes of layers as shown in Figure 6. The first inner layer ensures that the pressure of the suit is maintained and it is made of polyurethane-coated nylon which is in turn protected from any external pressures by the fabric-restraining dacron layer. The remaining layers form the thermal micrometeoroid garment (TMG) which primarily provide thermal and micrometeoroid protection. The TMG liner is a neoprene-coated nylon ripstop above the MLI layer consisting of five to seven laminates made of low conductivity aluminized mylar reinforced with nylon scrim spacers. The MLI has an overall low thermal conductivity due to the low radiation absorptivity and high emissivity on its surface and low heat conductance between the laminates. The outer orthofabric sustains tear and wear protections in addition. The present TMG is operative only in hard vacuum milieu such as low orbit and the moon where radiation heat transfer is the predominant mechanism. In the existence of an atmosphere, likewise on Mars, the MLI is ineffective due to the presence of the interstitial gases which errand convection and conduction cooling.

The performance of different potential fibrous materials were reviewed for possible space suit applications to overcome this problem [151]. It has been found that, to provide sufficient insulation, the MLI requires an effective thermal conductivity of 5 mW/mK. The 4DG fiber and aerogel interstitial void medium combination gave the best insulation performance amongst other systems with a nominal thermal conductivity of 7.5 mW/mK. This configuration consists of a high interstitial void fraction with heat flux perpendicular to the fibers. Nevertheless, aerogel is still regarded as a capable insulation material to insulate future space suits.

In spacecraft, the accumulation of dense air, ice, water, and liquefied air within the insulation materials is of primary concern. This phenomenon is known as cryopumping. It affects the function of the insulator and therefore degrades the performance of the vehicle by increasing the heat transfer through the insulation material which increases the lift-off weight and the potential risk for damaging debris. Aerogel has been considered as a potential candidate to act as a heat shield in these cryogenic systems such as liquid-hydrogen (LH2) tanks and liquid-oxygen (LO2) feedlines because of its fully breathable and hydrophobic characteristics [152]. Furthermore, experiments in [153] have shown that liquid nitrogen (LN2) can be prevented from accumulating within the intertank of the space shuttle by using an insulation system consisting of a bulk-fill aerogel material. The key phases to assess the performance of cryogenic insulation systems are at lift-off and reentry into the atmosphere when there are sudden changes in temperature and pressure. For example, at re-entry, the temperature of the vehicle is over thousand degrees Celsius while the LH2 and LO2 are essential to be retained below −253°C and −183°C, respectively in order to remain in the liquid form [154].

A wide variety and permutations of aerogel blankets manufactured by Aspen Aerogel Inc. and aerogel beads from Cabot Corporation have been characterized using insulation test cryostats at the Cryogenics Test Laboratory of NASA Kennedy Space Center. It was noticed that cyropumping effects were stopped beyond thermal stabilization [155]. Using these superinsulation materials, lightweight and robust vehicles can be designed which will ensure the safety of the operations.

Strangely, a manned mission to Mars has been proposed which is expected to last for nearly three years. For this, a human friendly architectural design has been planned and silica aerogel has been selected to provide the necessary thermal insulation for the floors, walls, and windows. The conceptual design requires that a thin flexible aerogel with low thermal conductivity be used which makes Spaceloft a probable choice [156].

4.3. Cryogenic Fluid Containment

A third function of silica aerogel is to act as cryogenic fluid containment. This idea was proposed in 2004 when engineers were working on the Satellite Test of the Equivalence Principle (STEP) mission. The satellite was to be sent into the earth orbit to probe the underlying foundation of Einstein's theory, the (local) equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass [157]. The test masses and detectors were required to sustain stability from disturbances such as air drag, magnetic field, and solar pressure in order to obtain precise results [158]. This could be achieved by placing the measurement instruments in a Dewar containing liquid helium maintained at cryogenic temperatures. Silica aerogel, being highly porous and an open-cell material, was recognized to be an excellent container to store the liquid helium while simultaneously preventing any bulk flow to occur. The liquid helium coming out of the aerogel would be directed to the spacecraft thrusters along the time of the mission. An aerogel control tide was built in for the helium storage system [159]. The aerogel was firstly shaped in annular cylinders to be encircled around the cylinders inside which was the equipment. Later, it was suggested to shape the aerogel into parts, into trapezoids [56], rather than one annular cylinder to facilitate its assembly into any desired structure. The presence of aerogel in the Dewar gave rise to some doubts. One of which was whether the aerogel filled with liquid helium would survive a launch vibration environment. A test was carried out and it was found that there were no signs of damage and degradation. The STEP mission was not launched though; instead NASA selected the 2003 SMEX. The technology was however applied with success on the Gravity Probe B mission. Nonetheless, there is still an optimistic vision of bringing aerogel on STEP someday.

5. Evaluation of Silica Aerogels in Aeronautics

According to the Federal Aviation Regulations, Section 25.856(a), thermal and acoustical insulation should be provided by the same material while being simultaneously a fire retardant. This applies primarily for the fuselage and the current material is fiberglass batting. To hold the fiberglass in place and to protect it against contamination, insulation covers are wrapped around [160]. The common plastic covers are polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinyl fluoride (PVF), and silicone-coated fiberglass for high temperature environment. Silica aerogel, being a superinsulation material and an acoustic shock-absorber, can be therefore considered as a thermal/acoustical insulator for this task. But a more realistic way to employ aerogel would be by exploiting its remarkable properties separately for thermal insulation, fire protection, and acoustics purposes in different parts of the aircraft.

5.1. Thermal Barrier

The justification of considering silica aerogel as a thermal barrier is due to its favorable characteristics in operating temperatures, longevity, chemical (aviation fuels and lubricants) and erosion resistance, and maintenance. A simpler and lighter overall design of the thermal insulation system can be achieved which will consequently reduce the assembly cost as fewer materials are needed. More space will be available for other usages. There will be a rise in the energy efficiency because of the minimization of heat loss and hence fuel will be saved. That is, the direct operating cost will also decrease. Considering, an aeroengine, silica aerogel can be applied in two modes, depending on the temperature and environment requirements. Firstly, it could be sprayed as a thin insulative coating to protect unattainable and uneven substrate from high temperatures. The smooth and uniform layer of insulation will cause little resistance to the airflow. The thermal responses will be improved which will in turn increase the performance of the engine while the aircraft is cruising at high altitude. Secondly, in compartments where the vibration is high, flexible light-weight blankets of silica aerogel with custom thickness can be used. They can be fastened mechanically to prevent any displacing hence interferences problems. Contrary to coatings, blankets are more resistant to contaminations and do not disintegrate easily. Their maintenance cost is also lower than that of coatings.

5.2. Fire Retardation

The fact of being an inorganic and inflammable material with a continuous operating temperature ranging from −273°C to 650°C and a high melting point of 1400°C makes silica aerogel an excellent firewall compared to the existing combustible organic coatings that cause toxic fumes when burning. The components such as pipes, wires, and electronic accessories within the fire zones of an aeroengine can be protected using thin blankets of aerogel whilst simultaneously enabling weight saving compared to conventional metal sheets. Similarly, the adjacent airframe structures will be prevented from being burnt. Aspen Aerogels has investigated on such applications where the insulation blanket made of silica aerogel with a thickness of 7 mm was exposed to a flame at temperature 1100°C for at least 15 minutes (see Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). The temperature on the cold side did not exceed 150°C. Both the fire testing and the outcomes are in accordance with FAR Part 25.1191 [160] and AC 20–135 [161]. However, the product, Pyrogel 6350, has not been commercialized for aeronautical applications until now [162]. In addition, the thermal loss when the blankets are under constant vibration and gravitational stress through repeated thermal cycles is still unknown.

5.3. Acoustics

Sound waves are significantly absorbed through silica aerogels thus reducing the speed of propagation to 100 m/s. This is due to their extremely low Young modulus which is related to the synthesis of the aerogel, more precisely, the interstitial gas type, pressure, and density [163, 164]. Silica aerogel is now acknowledged as a promising material for acoustic matching layers of high-sensitivity airborne ultrasonic transducers for boosting of airborne acoustic waves [165]. Experiments were carried out using different sol-gel densities of aerogels to observe the effect of the speed of sound through the aerogels. It was found that the sensitivity of a matching layer type of ultrasonic transducer (ML-UT) could reach twenty times higher than that of a conventional one. The aerogel ultrasonic transducer can be therefore incorporated into future aeronautical sensing systems for range findings. Acoustical insulation in aircraft using aerogel can also be considered based on its acoustic absorption. Forest and Gibiat found that the minimum transmission loss in granular aerogel can be 10 dB higher than that of fibreglass with the same thickness [166].

5.4. Cost Analysis

The main limitation of preventing silica aerogel from commercially integrating into the aviation sector is its high cost. Is it worth now to spend on such an expensive material for space saving and lighter weight? Can there be a linear relationship between space saving and cost saving? American Airlines claimed for having saved $422 million in operating costs through fuel savings in 2011 [167]. One way to achieve this is by reducing the take-off weight, for example, by removing unnecessary items from the aircraft. In consequence, about 1 million of jet fuel gallons can be saved which would sum up to an amount of approximately $3.63 M annually [168]. Up to now, the actual leading companies for mass production of silica aerogel are the North American-based industrials Cabot Corporation and Aspen Aerogels. Both of which are apprehensive with thermal insulation. The former produces silica aerogels mainly in the form of granules under the Trademark Nanogel, whilst the second one concentrates on flexible blankets, registered as Cryogels, Pyrogels, and Spaceloft. Recently, there has been Nano Hi-Tech in China which is considered to be the third player followed by some other relatively small manufacturers like EM-Power (Korea), AIRGLASS AB, and the German ROCKWOOL. Despite the existing market competition, it remains difficult to compensate the price of silica aerogel for other beneficial factors. On the other hand, it is reported that a reduction up to 80% can be attained in the manufacturing cost of Maerogel. A performance-cost comparison between fibreglass, conventional silica aerogel, and Maerogel is shown below. A performance-cost comparison between fiberglass, conventional silica aerogel, and Maerogel is displayed in Table 4.

MaterialThermal conductivity (W/mK)Acoustic absorption (dB)Average cost (US$)

Fiberglass0.0345–0.0040~50.2–2.8/m2 [126]
Monolithic silica aerogel0.0136–0.0038~153800/m3 [126]
Monolithic Maerogel0.0200–0.099~15~750–900/m3

6. Conclusions

Based on the above literature, it can be said that the fundamental synthesis-structure-property relationships of aerogels are now comprehended in the research community after eighty years of tremendous efforts. Different cost-effective manufacturing methods have been developed along the time to promote the commercialization of silica aerogels in various high-tech areas. In the aerospace industry, the capture effectiveness of silica aerogel as a kinetic energy absorber is already considered to be superior whilst its potential as a thermal insulator shows great promise for applications ranging from cryogenic temperatures in spacecraft to high temperatures in aeroengines. The feasibility tests of insulating space suits with aerogel show that a lower thermal conductivity is required and yet to be achieved. Silica aerogel as a fiber-reinforced blanket has efficaciously fulfilled the necessary criteria of the Federal Aviation Regulations for fire retardation in aeroengines while a profound study is still required for acoustical applications in aircraft. With the reinforcement using polymers, the mechanical properties of silica aerogels can be tailored to meet the specifications of future astronautical applications. Often in such cases, the success of the mission is more significant than the budget. However, for aeronautical implementations, the introduction of silica aerogels is questionable based on the current market manufacturing cost and the current performance of the existing materials. Maerogel, which is an ecological and green-technology material, has been proposed as a promising substitute due its relatively low cost and comparable properties with the conventional silica aerogels.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.


The first author wishes to express his appreciation to the Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia for their financial support.


  1. J. Fricke and T. Tillotson, “Aerogels: production, characterization, and applications,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 297, no. 1-2, pp. 212–223, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. Fricke and A. Emmerling, “Aerogels—recent progress in production techniques and novel applications,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 1–3, pp. 299–303, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  3. M. Schmidt and F. Schwertfeger, “Applications for silica aerogel products,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 225, no. 1–3, pp. 364–368, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  4. G. Herrmann, R. Iden, M. Mielke, F. Teich, and B. Ziegler, “On the way to commercial production of silica aerogel,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 186, pp. 380–387, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. K. Akimov, “Fields of application of aerogels,” Pribory i Tekhnika Eksperimenta, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 5–19, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  6. A. C. Pierre and G. M. Pajonk, “Chemistry of aerogels and their applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. 4243–4265, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. A. M. Mulder and J. G. Lierop, “Preparation, densification and characterization of autoclave dried SiO2 gels,” in Aerogels, J. Fricke, Ed., pp. 68–75, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  8. L. W. Hrubesh, “Aerogels: the world's lightest solids,” Chemistry and Industry, no. 24, pp. 824–827, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. R. Hostler, A. R. Abramson, M. D. Gawryla, S. A. Bandi, and D. A. Schiraldi, “Thermal conductivity of a clay-based aerogel,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 665–669, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. Wei, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, F. Yu, and X. Du, “Thermal conductivities study on silica aerogel and its composite insulation materials,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 54, no. 11-12, pp. 2355–2366, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Wei, Y. Liu, X. Du, and X. Zhang, “Gaseous conductivity study on silica aerogel and its composite insulation materials,” Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 134, no. 4, Article ID 041301, 5 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J.-J. Zhao, Y.-Y. Duan, X.-D. Wang, and B.-X. Wang, “A 3-D numerical heat transfer model for silica aerogels based on the porous secondary nanoparticle aggregate structure,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 358, no. 10, pp. 1287–1297, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J.-J. Zhao, Y.-Y. Duan, X.-D. Wang, and B.-X. Wang, “An analytical model for combined radiative and conductive heat transfer in fiber-loaded silica aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 358, no. 10, pp. 1303–1312, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. S. Kistler, “Coherent expanded aerogels and jellies,” Nature, vol. 127, no. 3211, p. 741, 1931. View at: Google Scholar
  15. S. S. Kistler, “Coherent expanded aerogels,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 52–64, 1932. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. S. Kistler, “The relation between heat conductivity and structure in silica aerogel,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 79–85, 1935. View at: Google Scholar
  17. Stardust. NASA, January 2013,
  18. S. S. Kistler and A. G. Caldwell, “Thermal conductivity of silica aerogel,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, vol. 26, pp. 658–662, 1934. View at: Google Scholar
  19. C. E. Carraher Jr., “General topics,” Polymer News, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 62–64, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  20. G. M. Pajonk, “Some applications of silica aerogels,” Colloid and Polymer Science, vol. 281, no. 7, pp. 637–651, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. J. Teichner and G. A. Nicoloan, “Method of preparing inorganic aerogels,” US patent no. 3,672,833, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  22. S. J. Teichner, G. A. Nicolaon, M. A. Vicarini, and G. E. E. Gardes, “Inorganic oxide aerogels,” Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 245–273, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  23. G. Poelz and R. Riethmüller, “Preparation of silica aerogel for Cherenkov counters,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 195, no. 3, pp. 491–503, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  24. Airglass AB, January 2013,
  25. P. H. Tewari and A. J. Hunt, “Process for forming transparent aerogel insulating arrays,” US patent no. 4,610,863, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  26. P. H. Tewari, A. J. Hunt, and K. D. Lofftus, “Ambient-temperature supercritical drying of transparent silica aerogels,” Materials Letters, vol. 3, no. 9-10, pp. 363–367, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  27. T. Woignier and J. Phalippou, “Skeletal density of silica aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 17–21, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  28. R. W. Pekala, “Organic aerogels from the polycondensation of resorcinol with formaldehyde,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 3221–3227, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. M. Tillotson and L. W. Hrubesh, “Transparent ultralow-density silica aerogels prepared by a two-step sol-gel process,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 145, pp. 44–50, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. T. Mayer, R. W. Pekala, and J. L. Kaschmitter, “The aerocapacitor: an electrochemical double-layer energy-storage device,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 446–451, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  31. R. W. Pekala, S. T. Mayer, J. L. Kaschmitter, and F. M. Kong, “Carbon aerogels: an update on structure, properties, and applications,” in Sol-Gel Processing and Applications, Y. A. Attia, Ed., pp. 369–377, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  32. D. M. Smith, R. Deshpande, and C. J. Brinker, “Preparation of low-density aerogels at ambient pressure,” in Better Ceramics through Chemistry V, M. J. Hampden-Smith, W. G. Klemperer, and C. J. Brinker, Eds., vol. 271 of MRS Proceedings, pp. 567–572, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  33. S. S. Prakash, C. J. Brinker, A. J. Hurd, and S. M. Rao, “Silica aerogel films prepared at ambient pressure by using surface derivatization to induce reversible drying shrinkage,” Nature, vol. 374, pp. 439–443, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. F. Shi, L. Wang, and J. Liu, “Synthesis and characterization of silica aerogels by a novel fast ambient pressure drying process,” Materials Letters, vol. 60, no. 29-30, pp. 3718–3722, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. T.-Y. Wei, T.-F. Chang, S.-Y. Lu, and Y.-C. Chang, “Preparation of monolithic silica aerogel of low thermal conductivity by ambient pressure drying,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 2003–2007, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. D. Bhagat, Y.-H. Kim, K.-H. Suh, Y.-S. Ahn, J.-G. Yeo, and J.-H. Han, “Superhydrophobic silica aerogel powders with simultaneous surface modification, solvent exchange and sodium ion removal from hydrogels,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 112, no. 1–3, pp. 504–509, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. M. Shewale, A. Venkateswara Rao, A. Parvathy Rao, and S. D. Bhagat, “Synthesis of transparent silica aerogels with low density and better hydrophobicity by controlled sol-gel route and subsequent atmospheric pressure drying,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 285–292, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S.-W. Hwang, T.-Y. Kim, and S.-H. Hyun, “Effect of surface modification conditions on the synthesis of mesoporous crack-free silica aerogel monoliths from waterglass via ambient-drying,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 130, no. 1–3, pp. 295–302, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S.-K. Kang and S.-Y. Choi, “Synthesis of low-density silica gel at ambient pressure: effect of heat treatment,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 35, no. 19, pp. 4971–4976, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. F. Poco, P. R. Coronado, R. W. Pekala, and L. W. Hrubesh, “A rapid supercritical extraction process for the production of silica aerogels,” in Microporous and Macroporous Materials, J. S. Beck, D. R. Corbin, M. E. Davis, L. E. Iton, and R. F. Lobo, Eds., vol. 431 of MRS Proceedings, pp. 297–302, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  41. T. B. Roth, A. M. Anderson, and M. K. Carroll, “Analysis of a rapid supercritical extraction aerogel fabrication process: prediction of thermodynamic conditions during processing,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 354, no. 31, pp. 3685–3693, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. E. Gash, T. M. Tillotson, J. H. Satcher Jr., L. W. Hrubesh, and R. L. Simpson, “New sol-gel synthetic route to transition and main-group metal oxide aerogels using inorganic salt precursors,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 285, no. 1–3, pp. 22–28, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. N. Leventis, C. Sotiriou-Leventis, G. Zhang, and A.-M. M. Rawashdeh, “Nanoengineering strong silica aerogels,” Nano Letters, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 957–960, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. Leventis, S. Mulik, and C. Sotiriou-Leventis, “Crosslinking 3D assemblies of silica nanoparticles (aerogels) by surface-initiated free radical polymerization of styrene and methylmethacrylate,” Polymer Preprints, vol. 48, pp. 950–951, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  45. J. L. Mohanan, I. U. Arachchige, and S. L. Brock, “Porous semiconductor chalcogenide aerogels,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5708, pp. 397–400, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. B. C. Tappan, M. H. Huynh, M. A. Hiskey et al., “Ultralow-density nanostructured metal foams: combustion synthesis, morphology, and composition,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 20, pp. 6589–6594, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. B. Bryning, D. E. Milkie, M. F. Islam, L. A. Hough, J. M. Kikkawa, and A. G. Yodh, “Carbon nanotube aerogels,” Advanced Materials, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 661–664, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. H. Halimaton, “Silica aerogels,” US patent no. 20070276051A1, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  49. Q. Tang and T. Wang, “Preparation of silica aerogel from rice hull ash by supercritical carbon dioxide drying,” The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 91–94, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. T. Li and T. Wang, “Preparation of silica aerogel from rice hull ash by drying at atmospheric pressure,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 398–401, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. Tadjarodi, M. Haghverdi, and V. Mohammadi, “Preparation and characterization of nano-porous silica aerogel from rice husk ash by drying at atmospheric pressure,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2584–2589, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. N. Leventis, N. Chandrasekaran, C. Sotiriou-Leventis, and A. Mumtaz, “Smelting in the age of nano: iron aerogels,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 63–65, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. A. Meador and H. Guo, “Polyimide aerogel thin films,” Patent application LEW-18864-1, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  54. H. Guo, M. A. B. Meador, L. McCorkle et al., “Tailoring properties of cross-linked polyimide aerogels for better moisture resistance, flexibility, and strength,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 5422–5429, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. A. B. Meador, E. J. Malow, R. Silva et al., “Mechanically strong, flexible polyimide aerogels cross-linked with aromatic triamine,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 536–544, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. M. Jones, “Aerogel: space exploration applications,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 2-3, pp. 351–357, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. Fricke, X. Lu, P. Wang, D. Büttner, and U. Heinemann, “Optimization of monolithic silica aerogel insulants,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2305–2309, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  58. J. J. Zhao, Y. Y. Duan, X. D. Wang, and B. X. Wang, “Radiative properties and heat transfer characteristics of fiber-loaded silica aerogel composites for thermal insulation,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 55, no. 19-20, pp. 5196–5204, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. G. R. Cunnington, S. C. Lee, and S. M. White, “Radiative properties of fiber-reinforced aerogel: theory versus experiment,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  60. X. Lu, R. Caps, J. Fricke, C. T. Alviso, and R. W. Pekala, “Correlation between structure and thermal conductivity of organic aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 226–234, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  61. C. Bi and G. H. Tang, “Effective thermal conductivity of the solid backbone of aerogel,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 64, pp. 452–456, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  62. O.-J. Lee, K.-H. Lee, T. Jin Yim, S. Young Kim, and K.-P. Yoo, “Determination of mesopore size of aerogels from thermal conductivity measurements,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 298, no. 2-3, pp. 287–292, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. Y. Duan, J. Lin, X. Wang, and J. Zhao, “Analysis of gaseous thermal conductivity models for silica aerogels,” CIESC Journal, vol. 63, pp. 54–58, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  64. G. Wei, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, and X. Du, “Radiative heat transfer study on silica aerogel and its composite insulation materials,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 362, pp. 231–236, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. G. Lu, X.-D. Wang, Y.-Y. Duan, and X.-W. Li, “Effects of non-ideal structures and high temperatures on the insulation properties of aerogel-based composite materials,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 357, no. 22-23, pp. 3822–3829, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. Z. Jun-Jie, D. Yuan-Yuan, W. Xiao-Dong, and W. Bu-Xuan, “Experimental and analytical analyses of the thermal conductivities and high-temperature characteristics of silica aerogels based on microstructures,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 46, no. 1, Article ID 015304, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. Wang, J. Kuhn, and X. Lu, “Monolithic silica aerogel insulation doped with TiO2 powder and ceramic fibers,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 186, pp. 296–300, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. Spagnol, B. Lartigue, A. Trombe, and V. Gibiat, “Modeling of thermal conduction in granular silica aerogels,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 48, no. 1-2, pp. 40–46, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. D. Haranath, G. M. Pajonk, P. B. Wagh, and A. V. Rao, “Effect of sol-gel processing parameters on thermal properties of silica aerogels,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 129–134, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  70. G.-S. Kim and S.-H. Hyun, “Synthesis of window glazing coated with silica aerogel films via ambient drying,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 320, no. 1–3, pp. 125–132, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. J. F. Poco, J. H. Satcher Jr., and L. W. Hrubesh, “Synthesis of high porosity, monolithic alumina aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 285, no. 1–3, pp. 57–63, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. V. Bock, O. Nilsson, J. Blumm, and J. Fricke, “Thermal properties of carbon aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 233–239, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  73. J. S. Q. Zeng, P. C. Stevens, A. J. Hunt, R. Grief, and D. Lee, “Thin-film-heater thermal conductivity apparatus and measurement of thermal conductivity of silica aerogel,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2311–2317, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. W. C. Wanqing Cao and A. J. Hunt, “Improving the visible transparency of silica aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  75. Q. Zhu, Y. Li, and Z. Qiu, “Research progress on aerogels as transparent insulation materials,” in Challenges of Power Engineering and Environment, K. Cen, Y. Chi, and F. Wang, Eds., pp. 1117–1121, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  76. A. Emmerling, R. Petricevic, A. Beck, P. Wang, H. Scheller, and J. Fricke, “Relationship between optical transparency and nanostructural features of silica aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 240–248, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  77. M. Reim, G. Reichenauer, W. Körner et al., “Silica-aerogel granulate—structural, optical and thermal properties,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 350, pp. 358–363, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. A. J. Hunt, “Light scattering for aerogel characterization,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 225, no. 1–3, pp. 303–306, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  79. A. F. Danilyuk, E. A. Kravchenko, A. G. Okunev, A. P. Onuchin, and S. A. Shaurman, “Synthesis of aerogel tiles with high light scattering length,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 433, no. 1, pp. 406–407, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. A. Venkateswara Rao and G. M. Pajonk, “Effect of methyltrimethoxysilane as a co-precursor on the optical properties of silica aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 285, no. 1–3, pp. 202–209, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. I. Adachi, Y. Ishii, H. Kawai, A. Kuratani, and M. Tabata, “Study of a silica aerogel for a Cherenkov radiator,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 595, no. 1, pp. 180–182, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. I. Adachi, S. Fratina, T. Fukushima et al., “Study of highly transparent silica aerogel as a RICH radiator,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 553, no. 1-2, pp. 146–151, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. S. D. Bhagat, H. Hirashima, and A. Venkateswara Rao, “Low density TEOS based silica aerogels using methanol solvent,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 3207–3214, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. M. A. Worsley, J. H. Satcher, and T. F. Baumann, “Enhanced thermal transport in carbon aerogel nanocomposites containing double-walled carbon nanotubes,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 105, no. 8, Article ID 084316, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. D. Lee, P. C. Stevens, S. Q. Zeng, and A. J. Hunt, “Thermal characterization of carbon-opacified silica aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 186, pp. 285–290, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. J. Kuhn, T. Gleissner, M. C. Arduini-Schuster, S. Korder, and J. Fricke, “Integration of mineral powders into SiO2 aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 186, pp. 291–295, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. T. Woignier, L. Duffours, P. Colombel, and C. Durin, “Aerogels materials as space debris collectors,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 484153, 6 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. T. Sumiyoshi, I. Adachi, R. Enomoto et al., “Silica aerogels in high energy physics,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 225, no. 1–3, pp. 369–374, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  89. K. E. Parmenter and F. Milstein, “Mechanical properties of silica aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 223, no. 3, pp. 179–189, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  90. M. A. B. Meador, S. L. Vivod, L. McCorkle et al., “Reinforcing polymer cross-linked aerogels with carbon nanofibers,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 1843–1852, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. A. V. Rao, M. M. Kulkarni, D. P. Amalnerkar, and T. Seth, “Surface chemical modification of silica aerogels using various alkyl-alkoxy/chloro silanes,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 206, no. 1–4, pp. 262–270, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. A. V. Rao, G. M. Pajonk, S. D. Bhagat, and P. Barboux, “Comparative studies on the surface chemical modification of silica aerogels based on various organosilane compounds of the type R nSiX4-n,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 350, pp. 216–223, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. G. Zhang, A. Dass, A.-M. M. Rawashdeh et al., “Isocyanate-crosslinked silica aerogel monoliths: preparation and characterization,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 350, pp. 152–164, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. N. Leventis, “Three-dimensional core-shell superstructures: mechanically strong aerogels,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 874–884, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. M. A. B. Meador, L. A. Capadona, L. McCorkle, D. S. Papadopoulos, and N. Leventis, “Structure-property relationships in porous 3D nanostructures as a function of preparation conditions: isocyanate cross-linked silica aerogels,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2247–2260, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. A. B. Meador, E. F. Fabrizio, F. Ilhan et al., “Cross-linking amine-modified silica aerogels with epoxies: mechanically strong lightweight porous materials,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1085–1098, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. N. Leventis, S. Mulik, X. Wang et al., “Polymer nano-encapsulation of templated mesoporous silica monoliths with improved mechanical properties,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 354, no. 2–9, pp. 632–644, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. H. Luo, G. Churu, E. F. Fabrizio et al., “Synthesis and characterization of the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of isocyanate-crosslinked vanadia aerogels,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 48, no. 1-2, pp. 113–134, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. H. Luo, H. Lu, and N. Leventis, “The compressive behavior of isocyanate-crosslinked silica aerogel at high strain rates,” Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 83–111, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. J. P. Randall, M. A. B. Meador, and S. C. Jana, “Tailoring mechanical properties of aerogels for aerospace applications,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 613–626, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. P. Etienne, J. Phalippou, T. Woignier, and A. Alaoui, “Slow crack growth in aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 188, no. 1-2, pp. 19–26, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  102. T. Woignier, F. Despetis, A. Alaoui, P. Etienne, and J. Phalippou, “Mechanical properties of gel-derived materials,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 19, no. 1–3, pp. 163–169, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. A. Du, B. Zhou, J.-Y. Gui et al., “Thermal and mechanical properties of density-gradient aerogels for outer-space hypervelocity particle capture,” Acta Physico—Chimica Sinica, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1189–1196, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. S.-W. Hwang, H.-H. Jung, S.-H. Hyun, and Y.-S. Ahn, “Effective preparation of crack-free silica aerogels via ambient drying,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. F. Hoerz, G. Cress, M. Zolensky, T. H. See, R. P. Bernhard, and J. L. Warren, “Optical analysis of impact features in aerogel from the orbital debris collection experiment on the MIR station,” NASA TM-1999-209372, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  106. P. Tsou, “Silica aerogel captures cosmic dust intact,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 186, pp. 415–427, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. F. Hörz, M. E. Zolensky, R. P. Bernhard, T. H. See, and J. L. Warren, “Impact features and projectile residues in aerogel exposed on Mir,” Icarus, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 559–579, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. H. A. Ishii, J. P. Bradley, Z. R. Dai et al., “Comparison of comet 81P/Wild 2 dust with interplanetary dust from comets,” Science, vol. 319, no. 5862, pp. 447–450, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. D. E. Brownlee, P. Tsou, K. L. Atkins et al., “Stardust: finessing expensive cometary sample returns,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 39, no. 1–4, pp. 51–60, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  110. D. E. Brownlee, P. Tsou, J. D. Anderson et al., “Stardust: comet and interstellar dust sample return mission,” Journal of Geophysical Research E, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 1–15, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  111. J. M. Arvidson and L. L. Scull, “Compressive properties of silica aerogel at 295, 76, and 20 K,” in Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Materials, R. P. Reed and A. F. Clark, Eds., pp. 243–250, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  112. M. Gronauer, A. Kadur, and J. Fricke, “Mechanical and acoustic properties of silica aerogel,” in Aerogels, J. Fricke, Ed., pp. 167–173, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  113. T. Woignier and J. Phalippou, “The aerogel glass conversion,” Revue de Physique Appliquée, vol. 24, pp. 179–184, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  114. J. Gross, G. Reichenauer, and J. Fricke, “Mechanical properties of SiO2 aerogels,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1447–1451, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. G. W. Scherer, D. M. Smith, X. Qiu, and J. M. Anderson, “Compression of aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 186, pp. 316–320, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. R. W. Stark, T. Drobek, M. Weth, J. Fricke, and W. M. Heckl, “Determination of elastic properties of single aerogel powder particles with the AFM,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 161–169, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. M. Moner-Girona, E. Martínez, A. Roig, J. Esteve, and E. Molins, “Mechanical properties of silica aerogels measured by microindentation: influence of sol-gel processing parameters and carbon addition,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 285, no. 1–3, pp. 244–250, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. J. Martin, B. Hosticka, C. Lattimer, and P. M. Norris, “Mechanical and acoustical properties as a function of PEG concentration in macroporous silica gels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 285, no. 1–3, pp. 222–229, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. L. Perin, A. Faivre, S. Calas-Etienne, and T. Woignier, “Nanostructural damage associated with isostatic compression of silica aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 333, no. 1, pp. 68–73, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. M. R. Miner, B. Hosticka, and P. M. Norris, “The effects of ambient humidity on the mechanical properties and surface chemistry of hygroscopic silica aerogel,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 350, pp. 285–289, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. F. Despetis, P. Etienne, and S. Etienne-Calas, “Subcritical crack growth in silica aerogel,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 344, no. 1-2, pp. 22–25, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. R. Takahashi, S. Sato, T. Sodesawa, T. Goto, K. Matsutani, and N. Mikami, “Bending strength of silica gel with bimodal pores: effect of variation in mesopore structure,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1148–1156, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. X. Yang, Y. Sun, and D. Shi, “Experimental investigation and modeling of the creep behavior of ceramic fiber-reinforced SiO2 aerogel,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 358, no. 3, pp. 519–524, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. A. Hasmy, M. Foret, E. Anglaret, J. Pelous, R. Vacher, and R. Jullien, “Small-angle neutron scattering of aerogels: simulations and experiments,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 186, pp. 118–130, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. A. Rahmani, P. Jund, C. Benoit, and R. Jullien, “Numerical study of the dynamic properties of silica aerogels,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 13, no. 23, pp. 5413–5426, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. Alibaba, January 2013,
  127. Stardust. NASA, January 2013,
  128. J.-Y. Gui, B. Zhou, Y.-H. Zhong, A. Du, and J. Shen, “Fabrication of gradient density SiO2 aerogel,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 470–475, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. S. M. Jones, “A method for producing gradient density aerogel,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 255–258, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. G. Domínguez, A. J. Westphal, S. M. Jones, and M. L. F. Phillips, “Energy loss and impact cratering in aerogels: theory and experiment,” Icarus, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 613–624, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. H. A. Ishii, G. A. Graham, A. T. Kearsley, P. G. Grant, C. J. Snead, and J. P. Bradley, “Rapid extraction of dust impact tracks from silica aerogel by ultrasonic microblades,” Meteoritics and Planetary Science, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1741–1747, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  132. G. J. Flynn, P. Bleuet, J. Borg et al., “Elemental compositions of comet 81P/wild 2 samples collected by stardust,” Science, vol. 314, no. 5806, pp. 1731–1735, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. S. A. Sandford, J. Aléon, C. M. O. Alexander et al., “Organics captured from comet 81P/wild 2 by the stardust spacecraft,” Science, vol. 314, no. 5806, pp. 1720–1724, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. M. E. Zolensky, T. J. Zega, H. Yano et al., “Mineralogy and petrology of comet 81P/Wild 2 nucleus samples,” Science, vol. 314, no. 5806, pp. 1735–1739, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. K. D. McKeegan, J. Aléon, J. Bradley et al., “Isotopic compositions of cometary matter returned by stardust,” Science, vol. 314, no. 5806, pp. 1724–1728, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. M. F. A'Hearn, M. J. S. Belton, W. A. Delamere et al., “Deep impact: excavating comet tempel 1,” Science, vol. 310, no. 5746, pp. 258–264, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. T. E. Economou, S. F. Green, D. E. Brownlee, and B. C. Clark, “Dust flux monitor instrument measurements during Stardust-NExT Flyby of Comet 9P/Tempel 1,” Icarus, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 526–539, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  138. J. Veverka, K. Klaasen, M. A’Hearn et al., “Return to Comet Tempel 1: overview of Stardust-NExT results,” Icarus, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 424–435, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  139. L. A. Leshin, A. Yen, J. Bomba et al., “Sample collection for investigation of mars (SCIM): An early mars sample return mission through the mars scout program,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Lunar Planetary Institute, 2002, abstract no. 1721. View at: Google Scholar
  140. L. A. Leshin, B. C. Clark, L. Forney et al., “Scientific benefit of a mars dust sample capture and earth return with SCIM,” in Proceedings of the 34th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, Lunar Planetary Institute, 2003, abstract no. 1288. View at: Google Scholar
  141. M. J. Burchell, J. A. Creighton, M. J. Cole, J. Mann, and A. T. Kearsley, “Capture of particles in hypervelocity impacts in aerogel,” Meteoritics and Planetary Science, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 209–221, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  142. A. Tighe, S. Gabriel, D. Goulty et al., “Materials exposure and degradation experiment (MEDET),” in Proceedings of the Conference and Exhibit on International Space Station Utilization, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  143. V. Rejsek-Riba, V. Inguimbert, S. Duzellier, C. Pons, M. Crepel, and A. P. Tighe, “Spectrometers results of material exposure and degradation experiment onboard international space station,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. S. M. Jones, M. S. Anderson, G. Dominguez, and A. Tsapin, “Thermal calibrations of hypervelocity capture in aerogel using magnetic iron oxide particles,” Icarus, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. H. Eisen, L. Wen, G. Hickey, and D. Braun, “Sojourner mars rover thermal performance,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Systems, 1998, SAE paper no. 981685. View at: Google Scholar
  146. K. S. Novak, C. J. Phillips, G. C. Birur, E. T. Sunada, and M. T. Pauken, “Development of a thermal control architecture for the mars exploration rovers,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Thermophysics in Microgravity; Commercial/Civil Next Generation Space Transportation, Human Space Exploration, pp. 194–205, American Institute of Physics, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  147. G. Hickey, “Thermal insulation for Mars surface exploration,” NASA TRS 97-0683, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  148. Opportunity. NASA, January 2013,
  149. Mars Rovers. NASA, January 2013,
  150. L. Trevino and E. Orndoff, “Advanced space suit insulation feasibility study,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Systems, pp. 913–920, American Institute of Physics, Tucson, Ariz, USA, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  151. H. L. Paul and K. R. Diller, “Comparison of thermal insulation performance of fibrous materials for the advanced space suit,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 639–647, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. J. E. Fesmire, “Aerogel insulation systems for space launch applications,” Cryogenics, vol. 46, no. 2-3, pp. 111–117, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. J. E. Fesmire and J. P. Sass, “Aerogel insulation applications for liquid hydrogen launch vehicle tanks,” Cryogenics, vol. 48, no. 5-6, pp. 223–231, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  154. Basics of Space Flight, January 2013,
  155. B. E. Coffman, J. E. Fesmire, S. White, G. Gould, and S. Augustynowicz, “Aerogel blanket insulation materials for cryogenic applications,” in Proceedings of the Joint Cryogenic Engineering and International Cryogenic Materials Conferences, pp. 913–920, American Institute of Physics, Tucson, Ariz, USA, July 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. J. Kozicki and J. Kozicka, “Human friendly architectural design for a small Martian base,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 1997–2004, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. T. J. Sumner, J. Anderson, J.-P. Blaser et al., “STEP (satellite test of the equivalence principle),” Advances in Space Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 254–258, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. P. Worden, R. Torii, J. C. Mester, and C. W. F. Everitt, “The step payload and experiment,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1205–1208, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  159. P. W. Worden, “STEP payload development,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 259–267, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. FARS, 14 CFR 25.1191: Firewalls, U.S Government Printing Office, 2001,
  161. FAA AC 20-135—Powerplant Installation and Propulsion System Component Fire Protection Test Methods, Standards and Criteria, Federal Aviation Administration, 1990,
  162. Aspen Aerogels, January 2013,
  163. J. Fricke, “Aerogels—highly tenuous solids with fascinating properties,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 100, no. 1–3, pp. 169–173, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  164. L. Forest, V. Gibiat, and T. Woignier, “Evolution of the acoustical properties of silica alcogels during their formation,” Ultrasonics, vol. 36, no. 1–5, pp. 477–481, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  165. H. Nagahara, T. Suginouchi, and M. Hashimoto, “Acoustic properties of nanofoam and its applied air-borne ultrasonic transducers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp. 1541–1544, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  166. L. Forest, V. Gibiat, and A. Hooley, “Impedance matching and acoustic absorption in granular layers of silica aerogels,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 285, no. 1–3, pp. 230–235, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  167. Smartplant, “American Airlines flies past fuel conservation goal,” 2012, View at: Google Scholar
  168. American Airlines, “Fuel Smart,” January 2013, View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Nadiir Bheekhun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are experiencing issues with article search and journal table of contents. We are working on a fix as to remediate it and apologise for the inconvenience.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.