Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 268930, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/268930
Research Article

A 3D Osteoblast In Vitro Model for the Evaluation of Biomedical Materials

1Post-Graduation Program on Dentistry, Fluminense Federal University, 22245-100 Niterói, RJ, Brazil
2Clinical Research Unit, Antônio Pedro Hospital, Fluminense Federal University, 22245-100 Niterói, RJ, Brazil
3Post-Graduation Program on Science and Biotechnology, Fluminense Federal University, 22245-100 Niterói, RJ, Brazil
4Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Institute of Biology, Fluminense Federal University, 22245-100 Niterói, RJ, Brazil

Received 29 September 2015; Revised 2 December 2015; Accepted 6 December 2015

Academic Editor: Massimiliano Barletta

Copyright © 2015 Luciana Restle et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. M. Morais, F. Papadimitrakopoulos, and D. J. Burgess, “Biomaterials/tissue interactions: possible solutions to overcome foreign body response,” The AAPS Journal, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 188–196, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. P. C. Salgado, P. C. Sathler, H. C. Castro et al., “Bone remodeling, biomaterials and technological applications: revisiting basic concepts,” Journal of Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 318–328, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. W. F. Zambuzzi, P. G. Coelho, G. G. Alves, and J. M. Granjeiro, “Intracellular signal transduction as a factor in the development of ‘Smart’ biomaterials for bone tissue engineering,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1246–1250, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. International Organization for Standardization, “Biological evaluation of medical devices—part 1: evaluation and testing within a risk management process,” ISO 10993-1:2009, International Organization for Standardization, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  5. C. T. Hanks, J. C. Wataha, and Z. Sun, “In vitro models of biocompatibility: a review,” Dental Materials, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 186–193, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. A. Cortês, E. Mavropoulos, M. Hausen, A. Rossi, J. M. Granjeiro, and G. G. Alves, “Methodological implications on quantitative studies of cytocompatibility in direct contact with bioceramic surfaces,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 493-494, pp. 325–330, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. Torricelli, M. Fini, G. Giavaresi, and R. Giardino, “In vitro models to test orthopedic biomaterials in view of their clinical application in osteoporotic bone,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 658–663, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Pampaloni, E. G. Reynaud, and E. H. K. Stelzer, “The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 839–845, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. T. Elliott and F. Yuan, “A review of three-dimensional in vitro tissue models for drug discovery and transport studies,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 59–74, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. M. Nelson and M. J. Bissell, “Modeling dynamic reciprocity: engineering three-dimensional culture models of breast architecture, function, and neoplastic transformation,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 342–352, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. M. Sutherland, “Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: the multicell spheroid model,” Science, vol. 239, no. 4849, pp. 177–184, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. M. Sutherland, J. A. McCredie, and W. R. Inch, “Growth of multicell spheroids in tissue culture as a model of nodular carcinomas,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 113–120, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Neunzehn, S. Heinemann, and H. P. Wiesmann, “3-D osteoblast culture for biomaterials testing,” Journal of Developmental Biology and Tissue Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. A.-C. Tsai, Y. Liu, X. Yuan, and T. Ma, “Compaction, fusion, and functional activation of three-dimensional human mesenchymal stem cell aggregate,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 21, no. 9-10, pp. 1705–1719, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. S. Burns, P. L. Rasmussen, K. H. Larsen, H. D. Schrøder, and M. Kassem, “Parameters in three-dimensional osteospheroids of telomerized human mesenchymal (Stromal) stem cells grown on osteoconductive scaffolds that predict in vivo bone-forming potential,” Tissue Engineering—Part A, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2331–2342, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. W. Wang, K. Itaka, S. Ohba et al., “3D spheroid culture system on micropatterned substrates for improved differentiation efficiency of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 2705–2715, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. S. Lourenço, J. Côrtes, J. Costa, A. Linhares, and G. Alves, “Evaluation of commercial latex as a positive control for in vitro testing of bioceramics,” Key Engineering Materials, vol. 631, pp. 357–362, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. International Organization for Standardization, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity, International Organization for Standardization, 2009.
  19. EN-ISO-10993-12, “Biological evaluation of medical devices—part 12: sample preparation and reference materials,” ISO 10993-12:2008, vol. 3, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  20. P. E. Murray, C. García Godoy, and F. García Godoy, “How is the biocompatibilty of dental biomaterials evaluated?” Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. E258–266, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. T.-M. Achilli, J. Meyer, and J. R. Morgan, “Advances in the formation, use and understanding of multi-cellular spheroids,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1347–1360, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Alcaide, M.-C. Serrano, J. Roman et al., “Suppression of anoikis by collagen coating of interconnected macroporous nanometric carbonated hydroxyapatite/agarose scaffolds,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 793–800, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. L. Luebke-Wheeler, G. Nedredal, L. Yee, B. P. Amiot, and S. L. Nyberg, “E-cadherin protects primary hepatocyte spheroids from cell death by a caspase-independent mechanism,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1281–1287, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. X. Zhang, L.-H. Xu, and Q. Yu, “Cell aggregation induces phosphorylation of PECAM-1 and Pyk2 and promotes tumor cell anchorage-independent growth,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 9, article 7, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. F. Steuer and R. C. Ting, “Formation of larger cell aggregates by transformed cells: an in vitro index of cell transformation,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1279–1280, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. Zahir and V. M. Weaver, “Death in the third dimension: apoptosis regulation and tissue architecture,” Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Stahl, X. Wu, A. Wenger, M. Klagsbrun, and P. Kurschat, “Endothelial progenitor cell sprouting in spheroid cultures is resistant to inhibition by osteoblasts: a model for bone replacement grafts,” FEBS Letters, vol. 579, no. 24, pp. 5338–5342, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Cormio, K. Turjanmaa, M. Talja, L. C. Andersson, and M. Ruutu, “Toxicity and immediate allergenicity of latex gloves,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 618–623, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. B. L. Charous, C. Blanco, S. Tarlo et al., “Natural rubber latex allergy after 12 years: recommendations and perspectives,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 31–34, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus