Research Article  Open Access
Effect of Nitrogen Content on Hot Deformation Behavior and Grain Growth in Nuclear Grade 316LN Stainless Steel
Abstract
316LN stainless steel with 0.08%N (08N) and 0.17%N (17N) was compressed at 1073–1473 K and 0.001–10 s^{−1}. The hot deformation behavior was investigated using stressstrain curve analysis, processing maps, and so forth. The microstructure was analyzed through electron backscatter diffraction analysis. Under most conditions, the deformation resistance of 17N was higher than that of 08N. This difference became more pronounced at lower temperatures. The strain rate sensitivity increased with increasing temperature for types of steel. In addition, the higher the N content, the higher the strain rate sensitivity. Hot deformation activation energy increased from 487 kJ/mol to 549 kJ/mol as N concentration was increased from 0.08% to 0.17%. The critical strain for initiation of dynamic recrystallization was lowered with increasing N content. In the processing maps, both power dissipation ratio and unstable region increased with increasing N concentration. In terms of microstructure evolution, N promoted dynamic recrystallization kinetic and decreased dynamic recrystallization grain size. The grain growth rate was lower in 17N than in 08N during heat treatment. Finally, it was found that N favored twin boundary formation.
1. Introduction
316LN stainless steel containing a low C content has good stress corrosion resistance. The addition of N induces excellent high temperature mechanical properties. Therefore, 316LN stainless steel is widely used in the energy industries and is one of the candidate structural materials for fast breeder reactors [1, 2].
N content has significant influences on the microstructure and properties of 316LN stainless steel. In terms of chemical properties, critical pitting potential increases with the increase in nitrogen content from 0.07% to 0.22% in type 316LN stainless steel in a millannealed condition [3]. Nitrogen alloying enriched the chromium within the passive film [4]. In terms of mechanical properties, the steady state creep rate decreased significantly with increasing nitrogen content [5, 6], and a similar phenomenon was also found in impression creep tests [7, 8]. When the N content was no more than 0.14%, 316LN stainless steel with higher N content showed better crack growth resistance at ambient [9] and high temperature [10]. In terms of microstructure evolution, the temperature of the onset of dynamic strain aging in 316LN steel with 0.22%N is 773 K, while that in 316LN with 0.078%N is found to be 673 K [11]. The dislocation structure changed from cellular to planar with increasing N content from 0.04% to 0.1% during low cycle fatigue tests at 873 K [12].
A few of the reports concerned the hot working characteristics. Grain size was reduced from 100 μm to 47 μm when the nitrogen concentration was increased from 0.04% to 0.10% after hot rolling and heat treatment at 1373 K [12]. Tendo et al. [13] found that, in the CrNi steel with similar chemical composition with 316LN stainless steel, the flow resistance is higher in 0.25%N containing steel than that in 0.05% steel. It can be inferred that N content could affect the hot working behavior of 316LN stainless steel. The deformation parameter in [12, 13] is single and the effect of N content on these properties may not be monotonic, as observed in the investigation of creep [6] and fatigue properties [9] of 316LN stainless steel with notch specimens.
The hot deformation behaviors of high nitrogen (N > 0.5%) CrMn austenitic stainless steel with different N contents were investigated extensively [14–16]. However, the effect of N content on the hot working characteristics of CrNi austenitic stainless steel (N < ~0.3%) has not been addressed systematically. Therefore, the hot working characteristics and grain growth behaviors of 316LN steels with 0.08%N and 0.17%N were investigated in the temperature range of 1073–1473 K and strain rate range of 0.001–10 s^{−1}. The aim of this study is to reveal the N content effect and to optimize the chemical composition.
2. Experimental Materials and Procedure
316LN stainless steels were melted in an arc furnace and then refined and cast in a vacuum environment. The principal difference between these two alloys is the percentage of nitrogen, as shown in the chemical compositions listed in Table 1.

After forging, slabs with dimensions of 40 × 40 mm were cut and rolled at 1273 K. The cumulative deformation was approximately 1. The rolled slabs were held at 1373 K for 10–30 min, resulting in a homogenized microstructure with average grain size of 80 μm for 08N and 17N. Hot compression specimens (10 × 16 mm) were machined parallel to the rolling direction. Hot compression tests were conducted on a Gleeble3500 thermal/mechanical simulator. Graphite foil was used as a lubricant between the specimen and compression dies. Specimens were preheated at a rate of 10 Ks^{−1} to 1073–1473 K. Thereafter, compression tests were performed at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 s^{−1}. Specimens were deformed to a strain of 0.8 and then quenched immediately in water. To investigate the grain growth behavior, some rolled slabs were cut and then held at 1473 K for 5–300 min.
Deformed specimens were sectioned parallel to the direction of compression. The observation area was situated in the center of the specimen. Heat treated specimens were also cut along the center. The sectioned specimens were ground using 100–1200 grit SiC paper followed by polishing with 3, 1, and 0.5μm oilbased diamond slurries. Final electrical polishing was conducted in a solution consisting of 20 mL HNO_{3} and 80 mL methanol at 20 V and −30°C. The microstructures were observed using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis with TSLOIMAnalysis software. The spatial resolution was 1–3 μm and the misorientation detection limit was 1°. The crystal orientation maps displayed highangle grain boundaries (misorientation ≥ 15°, shown as black lines) and twin boundaries (shown as white lines). The grain boundary profile and differences in crystallographic orientation of the specimens after the hot compression or the heat treatment tests were plotted as inverse pole figure maps.
3. Experimental Results and Analysis
3.1. Flow Behaviors
The flow curves of 316LN steels with different N content obtained at 0.001–10 s^{−1} and 1073–1473 K are shown in Figure 1. Under most conditions, the flow stress of 17N is higher than that of 08N. This difference becomes more pronounced at lower temperatures. At 1473 K, their flow curves almost coincide with each other.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
The character of dynamic recrystallization (DRX) is more obvious for 17N; that is, stress rises to a maximum at a peak strain and then diminishes to a value intermediate between the yield stress and the peak stress (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). This may be induced by the lower stacking fault energy of 17N, which favors DRX. In Figure 1(a), 08N shows a continuous hardening behavior at 0.001 s^{−1}. This phenomenon disappears at higher strain rate conditions, which may be caused by flow instability [16] and/or deformation heat [17].
According to [18], the relationship between strain rate sensitivity and strain for 08N and 17N in the temperature range 1073–1473 K can be obtained through further processing of the strainstress data, as shown in Figure 2. The strain rate sensitivity is increased with increasing temperature for both 08N and 17N. It is worth noting that the higher the N content, the higher the strain rate sensitivity.
3.2. Hot Deformation Equation
The relationship between the peak stress, the deformation temperature, and the strain rate (i.e., hot deformation equation) can be described as the classical hyperbolic sine function (1) when the metal is deformed at elevated temperature. Consider the following:where and are material constants, which are independent of deformation temperature, is the stress exponent, is a hot deformation activation energy, is the gas constant, is the absolute temperature, and is the static stress, or peak stress, or the stress for a given strain. In this work, the peak stress is taken. According to [19], through linear regression, average values of every parameter can be obtained, as shown in Figures 3 and 4. The hot deformation equation of 08N and 17N can be expressed as (2) and (3), respectively. Consider the following:
Obviously, the of 316LN stainless steel increases from 487 kJ/mol to 549 kJ/mol as N concentration is increased from 0.08% to 0.17%.
The ZenerHollomon parameter ( parameter), known as the temperature modified strain rate, is widely used to characterize the combined effect of strain rate and temperature on the deformation process, as shown in the following:
Substituting the values into (4), we obtain
3.3. Critical Strain for Initiation of DRX
Poliak et al. [20, 21] found that the initiation of DRX is associated with the point of inflection in the curve of strain hardening rate versus flow stress . The simplest equation, which has an inflection point, fits the experimental  data from zero until the peak stress iswhere and , , , and are constants for a given set of deformation conditions. On taking partial derivatives of (6), then
The minimum point of this secondorder equation corresponds to the critical stress; that is, . Based on , the critical strain () for initiation of DRX can be read from the strainstress data. The dependence of on is shown in Figure 5. There is a linear relationship between and :
It can be seen that the critical strain for initiation of DRX was lowered with increasing N content.
3.4. Processing Maps
The theoretical basis and methods for hot processing maps to be established have been described in detail earlier by Prasad and Sasidhara [22]. A workpiece deformed under hot working conditions can be considered to be a power dissipator. The strain rate sensitivity index for determining the distribution between the system power dissipation caused by viscousplastic deformation and that caused by structural changes, wherein the ratio of power dissipation due to structural changes in the deformation process is denoted by (known as power dissipation ratio), indicates how efficiently the material dissipates energy under microstructural changes. It can be defined as
This parameter varies with deformation temperature and strain rate. The power dissipation map can be obtained based on the values of under different conditions. The following shows the flow instability criteria:
Flow instabilities are predicted to occur when is negative. The instability map may be superimposed on the power dissipation map to obtain a processing map. Processing maps for the tested steels, developed at different strains, are shown in Figure 6.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Contour numbers represent the percent efficiency of dissipation and the shaded region corresponds to flow instability in Figure 6. The power dissipation ratios of 08N and 17N both increase with increasing temperature and decreasing strain rate (lower condition). Flow instability regions are localized at higher conditions. For 08N, the power dissipation ratio has not changed significantly with strain. However, the dissipation of 17N increases with increasing strain and is higher than that of 08N at a given condition. In addition, the flow instability region is larger in 17N than that in 08N.
The higher power dissipation ratio indicates that 17N favors DRX. This is consistent with the shapes of their flow curves (Figure 1). Furthermore, the critical strain for the initiation of DRX in Section 3.3 is based on the flow data, which does not concern the possible flow instability. Therefore, the larger unstable region in 17N might be the reason why the critical strain points are much dispersed (Figure 5).
3.5. Deformed Microstructure
Figure 7 shows the microstructure of 316LN steels with different N contents deformed at 1273 K and 0.1 s^{−1}. It can be seen that a small amount of DRX grains forms around parent grains in Figure 7(a), that is, necklace structure [23]. In Figure 7(b), the DRX extent is larger than that in Figure 7(a). Obviously, N promotes the DRX process. This is consistent with the result in Figure 5.
(a)
(b)
Figure 8 shows the microstructure of 316LN steel with different N contents deformed at 1473 K and 0.001 s^{−1}. Full DRX has occurred under both N content conditions. It is very interesting to note that the DRX grain size is finer in Figure 8(b) than that in Figure 8(a). That is to say, DRX grain size decreases with increasing N content.
(a)
(b)
3.6. Grain Growth
Figure 9 shows the microstructure of 316LN steel with different N contents heat treated at 1473 K for 60 min. It can be seen that the grain size in Figure 9(a) (08N) is larger than that in Figure 9(b) (17N). A lot of twin boundaries exist in both specimens. It seems that the specimen with high N content contains more twin boundaries.
(a)
(b)
The misorientation angle distributions of these two specimens are shown in Figure 10. Obviously, the fractions of twin boundary in both specimen are beyond 0.4. It is notable that the twin boundary fraction increases with increasing N content. In grain boundary engineering, it is believed that these special boundaries can dramatically improve the chemical and mechanical properties of metallic materials. Therefore, one can infer that the effect of N content on twin boundary fraction is of practical interest in grain boundary engineering. It should be pointed out that a few of low angle grain boundaries may be induced by specimen preparation in Figure 9.
The grain size of 316LN steel after heat treatment at 1473 K for 5–300 min was measured using the liner interception method. The results of the measurements are shown in Figure 11. The initial grain sizes are about 20 μm in both types of steel. After holding at 1473 K for 30 min, their size can reach to about 200 μm. Obviously, in the whole treatment process, the grain growth rates are higher in 08N specimen than in 17N steel. In the further work, more quantitative studies will be done. In addition, the effect of N content on the DRX mechanism, flow instability mechanism, and hot ductility will also be investigated in the future.
4. Conclusions
(1)Under most conditions, the flow stress of 17N was higher than that of 08N. This difference became more pronounced at lower temperatures.(2)The strain rate sensitivity was increased with increasing temperature for both 08N and 17N. The higher the N content, the higher the strain rate sensitivity.(3)Hot deformation activation energy increased from 487 kJ/mol to 549 kJ/mol as N concentration was increased from 0.08% to 0.17%.(4)The critical strain for initiation of DRX was lowered with increasing N content. N increased the power dissipation ratio and the unstable region.(5)N promoted DRX kinetic and decreased DRX grain size.(6)N restrained the grain growth rate during heat treatment. N favored twin boundary formation.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The project is supported by the Natural Science FoundationSteel and Iron Foundation of Hebei Province (E2013203110) and the Foundation for Young Scholars in Yanshan University (14LGA004).
References
 N. S. Bharasi, K. Thyagarajan, H. Shaikh et al., “Effect of flowing sodium on corrosion and tensile properties of AISI type 316LN stainless steel at 823 K,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 377, no. 2, pp. 378–384, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. J. Pawel, “Assessment of cavitationerosion resistance of 316LN stainless steel in mercury as a function of surface treatment,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 343, no. 1–3, pp. 101–115, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Poonguzhali, M. G. Pujar, and U. K. Mudali, “Effect of nitrogen and sensitization on the microstructure and pitting corrosion behavior of AISI type 316LN stainless steels,” Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1170–1178, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J.B. Lee and S.I. Yoon, “Effect of nitrogen alloying on the semiconducting properties of passive films and metastable pitting susceptibility of 316L and 316LN stainless steels,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 194–199, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. D. Mathew, K. Laha, and V. Ganesan, “Improving creep strength of 316L stainless steel by alloying with nitrogen,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 535, pp. 76–83, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Ganesan, J. Ganesh Kumar, K. Laha, and M. Mathew, “Notch creep rupture strength of 316LN SS and its variation with nitrogen content,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 254, pp. 179–184, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. D. Mathew and D. Vijayanand, “Impression creep behavior of 316LN stainless steel,” Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 492–497, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Naveena, V. D. Vijayanand, V. Ganesan, K. Laha, and M. D. Mathew, “Evaluation of the effect of nitrogen on creep properties of 316LN stainless steel from impression creep tests,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 552, pp. 112–118, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. N. Babu, B. S. Dutt, S. Venugopal et al., “Fatigue crack growth behavior of 316LN stainless steel with different nitrogen contents,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 55, pp. 718–721, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 W.Y. Maeng and M.H. Kim, “Comparative study on the fatigue crack growth behavior of 316L and 316LN stainless steels: effect of microstructure of cyclic plastic strain zone at crack tip,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. V. P. Reddy, R. Sandhya, M. Valsan, K. B. S. Rao, and S. Sankaran, “Strain controlled fatigue deformation and fracture of nitrogen alloyed 316LN austenitic stainless steel,” Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, vol. 63, no. 23, pp. 505–510, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. W. Kim, “Influence of nitrogeninduced grain refinement on mechanical properties of nitrogen alloyed type 316LN stainless steel,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 420, no. 1–3, pp. 473–478, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Tendo, Y. Tadokoro, K. Suetsugu, and T. Nakazawa, “Effects of nitrogen, niobium and molybdenum on strengthening of austenitic stainless steel produced by thermomechanical control process,” ISIJ International, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 262–267, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y.P. Lang, Y. Zhou, F. Rong, H.T. Chen, Y.Q. Weng, and J. Su, “Hot working of high nitrogen austenitic stainless steel,” Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 45–49, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. M. Hong, J. Shi, L. Y. Sheng, W. C. Cao, W. J. Hui, and H. Dong, “Effects of hotworking parameters on microstructural evolution of high nitrogen austenitic stainless steel,” Materials & Design, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 3711–3717, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. H. Wang, W. T. Fu, S. H. Sun, H. Li, Z. Q. Lv, and D. L. Zhao, “Mechanical behavior and microstructural change of a high nitrogen crmn austenitic stainless steel during hot deformation,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1025–1032, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S.P. Tan, Z.H. Wang, S.C. Cheng, Z.D. Liu, J.C. Han, and W.T. Fu, “Hot deformation behavior of Super304H austenitic heat resistant steel,” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K.D. Woo, S.W. Kim, C.H. Yang, T. P. Lou, and Y. Miura, “Effects of grain size on high temperature deformation behavior of Al—4Mg—0.4Sc alloy,” Materials Letters, vol. 57, no. 1314, pp. 1903–1909, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. F. Medina and C. A. Hernandez, “General expression of the ZenerHollomon parameter as a function of the chemical composition of low alloy and microalloyed steels,” Acta Materialia, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 137–148, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. I. Poliak and J. J. Jonas, “Initiation of dynamic recrystallization in constant strain rate hot deformation,” ISIJ International, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 684–691, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Najafizadeh and J. J. Jonas, “Predicting the critical stress for initiation of dynamic recrystallization,” ISIJ International, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1679–1684, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. V. R. K. Prasad and S. Sasidhara, Hot Working Guide: A Compendium of Processing Maps, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, USA, 1st edition, 1997.
 D. Ponge and G. Gottstein, “Necklace formation during dynamic recrystallization: mechanisms and impact on flow behavior,” Acta Materialia, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Mingwei Guo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.