Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2015 / Article / Tab 8

Research Article

Shear Strengthening Performance of Hybrid FRP-FRCM

Table 8

Comparisons between the existing experimental results and proposed model.

ReferenceSpecimen IDType of bondType of fiber
(%)(kN)(kN)(kN)(kN)(kN)

[4]SB-GTSG0.297146.348.0260.27216.60.68
UW-GTUG0.297180.248.0260.27216.60.83
SB-CT1SC0.229155.548.0260.27216.60.72
UW-CT1UC0.229151.848.0260.27216.60.70
SB-CT2SC0.516245.448.0260.27216.61.13
UW-CT2UC0.516253.448.0260.27216.61.17

[10]Beam 4UG0.096294.053.2535.5943.37264.41.11

[11]TRA1SP0.135188.731.8234.5531.47195.70.96
TRA2UP0.034170.431.8238.8116.10173.50.98
TRB1SP0.202279.131.8238.8147.02235.31.19
TRB2SP0.202191.731.8238.8139.47220.20.87
TRB3UP0.095191.931.8238.8122.87187.01.03
TRB4UP0.095200.031.8238.8127.37196.01.02
TRB5UP0.095199.831.8238.8127.37196.01.02

[14]BS2SB0.19582.719.9619.679.11.05
BS3SB0.19583.519.9619.679.11.06
BS4SB0.39088.719.9619.679.11.12
BS5SB0.39092.519.9619.679.11.17

Mean0.99

Coefficient of variation0.16

Note. S = side-bonding; U = U-jacketing; G = glass; C = carbon; P = PBO; B = basalt.