Photocatalytic Performance of Carbon Monolith/TiO<sub>2</sub> Composite

Maletić, Marina; Vukčević, Marija; Kalijadis, Ana; Laušević, Zoran; Laušević, Mila

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/803492

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results and Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 803492 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/803492

Photocatalytic Performance of Carbon Monolith/TiO₂ Composite

Marina Maletić,¹Marija Vukčević,²Ana Kalijadis,³Zoran Laušević,³and Mila Laušević²

Academic Editor: Antonio Riveiro

Received24 Feb 2015

Accepted08 Jun 2015

Published16 Jun 2015

Abstract

The new and simple approach for deposition of catalytically active TiO₂ coating on carbon monolith (CM) carrier was presented. CM photocatalysts were impregnated with TiO₂ using titanium solution and thermal treatment, and their photocatalytic activity was investigated in the process of methylene blue (MB) photodegradation. For the purpose of comparison, CM composite photocatalysts were prepared by dip-coating method, which implies binder usage. The presence of TiO₂ on CM carrier was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. The sorption characteristics of CM and the role of adsorption in the overall process of MB removal were evaluated through amount of surface oxygen groups obtained by temperature-programmed desorption and specific surface area determined by BET method. CM has shown good adsorption properties toward MB due to high amount of surface oxygen groups and relatively high specific surface area. It was concluded that photocatalytic activity increases with CM disc thickness due to increase of MB adsorption and amount of deposited TiO₂. Good photocatalytic activity achieved for samples obtained by thermal treatment is the result of better accessibility of MB solution to the TiO₂ particles induced by binder absence.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the mobilization of pollutants in the environment becomes a serious concern due to the increased industrial activities and effluents discharge into environment. Most of these effluents contain toxic substances, especially organic pollutants such as drugs, pesticides, and organic dyes. The presence of these pollutants in the environment is of a major concern because of their toxicity, threat to humans and other form of life. Therefore, it is essential to find the optimal method for removing the organic pollutants from the environment, especially from water. Several methods, such as combined photo-Fenton and biological oxidation, advanced oxidation processes, aerobic degradation, biodegradation, coagulation, nanofiltration, ozonation, adsorption, and heterogeneous photocatalysis [1–4], have been developed for the removal of organic pollutants from water and liquid waste. Recently, more attention is paid to photocatalytic degradation as an effective method for removal of these pollutants. Much work on the TiO₂-mediated heterogeneous photocatalysis as a successful and convenient alternative to the conventional methods for the treatment of wastewater containing organic pollutants has been reported so far [1]. Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) has advantages over other photocatalysts, such as good stability, high activity, little harmfulness to humans, easy availability, and low cost [5, 6]. Therefore, titanium dioxide is photocatalysts of choice for degradation of drugs, pesticides, organics dyes, and air pollutants [7–9]. For photocatalytic applications and water treatment, catalyst is usually dispersed in aqueous solution and used in slurry reactors. But this type of reactors has a major drawback: the catalyst particles must be separated from the liquid phase which involves a time and energy consuming process. To avoid the filtration/separation and catalyst recovery steps, the active phase is anchored on a suitable support and used in fixed or fluidized bed reactors [10, 11]. Different materials can be used as catalytic carrier for TiO₂ in the photocatalytic degradation process. Recently, TiO₂ has been combined with different carbon materials in simple mixtures or as composite materials in order to create more highly reactive photocatalysts [12–16]. A number of methods can be used for loading the TiO₂ particles on carbon material carrier. According to the literature [17], one of the most frequently used methods for loading the TiO₂ particles on carbon material carrier is a sol-gel method. Although catalysts obtained in this way show good photocatalytic activity, sol-gel method represents a time consuming process, which is its main disadvantage. Another group of methods for loading the TiO₂ particles on carbon material carrier implies TiO₂ deposition from gas phase. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) and metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) are extensively used surface coating technologies for preparation of the TiO₂ photocatalyst [18, 19]. These methods allow the obtaining of a desired TiO₂ loading by controlling the number of ALD cycles or deposition time in MOCVD method. The necessity of controlling a large number of experimental parameters makes these methods very complicated. Unlike the already mentioned complicated methods TiO₂ particles could be loaded to the carbon material surface by cheap and simple dip-coating method [6]. This method implies the use of binder in order to ensure firmly loading of TiO₂ particles on the surface on carbon materials.

In this work, the attempt was made to develop a simple and cheap method for obtaining firmly attached photocatalytically active TiO₂ coating on carbon material without using a binder. The baseline was that binder may cover a substantial amount of TiO₂, making it photocatalytically inactive. Carbon monolith (CM) was used as a catalyst carrier for TiO₂. In our previous work we have shown that cylindrical CM with its porous structure and surface oxygen groups represents a good carrier for silver deposition and it was successfully used for disinfection of drinking water [20]. In the present work, carbon monolith photocatalysts were prepared by deposition of titanium dioxide on CM surface, by adsorption from the fresh Ti solution, followed by evaporation of solvent and oxidation of TiCl₄ to TiO₂. Unlike dip-coating method, this method, tentatively called thermal treatment, does not require the usage of binder. Photocatalytic activity of obtained CM photocatalysts was compared with the activity of composite photocatalysts obtained by dip-coating method, for revealing the influence of the binder mass fraction on photocatalytic activity. Photocatalytic activity of obtained samples was examined by photodegradation of methylene blue in the flow system.

2. Experimental

2.1. Carbon Monolith as a Catalyst Carrier

Carbon monolith, made in the form of tubes of circular cross section and variable length, was purchased from Fractal Carbon (London, UK). The main feature of carbon monolith microstructure is the presence of 8600 capillary columns, with 80 µm in diameter each. This is a composite material, consisting of the glassy carbon bed and activated carbon on the inner capillary walls [21]. In our experiments CM discs of different thickness were used.

2.2. Surface Properties of Catalyst Carrier

2.2.1. Surface Oxygen Groups

Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) in combination with mass spectrometry was used to investigate the nature and the thermal stability of CM surface oxygen groups. The TPD profiles were obtained using a custom-built setup, consisting of a quartz tube placed inside an electrical furnace. CM samples were outgassed in the quartz tube and subjected to TPD at a constant heating rate of 10°C/min to 900°C under high vacuum. The amounts of CO and CO₂ released from the carbon monolith sample (0.1 g) were monitored using an Extorr 300 quadrupole mass spectrometer (Extorr Inc., USA).

2.2.2. Specific Surface Area

Specific surface area of carbon monolith, , was determined by nitrogen adsorption at the temperature of liquid nitrogen using Automatic Surface Area Analyzer, model 4200 (Leeds & Northrup Instruments, USA).

2.3. Preparation of Photocatalysts

CM photocatalysts were obtained by thermal treatment. Titanium was dissolved in hydrochloric acid water solution (HCl : H₂O = 1 : 1). Using 10 mL of fresh TiCl₄ solution (3 g/dm³), CM discs were impregnated with TiCl₄ in the batch system and then heated at 300°C for 2 h. During the heating treatment, deposited TiCl₄ was oxidized, and CM impregnated with TiO₂ (CM/TiO₂) were obtained (Table 1).

The composite photocatalysts were obtained by dip-coating method [6], using mixture of TiO₂ powder and the binder for impregnation of CM surface. This kind of mixture was used in order to avoid attrition of TiO₂ from the CM surface. For this method, 10 mL of TiO₂ (anatase) water suspension (3 g/dm³) was mixed with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and Teflon, as a binders, to achieve different mass fraction of binder (Table 1). The suspension obtained in this way was used for impregnation of CM with TiO₂ in the batch system. Impregnated samples were dried at 105°C for 2 h. In this way six different samples were obtained. Obtained samples were indicated with different labels given in Table 1. General mark of the used samples is CM_A/TiO₂/_%, where is the thickness of the CM disc and B denotes a binder, while is a type of binder used and % refers to the mass fraction of binder. All chemicals used were purchased from Aldrich Chemistry, USA.

2.4. Characterization of Photocatalysts

For determining the presence of titanium dioxide on the surface of the CM, Raman spectroscopy (Advantage 532 Raman spectrometer (DeltaNu Inc.)) was used. Additional structure analysis of obtained CM photocatalysts was performed by Phillips PW1710 diffractometer, using CuKα1,2 radiation.

Surface structure and morphology as well as morphology of TiO₂ deposited at the CM surface were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM JEOL JSM 5800 operated at 20 keV, Jeol, Ltd., Japan).

2.5. Methylene Blue Adsorption Test

CM is composite carbon material containing activated carbon on the inner capillary walls, which is good sorbent for methylene blue (MB) [22]. Therefore, the disappearance of MB in the solution can be attributed to adsorption by CM and/or photodegradation by TiO₂ when CM with TiO₂ deposit is used. In order to examine the role of methylene blue adsorption on CM surface in the overall process of MB removal from aqueous solution, adsorption test in the flow system was performed without UV irradiation. Aqueous solution of MB, with initial concentration of 1 mg/dm³ and pH 4.7, was passed through the different samples of CM with TiO₂ deposit (CM₃/TiO₂, CM₅/TiO₂, CM/TiO₂/Bc_0.25, CM/TiO₂/Bt_0.25), until reaching equilibrium adsorption. Concentration of MB during the adsorption process was measured using visible spectrophotometer (Specol, Carl-Zeiss, Jena), by measuring absorbance at 675 nm. Methylene blue was purchased from Ciba, Aktiengesellschaft, Basel.

2.6. Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic efficiency of CM coated with TiO₂ was assessed by photodegradation of aqueous solution of methylene blue. Experiment was carried out in the flow system with the flow rate of 2.4 mL/min. MB is a heterocyclic aromatic organic compound often used as target molecule for the evaluation of photocatalytic activity of TiO₂ [8]. After reaching the equilibrium adsorption in the dark, for 45 minutes, the UV light was turned on. At this time the concentration of MB in solution was denoted as . The decolorization of methylene blue, as a consequence of photocatalytic degradation, was carried out by irradiating methylene blue aqueous solutions entering the CM disc with a 125 W high-pressure mercury lamp (Philips, HPLN, emission bands in the UV region at 304, 314, 335, and 366 nm, with maximum emission at 366 nm). Position of the lamp is adjusted in a way that the front of the CM disc is illuminated with UV rays. The actual concentration of methylene blue during the decolorization experiments was followed by spectrophotometric measurements. The photocatalytic degradation efficiency is calculated as (/) × 100%, where is the concentration of MB during photocatalytic degradation.

The influence of the binder mass fraction in the composite photocatalysts on their photocatalytic activity was tested. Additionally, in order to increase the photocatalytic activity and find the optimal parameters of examined system, CM photocatalysts with different disc thickness were tested.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Properties of Catalyst Carrier

During the TPD analysis, oxygen groups present on the surface of carbon material decompose by releasing CO and CO₂. According to the literature [23–26], TPD peaks can be assigned to specific surface groups. The CO₂ profile results from carboxylic acids at low temperatures and lactones at higher temperatures; carboxylic anhydrides are the origin of both CO and CO₂ peaks; phenols, ethers, and carbonyls are the origin of the CO peak.

TPD profiles of CO and CO₂ evolution, for tested carbon monolith, are shown in Figure 1. The TPD desorption profile of CO₂ shows one intensive peak at relatively high temperature (around 735°C). Additionally, the CO desorption profile has a maximum at the temperature which coincides with the maximum in CO₂ desorption profile, which indicates the existence of anhydride groups [23]. The CO desorption profile has also broad maximum around 400°C. This is a very low temperature for CO evolution, and according to the literature [25] it may be due to thermal decomposition of carbonyl groups in α-substituted ketones and aldehydes. The CO evolution at the temperatures higher than 800°C may be attributed to phenols, ethers, carbonyls, or quinones.

The amounts of CO and CO₂ released from the surface of CM samples were obtained by integration of corresponding TPD curves. Specific surface area calculated by BET equation () and the amounts of CO () and CO₂ () are given in Table 2.

Due to the fact that CM is composite material consisting of glassy carbon bed, which generally has very low specific surface area [27] and activated carbon on the inner capillary walls, obtained specific surface area value is expected.

3.2. Characterization of Photocatalysts

Microstructure of the CM coated with TiO₂ obtained by using dip-coating method and thermal treatment is shown in Figures 2 and 3.

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

SEM photographs show visible differences in the TiO₂ coatings. The usage of binder in dip-coating method leads to clogging of the CM capillary columns and forming of heterogeneous TiO₂ coating (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). On the other hand, thermal treatment gives more homogeneous coating without channel blocking (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). Microstructured CM has microporous surface with relatively high specific surface area and amount of surface oxygen groups [21]. These surface characteristics are crucial for fine and uniform adsorption of titanium ions. Consequently, the obtained oxidized TiO₂ coating is more homogenous.

The presence of TiO₂ on the tested samples was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy (Figure 4). The main features of all obtained spectra are the two broad peaks referred to as the D band at 1340 cm⁻¹ and G band at 1590 cm⁻¹. The G and D bands are characteristic of graphitic and disordered sp²-bonded carbon. The G peak is due to a bond stretching vibration of all pair of sp² sites in both chain and rings, representing graphite like sp², while the D peak is due to the breathing vibration of sp² atoms in the rings and represents disordered sp² hybridized carbon [28]. For all tested samples TiO₂ peaks appear in the spectra near 510 cm⁻¹ and 639 cm⁻¹ originating from anatase, while CM₃/TiO₂ spectrum has additional weak peak at 837 cm⁻¹ which may originate from rutile structure [29]. For sample CM₃/TiO₂ peaks originating from anatase are of much higher intensity compared to the peaks obtained for composite photocatalysts. The difference in anatase peak intensity is most likely the consequence of TiO₂ particles coverage with a binder.

The composition and crystallinity of TiO₂ deposits were additionally examined by X-ray diffraction (Figure 5). XRD patterns for all examined samples exhibited characteristic diffraction peaks at of approximately 25.35°, assigned to (101) lattice planes of TiO₂, which is attributed to the signal of anatase phase [30]. However, XRD results have not confirmed the presence of rutile phase for sample CM₃/TiO₂, suggested by Raman spectroscopy.

3.3. Methylene Blue Adsorption Test

The decrease of MB concentration in the solution as a consequence of adsorption on CM, carried out in the dark, is shown in Figure 6. Results obtained for CM photocatalysts prepared by thermal treatment (CM₂/TiO₂, CM₃/TiO₂, and CM₅/TiO₂) indicate that thicker disks induce better adsorption of MB. The level of MB adsorption is determined by CM specific surface area and the amount of surface oxygen groups, which function as centers of MB condensation in the physical adsorption process. In the flow system, thicker disc provides longer contact between MB solution and activated carbon on the CM inner capillary walls. Since activated carbon layer determines adsorption characteristics of CM, thicker discs provide better MB adsorption. Nevertheless, for samples CM₂/TiO₂, CM₃/TiO₂, CM₅/TiO₂, and CM/TiO₂/Bt_0.25 adsorption equilibrium was reached after 20 minutes and MB concentration was decreased up to 10%. However, in the presence of sample CM/TiO₂/Bc_0.25 equilibrium was reached after 45 minutes and concentration of MB was decreased for approximately 31%. Since sodium carboxymethyl cellulose can act as an ion-exchanger [31], decrease in the MB concentration may be the consequence of two simultaneous processes occurring on the CM/TiO₂/Bc_0.25 surface: adsorption onto CM surface and ion exchange reaction between MB and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose. Taking into account the decrease of the MB concentration induced by adsorption onto CM surface (up to 10%), relatively high concentration decrease and slower equilibrium reach in the case of sample CM/TiO₂/Bc_0.25 primarily originate from ion exchange reaction between sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and MB.

3.4. Photocatalytic Activity

After reaching the adsorption saturation on CM in the dark, the UV lamp was turned on and the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue on carbon monolith photocatalysts was monitored. The photocatalytic activity and the influence of the binder mass fraction of composite photocatalysts are presented in Figures 7(a) and 7(b). Figure 7(a) shows the degradation of MB in the presence of TiO₂ mixed with different ratio of Teflon. It can be noted that photocatalytic activity decreases with increasing mass fraction of binder. The sample CM/TiO₂/Bt_0.2 shows the highest level of methylene blue degradation (Figure 7(a)).

(a)

(b)

The similar trend of photocatalytic activity is obtained for samples prepared with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose as a binder. As it is shown in the Figure 7(b), the highest level of MB photocatalytic degradation was obtained in the presence of the sample with the lowest mass fraction of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose.

Additionally, samples obtained by using Teflon as a binder showed higher photocatalytic activity compared to the sodium carboxymethyl cellulose composites. At this point we can only assume that this higher photocatalytic activity is a consequence of binder nature which provides lower coverage of TiO₂ particles.

Photocatalytic activity of all tested composite photocatalysts is influenced by mass fraction of the binder. The reason of decreased photocatalytic activity lies in the possibility of masking titanium dioxide located on the surface of carbon monolith, as well as within the pores, with a binder. In order to assess the influence of the binder presence, photocatalytic activity of the composite catalysts, obtained by dip-coating method, was compared to the CM catalysts obtained by thermal treatment. As it is shown in the Figure 8, the sample without a binder, obtained by thermal treatment, has noticeably better photocatalytic activity than composite photocatalysts. The absence of binder allows more homogenous coverage of CM surface with TiO₂ particles (Figure 3). Furthermore, porous structure as well as oxygen groups on CM surface are more available for MB adsorption. As it was reported [5], high level of MB adsorption on the carbon carrier surface elevates the photocatalytic activity of TiO₂. Turning on the UV lamp leads to the photocatalytic degradation of more accessible, adsorbed, MB on CM/TiO₂ surface. After that, surface oxygen groups as well as porous structure are again available for adsorption which elevates the photocatalytic activity of sample CM/TiO₂ and therefore improves its efficiency in organic pollutants removal.

The influence of disk thickness on photocatalytic activity was tested using CM catalysts, obtained by thermal treatment, with different discs thickness. The photocatalytic activities of used samples were evaluated by measuring the decoloration rate of MB under UV irradiation, after adsorption saturation of used CM photocatalysts in the dark. The degradation curves are given in Figure 9.

The obtained results showed that decomposition rate of MB on examined samples follows the order, CM₅/TiO₂ > CM₃/TiO₂ > CM_1.5/TiO₂, and that photocatalytic activity increases for approximately 10% with increase of CM disc thickness from 1.5 to 5 mm. Thicker disk enables longer contact between MB solution and activated carbon on the CM inner capillary walls, which is responsible for adsorption. For all samples, the MB concentration decreases rapidly in the first 20 minutes and then slows down until it reaches the equilibrium. Rapid decomposition of MB in the beginning is reasonable which is supposed to be due to the higher concentration gradient which causes faster diffusion and quicker photocatalytic degradation. As the time progressed, photocatalytic degradation starts to slow down due to the low solute concentration in the solution.

Comparing to the literature [5, 6, 30], all tested samples have good photocatalytic activity. Therefore, the sample CM₅/TiO₂ showed the best photocatalytic activity, since it decreases the MB concentration for nearly 80%.

4. Conclusion

Carbon monolith photocatalysts obtained by new thermal treatment showed much better photocatalytic activity toward methylene blue degradation than composite photocatalysts obtained by dip-coating method. The absence of binder in thermal treatment excluded the TiO₂ coverage and enables better accessibility of catalysts particles to the methylene blue solution. Carbon monolith carrier contains a considerable amount of surface oxygen groups, which, along with relatively high specific surface area, induced its good adsorption properties. It was found that high level of methylene blue adsorption on carbon monolith carrier elevates the photocatalytic activity of TiO₂. Photocatalytic activity increases with carbon monolith disc thickness due to increase in both level of methylene blue adsorption and amount of deposited TiO₂.

Due to its specific shape and good surface characteristics carbon monolith represents good carrier for TiO₂. Utilization of new thermal treatment as a method of TiO₂ deposition and carbon monolith as catalysts carrier represent cheap and simple way for obtaining photocatalysts for methylene blue removal from water solution.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia for financial support through the project of Basic Research, no. 172007, and Physics and Chemistry with Ion Beams (III) no. 45006.

References

A. S. Giri and A. K. Golder, “Fenton, photo-fenton, H₂O₂ photolysis, and TiO₂ photocatalysis for dipyrone oxidation: drug removal, mineralization, biodegradability, and degradation mechanism,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1351–1358, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. N. Chong, B. Jin, C. W. K. Chow, and C. Saint, “Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review,” Water Research, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2997–3027, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-G. Yu, X.-H. Zhao, H. Yang et al., “Aqueous adsorption and removal of organic contaminants by carbon nanotubes,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 482-483, no. 1, pp. 241–251, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ahmed, M. G. Rasul, W. N. Martens, R. Brown, and M. A. Hashib, “Advances in heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of phenols and dyes in wastewater: a review,” Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, vol. 215, no. 1–4, pp. 3–29, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Kim, B.-H. Kim, and K. S. Yang, “TiO₂ nanoparticles loaded on graphene/carbon composite nanofibers by electrospinning for increased photocatalysis,” Carbon, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 2472–2481, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhao, Z. Bai, A. Ren, B. Guo, and C. Wu, “Sunlight photocatalytic activity of CdS modified TiO₂ loaded on activated carbon fibers,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 256, no. 11, pp. 3493–3498, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Abdennouri, R. Elmoubarki, A. Elmhammedi et al., “Influence of tungsten on the anatase-rutile phase transition of sol-gel synthesized TiO₂ and on its activity in the photocatalytic degradation of pesticides,” Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 953–960, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Bestetti, D. Sacco, M. F. Brunella, S. Franz, R. Amadelli, and L. Samiolo, “Photocatalytic degradation activity of titanium dioxide sol-gel coatings on stainless steel wire meshes,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 124, no. 2-3, pp. 1225–1231, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Zaccariello, E. Moretti, L. Storaro et al., “TiO₂–mesoporous silica nanocomposites: cooperative effect in the photocatalytic degradation of dyes and drugs,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 71, pp. 37826–37837, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Minzae Lee, H. J. Yun, S. Yu et al., “Design of an efficient photocatalytic reactor for the decomposition of gaseous organic contaminants in air,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 187, pp. 203–209, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Rodriguez, V. Meille, S. Pallier, and M. Ali Al Sawah, “Deposition and characterisation of TiO₂ coatings on various supports for structured (photo)catalytic reactors,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 360, no. 2, pp. 154–162, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. S. Jamil, M. Y. Ghaly, N. A. Fathy, T. A. Abd El-Halim, and L. Österlund, “Enhancement of TiO₂ behavior on photocatalytic oxidation of MO dye using TiO₂/AC under visible irradiation and sunlight radiation,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 98, pp. 270–279, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Li, S. Sun, Y. Jiang, M. Xia, M. Sun, and B. Xue, “Photodegradation of an azo dye using immobilized nanoparticles of TiO₂ supported by natural porous mineral,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 1037–1044, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. He, K. B. Male, P. N. Nesterenko, D. Brabazon, B. Paull, and J. H. T. Luong, “Adsorption and desorption of methylene blue on porous carbon monoliths and nanocrystalline cellulose,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 17, pp. 8796–8804, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Zhao, X. Yang, C. Chen, and X. Wang, “Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue on multiwalled carbon nanotubes-TiO₂,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 398, pp. 234–239, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Yang, Y. Liu, H. Wen et al., “Photocatalytic properties of graphdiyne and graphene modified TiO₂: from theory to experiment,” ACS Nano, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1504–1512, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-H. Liu, R. Yang, and S.-M. Li, “Preparation and application of efficient TiO₂/ACFs photocatalyst,” Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 979–982, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. K. Dey, M. J. Kim, K.-D. Kim et al., “Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue over TiO₂ films on carbon fiber prepared by atomic layer deposition,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 337, no. 1-2, pp. 33–38, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Antunes, M. C. L. de Oliveira, and M. F. Pillis, “Effect of the deposition temperature on the corrosion stability of TiO₂ films prepared by metal organic chemical vapor deposition,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1487–1500, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Vukčević, A. Kalijadis, S. Dimitrijević-Branković, Z. Laušević, and M. Laušević, “Surface characteristics and antibacterial activity of a silver-doped carbon monolith,” Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID 015006, 7 pages, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Vukčević, A. Kalijadis, B. Babić, Z. Laušević, and M. Laušević, “Influence of different carbon monolith preparation parameters on pesticide adsorption,” Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 1617–1632, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bestani, N. Benderdouche, B. Benstaali, M. Belhakem, and A. Addou, “Methylene blue and iodine adsorption onto an activated desert plant,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, no. 17, pp. 8441–8444, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Domingo-García, F. J. López Garzón, and M. J. Pérez-Mendoza, “On the characterization of chemical surface groups of carbon materials,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 248, no. 1, pp. 116–122, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Kalijadis, M. M. Vukčević, Z. M. Jovanović, Z. V. Laušević, and M. D. Laušević, “Characterisation of surface oxygen groups on different carbon materials by the Boehm method and temperature-programmed desorption,” Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 757–768, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Szymański, Z. Karpiński, S. Biniak, and A. Świa̧tkowski, “The effect of the gradual thermal decomposition of surface oxygen species on the chemical and catalytic properties of oxidized activated carbon,” Carbon, vol. 40, no. 14, pp. 2627–2639, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Vukcevic, A. Kalijadis, M. Radisic et al., “Application of carbonized hemp fibers as a new solid-phase extraction sorbent for analysis of pesticides in water samples,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 211-212, pp. 224–232, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Baćić-Vukčević, A. Udovičić, Z. Laušević, A. Perić-Grujić, and M. Laušević, “Surface characteristics and modification of different carbon materials,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 518, pp. 217–222, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Ferrari and J. Robertson, “Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 61, no. 20, pp. 14095–14107, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Ma, J. Y. Yang, Y. Dai, Y. B. Zhang, B. Lu, and G. H. Ma, “Raman study of phase transformation of TiO₂ rutile single crystal irradiated by infrared femtosecond laser,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 253, no. 18, pp. 7497–7500, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Kwon, H. Shin, J. H. Kim, W. S. Choi, and K. H. Yoon, “Degradation of methylene blue via photocatalysis of titanium dioxide,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 78–82, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Jin, Q. An, Q. Zhao, J. Qian, and M. Zhu, “Pervaporation dehydration of ethanol by using polyelectrolyte complex membranes based on poly (N-ethyl-4-vinylpyridinium bromide) and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 347, no. 1-2, pp. 183–192, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Marina Maletić et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1221

Downloads

914

Citations

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Photocatalytic Performance of Carbon Monolith/TiO2 Composite

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Experimental

2.1. Carbon Monolith as a Catalyst Carrier

2.2. Surface Properties of Catalyst Carrier

2.2.1. Surface Oxygen Groups

2.2.2. Specific Surface Area

2.3. Preparation of Photocatalysts

2.4. Characterization of Photocatalysts

2.5. Methylene Blue Adsorption Test

2.6. Photocatalytic Activity

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Properties of Catalyst Carrier

3.2. Characterization of Photocatalysts

3.3. Methylene Blue Adsorption Test

3.4. Photocatalytic Activity

4. Conclusion

Conflict of Interests

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

Photocatalytic Performance of Carbon Monolith/TiO₂ Composite