Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 1712383 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1712383

Thermoluminescence Properties of Novel Self-Agglomerating CaSO4:Eu Phosphors Obtained by an Environmentally Friendly Method

Academic Editor: Mikhael Bechelany
Received14 Sep 2016
Revised31 Oct 2016
Accepted28 Nov 2016
Published20 Dec 2016

Abstract

In this work, we report the thermoluminescence (TL) properties of self-agglomerating CaSO4:Eu samples obtained by an environmentally friendly coprecipitation technique. No binding material is needed to form solid CaSO4:Eu samples. Samples exposed to beta particle irradiation exhibit a TL maximum at 473.15 K when a 5 K/s heating rate is used, they are two times more sensitive than the TLD-100 commercial dosimeter, and their lower detection limit was determined to be less than 0.69 mGy. The computerized glow curve deconvolution carried out fitting the residual glow curves from McKeever method revealed that the whole glow curve is composed of four individual TL peaks with intermediate-order kinetics. The main peak order kinetics is = 1.48. This result agrees with that computed using Chen’s formula.

1. Introduction

Since it was first proposed by Farrington Daniels as a useful tool for radiation dosimetry, the increasing use of the thermoluminescence (TL) technique was accompanied by a growing interest in the development of new phosphor materials with properties suitable to be used as TL dosimeters [13]. CaSO4 has a long history as one of the most investigated thermoluminescent materials. It exhibits a high TL sensitivity for which it is attractive for dosimetry applications that involves low level doses, such as environmental radiation levels from natural sources [28].

In recent years, nano- and microstructure materials have been synthesized and their TL properties studied to evaluate their application in radiation dosimetry. LiF nanocubes doped with different elements are very sensitive under exposure to gamma rays and C6+ ions, the Eu and Tb doped samples being the most sensitive [9, 10]. The dosimetric capabilities of Al2O3 nanoparticles have also been investigated under exposure to gamma radiation and 85 MeV C6+ ions, showing a linear response as well as a low TL fading for Tb doped samples [11].

The synthesis of nano- and microsized CaSO4 has also been reported, as well as the effect of different dopants (Ag, Cu, Dy, Eu, and Tb) on their TL properties after exposure to gamma radiation [12, 13]. Eu and Tn doped samples exhibit a prominent TL peak in the temperature range 230–270°C and a linear response upon the radiation dose in the dose range from 10 Gy to 10 kGy, being attractive phosphors for high dose dosimetry, useful in food and seed irradiation [13].

Usually, the synthesis of CaSO4:X (X = dopant) involves the use of sulfuric acid, so important health risks have to be taken into account. Moreover, it contributes to environmental pollution. On the other hand, for practical convenience, it is preferred to have dosimeters in solid form rather than in powder form. In order to obtain handled solid samples, CaSO4 is embedded in Teflon, glass as a binding material, which prevents having 100% CaSO4 samples [68, 1417].

We reported on the synthesis of novel self-agglomerating Eu doped CaSO4 phosphors, using a cheap, easy, and environmental friendly aqueous solution based chemical route. Solid samples were obtained with no need of any binding material, nor the use of sulphuric acid [18]. Those are the two remarkable advantages of the reported coprecipitation technique over the conventional method used for dosimetric CaSO4 preparation. Glow curves of beta particle irradiated samples exhibited a TL maximum located at 473.15 K using a 5 K/s heating rate.

Going on with the study of the TL properties of the self-agglomerating CaSO4:Eu samples, in this article we report their TL characterization after being exposed to beta particle irradiation, such as TL versus dose response, sensitivity as a function of irradiation-TL readout cycle number, lower detection limit, and TL fading. Furthermore, the computerized glow curve deconvolution using a general order kinetics model reveals that the glow curves are composed of four individual peaks, the main with kinetics order b = 1.48.

2. Materials and Methods

CaSO4:Eu powder was synthesized as follows: an Na2SO4 (Baker, 99.98%) aqueous solution was added to a CaCl2 (Merck, 99.9%) and EuCl3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.99%) aqueous solution. The reaction proceeded with stirring at room temperature (295 K). Then, 0.0836 g of the precipitated powder was weighed and placed in a 6.0 mm diameter cylindrical mold and compressed at 0.5 ton during 3.0 min using a hydraulic press to fabricate pellet-shaped samples. No binding material was needed to form the solid 100% CaSO4:Eu samples. The obtained pellets were sintered at 973.15 K during 9 h under air atmosphere using a Thermolyne 4000 furnace. During the sintering process, the pellets lost ca. 30% of their mass. The thickness of the samples after being sintered is ca. 0.5 mm. The EuCl3 weight added to the aqueous solution was calculated to have 0.05 mol% of dopant, considering this concentration in the initial solution. These obtained detectors are fully mechanically stable.

A Risø TL/OSL-DA-20 unit equipped with a 90Sr beta source was used to perform beta particle irradiations and TL measurements. All irradiations were accomplished using a 5 Gy/min dose rate at room temperature (295 K), and the TL readouts were carried out under N2 atmosphere using a 5°C/s heating rate, except for the McKeever method readouts, for which a 2 K/s heating rate was used. Photoluminescence data were collected in a spectrofluorometer brand SPEX, model FLUOROMAX. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained in a Rigaku Geigerflex diffractometer equipped with a graphite monochromator by using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.542 Å).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the intensity of the TL emission maximum of CaSO4:Eu samples, for 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mol% Eu concentrations. All samples were exposed to 2.5 Gy of beta particle irradiation. It can be seen that samples with 0.5 mol% exhibit the most intense TL emission, so, for the subsequent characterization, samples with that Eu concentration were used. In order to confirm the presence of Eu into the samples and to identify its valence state, the photoluminescence (PL) of the synthesized CaSO4:Eu was obtained. Figure 2 shows the PL emission spectrum as obtained when exciting by 394 nm light. The presence of emissions with maximum at 590, 617, and 700 nm can be noted, revealing the presence of Eu3+ [19].

Figure 3 shows the X-ray diffraction (XD) pattern of synthesized CaSO4:Eu samples. As can be seen, the diffraction peaks agree with those of CaSO4 anhydrite (ICDD no. 37-1496), whose reference lines are included for comparison. Figure 4 shows the normalized sensitivity of a sample as a function of the irradiation-TL readout cycle number. All ten irradiations were carried out using a 1.0 Gy dose without preirradiation annealing. The first and the last readout differ as low as 3%. This result shows that the TL intensity of this phosphor was scarcely changed during the 10 cycles.

Figure 5 shows the glow curves of CaSO4:Eu exposed to beta particle irradiation, in the dose range from 0.08 up to 1.0 Gy. A defined glow curve and the fact that the TL intensity increases for increasing doses can be seen. In fact, higher doses were also used (up to 170 Gy), as will be shown. No shift of the TL maximum was observed. The form factor computed taking the maximum of the glow curve as a peak is 0.44, close to the 0.42 value characteristic of first-order processes [20]. The lack of exact agreement with the theoretically ideal value 0.42 could indicate the superposition of more than one individual peak and/or that non-first-order kinetic order TL processes are involved. The TL maximum is located at around 473.15 K, considered suitable for dosimetry applications. Other less intense maxima are observed around 443.15 K and above 773.15 K, respectively.

Figure 6(a) shows the integrated TL (ITL) as a function of the irradiation dose, in the range from 0.08 to 10 Gy of beta particle irradiation. Figure 6(b) shows ITL for doses up to 150 Gy. For the lower doses, a superlinear behavior can be seen, while, for doses greater than 10 Gy, a sublinear dependence is observed, with saturation clues above 50 Gy. The lower detection limit (LDL) was determined to be 0.69 mGy [21]. The LDL depends on both the sample and upon the reading system. In spite of the LDL value and the fact that the linear dependence was found to lower investigated doses, the system used to irradiate samples does not allow delivering doses lower than 80 mGy, and so further investigations should be carried out in order to study the TL features of the synthesized CaSO4 at lower dose levels.

Figure 7 shows the ITL as a function of the time interval elapsed between the irradiation and the corresponding TL readout. As can be seen, for the investigated time intervals the TL signal displays a very stable behavior with a 2.4% loss of the initial integrated TL (that recorded just after irradiation) after being stored in darkness at room temperature. In all cases, samples were exposed to 1.0 Gy of beta particle irradiation.

The glow curve deconvolution (GCD) was carried out using a general order expression for the individual TL peaks to be fit, such as [22]where is the kinetics order, , , and . The experimental data for the GCD of the CaSO4:Eu glow curve were collected according to the McKeever method: after irradiation of samples, a TL readout (partial thermal cleaning) up to a specific temperature is followed by a new readout of the sample up to 400°C in order to obtain the residual glow curve [23]. The latter glow curves were treated for the fitting from which the kinetics parameters were obtained.

Figure 8 shows the graph that is obtained by registering the first TL maximum corresponding to the glow curve that follows to partial cleaning up to a temperature . As can be seen, there are three well defined maxima, in accordance with the glow curves displayed in Figure 5. Although in Figure 5 the maxima do not exhibit shift when doses change, the steps in Figure 8 show curvature that indicate that non-first-order processes are involved.

The computational work started from the residual glow curve corresponding to the highest temperature that allows isolating the highest possible individual TL peak and in this way evaluating its trapping parameters with the best accuracy. Once these trapping parameters were computed, the next step is to proceed to the deconvolution of the residual glow curves corresponding to lower temperatures fixing the values of the evaluated kinetics parameters of the highest peak and that allows resolving the following individual peak. The process follows to deconvolute the whole glow curve.

The glow curves fitting was performed using the MINUIT program [24], where the goodness of the fit was tested by the figure of merit (FOM) [25], defined bywith being the data of the experimental glow curve, being the fitted glow curve, and being the area of the fitted glow curve.

Four steps of the procedure followed for the GCD are shown in Figure 9. The glow curve shapes after the partial thermal cleaning at temperatures above 623 K and 643 K are shown in Figures 9(a) and 9(b). At these high thermal cleaning temperatures, the highest TL peak can be studied. In the case of Figure 9(a), the low temperature TL peak is a residual of a higher intensity TL peak, which will be shown below. The glow curve shapes for = 543 and 593, respectively, are shown in Figures 10(a) and 10(b). These glow curves include the high temperature TL peak at 643 K shown in Figure 9, a main peak, and a satellite at its low temperature tail.

The complete GCD of the whole glow curve is shown in Figure 11. The vertical axis is displayed in logarithmic scale in order to observe the goodness of fit as well as the detailed resolution in the individual peaks. The kinetics parameters obtained from the GCD are summarized in Table 1. In this table, is the kinetics order, the maximum of the TL peak, the activation energy of the trapping states associated with the peak, and the preexponential factor. The main peak is peak 1 of Table 1 and the trapping parameters of the peak at lower temperature shown in Figure 11 are not included.


Peak (K) (eV) (s−1)

11.484611.82
21.245251.96
31.156061.68
426452.18

The main TL peak predominates over the other ones. Taking this fact into account, Chen’s formulawas used to estimate the activation energy. In Chen’s formula, or or , andThe activation energy value obtained using Chen’s formula was 1.9 eV, which is in good agreement with the GCD results.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the thermoluminescence properties of beta particle irradiated self-agglomerating CaSO4:Eu are reported. In addition to being a self-agglomerating phosphor (no binding material was needed to fabricate 100% CaSO4:Eu solid samples), the synthesized CaSO4 is obtained through an easy, cheap, and environmentally friendly chemical reaction. These pellet-shaped samples exhibit a TL maximum located at 200°C when a 5°C/s heating rate is used and are two times more sensitive than the commercially available dosimeter TLD-100, and their lower detection limit was determined to be less than 1.0 mGy. Although the synthesized samples were characterized after beta particle exposure, from previous reports (some cited in Section 1) it is known that other kinds of radiations also excite the TL in CaSO4. The computerized glow curve deconvolution carried out fitting the residual glow curves from McKeever experiments revealed that the whole glow curve is composed of four individual peaks with intermediate-order kinetics. The main peak order kinetics is = 1.48. This result agrees with that computed using Chen’s formula, based on the shape of the glow curve. The method here reported can be used to synthesize CaSO4 doped with other impurities different than those used in this work, opening new possibilities in the search of new high performance dosimetric CaSO4 based phosphors.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this work from PRODEP, under Grant F-Promed-38/REV-03.

References

  1. F. Daniels, C. A. Boyd, and D. F. Saunders, “Thermoluminescence as a research tool,” Science, vol. 117, no. 3040, pp. 343–349, 1953. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. Yamashita, N. Nada, H. Onishi, and S. Kitamura, “Calcium sulfate activated by thulium or dysprosium for thermoluminescence dosimetry,” Health Physics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 295–300, 1971. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. S. V. Nambi, V. N. Bapat, and A. K. Ganguly, “Thermoluminescence of CaSO4 doped with rare earths,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 4403–4415, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. N. Azorín, G. M. González, A. C. Gutiérrez, and R. P. C. Salvi, “Preparation and dosimetric properties of a highly sensitive CaSO4: Dy thermoluminescent dosimeter,” Health Physics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 269–274, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. V. Gérôme, D. Lapraz, P. Iacconi, M. Benabdesselam, H. Prévost, and A. Baumer, “Thermoluminescence mechanisms in rare earth doped CaSO4,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 84, no. 1-4, pp. 109–113, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. S. Yang, D. Y. Kim, J. L. Kim et al., “Thermoluminescence characteristics of teflon embedded CaSO4:Dy TLD,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 100, no. 1–4, pp. 337–340, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. Dhabekar, S. Menon, R. Kumar, T. K. G. Rao, B. C. Bhatt, and A. R. Lakshmanan, “Electron spin resonance and thermoluminescence studies in CaSO4: Dy,Ag phosphor,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 38, no. 18, pp. 3376–3381, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. Salah, P. D. Sahare, S. P. Lochab, and P. Kumar, “TL and PL studies on CaSO4: Dy nanoparticles,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 40–47, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Salah, N. D. Alharbi, and S. S. Habib, “Thermoluminescence of gamma rays irradiated LiF nanocubes doped with different elements,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 161, pp. 313–317, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. Salah, N. D. Alharbi, S. S. Habib, and S. P. Lochab, “TL response of Eu activated LiF nanocubes irradiated by 85 MeV carbon ions,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 358, Article ID 61139, pp. 201–205, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. Salah, N. D. Alharbi, S. S. Habib, and S. P. Lochab, “Thermoluminescence properties of Al2O3:Tb nanoparticles irradiated by gamma rays and 85 MeV C6+ ion beam,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 167, pp. 59–64, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Mehrabi, M. Zahedifar, and E. Sadeghi, “Luminescence properties of pure CaSO4 nanoparticles produced by coprecipitation method,” Journal of Nanostructures, vol. 4, pp. 425–431, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  13. N. Salah, “Thermoluminesence of gamma rays irradiated CaSO4 nanorods doped with different elements,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 106, pp. 40–45, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. O. Junot, J. J. Rodrigues, D. N. Souza, M. A. Couto Dos Santos, and L. A. O. Nunes, “The CaSO4:Eu–Ag composite material: Thermo-photoluminescence Study,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 70, pp. 1–4, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. B. Ingle, S. K. Omanwar, P. L. Muthal et al., “Synthesis of CaSO4:Dy, CaSO4:Eu3+ and CaSO4:Eu2+ phosphors,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1191–1197, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Z. S. Khan, N. B. Ingale, and S. K. Omanwar, “Thermoluminescence studies of terbium doped calcium sulfate phosphor,” International Journal of Luminescence and Applications, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 471–474, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  17. A. R. Lakshmanan, M. T. Jose, and O. Annalakshmi, “High-sensitive CaSO4:Dy thermoluminescent phosphor synthesis by co-precipitation technique,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 42–50, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. Bernal, A. R. García-Haro, L. Machi et al., “Advances in the synthesis of new Europium doped CaSO4 phosphors and their thermoluminescence characterization,” Radiation Measurements, vol. 43, no. 2–6, pp. 371–374, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. Sivaiah and S. Buddhudu, “Light-emission in Tb3+ and Eu3+: PVP polymer films,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 377–381, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. Furetta and P. S. Weng, Operational Thermoluminescence Dosimetry, World Scientific, Singapore, 2003.
  21. V. Pagonis, G. Kitis, and G. Furetta, Numerical and Practical Exercises in Thermoluminescence, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2006. View at: Publisher Site
  22. G. Kitis, J. M. Gomez-Ros, and J. W. N. Tuyn, “Thermoluminescence glow-curve deconvolution functions for first, second and general orders of kinetics,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 31, no. 19, pp. 2636–2641, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. W. S. McKeever, Thermoluminescence of Solids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985.
  24. F. James and M. Ross, Minuit, CERN Computer Centre Program Library D-506, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 1977.
  25. H. G. Balian and N. W. Eddy, “Figure-of-merit (FOM), an improved criterion over the normalized chi-squared test for assessing goodness-of-fit of gamma-ray spectral peaks,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 389–395, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 A. R. García-Haro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

783 Views | 312 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up