Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 2658621 | 7 pages |

Preparation of Magnetic Hybrid Microspheres with Well-Defined Yolk-Shell Structure

Academic Editor: Peter Majewski
Received15 Jun 2016
Revised06 Sep 2016
Accepted08 Sep 2016
Published28 Nov 2016


A facile and efficient route was reported to prepare a kind of yolk-shell magnetic hybrid microspheres by suspension polymerization and calcinations method. The morphology, structure, and composition of the magnetic microspheres were characterized by FTIR, XRD, TEM, SEM, and TGA analysis. The vibrating-sample magnetometry (VSM) results clearly showed that the magnetic particles were superparamagnetic with saturation magnetization of 32.82 emu/g which makes the microcomposites easily controlled by an external magnetic field. The results revealed that the magnetic hybrid microspheres might have important applications in magnetic bioseparation and drug delivery.

1. Introduction

In recent years, magnetic particles have been paid considerable attention due to their superparamagnetic properties and potential applications, for example, magnetic bioseparation [1, 2], drug delivery [3, 4], magnetorheological fluid [5], magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement [6, 7], targeted drug [8], gene separation from biochemical products and cells [9], microwave absorption [10], high saturation magnetization, high magnetic susceptibility, biocompatibility, and low toxicity. Therefore, more and more researchers have focused on the fascinating feature of targeting [1113]. However, because bare magnetic particles are liable to aggregation and rapid biodegradation when they are exposed to a biological system, coupled with a limited carrying capacity, it is quite necessary to combine magnetic particles with other carriers to achieve targeted delivery efficiently [1416].

Various inorganic and polymeric materials have been reported as carriers of magnetic materials [1720]. Recently, polymers which could stabilize magnetic particles are receiving more and more attention. Polymers can increase repulsive forces more than surfactants. In addition, a polymer coating on the surface used for the designed purpose of a well-defined composite of materials and their dispersions offers a high potential of application in several fields [2124]. There are mainly two methods to prepare Fe3O4@polymer composite particles: first polymer coating Fe3O4 or modified Fe3O4 is used directly [2527]; second Fe3O4 is first prepared by the coprecipitation of ferrous and ferric ions at the ratio of 1 : 2 in an alkaline medium and at the same time Fe3O4@polymer is prepared, because Fe3O4 contains ferrous and ferric iron at this ratio [28, 29].

In this contribution, we report a simple and efficient route to prepare yolk-shell monodisperse superparamagnetic polymer@Fe3O4 composite microspheres, using ferric ions as the only source of iron. Unlike traditional synthesis methods, we first prepare Fe(OH)3@PMMA. Then, the magnetic hybrid microspheres were obtained by calcination”. The well control of the calcination temperature contributes to getting well-defined yolk-shell magnetic hybrid microspheres. The unique advantage of the yolk-shell morphology lies in the presence of internal void space to accommodate the targeted drug.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Materials

Methyl methacrylate (MMA, 99 wt.%, Shanghai Chemical Reagent Company, China) was distilled under reduced pressure before polymerization. Absolute ethanol was of reagent grade. Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) (97 wt.%, Aldrich) was used as received. Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP, K30) was purchased from Shanghai Chemical Regent Company, China. Ferric nitrate (Fe(NO3)3), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS) were purchased from Tianjin Guangfu Chemical Reagents Company, China. Water used throughout all experiments was distilled followed by deionization.

2.2. Preparation

The overall synthesis procedure and possible mechanisms for formation of the monodisperse magnetic hybrid microspheres were illustrated in Figure 1, and the detailed procedures are described as follows.

(1) Preparation of Fe(OH)3@PMMA Composite Microspheres. In a typical preparation procedure, 0.5 g SDBS and 80 mL deionized water were added into a 250 mL four-necked flask fitted with a condenser, coupled with a mechanical overhead stirrer, and at the same time inlet for nitrogen gas. 3 mL 1 M NaOH and 1 mL 1 M Fe(NO3)3 were added in turns as the water was heated to 60°C. Then, 5 mL methyl methacrylate was injected into the mixture above under continuous vigorously stirring. The initiator BPO (0.15 g) that dissolved in 20 mL deionized water was then added into the flask, and the flask was heated to 70°C gradually in an oil bath with stirring. The polymerization was maintained for 2 h. The particles, which appear yellow in color, were centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was resuspended in water. This wash process was performed three times. After the last wash, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was dried under ambient conditions.

(2) Preparation of Magnetic Particles. The obtained Fe(OH)3@PMMA composite microspheres were heated to 350°C at a ramp rate of 100°C h−1 under N2 atmosphere in a pipe furnace and kept at this temperature for 2 h to remove and water. Then, a kind of black powder was obtained from the crucible after calcinations [30]. A possible mechanism was that by calcination of PMMA@Fe(OH)3 at 350°C for 3 h under N2 atmosphere, Fe2O3 nanoparticles were formed, and part of PMMA coating was carbonized. Then, the inner Fe2O3 NPs were reduced to Fe3O4 by the resulting outer carbon layers during the calcination process [31, 32].

2.3. Characterizations

A Hitachi S3400 SEM was used to determine the morphology and composition of the products with samples previously coated with gold via vapour deposition. TEM measurements were made on a Philips CM12 TEM/STEM with an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. XRD analysis was carried out on a D/Max 2500V/PC X-ray diffractometer using Cu (40 kV, 30 mA) radiation. FTIR spectroscopy was done in solid state on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100. TGA were performed on a TGA Q50 from TA Instrument using a temperature ramp from 30 to 600°C at 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere. Specific surface area N2 adsorption measurements were performed on a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 V4 analyzer (Nor-mass, GA) and the data were subjected to the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) treatment. The magnetic properties were investigated with a BHV-55 vibrating-sample magnetometer (VSM) at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FTIR Analysis

Figure 2 shows the infrared spectra of Fe(OH)3@PMMA composite microspheres (a) and magnetic microspheres (b). The prominent bands in the FTIR spectrum (Figure 2(a)) were associated with the polymerization of the acrylic (C=O at 1728 cm−1, -CH between 2840 and 2955 cm−1, -CH2 at 1457 cm−1, and C-O between 1082 and 1270 cm−1) [28, 33]. As seen from Figure 2(b), the typical adsorption peaks of PMMA were weakened, which further demonstrated that PMMA template was mostly removed from the composite microspheres by means of calcination. And the adsorption centered at 580 cm−1 corresponding to the Fe-O vibration related to the magnetite phase [34, 35]. The IR analysis provides some insights into the composition of the core and the composite.

3.2. Nanostructure and Component

The surface morphology and components of the prepared sample Fe(OH)3@PMMA were examined by SEM and EDS, respectively, as shown in Figures 3(a) and 3(b). The SEM image showed that the products were composed of some well monodispersed spheres with a coarse surface. As illustrated in Figure 3(b), EDS analysis indicated that, besides weak Al peaks, only C, Fe, and O were detected, which provides evidence for the presence of Fe(OH)3@PMMA particles. Based on the above results, it has been confirmed that PMMA was hybridized with Fe(OH)3[28].

TEM measurements could provide further insights into the morphology and structure of composite particles, and TEM images of resultant microspheres were shown in Figure 3(c). It shows that magnetic microspheres were of spherical shape with a particle size in the range of 150–300 nm, and they have two phases [31, 36]. The bright phase maybe is partly carbonized polymer and the dark phase is magnetic Fe3O4. Most interestingly, these composite particles have a novel yolk-shell morphology. Moreover, it is observed that very thin layer was facilely coated on the surface of Fe3O4 NPs which maybe is partly carbonized PMMA [37]. It could be noted that the calcination temperature was controlled pretty well. Figure 3(d) shows the corresponding SAED pattern taken from the single sphere. The diffraction rings suggest that the magnetite spheres were polycrystalline, confirming that the sphere was composed of many small particles. From inside to outside, the rings can be indexed to (220), (311), (400), (422), and (440) planes of spinel Fe3O4, respectively. The magnetic hybrid microspheres are composed of the porous hollow spheres reported by Cheng et al. [36].

3.3. XRD Analysis

XRD measurement was an effective way to further investigate the presence of intercalation in composites. Figure 4 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of Fe(OH)3@PMMA (a) and magnetic microspheres (b). Because of the high concentration of PMMA, there were no sharp diffraction peaks in the diffractogram of Fe(OH)3@PMMA microspheres, which could confirm their noncrystalline nature (Figure 4(a)). Based on Figure 4(b), characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ of 30.2°, 35.7°, 43.3°, 57.2°, and 62.6° were assigned to [], [], [], [], and [] lattice planes of Fe3O4. On the basis of the analysis above, it was confirmed that magnetic microspheres were successfully prepared. XRD patterns of the magnetic hybrid microspheres indicate that all the characteristic peaks match well with the standard crystal phase of magnetite (JCPDS numbers 894319, 19-0629) [38, 39]. So the spinel structures of magnetite in the samples were retained. Moreover, the intensity of diffraction peaks for the magnetic composite microspheres became lower as the Fe3O4 content decreased [4]. XRD patterns revealed that Fe3O4 content significantly affected the characteristic peak intensities of the Fe3O4/PMMA composite microspheres. PMMA had little influence because of its transparency over the Fe3O4 peak range.

3.4. Nitrogen Sorption Isotherm

The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of Fe(OH)3@PMMA (a) and magnetic microspheres (b) were presented in Figure 5. It could be observed from Figure 5(a) that the sorption isotherm was of type III, which demonstrated that Fe(OH)3@PMMA nearly have no porous. After being calculated, the BET surface area increased from 3.19 m2/g to 32.98 m2/g and the sorption isotherm was of type IV (Figure 5(b)) and displayed an obvious hysteresis loop, which demonstrated that magnetic microspheres were typical porous materials. This may be explained by the fact that after calculating part of PMMA was carbonized and the BET surface area was increased [40]. Furthermore, the relatively large pore volume was 1.33 cm3/g by using the BET method, which could endow magnetic microspheres with large drug loading capacity.

3.5. TGA Analysis

The materials were quantified by TGA under nitrogen atmosphere. Figure 6 shows the TGA curves of Fe(OH)3@PMMA composite microspheres and magnetic microspheres. After being calcined at 600°C, the Fe(OH)3@PMMA composite nanosphere sample lost 80.5% of its weight in two steps (Figure 6(a)). The weight loss before 270°C can be assigned to the dehydration of Fe(OH)3. It was noted that the decomposition temperature of PMMA ranged from 270°C to 500°C, and it was completely decomposed at 500°C [28]. Figure 5(a) exhibited the residual weight of about 19.5%, which suggested that the content of PMMA was about 80.5% in the Fe(OH)3@PMMA composite microspheres. Figure 6(b) shows that magnetic microspheres begin to lose weight at 270°C and ended at 500°C and exhibited a residual weight of about 70.5%. The result shows that most of the PMMA in the composite microspheres decomposed after being carbonized at 350°C for 2 h, but there still have a small amount of residue PMMA [41].

3.6. Magnetic Property Testing

The Fe(OH)3@PMMA composite and the magnetic microspheres were dispersed in water by vigorous shaking, respectively; the Fe(OH)3@PMMA composite results in a brown-colored suspension and it cannot be aggregated in the presence of an external magnetic field [42]. However, the magnetic microspheres result in a black-colored suspension and they could be separated from solution in a short period under an external magnetic field. Once the external magnetic field was evacuated, the magnetic hybrid microspheres can be redispersed into the solution with slight shaking (Figure 7). These results show that magnetic microspheres have been successfully produced; they possess excellent magnetic responsivity and redispersibility, which is of great importance in practical manipulation [30, 43].

3.7. VSM Analysis

The magnetization of samples was evaluated by VSM. Figure 8 shows the magnetization curve of Fe(OH)3@PMMA composite microspheres and magnetic microspheres, respectively. It can be seen that the Fe(OH)3@PMMA composite microspheres (Figure 8(a)) almost have no magnetism, but after calcining, they possessed a characteristic of paramagnetic with the saturation magnetization value of about 32.82 emu/g. They also exhibited superparamagnetism at room temperature because of no hysteresis and remanence (Figure 8(b)) [44].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have successfully prepared the magnetic microspheres with diameters in the range of 150–300 nm. TEM results demonstrated that the obtained magnetic microspheres have a novel yolk-shell structure and were well monodispersed. The magnetic microspheres exhibited the feature of polycrystalline, increased BET surface area, and the high magnetic saturation. Taking into account the suitable size, special structure, and good hydrophilic and biocompatible properties, the magnetic microspheres will have wide applications in biomedical fields such as targeted drug delivery, biomolecular separations, cancer treatment, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11475112) and Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20130073120051).


  1. F. Lan, Y. Wu, H. Hu, L. Xie, and Z. Gu, “Superparamagnetic Fe3O4/PMMA composite nanospheres as a nanoplatform for multimodal protein separation,” RSC Advances, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1557–1563, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. Velez, I. Torres-Díaz, L. Maldonado-Camargo, C. Rinaldi, and D. P. Arnold, “Magnetic assembly and cross-linking of nanoparticles for releasable magnetic microstructures,” ACS Nano, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 10165–10172, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Yakar, G. Tansık, T. Keskin, and U. Gündüz, “Tailoring the magnetic behavior of polymeric particles for bioapplications,” Journal of Polymer Engineering, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 265–274, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Cervadoro, M. Cho, J. Key et al., “Synthesis of multifunctional magnetic nanoflakes for magnetic resonance imaging, hyperthermia, and targeting,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 6, no. 15, pp. 12939–12946, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. J. Park, F. F. Fang, and H. J. Choi, “Magnetorheology: materials and application,” Soft Matter, vol. 6, no. 21, pp. 5246–5253, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. R. Hurley, H. L. Ring, H. Kang, N. D. Klein, and C. L. Haynes, “Characterization of magnetic nanoparticles in biological matrices,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 87, no. 23, pp. 11611–11619, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Wan and J. Li, “Facile synthesis of well-dispersed superparamagnetic γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles encapsulated in three-dimensional architectures of cellulose aerogels and their applications for Cr(VI) removal from contaminated water,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2142–2152, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. K. Suh, K. Yuet, D. K. Hwang, K. W. Bong, P. S. Doyle, and T. A. Hatton, “Synthesis of nonspherical superparamagnetic particles: in situ coprecipitation of magnetic nanoparticles in microgels prepared by stop-flow lithography,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, no. 17, pp. 7337–7343, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L.-K. Shen, K.-H. Fan, T.-L. Wu et al., “Fabrication and magnetic testing of a poly-L-lactide biocomposite incorporating magnetite nanoparticles,” Journal of Polymer Engineering, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 231–235, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Liu, R. Che, H. Chen et al., “Microwave absorption enhancement of multifunctional composite microspheres with spinel Fe3O4 cores and anatase TiO2 shells,” Small, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1214–1221, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Chuayjuljit, N. Sukasem, and A. Boonmahitthisud, “Effects of silica, poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(methyl methacrylate)-grafted-silica nanoparticles on the physical properties of plasticized-poly(vinyl chloride),” Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 116–122, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. R. Mahdavian, Y. Sehri, and H. Salehi-Mobarakeh, “Nanocomposite particles with core-shell morphology II. An investigation into the affecting parameters on preparation of Fe3O4-poly (butyl acrylate-styrene) particles via miniemulsion polymerization,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2482–2488, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Kumari, S. K. Yadav, and S. C. Yadav, “Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. H. Ahmad, K. Kumar, M. A. Rahman et al., “Preparation and characterization of conducting polyaniline layered magnetic nano composite polymer particles,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 740–746, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Z. Shi, Z. Zhang, R. Fan et al., “Synthesis and characterization of iron particles hosted in Porous Alumina,” Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 836–840, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. N.-N. Song, H.-T. Yang, H.-L. Liu et al., “Exceeding natural resonance frequency limit of monodisperse Fe3O4 nanoparticles via superparamagnetic relaxation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, article 3161, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Gunay, H. Kavas, and A. Baykal, “Simple polyol route to synthesize heptanoic acid coated magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1296–1303, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Zhang, W. Wu, K. Guo, J.-F. Chen, and P.-Y. Zhang, “Magnetic polymer enhanced hybrid capsules prepared from a novel Pickering emulsion polymerization and their application in controlled drug release,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 349, no. 1–3, pp. 110–116, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. Alamri, N. Ballot, J. Long et al., “Integrative synthesis of coordination polymers, metal oxides, and alloys magnetic nanoparticles in MSU mesoporous silica,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 875–885, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Eid and A. Mansour, “Preparation and magnetic investigation of magnetic nanoparticles entrapped hydrogels and its possible use as radiation shield,” Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1255–1265, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Faraji, Y. Yamini, and M. Rezaee, “Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, functionalization, characterization, and applications,” Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. Seckin, S. Vural, and S. Köytepe, “Preparation and structural properties of Fe3O4–polyimide hybrid nanocomposites,” Polymer Bulletin, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. B. Rajput, S. J. Rahaman, G. Sarkhel, M. K. Patra, S. R. Vadera, and N. N. Ghosh, “Preparation, characterization and properties of flexible magnetic nanocomposites of NiFe2O4-polybenzoxazine-LLDPE,” Polymer—Plastics Technology and Engineering, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1097–1105, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Hu, M. Chen, and L. Wu, “Organic-inorganic nanocomposites synthesized via miniemulsion polymerization,” Polymer Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 760–772, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Ashjari, A. R. Mahdavian, N. G. Ebrahimi, and Y. Mosleh, “Efficient dispersion of magnetite nanoparticles in the polyurethane matrix through solution mixing and investigation of the nanocomposite properties,” Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 213–219, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Xuan, F. Wang, J. M. Y. Lai et al., “Synthesis of biocompatible, mesoporous Fe3O4 nano/microspheres with large surface area for magnetic resonance imaging and therapeutic applications,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 237–244, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Q. Yang, Y. Wu, F. Lan et al., “Hollow superparamagnetic PLGA/Fe3O4 composite microspheres for lysozyme adsorption,” Nanotechnology, vol. 25, no. 8, Article ID 085702, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. Y. Hong, B. Feng, X. Cai et al., “Double-miniemulsion preparation of Fe3O4/poly(methyl methacrylate) magnetic latex,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Xiao, J. J. Zhang, Z. Q. Wang, and H. Lin, “Photon conversion and radiation synergism in Eu/Tb complexes incorporated poly methyl methacrylate,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 2618253, 11 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. A. Medford, J. W. Hubbard, F. Orange, M. J.-F. Guinel, B. O. Calcagno, and C. Rinaldi, “Magnetothermal repair of a PMMA/iron oxide magnetic nanocomposite,” Colloid and Polymer Science, vol. 292, no. 6, pp. 1429–1437, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Li, T. Wang, L. Zhang, Z. Su, C. Wang, and R. Wang, “Selected-control synthesis of monodisperse Fe3O4@C core-shell spheres, chains, and rings as high-performance anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” Chemistry—A European Journal, vol. 18, no. 36, pp. 11417–11422, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Du, W. Liu, R. Qiang et al., “Shell thickness-dependent microwave absorption of core-shell Fe3O4@C composites,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 6, no. 15, pp. 12997–13006, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. Li, Y. Feng, Y. Li, W. Zhao, and J. Shi, “Fe3O4 core/layered double hydroxide shell nanocomposite: versatile magnetic matrix for anionic functional materials,” Angewandte Chemie—International Edition, vol. 48, no. 32, pp. 5888–5892, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. C. Zhang, X. Li, Y. Yang, and C. Wang, “Polymethylmethacrylate/Fe3O4 composite nanofiber membranes with ultra-low dielectric permittivity,” Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 281–285, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Shen, K. Chen, L. Li, W. Wang, and Y. Jin, “Fabrication and microwave absorbing properties of (Z-type barium ferrite/silica)@polypyrrole composites,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 615, pp. 488–495, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. W. Cheng, K. Tang, Y. Qi, J. Sheng, and Z. Liu, “One-step synthesis of superparamagnetic monodisperse porous Fe3O4 hollow and core-shell spheres,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1799–1805, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. B. J. Park, M. K. Hong, and H. J. Choi, “Atom transfer radical polymerized PMMA/magnetite nanocomposites and their magnetorheology,” Colloid and Polymer Science, vol. 287, no. 4, pp. 501–504, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. H. Kavas, M. Günay, A. Baykal, M. S. Toprak, H. Sozeri, and B. Aktaş, “Negative permittivity of polyaniline-Fe3O4 nanocomposite,” Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 306–314, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. L. Chen, Q. Zhou, Q. Xiong, W. Li, J. Liu, and X. Yang, “Shape-evolution and growth mechanism of Fe3O4 polyhedrons,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 763124, 7 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. Shao, F. Ning, J. Zhao, M. Wei, D. G. Evans, and X. Duan, “Preparation of Fe3O4@ SiO2@ layered double hydroxide core-shell microspheres for magnetic separation of proteins,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 1071–1077, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. K. Zhang, J. Y. Lim, and H. J. Choi, “Amino functionalization and characteristics of multi-walled carbon nanotube/poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposite,” Diamond and Related Materials, vol. 18, no. 2-3, pp. 316–318, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Y. Tan, Z. Zhuang, Q. Peng, and Y. Li, “Room-temperature soft magnetic iron oxide nanocrystals: synthesis, characterization, and size-dependent magnetic properties,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 5029–5034, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. F. F. Fang, J. H. Kim, and H. J. Choi, “Synthesis of core–shell structured PS/Fe3O4 microbeads and their magnetorheology,” Polymer, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2290–2293, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Kanagesan, M. Hashim, S. Tamilselvan et al., “Synthesis, characterization, and cytotoxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 710432, 7 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Yuan Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

620 Views | 316 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.