Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 6158432, 9 pages
Research Article

Optimization of Life Cycle Extension of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures in regard to Material Properties, Structural Design, and Economic Implications

University of Zilina, Zilina, Slovakia

Received 13 June 2016; Revised 25 July 2016; Accepted 16 August 2016

Academic Editor: Antônio G. de Lima

Copyright © 2016 Jan Mikolaj et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Mandapaka, I. Basheer, S. Khushminder, P. Udloitz, J. T. Harvey, and N. Sivaneswaran, “Mechanistic—empirical and life—cycle cost analysis for optimizing flexible pavement maintenance and rehabilitation,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 138, no. 5, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. U.S. Department od Transportation, “Life—Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design, Federal Highway Administration,” No.FHWA-SA-98-079, 1998.
  3. World Road Association (PIARC), Highway Develompent and Management Series, 2006.
  4. I. Gschwendt, “Pavement structure design,” Technical Standards 3/2009, Ministry of Transport and Telecommunication, Bratislava, Slovakia, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  5. European Committee for Standardization (Cen) EN 12697-26, Bituminous mixtures—Test method for hot mix asphalt—Part 26: Complex modulus, Brussels, Belgium 2003.
  6. F. Schlosser, E. Šrámeková, and J. Šrámek, “Rheology, deformational properties and fatigue of the asphalt mixtures,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 875–877, pp. 578–583, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  7. K. Zgutova, “Non-destructive determining CBR values of ground structures of engineering constructions,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo Conference (SGEM '14), Albena, Bulgaria, June 2014.
  8. Ministry of Transportaion of Czech Republic, Czech Pavement Design Manual, TP 170, VUT Brno, ČVUT Praha, SSŽ, ODS, November 2004.
  9. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), “Bituminous mixtures—test method for hot mix asphalt—part 24: resistant to fatigue,” EN 12697-24, CEN, Brussels, Belgium, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Čelko and J. Komačka, “Analysis of the pavement bearing capacity on the deflection bowl basis,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, vol. 1, pp. 609–617, Trondheim, Norway, 1998.
  11. B. Novotný and A. Hanuška, The Theory of Multi Layered Half Space, VEDA Bratislava, Bratislava-Karlova Ves, Slovakia, 1983.
  12. H. Y. Katman, M. R. Ibrahim, M. R. Karim, N. S. Mashaan, and S. Koting, “Evaluation of permanent deformation of unmodified and rubber-reinforced SMA asphalt mixtures using dynamic creep test,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 247149, 11 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Čelko, M. Decký, and M. Kováč, “An analysis of vehicle—road surface interaction for classification of IRI in frame of Slovak PMS,” in Maintenance and Reliability, vol. 1, pp. 15–21, Polish Maintenance Society, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Chytčáková, Evaluation parameters of operational competence in the pavement management system [Ph.D. thesis], University of Žilina, Žilina, Slovakia, November 2014.
  15. G.-F. Peng, Y.-Z. Huang, H.-S. Wang, J.-F. Zhang, and Q.-B. Liu, “Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete at low and high water/binder ratios,” Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 842929, 6 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Mikolaj, F. Schlosser, and L. Remek, “Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement management system,” in Communications, vol. 15 of EDIS ŽU, pp. 102–106, 2013. View at Google Scholar