Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 2813058, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2813058
Research Article

Experimental Investigation on the Behavior of Bracing Damper Systems by Utilizing Metallic Yielding and Recentering Material Devices

1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University, 12-1 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea
2Incheon Disaster Prevention Research Center, Incheon National University, 12-1 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea
3POSCO Product Application Center, 180-1 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Myoung-hyun Noh

Received 30 July 2017; Revised 26 November 2017; Accepted 10 December 2017; Published 30 January 2018

Academic Editor: Carlos Garcia-Mateo

Copyright © 2018 Jong Wan Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Seo and J. W. Hu, “Seismic response and performance evaluation of self-centering LRB isolators installed on the CBF building under NF ground motions,” Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 109, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. W. Hu, “Response of seismically isolated steel frame buildings with sustainable lead-rubber bearing (LRB) isolator devices subjected to near-fault (NF) ground motions,” Sustainability, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 111–137, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. A. Matssgar and R. S. Jangid, “Influence of isolator characteristics on the response of base-isolated structures,” Engineering Structures, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1735–1749, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Castaido and M. De Iuliis, “Optimal integrated seismic design of structural and viscoelastic bracing-damper systems,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 43, pp. 1809–1827, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. S. Lobo, J. Almeida, and L. Guerreiro, “Semi-active damping device based on superelastic shape memory alloys,” Engineering Structures, vol. 3, pp. 1–12, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Silwal, R. J. Michael, and O. E. Ozbulut, “A superelastic viscous damper for enhanced seismic performance of steel moment frames,” Engineering Structures, vol. 105, pp. 152–164, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. J. Miller, L. A. Fahnestock, and M. R. Eatherton, “Development and experimental validation of a nickel–titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace,” Engineering Structures, vol. 40, pp. 288–298, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. R. Sahoo and S. H. Chao, “Performance-based plastic design method for buckling-restrained frames,” Engineering Structures, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 2950–2958, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. Asgarian and S. Moradi, “Seismic response of steel braced frames with shape memory alloy braces,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 65–74, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Y. Yang, Y. Li, and S. Leelataviwat, “Performance-based design and optimization of buckling restrained knee braced truss moment frame,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 28, no. 6, p. A4014007, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. X. Qiu and S. Zhu, “High-mode effects on seismic performance of multi-story self-centering braced steel frames,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 119, pp. 133–143, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Ma and M. C. H. Yam, “Modelling of a self-centring damper and its application in structural control,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 656–666, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. A. Farmani and M. Ghassemieh, “Shape memory alloy-based moment connections with superior self-centering properties,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 25, no. 7, p. 075028, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Moradi and M. S. Alam, “Feasibility study of utilizing superelastic shape memory alloy plates in steel beam-column connections for improved seismic performance,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 463–475, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  15. M. S. Speicher and R. DesRoches, “Experimental results of NiTi shape memory alloy (SMA)-based beam-column connection,” Engineering Structures, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 2448–2457, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. W. Hu, E. Choi, and R. T. Leon, “Design, analysis, and application of innovative composite PR connections between steel beams and CFT columns,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 20, pp. 25019–25033, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. W. Hu and R. T. Leon, “Analysis and evaluations for composite-moment frames with SMA PR-CFT connections,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 65, pp. 433–455, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. W. Hu, “Investigation on the cyclic response of superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) slit damper devices simulated by quasi-static finite element (FE) analyses,” Materials, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1122–1141, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. DesRoches, B. Taftali, and B. R. Ellingwood, “Seismic performance of steel frames with shape memory alloy connections, part I—analysis and seismic demands,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 471–486, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. S. W. Yang, R. DesRoches, and R. T. Leon, “Design and analysis of braced frames with shape memory alloy and energy-absorbing hybrid devices,” Engineering Structures, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 498–507, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Omar, “Seismic response of braced steel frames with shape memory alloy and mega bracing systems,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Journal of Computer and Systems Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 131–138, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  22. C. X. Qiu and S. Zhub, “Performance-based seismic design of self-centering steel frames with SMA-based braces,” Engineering Structures, vol. 130, pp. 67–82, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. W. Yang and D. DesRoches, “Bridges with innovative buckling restrained SMA expansion joints having a high symmetrical tension/compression capacity,” in Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2015, pp. 452–461, Portland, Oregon, April 2015.
  24. N. Gao, J. S. Jeon, D. E. Hodgson, and R. DesRoches, “An innovative seismic bracing system based on a superelastic shape memory alloy ring,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 25, p. 055030, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. B. M. Rafiqul Haque and M. S. Alam, “Hysteretic behaviour of a piston based self-centering (PBSC) bracing system made of superelastic SMA bars—a feasibility study,” Engineering Structures, vol. 12, pp. 102–114, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. F. H. Dezfuli and M. S. Alam, “Smart lead rubber bearings equipped with ferrous shape memory alloy wires for seismically isolating highway brides,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1–26, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  27. ASTM Standard ASTM A370–17, Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2006.
  28. ASTM Standard A356/A356M, Specification for Steel Castings, Carbon, Low Alloy, and Stainless Steel, Heavy-Walled for Steam Turbines, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2006.