Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 3950980 |

Viera Homolová, Ján Kepič, Adéla Zemanová, Ondřej Zobač, "Experimental Study of Phase Composition of B-Fe-Mn-V Alloys and Thermodynamic Calculations of Phase Equilibria in the B-Mn-V and B-Fe-Mn-V Systems", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 3950980, 10 pages, 2018.

Experimental Study of Phase Composition of B-Fe-Mn-V Alloys and Thermodynamic Calculations of Phase Equilibria in the B-Mn-V and B-Fe-Mn-V Systems

Academic Editor: Pavel Lejcek
Received30 Jan 2018
Accepted12 Apr 2018
Published24 Jun 2018


Phase compositions of B-Fe-Mn-V alloys were studied by several experimental methods (DTA measurement, X-ray diffractions, and scanning electron microscopy). Besides the experimental study of the quaternary system, thermodynamic modelling of the ternary B-Mn-V system by the Calphad method and thermodynamic calculations for the quaternary B-Fe-Mn-V system were performed. Calculations for the quaternary system are based on the ternary subsystems (B-Mn-V, B-Fe-V, B-Fe-Mn, and Fe-Mn-V). Boron is modelled as an interstitial element in all solid solutions of vanadium, manganese, and iron. Very good agreement between experimental results and thermodynamic calculations was achieved. The created thermodynamic database is suitable for thermodynamic calculations of phase diagrams for all the ternary subsystems and also for the B-Fe-Mn-V quaternary system.

1. Introduction

The study of the quaternary system B-Fe-Mn-V and its ternary subsystems from the view of phase equilibria is important in several fields of materials research. The systems are the parts of advanced materials for energy industry [13]. Boron increases hardenability of steels; vanadium forms stable borides with high melting temperature, hardness, and wear resistance; and manganese improves the strength and toughness of metallic materials. Information about the system is also important for the study of boride coatings on various alloys and metals, including iron [4].

Up to now, the B-V-Mn system was experimentally studied only by Telegus and Kuzma [5]. They constructed the isothermal section at 1073 K. However, no thermodynamic description of the ternary system was found in their work and also in other literature. Thermodynamic descriptions of the B-Fe-V and B-Fe-Mn systems are given in our previous works [6, 7]. Neither theoretical nor experimental phase diagram information was found in the literature for the quaternary B-Fe-Mn-V system.

The present work is focused on an experimental study of phase composition of the B-Fe-Mn-V alloys and thermodynamic calculations of phase equilibria in the B-Fe-Mn-V quaternary system. The thermodynamic calculations are based on ternary subsystems. Therefore, thermodynamic modelling of the ternary B-Mn-V system by the Calphad method was also done in the scope of this work. Besides the study of the B-Fe-Mn-V phase diagram, the aim of this work is the verification of the database based on ternary systems (B-Mn-V, B-Fe-V, B-Fe-Mn, and Fe-Mn-V) for calculations of the quaternary system.

2. Materials and Methods

Three quaternary model B-Fe-Mn-V alloys were produced from high-purity powders of B (99.9%), Fe (99.98%), Mn (99.98%), and V (99.8%) bought from Alfa Aesar Company (Germany). Powders were mixed and pressed into cylindrical pellets and subsequently melted. The melting was carried out in an argon arc furnace on a water-cooled copper plate in the argon atmosphere of 99.999% purity. The solidified alloys were remelted several times in order to achieve good homogeneity. The final chemical compositions of the produced alloys (7 g) are shown in Table 1. The alloys were then sealed in evacuated silica glass tubes and annealed in the furnace (LAC, Czech Republic) at 900 K for 2040 h. After the annealing, the samples were quenched into cold water.

AlloyComposition (at %)Phase composition at 900 K

140B-45Fe-5Mn-10VM2B, MB, V3B4
25B-70Fe-5Mn-20VBCC, σ, VB
32B-90Fe-5Mn-3VBCC, M2B

The annealed material was studied by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy JEOL JSM-7000F (JEOL, Japan) equipped with a “thermal FEG” and an INCA EDX analyzer. The backscattered electron image mode of scanning electron microscopy was used to study the alloy microstructure.

For X-ray diffraction, the powder of the samples was prepared by a smooth file and homogenized in a steel mortar. X-ray powder diffraction analyses were performed by a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, USA) in Bragg–Brentano pseudofocusing geometry, using Cu-Kα radiation and a LynxEye® one-dimensional silicon strip detector.

Also, DTA (differential thermal analysis) measurements of nonannealed alloy were performed on the apparatus Netzsch DSC 404C (Netzsch, Germany). Pieces of the sample weighing 200–400 mg were sealed in evacuated quartz glass crucibles. Heating and cooling curves were recorded for the sample using a scanning rate of 5 K·min−1. The DTA instrument was calibrated at the melting points of high-purity In, Sn, Sb, Zn, Ag, and Al sealed in quartz crucibles to establish an internal calibration file.

3. Thermodynamic Model and Calculations

Thermodynamic calculations of the B-Fe-Mn-V system were based on data for ternary subsystems. Data for B-Fe-X systems were taken from our previous works. The paper [6] was a source of data for the B-Fe-V system. Data for the B-Fe-Mn system were taken from the literature [7]. Data for the Fe-Mn-V system were taken from the private steel database [8], and the data are shown in Table 2. Data for the last ternary system were not found in any literature, and only one experimental work [5] was found for the B-V-Mn system. The experimental work [5], which described an isothermal section at 1073 K after annealing for 1200 h, was used for modelling the ternary system. Data for pure elements were taken from the work [9]. For all the calculations, Thermo-Calc software was used [10].


σG0(Fe : V : Mn) = 8GFEFCC + 4GVBCC + 18∗GHSERMN − 200000
G0(Mn : V : Fe) = 8GMNFCC + 4GVBCC + 18GFEBCC − 150000;
L0(V : Mn, V) = −100000
L0(V : FE, V; 0) = −300000
FCCL0(Fe, Mn : Va) = −7762 + 3.865T
L1(Fe, Mn : Va) = −259
BCCL0(Fe, Mn : Va) = −2759 + 1.237T
α-MnG(V : Va) = GVBCC + 9000
L0(Fe, Mn : Va) = −10184
L0(Mn, V : Va; 0) = −22225
β-MnG(V : Va) = GVBCC + 10000
L0(Fe, Mn : Va; 0) = −11518 + 2.819T
L0(Mn, V : Va) = −17724

3.1. Thermodynamic Models for Solid Solutions and Liquid

The sublattice model developed by Hillert and Staffansson [11] was used in the present work to describe the Gibbs energy of the individual phases. Boron was considered as an interstitial element.

The Gibbs energies of the BCC, FCC, CBCC, and CUB solid solutions in the system are described using the two-sublattice model. Metallic elements occupy the first sublattice, and vacancy () and boron occupy the second (interstitial) sublattice. The Gibbs energy for the two-sublattice model can be expressed as follows:

In (1), represents the site fraction of the component in the relevant sublattice. The symbols and are stoichiometric coefficients of each sublattice (for BCC: and ; for FCC, CBCC, and CUB: ). is the Gibbs energy of a pure element in the phase and is the Gibbs energy of a hypothetical nonmagnetic boride, where the element occupies the first sublattice and all the interstitial positions are occupied by boron.

All values of are given relative to the standard element reference (SER) state, that is defined as the stable state of the element under standard conditions (298.15 K and 105 Pa). Interaction parameters are expressed by the Redlich–Kister polynomial [12]:

The interaction parameters , , and (where ) are defined analogically.

The temperature dependence of the parameter is expressed as follows:

in (1) is the magnetic contribution to the Gibbs energy. Its value is calculated according to the model of Hillert and Jarl [13].

The liquid phase is described by a single sublattice. Its Gibbs energy is described as follows:

The β-rhombohedral phase () is modelled using one sublattice with the formula (). The following expression described the Gibbs energy of the phase:

3.2. Thermodynamic Model for Borides

All borides are described as stoichiometric phases with two sublattices . The Gibbs energy is given as follows:

3.3. Thermodynamic Model for σ-Phase

The phase is described with the three-sublattice model with the formula . Its Gibbs energy is given as follows:where numbers I, II, and III denote the sublattice.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. B-Mn-V Ternary System

Modelling of the system is based on the same binary data as modelling other ternary subsystems [6, 7] of the studied quaternary system and mentioned experimental work [5]. Calculated binary phase diagrams are presented in Figure 1. In the ternary system, liquid, vanadium and manganese solid solutions (BCC, FCC, CBCC, and CUB), intermetallic σ-phase, βB, five vanadium borides (V3B2, VB, V5B6, V3B4, and V2B3), six manganese borides (MnB4, MnB2, Mn3B4, MnB, and o-Mn2B), and MB2 boride were considered. MB2 boride is VB2 phase in the B-V system and MnB2 boride in the B-Mn system. The MB2 boride is equilibrium phase only for high temperatures in the B-Mn system (Figure 1(a)); however, in the B-V system, it is stable also for low temperatures (Figure 1(b)). No ternary phase was considered in the ternary system, which is conformable with the experimental work [5]. Crystallographic data of the phases are given in Table 3. Calculated isothermal sections at 973, 1073, and 1173 K are shown in Figure 2. Experimental data points from the work [5] are presented in Figure 2(b). The significant difference between the calculated phase diagram and the work of Telegus et al. [5] is the presence of the o-Mn2B phase in our calculation rather than the Mn4B phase given in the phase work [5]. The decision about the replacement of the Mn4B phase is based on the work of Tergenius [14], who studied the Mn4B phase and redefined the phase as Mn2B0.982. Very good agreement between experimental results and the modelled isothermal section at 1073 K was achieved. Thermodynamic parameters developed in the present work are given in Table 4. The set of parameters was developed to fit available experimental results at 1073 K as best as possible and also to calculate reasonable phase equilibria for lower and higher temperatures. Therefore, some parameters are temperature-dependent.

PhasePearson symbol/space groupReference

δ-Mn, α-Fe, V (BCC)cI2/Im3m[15]
γ-Mn, γ-Fe (FCC)cF4/Fm3m[15]
β-Mn (CUB)cP20/P4132[7]
α-Mn (CBCC)cI58/I43m[7]
t-Mn2B, Fe2B (M2B)tI12/I4/mcm[15]
MnB, FeB (MB)oP8/Pnma[15]
MnB2, VB2 (MB2)hP3/P6/mmm[7]


M2BL0(Mn, V : B) = −65000
L1(Mn, V : B) = −85000
MBL0(Mn, V : B) = −263490 + 130T
V3B2L0(Mn, V : B) = −186690
V3B4L0(Mn, V : B) = −310000
L1(Mn, V : B) = 106000
L2(Mn, V : B) = 180000
VBL0(Mn, V : B) = −128000
Mn3B4L0(Mn, V : B) = −500000
L1(Mn, V : B) = −5000
L2(Mn, V : B) = −10000
MB2L0(Mn, V : B) = −49000
L1(Mn, V : B) = −4000
L2(Mn, V : B) = 13540 + 12.53T
α-MnG0(V : B) = GVBCC + GBβB + 2000
β-MnG0(V : B) = GVBCC + GBβB + 2000

The data were also used to calculate liquidus surface prediction of the system (Figure 3). However, no experimental results about liquidus of the ternary system are known. So, its experimental verification was not possible at this moment.

Considering no other experimental results for the system were found to be better described the B-Mn-V system, the description was used for calculations of a higher system.

4.2. B-Fe-Mn-V Quaternary System

Liquid, several solid solutions of metallic elements, one intermetallic phase, and lot of borides are the equilibrium phases in the quaternary system. Phases identified in the investigated alloys by experimental methods after long-term annealing are given in Table 1. Borides were found in all alloys, the intermetallic σ-phase was found in alloy 2, and the BCC phase was found in iron-rich alloys.

Calculations of phase equilibria for alloys are presented by isopleths (Figure 4) and by mole fractions in dependence on temperature (Figure 5).

Microstructure of the alloy 1 is presented in Figure 6. Large particles of borides are found in the alloy. There are three types of borides: M2B, MB, and V3B4. The alloy phase composition is conformable with calculation (Figures 4(a) and 5(a)). Experimentally determined chemical compositions of M2B (58Fe-5Mn-3V at %) and MB (36Fe-9V-5Mn at %) borides in the alloy are in very good agreement with the calculated values (Table 5). Experimental values of metallic elements in V3B4 are 29V-2.5Mn-11Fe at %. There are small differences between experimental and calculated values (Table 5) in the composition of V3B4 boride in the alloy.

AlloyPhasesCalculated values (at %)


Alloys 2 and 3 contain significantly less boron than the alloy 1. Figure 7 shows a eutectic structure of the alloy 2. The microstructure consists of the matrix and dark particles of borides. The boride particles are too small for exact determination of their chemical composition by EDX. However, the distribution of elements in the alloy (Figure 7(c)) shows that it is vanadium boride. The X-ray diffraction determined the boride as VB. The BCC phase and borides form from liquid. It is in conformance with the calculated isopleth (Figure 4(b)). The σ-phase that was determined by X-ray diffraction in the alloy forms as a secondary phase from solid phases. Very similar average atomic numbers of the σ-phase and matrix do not allow to distinguish between these phases by scanning electron microscopy because the atomic number contrast between them is negligible. It may be a reason why the σ-phase was not identified by this method. Experimentally identified phase composition of the alloy is in accordance with calculation (Figure 5(b)).

DTA heating and cooling curves of alloy 2 show phase transformation at 1025 K (752°C) (Figure 8). The experimentally determined temperature is comparable with the calculated temperature of phase transformation between BCC + σ + VB and BCC + VB (Figure 5(b)). The calculated temperature of the phase transformation is 1024 K. Based on comparison between experimental measurements and calculation, it is supposed that the peak of DTA curves at 1025 K indicates dissolution of the intermetallic σ-phase at heating, or formation of the σ-phase at cooling. There is a very good agreement between experimental measurements and calculation.

The microstructure of the alloy 3 is presented in Figure 9. M2B boride and BCC phase were found in the alloys after annealing. It is in accordance with calculation (Figure 5(c)).

Comparison of experimental and theoretical results shows very good agreement between them. The agreement also indicates that description of the B-Mn-V ternary system modelled by using a limited number of experimental results is sufficient.

5. Conclusions

This work was focused on phase equilibria of the B-V-Mn ternary system and B-Fe-Mn-V quaternary system. The results can be summarized as follows:(i)Thermodynamic description of the B-Mn-V system was developed by the Calphad method using available literature experimental-phase data. Boron was modelled as an interstitial element in solid solutions.(ii)Very good agreement was achieved between experimental results and calculation of the ternary system.(iii)Extrapolation to the B-Fe-Mn-V quaternary system by using descriptions of all ternary subsystems with no quaternary interaction parameters was done.(iv)Experimental phase analysis of the quaternary alloys after long-time annealing was performed.(v)Calculations for the quaternary systems are in very good agreement with the present experimental results.(vi)Database based on the ternary systems (B-Mn-V, B-Fe-V, B-Fe-Mn, and Fe-Mn-V) is applicable also for calculations of the quaternary system.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


The present work was supported by Slovak Grant Agency (VEGA) under Grant no. 2/0073/18. Thanks are also due to Dr. J. Szabó (IMR SAS Kosice) for production of the alloys and Dr. L. Falat (IMR SAS Kosice) for valuable comments.


  1. L. Falat, L. Čiripová, V. Homolová, and A. Kroupa, “The influence of isothermal ageing and subsequent hydrogen charging at room temperature on local mechanical properties and fracture characteristics of martensitic/bainitic weldments for power engineering,” Journal of Mining and Metallurgy, Section B: Metallurgy, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 373–382, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Lu, Y. Song, L. Hua, J. Liu, and Y. Shen, “Influence of thermal deformation conditions on the microstructure and mechanical properties of boron steel,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 701, pp. 328–337, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Matsunaga, H. Hongo, and M. Tabuchi, “Interfacial failure in dissimilar weld joint of high boron 9% chromium steel and nickel-based alloy under high-temperature creep condition,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 695, pp. 302–308, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. A. Rodriguez-Castro, R. C. Vega-Moron, A. Meneses-Amador et al., “Multi-pass scratch test behavior of AISI 316L borided steel,” Surface and Coatings Technology, Part: A, vol. 307, pp. 491–499, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. V. S. Telegus and J. B. Kuzma, “Poroskovaja Metalurgija,” vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 1971. View at: Google Scholar
  6. V. Homolová, A. Kroupa, and A. Výrostková, “Calculation of Fe-B-V ternary phase diagram,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 520, pp. 30–35, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. Repovský, V. Homolová, L. Čiripová, A. Kroupa, and A. Zemanová, “Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modelling of the B-Fe-Mn ternary system,” Calphad, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 252–259, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Kroupa, STEEL16 Database, 2010.
  9. A. T. Dinsdale, “SGTE data for pure elements,” Calphad, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 317–425, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Hillert and L.-I. Staffansson, “The regular solution model for stoichiometric phases and ionic melts,” Acta Chemica Scandinavica, vol. 24, pp. 3618–3626, 1970. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. O. Redlich and A. Kister, “Thermodynamics of nonelectrolyte solutions-x-y-t relations in a binary system,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 341–345, 1948. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Hillert and M. Jarl, “A model for alloying in ferromagnetic metals,” Calphad, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 227–238, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L.E. Tergenius, “Refinement of the crystal structure of orthorhombic Mn2B (formerly denoted Mn4B),” Journal of the Less Common Metals, vol. 82, pp. 335–340, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. Villars, Pearson’s Handbook, The Materials Information Society, Materials Park, OH, USA, 1997.
  16. P. Rogl, V. Romaka, J. Bursik et al., “Structure and properties of a novel boride (V0.92Fe0.08)2FeB2 with partially ordered U3Si2-type,” Journal of alloys and Compounds, vol. 746, pp. 638–647, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Viera Homolová et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.