Research Article
Comparison of Asphalt Mixtures Designed Using the Marshall and Improved GTM Methods
Table 2
Aggregate physical and mechanical indicators.
| Material name | Test project | Apparent relative density (g/cm3) | Gross volume relative density (g/cm3) | Needle particle content (%) | Crushing value (%) | <0.075 particle content (%) | Water absorption (%) |
| 11–22 mm gravel | 2.740 | 2.699 | 5.5 | — | 0.3 | 0.56 | 11–16 mm gravel | 2.744 | 2.701 | 4.8 | 11.7 | 0.2 | 0.63 | 6–11 mm gravel | 2.752 | 2.692 | — | — | 0.4 | 0.82 | 3–6 mm gravel (≥2.36 mm) | 2.726 | 2.652 | — | — | 2.1 | 1.02 | 3–6 mm gravel (<2.36 mm) | 2.705 | 2.644 | — | — | 0.96 | 0–3 mm gravel (≥2.36 mm) | 2.725 | 2.639 | — | — | 4.8 | 1.21 | 0–3 mm gravel (<2.36 mm) | 2.714 | 2.639 | — | — | 1.06 | Filler | 2.784 | — | — | — | — | — | Cement | 3.099 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
|