Research Article

Comparison of Asphalt Mixtures Designed Using the Marshall and Improved GTM Methods

Table 2

Aggregate physical and mechanical indicators.

Material nameTest project
Apparent relative density (g/cm3)Gross volume relative density (g/cm3)Needle particle content (%)Crushing value (%)<0.075 particle content (%)Water absorption (%)

11–22 mm gravel2.7402.6995.50.30.56
11–16 mm gravel2.7442.7014.811.70.20.63
6–11 mm gravel2.7522.6920.40.82
3–6 mm gravel (≥2.36 mm)2.7262.6522.11.02
3–6 mm gravel (<2.36 mm)2.7052.6440.96
0–3 mm gravel (≥2.36 mm)2.7252.6394.81.21
0–3 mm gravel (<2.36 mm)2.7142.6391.06
Filler2.784
Cement3.099