Research Article  Open Access
Jicai Liang, Chuandong Chen, Ce Liang, Yi Li, Guangyi Chen, Xiaoming Li, Aicheng Wang, "OneTime RollForming Technology for HighStrength Steel Profiles with “日” Section", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2019, Article ID 6505914, 10 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6505914
OneTime RollForming Technology for HighStrength Steel Profiles with “日” Section
Abstract
Roll forming is an important processing method for the production of commercial vehicle anticollision beams, and edge buckling is one of the common defects in rollforming process. In this paper, the “日” shape section of roll forming is studied, and first the bshaped section is formed by roll forming, and the internal weld line is automatically welded while forming; then the long side of the bshaped section is bent into the “U” shape, and the external weld line is welded while forming. The profile is cut off and then bent at both ends to form a commercial vehicle anticollision beam. The ABAQUS finite element software is used to model and analyze the factors affecting the “edge buckling” defect of rollformed products. This paper uses three factors and three levels of orthogonal simulation experiments to study the problem. The results show that the effect of the factors of flange height, sheet thickness, and forming speed on the formation of edge buckling is in the order of sheet thickness > flange height > forming speed. The edge buckling size of the vertical edge of bshaped tube decreases with the increase of sheet thickness and increases with the increase of flange height.
1. Introduction
Roll forming is a plastic processing method for gradually forming a metal strip into a desired product section through multipass rolls [1], and its schematic diagram is shown in Figure 1.
Roll forming has many advantages such as high production efficiency, good forming effect, and saving forming material [2]. This processing method is widely used in automobile parts, track bus brackets, oil and gas pipelines, building components, and other aspects [3]. The sheet metal is constantly subjected to complex bending and shearing forces during the forming process, which makes the forming mechanism particularly complicated, and the forming law is extremely difficult to grasp. The main defects of the formed parts are distortion, warpage, fracture, edge buckling, springback, and so on [4].
By using ABAQUS finite element software for numerical simulation, it is convenient and efficient to study the forming law of rollforming process, master the technological conditions affecting its forming effect, avoid the waste caused by “trial and error method,” effectively improve the product forming quality, and create greater production value [5]. Domestic and foreign scholars have carried out a lot of research work on this and have achieved many achievements in the aspects of rollforming mechanism, process parameter control, and finite element simulation: Heislitz and Duggal et al. [6, 7] began to simulate the simple Ushaped channel steel by finite element method to predict the stressstrain distribution and geometric shape after forming. McClure and Li [8] used ABAQUS’s implicit algorithm to simulate the roll forming of the channel section. They compared the calculated longitudinal strain with the experimental results of Bhattacharyya and Smith [9] to demonstrate the validity of the finite element simulation. Tehrani et al. [10, 11] conducted a finite element simulation study on the phenomenon of edge buckling in the rollforming process and found that if the bending angle of the sheet metal in the first forming process exceeded a specific limit, it would appear edge buckling in the subsequent second rollforming process. Kim et al. [12] studied the shape of the edge of the sheet before welding. In order to ensure the weld quality of the ERW pipeline, an optimized edge shape was obtained by preprocessing the edge to ensure a good welding effect. Wang and Fei [13] studied the effect of sheet thickness, arc radius, side leg height, and bending arc length on side leg wrinkling through orthogonal simulation experiments, which provided a basis for the formulation of rollforming process and finite element model.
As an important component product of automobile, the common anticollision beam is commonly used in the shape of rectangle, Ushape, and complex section as shown in Figure 2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
The research content of this paper is to study the rollforming process of anticollision beam with complex “日” closed section because the section needs to be further welded after forming, the forming effect of its edge will seriously affect the next step of production, so its profile welding edgeforming accuracy is particularly important. Edge buckling is one of the common forming defects in the rollforming process, which cannot be eliminated but can be minimized by process optimization design. In this paper, COPRA, a professional rollforming software of German Data M Company, is used to carry out inverse modeling and analysis of rollforming parts and their forming methods [14]. The accuracy of the simulation model is verified by simulation and experiment comparison. The section nodes of tube after forming are compared with the section of test results, so as to master the forming law of closed section. The effects of different process conditions on the edge buckling of roll forming are studied to determine the process conditions for reducing the longitudinal strain and optimize the forming scheme, so as to provide guarantee for improving the product quality.
2. Experimental Design
2.1. Experimental Method
The “日” shape section is one of the typical product shapes of automobile anticollision beam, and its section shape is shown in Figure 3.
Due to the complexity of the rollforming process, the design of the roll flower is cumbersome and difficult to process and the processing pass is more than that of the general shape. The processing sequence is shown in Figure 4.
The traditional “日” shape tube processing method is divided into two types: The first type is carried out in three steps: (1) two Ushaped channel steels are processed by rollforming equipment, (2) cut out a rectangular baffle, and (3) weld two Ushaped channel steels with a rectangular baffle as shown in Figure 5(a). The second is done in two steps: (1) a rectangular tube and a Ushaped tube are manufactured by rollforming equipment and (2) the rectangular tube and the Ushaped tube are weld as shown in Figure 5(b). The welding process of the above two methods is very complex, requiring repeated welding to achieve the forming effect, which not only increases the workload of workers but also has low production efficiency and poor product quality. The mechanical properties of the products are difficult to guarantee. In this paper, onetime roll forming is used to form the anticollision beam of commercial vehicle, which is a challenging forming method, as shown in Figure 5(c). First of all, the bshaped tube is rolled out by the rollforming equipment and the side position is automatically welded to complete the internal weld line; then, the bshaped tube is rolled again to make the vertical edge roll into a Ushaped tube to obtain the “日” shape tube; finally, the curved edge position is welded to complete the external weld line, as shown in Figure 5(d). This not only reduces the manufacturing process and improves the material utilization and production efficiency but also ensures the mechanical properties of the product, such as tensile strength, flexural strength, and impact toughness, because it is the roll forminginternal weldingroll formingexternal welding continuous roll forming.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
In this paper, the vertical edge buckling of bshaped tube is studied. The section size of the bshaped tube is shown in Figure 6. The forming material of the bshaped tube is the beam high strength steel B700L, which is commonly used in the automobile field. The forming angle of each pass cannot be too large, and the bshaped tube needs to be welded automatically in time after forming. Therefore, the requirements for the accuracy of the rollforming section, especially the “edge buckling” control accuracy, should be ensured. The product is produced on the selfinvented rollforming production line, as shown in Figure 7. The distance between rolls is 350 mm. In the rollforming process, the lower rolls are used as the driving rolls and the upper rolls are used as the passive rolls.
2.2. The Flower Pattern for bShaped Tube Section
Flower pattern is a crosssectional diagram describing the rollforming process of the sheet metal. The forming sequence of the bshaped tube is designed by COPRA’s roll design module. As shown in Figure 8, the outer side angle is first formed to 75° for 6 passes. Then, the inner corners are formed, and the inner corners are finally formed to 90 degrees for 6 passes. Finally, the remaining unformed outer corners are formed, forming 7.5° per pass for 2 passes.
2.3. Design of Orthogonal Experiment
In the longitudinal direction of the sheet, the strain occurring in the forming zone is different, which is easy to produce the defect of edge buckling. The standard deviation of longitudinal strain of each node on the edge of channel steel is usually taken as a criterion to measure the magnitude of edge buckling. The bigger the standard deviation, the more serious the edge buckling at the edge of the forming part; the smaller the standard deviation, the smaller the edge buckling. (1) is the formula for calculating the standard deviation [15].where n is the number of vertical nodes of the measurement position, is the longitudinal strain of each node, and is the average value of the longitudinal strain.
There are many factors that affect the buckling defects of the edge of bshaped tube rollforming process, among which the factors such as flange height, sheet thickness, and forming speed have a great effect on the forming defects of the sheet metal. This paper mainly investigates the effect of various factors on the edge buckling of the bshaped tube of the highstrength beam steel B700L material during the rollforming process. In order to ensure the rationality of the experiment, three factors and three levels are selected for the orthogonal experimental design. The flange height of the material is 60, 70, and 80 mm, the thickness of the sheet metal is 2, 2.5, and 3 mm, and the forming speed is 50, 100, and 150 mm/s. The orthogonal table of the three factors and three levels that affect the edge buckling during the bshaped tube roll forming process is shown in Table 1.

3. Material Properties
Some material parameters of beam highstrength steel B700L are shown in Table 2. The mechanical properties of the material are measured by an uniaxial tensile test. Figure 9 is the stressstrain curve of the specimen obtained from the test results. Since ABAQUS requires the values of true stress and strain when inputting data, the following formulas are used to calculate the required values [16]:where and are real stress and real strain and and are nominal stress and nominal strain, respectively.

4. Finite Element Model
4.1. Modeling
In this paper, ABAQUS/Explicit analysis method is used to model and analyze the rollforming process [12]. For the convenience of research, the rolls are set as an analytical rigid body. The sheet is formed at a room temperature and a low speed and is set as a deformable body during the simulation. In order to be the same as the actual production process, the diameter of upper roll is set as 150 mm, the diameter of lower roll is set as 100 mm, and the diameter of vertical roll is set as 100 mm. The distance between the rolls is set as 350 mm, and the length of the sheets is set as 900 mm.
The roll group consists of 14 passes and is divided into three parts. The first group is the guide rolls, the second group is the forming rolls, and the third group is the shaping rolls. In the last three passes of the forming rolls and the shaping rolls, the vertical rolls are used to assist the shaping. The flower patterns designed with COPRA are used to create a plan drawing of the rolls, and then the plan drawing is imported into the ABAQUS software to create threedimensional rolls.
4.2. Contacts and Boundary Conditions
There are many choices for the feeding method of the sheet. In this paper, a constant speed is set at the front end of the sheet, and the angular velocity is applied by the driving rolls. This method has a long calculation time and the calculation results are accurate. Considering the actual forming process, the calculation time is too long for the selection of the feeding speed of the sheet metal, if the simulation is based on the forming speed of the actual product. The excessive speed setting will lead to slippage between the sheet metal and rolls, which will lead to inaccurate calculation results. In the simulation experiment, the line speed V of the sheet metal in this paper is selected as 50–300 mm/s, and the angular velocity of the lower roll is obtained by the formula . In order to simulate the actual production process as much as possible, the rolls retain only their degrees of freedom in the direction of rotation, and the remaining degrees of freedom are controlled. The general contact between the sheet metal and rolls is adopted, and the friction coefficient is set to 0.2 [17]. Figure 10 is the assembly drawing of the roll bending model of the bshaped tube.
4.3. Element Type and Meshing
In the process of finite element analysis of roll forming, the commonly used elements are SC4R, SC8R, C3D8R, and so on [13]. In this numerical simulation analysis, the edge buckling analysis of the bshaped tube’s vertical edge is performed. While saving calculation time and improving calculation accuracy, SC4R shell element [8] is selected in this paper. In the direction of sheet width, the mesh refinement element size at bend angle is set to 3 mm, the element size at flange and web is set to 10 mm, the element size in length direction is set to 15 mm, and the element size in thickness direction is set to 9 integral points. The meshing situation is shown in Figure 11.
4.4. Comparison of Simulation Results with Experimental Results
In order to verify the validity of the simulation results, this paper takes the sheet flange height of 70 mm, the thickness of 2.5 mm, and the forming speed of 150 mm/s as an example. The upper part of the side is selected for longitudinal strain analysis. The results show that the simulation results are basically consistent with the experimental results, as shown in Figure 12.
5. Results and Discussion
5.1. Analysis of Simulation Results
According to the process described in the previous sections, it can be concluded from the postprocessing of the model that along the rollforming direction, the edge of the sheet has a longitudinal strain and the shear strain is formed along the sheet forming direction of the roll bending, as well as the transverse strain along the transverse direction of the sheet. Taking the sheet metal flange height of 70 mm, thickness of 2.5 mm, and forming speed of 150 mm/s as an example, Figure 13(a) is Mises stress diagram of “b” tube. It can be seen that the stress distribution of the whole tube is not uniform, but the overall trend is that the closer to the bend, the greater the stress of the tube, which can be illustrated by the transverse stress distribution of the sheet in Figure 13(b). Figure 13(c) is the equivalent plastic strain diagram of the bshaped tube. It is shown that the strain of the tube mainly occurs at the bend corner as shown in the transverse strain distribution diagram of the sheet in Figure 13(d). And the cause of edge buckling at flange is closely related to stress and strain.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
5.2. Mechanism Analysis of Buckling Defect at Vertical Edge of bShaped Tube
From the simulation results, it can be seen that the front flange of the tube tends to move inward, as shown in Figure 14. This is due to the complex deformation force when the sheet metal is bitten by the rolls in the process of roll forming. Therefore, in order to ensure the accuracy of the simulation results, the strain at the flange is measured at 100–800 mm along the length direction of the sheet metal. As shown in Figure 15, the longitudinal strain distributions of the top, middle, and bottom nodes of the flange can be seen as follows: the top of the flange > the middle of the flange > the bottom of the flange. It can be seen from Figure 15 that the curve of the top nodes of the flange is more fluctuating than the curve of the middle and bottom nodes, indicating that the longitudinal strain distribution at the top of the flange is the most uneven and the longitudinal strain distribution at the bottom of the flange is the most uniform. Therefore, edge buckling is very easy to occur at the top of the flange.
Comparing the longitudinal strain curves of flange, it can be concluded that when the longitudinal strain is greater than 0, the sheet extends longitudinally, and when the longitudinal strain is less than 0, the sheet is compressed longitudinally. Because of the combined effect of stress and strain, edge buckling occurs at the flange of the sheet metal.
5.3. Analysis of Orthogonal Experiments of Vertical Edge Buckling of bShaped Tube
In this paper, B700L highstrength beam steel is used for simulation experiments, and three representative factors are selected, which are flange height, sheet thickness, and forming speed. A threefactor, threelevel orthogonal experiment is designed with a total of nine experiments. The experimental results and result analysis are shown in Table 3.

From the analysis of the experimental results in Table 3, it can be seen that in nine experiments of orthogonal design for roll forming of bshaped tube, the standard deviation of longitudinal strain at the top of flange of Exp. 6 is the largest, which is 6.92 × 10^{−4}; the standard deviation of Exp. 1 is the smallest, which is 1.62 × 10^{−4}. In order to make the experimental results more intuitive, this paper selects the intermediate values of two longitudinal strain standard deviations, Exp. 2 and Exp. 3, and compares with Exp. 1 and Exp. 6, as shown in Figure 16. By comparing the characteristics of each curve, it can be concluded that the maximum longitudinal strain fluctuation at the top of the flange is Exp. 6 and its flange edge buckling is the most serious; the result of the Exp. 1 is the smallest longitudinal strain fluctuation amplitude and the minimum edge buckling. Therefore, the magnitude of the longitudinal strain fluctuation at the flange is closely related to the severity of edge buckling.
Table 4 shows the results of the values of the results of the respective experiments. The experimental values corresponding to each factor at different levels are summed up, and then the average value is obtained and the range analysis is made. It can be seen from the data in the table that the effect degree of each factor on the side wave is the sheet thickness > flange height > forming speed. Therefore, for the material properties of a certain highstrength beam steel B700L sheet, the sheet thickness and flange height have a greater impact on the edge buckling of the flange of the bshaped tube, whereas the effect of the forming speed is smaller. In order to further explore the effect of sheet thickness and flange height on edge buckling, a comparative experiment is designed in this paper.

5.4. Additional Experimental Results and Analysis
In order to further explore the effect of sheet metal thickness and flange height on the flange edge buckling of “b” tube, two sets of comparative simulation experiments are designed in this paper. Based on the simulation results of the orthogonal experiment, the first experimental design is carried out under the condition of flange height h = 60 and forming speed = 100 mm/s. The variables are sheet metal thickness, which is set as 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 mm, respectively. The second experimental design is carried out under the condition of sheet thickness t = 2.5 mm and forming speed = 100 mm/s, and the variables are flange height, which are 65, 70, 75, and 80 mm, respectively. The experimental results are shown in Figure 15. Figure 17(a) shows that the longitudinal strain at the flange increases with the increase of flange height. Figure 17(b) shows that as the thickness of the sheet increases, the longitudinal strain at the flange is also getting smaller and smaller. It can be seen that the edge buckling at the flange increases with the increase of flange height and decreases with the increase of plate thickness.
(a)
(b)
6. Conclusion
In this paper, COPRA is used for pass design, ABAQUS is used for finite element modeling and analysis, and orthogonal experiments and comparative experiments are designed to study the rollforming law of the bshaped tube, which provides theoretical basis for the production of “日” shape tube. The conclusions are as follows:(1)Compared with the traditional rollforming method, the application of new rollforming technology in this paper not only improves the material utilization rate and production efficiency but also ensures the mechanical properties of the products, such as tensile strength, bending strength, and impact toughness.(2)For highstrength beam steel B700L sheet, flange height, sheet thickness, and forming speed all effect the generation of edge buckling in the rollforming process. When the standard deviation of longitudinal strain is taken as the evaluation criterion, the effect degree of each factor on the formation of edge buckling is sheet thickness > flange height > forming speed.(3)The comparative experimental results show that the edge buckling of the vertical edge of the bshaped tube decreases with the increase of the thickness of the sheet metal and increases with the increase of the flange height. The effect of forming speed on edge buckling of the sheet metal is small.
Data Availability
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
 B. Abeyrathna, B. Rolfe, P. Hodgson, and M. Weiss, “Local deformation in roll forming,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 88, no. 9–12, pp. 2405–2415, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. L. Liu, J. G. Cao, X. T. Chai et al., “Experimental and numerical prediction of the local thickness reduction defect of complex crosssectional steel in cold roll forming,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 95, no. 5–8, pp. 1837–1848, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Mahajan, A. Abrass, and P. Groche, “FE simulation of roll forming of a complex profile with the aid of steady state properties,” Steel Research International, vol. 89, no. 5, Article ID 1700350, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 G. T. Halmos, Roll Forming Handbook, CRC, New York, NY, USA, 2006.
 B. Shirani, H. M. Naeini, and R. A. Tafti, “Experimental and numerical study of required torque in the cold roll forming of symmetrical channel sections,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 27, pp. 63–75, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Heislitz, H. Livatyali, M. A. Ahmetoglu et al., “Simulation of roll forming process with the 3D FEM code PAMSTAMP,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 59–67, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Duggal, M. A. Ahmetoglu, G. L. Kinzel et al., “Computer aided simulation of cold roll forming—a computer program for simple section profiles,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 41–48, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. K. McClure and H. Li, “Roll forming simulation using finite element analysis,” Manufacturing Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 114–122, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Bhattacharya and P. D. Smith, “The Development of Longitudinal Strain in Cold Roll Forming and its Influence on Product Straightness,” in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology of Plasticity, pp. 422–427, Tokyo, Japan, June 1984. View at: Google Scholar
 M. S. Tehrani, H. M. Naeini, P. Hartley et al., “Localized edge buckling in cold rollforming of circular tube section,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 177, no. 1–3, pp. 617–620, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. S. Tehrani, P. Hartley, and H. Khademizadeh, “Localised edge buckling in cold rollforming of symmetric channel section,” ThinWalled Structures, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 184–196, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Kim, S. B. Kang, and S. Lee, “Prediction and design of edge shape of initial strip for thick tube roll forming using finite element method,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 479–486, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Wang and H. Fei, “Prediction of wrinkling in flexible roll forming based on finite element simulation,” Forging & Stamping Technology, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 67–72, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 Data M Software GmbH, “COPRA® roll forming,” 2001, http://www.rolldesign.com. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Luo, Z. Guo, S. Li et al., “Finite element analysis of the effect of material properties on wavy flange in high strength steel roll forming,” Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 744–747, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Hibbitt, B. Karlsson, and P. Sorensen, Getting started with ABAQUS/Explicit—interactive version. Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., Providence, RI, USA, 2002.
 Q. V. Bui and J. P. Ponthot, “Numerical simulation of cold rollforming processes,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 202, no. 1–3, pp. 275–282, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Jicai Liang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.