Research Article

Nondestructive Testing on Ancient Wooden Components Based on Shapley Value

Table 3

Comparison of nondestructive testing methods.

NumberTypeProportionActual defect S0 (cm2)Stress wave S1 (cm2)Drilling resistance S2 (cm2)Combined prediction S3 (cm2)Absolute error valueRelative error value
Stress wave R1 (cm2)Drilling resistance R2 (cm2)Stress wave Q1 (%)Impedance meter Q2 (%)Combined prediction Q3 (%)

D-1Core material cavity0000000000
1/963.9686.3552.8565.9222.3911.1135.0117.373.06
1/782.24138.1668.1195.4355.9214.1368.0017.1816.04
1/5115.13149.6795.41116.5734.5419.7230.0017.131.25
1/3191.89178.45158.88178.2116.5633.018.6317.207.13
1/2287.83316.61237.94268.6228.7849.8910.0017.336.67

Average123.51144.87102.20120.7926.3721.3125.2714.375.69

D-2Sapwood cavity0000000000
1/963.9672.0850.7360.348.1213.2312.7020.695.66
1/782.24104.3571.4286.2422.1110.8226.8913.164.86
1/5115.13155.4392.26120.6940.3022.8735.0019.874.83
1/3191.89236.02163.39196.0744.1328.5023.0014.852.18
1/2287.83324.29226.54270.5336.4661.2912.6721.296.01

Average123.51148.70100.72122.3130.2227.3418.3814.983.92