Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 9856734 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9856734

Improvement in Carbonation Resistance of Portland Cement Mortar Incorporating γ-Dicalcium Silicate

Academic Editor: Viviana F. Rahhal
Received29 Jan 2019
Revised22 Apr 2019
Accepted20 Jun 2019
Published05 Aug 2019

Abstract

In this study, γ-dicalcium silicate (γ-C2S) was incorporated into ordinary Portland cement (OPC) to sequester CO2 to enhance the carbonation resistance of cement-based composite materials. γ-C2S can react with CO2 rapidly to form vaterite and high dense SiO2 gel which could block the pores off and then inhibit further diffusion of CO2 into the system. Cement mortar specimens containing 0%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 40% γ-C2S as cement replacement were prepared. After water curing for 28 days followed by curing in an environmental chamber for 28 days, the specimens were then exposed to an accelerated carbonation with 5% CO2 concentration for 28 days. The carbonation depth of the cement mortar with a low replacement rate (5% and 10%) was lower than that of the OPC mortar at all ages due to the sequestration of CO2 by γ-C2S. However, the cement mortar with a high replacement rate (20% and 40%) showed less carbonation resistance due to the dilution effect of γ-C2S replacement and increase in initial porosity caused by nonhydraulic characteristic of γ-C2S.

1. Introduction

Carbonation is an important factor affecting the service life of reinforced concrete structures. Carbonation of concrete occurs when CO2 in the air continuously traverses capillary pores, diffuses into concrete, dissolves in the pore solution, and forms carbanions that react with the hydration products to form calcium carbonates. The carbonation reaction reduces the pH value inside the concrete to a value low enough to break the protective film on the surface of steel reinforcement. Thus, the corrosion of steel bars is induced [14].

In order to extend the service life of reinforced concrete buildings which can be damaged by carbonation, several factors must be considered during the design stage, such as structural aspects, material selection, concrete mix design, proper compaction, and correct curing [5]. The application of coatings is also adopted in practical operations [69]. These methods aim to reduce the contact of CO2 with concrete by improving pore structure to reduce channels for the diffusion of CO2 or shielding the concrete surface. Unlike conventional methods, the approach proposed in this study attempts to inhibit the diffusion of CO2 by introducing a highly active CO2-capturable material, γ-C2S, into concrete to fix up CO2 present in the concrete, which could reduce CO2 diffusion rate. During the reaction between CO2 and γ-C2S, carbonation products with large molecular weights are formed [10, 11], which could block the capillary pores. Then, the permeability of cement-based composite materials can be reduced; thus, the available channels for the subsequent intrusion of CO2 are reduced, and the carbonation reactions can be further limited [12].

γ-C2S has an orthorhombic structure, which is called calcio-olivine. Olivine group minerals have become a popular subject of research for CO2 storage and capture (CSC) due to their high CO2 sequestration per unit mass capabilities [12, 13]. γ-C2S is considered as an insoluble substance, but it can rapidly react with CO2 [14, 15] to form calcium carbonates and highly polymerized silica gel.

The carbonation reaction of γ-C2S is as follows.

Although γ-C2S does not react with water directly, it is the necessary reaction medium for the carbonation of γ-C2S. Similar with other olivine group minerals, γ-C2S reacts with CO2 after the formation of a very thin water film on the surface of particles [16]. In Kerisi’s study, it was confirmed that γ-C2S had the strongest water absorption capacity than the other four different types of olivine group minerals [17]. Additionally, different from the carbonation mechanism of other calcium silicates, such as C3S and β-C2S, which have a hydrate activity, very few Ca ions of γ-C2S are dissolved in water, so the intermediate product, such as Ca(OH)2, is not formed during carbonation [18]. The direct reaction between γ-C2S and CO2 also results in a high carbonation reaction rate. Theoretically, 1 g of γ-C2S can react with 0.5 g of CO2 [19].

Several novel γ-C2S based cementitious materials have been developed by using the high carbonation activity of γ-C2S. In the literature of Higuchi et al. [19], a new type of concrete (CO2-SUICOM) has been proposed. Fly ash and γ-C2S are mixed into concrete to replace cement, and concrete samples were cured in the exhaust gas treatment room of power plant which is filled with exhaust gas containing a 15%–20% concentration of CO2. Concrete samples had a compressive strength of 21.0 N/mm2 after carbonation which is close to that of control group without γ-C2S. Guan et al. developed a γ-C2S based mortar using CO2 curing. By increasing the concentration of CO2 to 99.99%, the compressive strength of γ-C2S mortar samples can reach up to 60 MPa in 5 hours.

However, the application of γ-C2S has not been implemented on a large scale yet. The CO2 emissions during the manufacturing of γ-C2S using existing methods are lower than those of OPC [20]. From the perspective of mitigating the greenhouse effect, the application of γ-C2S in the construction industry has a great research value. In this study, the beneficial effects of γ-C2S on the carbonation resistance of cement-based composite materials are investigated. The macroscopic and microscopic properties, such as pore structure, carbonation depth, and calcium carbonate content, of cement mortar and cement paste containing γ-C2S with and without carbonation were studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Synthesis of γ-C2S

The γ-C2S used in this study was prepared by using analytical grade Ca(OH)2 and SiO2 powders. Powders were mixed in a Ca/Si ratio of 2 : 1 and then placed in a muffle furnace for calcination. The heating rate was set at 10°C/min, and the temperature was maintained at 1450°C for 1.5 hours. After calcining, the samples were cooled down to room temperature with the cooling rate at 60°C/min, which is close to the natural cooling rate [20]. During the cooling process, the conversion from β-C2S to γ-C2S results in volume expansion, followed by pulverization of the materials, which is known as the “dusting phenomenon” [21]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed for the phase identification and quantification of the synthetic γ-C2S sample. RIGAKU D/MAX-2500 was used with CuKα radiation of 100 mA and 40 kV. XRD results for synthetic γ-C2S after performing Rietveld refinement using the software Profex are shown in Figure 1. The purity of γ-C2S is greater than 90%. The chemical composition of synthetic γ-C2S was characterized by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and the result is shown in Table 1. Synthetic γ-C2S was sieved through a 150 μm sieve before use.


CaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3MgOSO3SrO

63.5835.550.090.230.360.050.097

2.1.2. Sample Preparation and Curing Method

Type 1 ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was used in this study, and its chemical composition is listed in Table 2. Both cement mortar and cement paste specimens have a water-to-binder ratio of 0.5. As shown in Table 3, cement paste mixtures are designated as OPC-P, γ5-P, γ10-P, γ20-P, and γ40-P, which contain 0%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 40% γ-C2S replacement, respectively. The cement mortar specimens have a binder-to-sand ratio of 1 : 3. Cement mortar mixtures are designated as OPC-M, γ5-M, γ10-M, γ20-M, and γ40-M, which contain 0%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 40% γ-C2S replacement, respectively. Cement mortar specimens and cement paste specimens were prepared according to KS L 5109 and then cast into a 4 × 4 × 16 cm and 3.5 × 3.5 × 1 cm plastic mold, respectively.


CaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3SO3MgO

65.1418.023.043.084.242.95


SamplesBinder (weight (%))Sand-to-binder ratioWater-to-binder ratio
Cementγ-C2S

OPC-P100000.5
γ5-P9550
γ10-P90100
γ20-P80200
γ40-P60400
OPC-M10003
γ5-M9553
γ10-M90103
γ20-M80203
γ40-M60403

Both cement paste and mortar specimens were demolded after 24 hours. After demolding, specimens were placed in tap water for 27 days and were then dried in a constant temperature chamber (relative humidity 60%, temperature 20°C) for 28 days. After that, cement mortar specimens and a portion of the specimens was moved into a CO2 chamber (relative humidity 60%, CO2 5%, and temperature 20°C) for the accelerated carbonation curing over 28 days, and the remainder of the specimens were left in the environmental chamber. Curing process and characterizations used in this study are summarized in Table 4.


Accelerated carbonation experiment (curing process)CharacterizationsSamples

Cement pasteX (28-day water curing + 56-day air curing)XRD FT-IROPC-P
γ5-P
γ10-P
γ20-P
γ40-P
O (28-day water curing + 28-day air curing + 28-day accelerated carbonation)XRD FT-IR DSC-TGOPC-PC
γ5-PC
γ10-PC
γ20-PC
γ40-PC

Cement mortarX (28-day water curing + 56-day air curing)Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP)OPC-M
γ10-M
γ40-M
O (28-day water curing + 28-day air curing + 28-day accelerated carbonation)Carbonation depthOPC-MC
γ5-MC
γ10-MC
γ20-MC
γ40-MC
MIPOPC-MC
γ10-MC
γ40-MC

2.2. Test Methods
2.2.1. Hydration Product Analysis

To confirm the hydration products of the cement-based materials containing γ-C2S subjected to or not subjected to accelerated carbonation, the cement paste specimens were ground into powder with a particle size less than 150 μm at 84 days, and the powders were analyzed by XRD and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). FT-IR was performed using a PerkinElmer Spectrum Two FT-IR spectrometer (L160000A). Spectral analysis was performed over the range 4000–400 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1.

2.2.2. Quantification of Calcium Carbonate

Calcium carbonate content of carbonated cement paste was evaluated based on the results of thermogravimetry analysis (TGA). Each batch of cement paste specimens was ground to into powder with a particle size less than 150 μm at 84 days. Powders were heated from room temperature to 1000°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min under a continuous flow of N2 gas.

2.2.3. Carbonation Depth Measurement

Cement mortar specimens were sealed with epoxy resin except for two opposite rectangular faces at the age of 54 days. After drying for 2 days, the test specimens were placed in a CO2 chamber (relative humidity 60%, CO2 5%, and temperature 20°C) for the accelerated carbonation. The sealed specimens were cut perpendicular to the unsealed surfaces after 3, 7, 14, and 28 days of accelerated carbonation. The carbonation depth was measured by using a 1% phenolphthalein pH indicator. For each set, three specimens of each age were used for carbonation depth measurement. For each specimen, 12 carbonation depth data were obtained, and the average value was calculated as the carbonation depth.

2.2.4. Pore Structure Analysis

Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) was performed to study changes in pore structure of the cement mortar after accelerated carbonation. The pore structure of each test piece was measured and analyzed by Micromeritics AutoPore IV 9500 mercury intrusion porosimeter (MIP). The pore diameter measurement in this study is 0.003 to 370 μm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis

Crystalline phases in the specimens with and without accelerated carbonation were analyzed by XRD, and the results are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

The diffraction peaks of the major hydration products, such as Ca(OH)2 and ettringite, can be observed in Figure 2. At the same time, some diffraction peaks of quartz were also observed. The diffraction peaks of γ-C2S also appeared obviously at 20.5°, 22°, 32°, and 55° of 2θ for γ20-PC and γ40-PC. In particular, it was found that the main diffraction peaks of Ca(OH)2 were reduced due to the decrease in the formation of Ca(OH)2 by the large replacement of cement for γ40-PC; meanwhile, the diffraction peaks of γ-C2S became very conspicuous. In addition, since the analyzed powder samples were placed in the air and reacted with CO2, resulting in the formation of CaCO3, the diffraction peaks of calcite and vaterite were also detected.

The diffraction peaks of Ca(OH)2 were absent in all five batches of carbonated cement paste samples, and the diffraction peaks of three phases of CaCO3, calcite, aragonite, and vaterite, can be observed. Calcite was the main calcium carbonate phase formed in all specimens. Vaterite is considered to be the main carbonation product of γ-C2S. Saito reported that the crystallinity of C2S is associated with the crystallinity of the carbonation products [18]. γ-C2S and vaterite have a similar crystalline structure in which Ca2+ ions occupy a six-coordinate position of hexagonally close packed O2−, and their Ca-O bond lengths are also similar. Table 5 shows the coordination number and Ca-O bond length in C2S and CaCO3 crystals [12, 22, 23]. Therefore, vaterite could be generated after the topotactic reaction of γ-C2S in the carbonation reaction process [24]. So, the diffraction peaks of calcite are reduced for the cement paste mixed with γ-C2S. In addition, some previous studies reported that the main carbonation products of γ-C2S are calcite [15, 25]. This is because that calcite is more thermodynamically stable than the other two structures at room temperature and atmospheric pressure, aragonite is slightly less stable under similar conditions and is eventually transformed to calcite, and vaterite is thermodynamically the most unstable of the three crystal structures and can transform into the calcite at low temperature. Therefore, the different experimental environments and ways of preserving samples can cause a conversion of polymorphs in this study [2630]. The diffraction peaks of quartz can be observed at approximately 26.5° in the XRD results of all cement pastes, especially in carbonated samples of OPC which was very sharp. The quartz in samples might come from the clinker of the cement and/or synthetic γ-C2S [31].


Parameterγ-C2Sβ-C2SVateriteCalciteAragonite

Coordinate number of Ca66/8669
Average length of Ca-O0.2370.2460.2290.340.253

3.2. FT-IR Analysis

The FT-IR spectra of noncarbonated and carbonated cement paste at 84 days are shown in Figure 4. The shapes of the FT-IR spectra of the noncarbonated specimens were substantially similar because the hydration products in the specimens were the same, which is consistent with the XRD results. The noncarbonated samples show weak peak at 3640 cm−1, which corresponds to H-O stretching vibrations of Ca(OH)2. The peak near 950 cm−1 corresponds to the Q2 vibration of the Si-O bond in the hydrate product—C-S-H [32, 33]. The calcium carbonate formed by the reaction of the powdered specimen with CO2 in air is also reflected in the FT-IR spectra. The peaks at approximately 1400 cm−1 correspond to the asymmetric stretching vibration of C-O from three polymorphs of calcium carbonate (calcite, vaterite, and aragonite). Also, the peaks at 870 cm−1 and 850 cm−1 were assigned to the out-of-plane bending vibration of C-O from calcite and vaterite, respectively. The peaks observed at 715 cm−1 were caused by the in-plane bending vibration of C-O from calcite and aragonite [2729, 34, 35].

In the FT-IR spectra of the carbonated specimens, the effect of carbonation can be clearly observed. Due to carbonation of Ca(OH)2, peaks of O-H stretching vibrations were absent at 3640 cm−1. The peaks at approximately 1400 cm−1, 870 cm−1, 850 cm−1, and 715 cm−1 were sharper and more visible in comparison with noncarbonated samples. Lower crystallinity calcium carbonate formed during the accelerated carbonation, which was verified by the appearance of broad asymmetrical peaks at approximately 1410 cm−1. Additionally, the appearance of new peaks was observed at 745 cm−1, which is attributed to the formation of vaterite [24, 27, 28]. For carbonated OPC specimens, the vaterite peak can be also observed because the carbonation of C-S-H could form vaterite [2]. After the accelerated carbonation, the peaks of the Si-O-Si band that appeared in the FT-IR spectrum of the noncarbonated specimens at approximately 950 cm−1 appeared at approximately 1070 cm−1 in carbonated specimens. It indicates the formation of a silicate gel caused by the decalcification of C-S-H during the carbonation [36, 37].

3.3. TGA Analysis

To quantify the CaCO3 content of carbonated cement paste specimens, the completely carbonated cement paste specimens (confirmed by 1% phenolphthalein solution) were ground into powder and measured by using TGA. The differential thermogravimetry (DTG) and TG behaviors of each sample are shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5(b) shows that all specimens show very similar results of TG-DTG, which indicate the reaction products were almost same. All samples showed a mass loss at approximately 100°C due to the decomposition of free water and/or physically adsorbed water from C-S-H and/or SiO2 gel [38]. The humps in the region of 500°C–650°C and 650°C–750°C are due to the decomposition of poorly crystallized CaCO3. Sharp peaks at the temperature between 750°C and 850°C were attribute to the decomposition of well crystallized CaCO3 [35, 39]. In previous studies, researchers considered the mass loss at 750°C–850°C was from the decomposition of three polymorphs—calcite, vaterite, and aragonite. Based on these, we consider that the mass loss between 500°C and 850°C is mostly due to the decomposition of calcium carbonates of varying crystallinity [40]. Therefore, the mass loss in this range can be approximated as the amount of CO2 fixation by the cement paste specimens during the accelerated carbonation. According to Figure 5(a), the mass loss between 500°C and 850°C was calculated and are shown in Table 6. The CaCO3 content was calculated using formula (2) [41], and the results are shown in Table 7. It can be seen that the CaCO3 content of the samples mixed with γ-C2S is slightly higher than that of OPC-PC, and the CaCO3 content increases with increases in the substitution ratio of γ-C2S, which is attributed to the high carbonation activity of γ-C2S.where WL refers to the percent mass loss associated with the decomposition of subscript phase in TGA and MW refers to the molecular weight of subscript phase.


ParameterOPC-PCγ5-PCγ10-PCγ20-PCγ40-PC

Estimated CO2 fixation23.3424.1824.6525.0426.40


ParameterOPC-PC (%)γ5-PC (%)γ10-PC (%)γ20-PC (%)γ40-PC (%)

Estimated CaCO3 content53.0554.9556.0256.9160.00

3.4. Pore Structure Analysis

The pore size distribution and total porosity of cement mortar specimens at 84 days are shown in Figures 6 and 7, respectively. In Figure 6(a), it can be observed that the diameters of the pores in the noncarbonated sample of OPC-M, γ10-M, and γ40-M are mainly in the range of approximately 0.08–0.15 μm. Pores with a diameter smaller than 0.1 μm are even more in γ10-M than in OPC-M, especially those smaller than 0.06 μm. The porosity above 0.1 μm is approximately the same as that of OPC-M. Therefore, it can be inferred that the addition of γ-C2S with low substitution leads to an increase in the formation of relatively fine pores (<0.08 μm). The pore structure of the γ40-M noncarbonated sample shows the lowest pore concentration in the range of 0.08–0.15 μm, and the quantity of other pore sizes increased, especially in the range of 0.01–0.02 μm and above 0.15 μm. The addition of a large amount of γ-C2S significantly increases the quantity of large capillary pores. Figure 7 also shows the total porosity of the noncarbonated sample increases as γ-C2S increases. The reduction in the total amount of hydration products due to the nonhydraulic characteristic of γ-C2S probably results in an increase in porosity.

In Figure 6(b), the pore diameters of the OPC-MC and γ10-MC samples were concentrated between 0.1 and 0.2 μm. γ40-MC carbonated sample had distinct peak at 0.5 μm. Overall, the amount of large capillary pores in all three carbonated samples were more than that in uncarbonated samples. This coarsening of the pore structure can be explained by the formation of amorphous SiO2 gel due to the decomposition of C-S-H during carbonation [2, 36, 37]. As seen in Figure 7, total porosity of carbonated samples was significantly less compared to noncarbonated samples. It attributed to the formation of carbonation products which blocked pores, although the relatively larger capillary pore increased.

According to the total porosity results shown in Figure 7, the porosity of the noncarbonated samples of OPC-MC, γ10-MC, and γ40-MC are 13.9%, 16.16%, and 18.79%, respectively. The porosity of the carbonated samples of OPC-MC was 11.25%, which is 19.1% less compared to noncarbonated samples of OPC-MC. For γ10-MC and γ40-MC, more calcium carbonates were produced due to the addition of γ-C2S as shown in TGA results. The total porosity of γ10-MC and γ40-MC was 22.42% and 22.97% less than γ10-M and γ40-M, respectively. The gaps between porosity of noncarbonated and carbonated samples were more obvious as the replacement ratio increases. Vaterite formed by the carbonation of γ-C2S is denser than calcite and aragonite (vaterite: 2.645 g/cm3, calcite: 2.711 g/cm3, and aragonite: 2.944 g/cm3) [42]. Thus, volume expansion caused by vaterite and the formation of highly polymerized silica gel result in pores blocking in cement mortar samples incorporating γ-C2S.

3.5. Carbonation Depth

The carbonation depth at 3, 7, 14, and 28 days after the accelerated carbonation is shown in Figure 8.

When the replacement ratio of γ-C2S is low (γ5-MC and γ10-MC), the carbonation depth decreases at all ages as substitution increases. When the substitution ratio reaches at 20%, the carbonation depth begins to increase but is still lower than that of OPC-MC. However, the carbonation depth of γ40-MC was higher at all ages than that of OPC-MC. This is probably due to the dual effects of CO2 sequestration and alkalinity change. For the samples with a low replacement ratio (γ5-MC and γ10-MC), the addition of γ-C2S led to the increased consumption of CO2 in the cement mortar, and then the diffusion rate could be slowed down. Also, the subsequent intrusion channels for CO2 were limited due to the formation of more carbonates. Thus, the diffusion rate simultaneously decreased even further. For the samples with a high replacement ratio (γ20-MC and γ40-MC), the hydration products decreased significantly which led to the decrease in alkalinity of the systems, and then an internal environment of the samples became neutral soon after carbonation started. This phenomenon can be widely observed in cement-based composite materials containing supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) [2, 4, 25]. Based on experimental results, it is considered that incorporating γ-C2S at a low replacement ratio can improve the carbonation resistance of the cement mortar.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the carbonation resistance of cement-based composite materials incorporating 0%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 40% of γ-C2S was evaluated. The feasibility of methods incorporating γ-C2S into cement mortar to capture CO2, reduce CO2 diffusion, and improve the pore structure to inhibit the carbonation reaction was verified. The main conclusions are as follows:(1)Calcite, aragonite, and vaterite were the carbonation products formed in the cement paste during the accelerated carbonation. Vaterite is considered the main carbonation product of γ-C2S, which increased significantly in carbonated cement paste samples containing 40% γ-C2S.(2)In the DSC-TG study, the mass loss between 500°C–850°C is associated with the decomposition of crystallized and amorphous calcium carbonate. The results show that the CaCO3 content and amount of CO2 fixation increased with increasing replacement of γ-C2S.(3)The porosity of the noncarbonated cement mortar increased as the substitution of γ-C2S increased, which was caused by the relatively low hydration degree due to the dilution effect of γ-C2S replacement. The porosity of the carbonated cement mortar was less than noncarbonated samples due to the formation of carbonates in the capillary pores. The carbonation products of γ-C2S are mainly vaterite and highly polymerized silica gel which could block the pores off effectively and limit the diffusion of CO2 into the system.(4)For the samples with a low replacement ratio (γ5-MC and γ10-MC), the carbonation depth shows a downward trend at all ages with the increase in replacement rate, and γ10-MC had the lowest carbonation depth. However, porosity was increased and susceptibility to carbonation was increased with further increase in replacement rate of γ-C2S. The carbonation depth began to increase with more than 20% replacement of cement with γ-C2S. The carbonation depth of γ40-MC was higher than that of OPC-MC at all ages. The experimental results revealed that the incorporation of γ-C2S at a lower substitution rate can improve the carbonation resistance of the cement mortar.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Zhengxin Chen and Hanseung Lee conceptualized the study; Zhengxin Chen and Yunsu Lee performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Hyeongkyu Cho synthesized γ-C2S; Zhengxin Chen prepared the original draft; Seungmin Lim reviewed and edited the manuscript; and Hanseung Lee supervised the research.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant (19SCIP-B103706-05) from the Construction Technology Research Program funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean Government.

References

  1. C. Shi, M. Liu, P. He, and Z. Ou, “Factors affecting kinetics of CO2 curing of concrete,” Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, vol. 1, no. 1-2, pp. 24–33, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. Ashraf, “Carbonation of cement-based materials: challenges and opportunities,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 120, pp. 558–570, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H.-S. Lee and X.-Y. Wang, “Evaluation of the carbon dioxide uptake of slag-blended concrete structures, considering the effect of carbonation,” Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 312–329, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Šavija and M. Lukovićb, “Carbonation of cement paste: understanding, challenges, and opportunities,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 117, pp. 285–301, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. A. Aguirre-Guerrero and R. M. De Gutiérrez, “13—assessment of corrosion protection methods for reinforced concrete,” in Eco-Efficient Repair and Rehabilitation of Concrete Infrastructures, F. Pacheco-Torgal, E. R. Melchers, X. Shi et al., Eds., pp. 315–353, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK, 1st edition, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  6. X. Pan, Z. Shi, C. Shi, T.-C. Ling, and N. Li, “A review on concrete surface treatment part I: types and mechanisms,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 132, pp. 578–590, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Shi, J. Liu, and J. Liu, “Effect of polymer coating on the properties of surface layer concrete,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 27, pp. 291–300, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. W. Tsao, M. Liang, J. Chang, and N. Huang, “Effect of mortar coating on concrete carbonation,” Journal of Marine Science and Technology, vol. 23, pp. 420–430, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Baccay, N. Otsuki, T. Nishida, and S. Maruyama, “Influence of cement type and temperature on the rate of corrosion of steel in concrete exposed to carbonation,” Corrosion Engineering, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 811–821, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. Mu, Z. Liu, F. Wang, and X. Huang, “Carbonation characteristics of γ-dicalcium silicate for low-carbon building material,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 177, pp. 322–331, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Saphouvong, T. Saito, N. Otsuki, and T. Yumoto, “Corrosion of steel bars in autoclaved concrete pile containing γ-2CaO·SiO2 with an accelerated carbonation curing submerged in the real marine environment,” Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 299–307, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Mu, G. Xue, S. Zhao, X. Huang, and F. Wang, “Development of carbonation of γ-dicalcium silicate,” Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, vol. 45, pp. 1198–1203, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  13. H. Béarat, M. J. McKelvy, A. V. G. Chizmeshya et al., “Carbon sequestration via aqueous olivine mineral carbonation: role of passivating layer formation,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 40, no. 15, pp. 4802–4808, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Q. Wang, H. Manzano, Y. Guo, I. Lopez-Arbeloa, and X. Shen, “Hydration mechanism of reactive and passive dicalcium silicate polymorphs from molecular simulations,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 34, pp. 19869–19875, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. X. Guan, S. Liu, C. Feng, and M. Qiu, “The hardening behavior of γ-C2S binder using accelerated carbonation,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 114, pp. 204–207, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. L. Berger, J. F. Young, and K. Leung, “Acceleration of hydration of calcium silicates by carbon dioxide treatment,” Nature Physical Science, vol. 240, no. 97, pp. 16–18, 1972. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Kerisi, E. J. Bylaska, and A. R. Felmy, “Water and carbon dioxide adsorption at olivine surfaces,” Chemical Geology, vol. 359, pp. 81–89, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. T. Saito, E. Sakai, M. Morioka, and N. Otsuki, “Carbonation of γ-Ca2SiO4 and the mechanism of vaterite formation,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 273–280, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Higuchi, M. Morioka, I. Yoshioka, and K. Yokozeki, “Development of a new ecological concrete with CO2 emissions below zero,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 67, pp. 338–343, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Morioka, K. Yamamoto, T. Torichigai, and K. Yokozeki, “Manufacturing of γC2S used by industrial raw material and its evaluation of CO2 emission,” Cement Science and Concrete Technology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Watanabe, K. Yokozeki, R. Ashizawa et al., “High durability cementitious material with mineral admixtures and carbonation curing,” Waste Management, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 752–757, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Zhang, R. C. Ewing, U. Becker, and Z. Cai, “Carbonate orientational order and superlattice structure in vaterite,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 407, pp. 78–86, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Udagawa, K. Urabe, M. Natsume, and T. Yano, “Refinement of the crystal structure of γ-Ca2SiO4,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 139–144, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Chang, Y. Fang, and X. Shang, “The role of β-C2S and γ-C2S in carbon capture and strength development,” Materials and Structures, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 4417–4424, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. Lu, C. Shi, and G. Hou, “Strength and microstructure of CO2 cured low-calcium clinker,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 188, pp. 417–423, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Gopi, V. K. Subramanian, and K. Palanisamy, “Aragonite-calcite-vaterite: a temperature influenced sequential polymorphic transformation of CaCO3 in the presence of DTPA,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1906–1912, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. Chakrabarty and S. Mahapatra, “Aragonite crystals with unconventional morphologies,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 2953–2957, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. E. Mohamed, S. Ismaiel, H. Hanaa, and L. R. Abdel, “Preparation of vaterite calcium carbonate in the form of spherical nano-size particles with the aid of polycarboxylate superplasticizer as a capping agent,” American Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 4, pp. 44–51, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  29. T. Siva, S. Muralidharan, S. Sathiyanarayanan, E. Manikandan, and M. Jayachandran, “Enhanced polymer induced precipitation of polymorphous in calcium carbonate: calcite aragonite vaterite phases,” Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 770–778, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Naka, Y. Tanaka, and Y. Chujo, “Effect of anionic starburst dendrimers on the crystallization of CaCO3 in aqueous solution: size control of spherical vaterite particles,” Langmuir, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 3655–3658, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. Zhu, Y. Fang, and H. Wei, “Carbonation-cementation of recycled hardened cement paste powder,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 192, pp. 224–232, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. A. Bernal, R. M. De Gutierrez, J. L. Provis, and V. Rose, “Effect of silicate modulus and metakaolin incorporation on the carbonation of alkali silicate-activated slags,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 898–907, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Nedeljković, Y. Zuo, K. Arbi, and G. Ye, “Carbonation resistance of alkali-activated slag under natural and accelerated conditions,” Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–49, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. X. Pan, Z. Shi, C. Shi, X. Hu, and L. Wu, “Interactions between inorganic surface treatment agents and matrix of Portland cement-based materials,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 113, pp. 721–731, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. He, C. Shi, Z. Tu, C. S. Poon, and J. Zhang, “Effect of further water curing on compressive strength and microstructure of CO2-cured concrete,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 72, pp. 80–88, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Thiéry, P. Faure, A. Morandeau et al., “Effect of carbonation on the microstructure and moisture properties of cement-based materials,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Building Materials and Components, Porto, Portugal, April 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  37. A. Morandeau, M. Thiéry, and P. Dangla, “Impact of accelerated carbonation on OPC cement paste blended with fly ash,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 67, pp. 226–236, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. Ghoroi, D. Venkateswaran, and A. K. Suresh, “A critique of thermokinetic analysis in solids processing: cement industry as a case study,” Thermochimica Acta, vol. 618, pp. 56–66, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Z. Morshed and Y. Shao, “Influence of moisture content on CO2 uptake in lightweight concrete subject to early carbonation,” Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 144–160, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. Hidalgo, C. Domingo, C. Garcia, S. Petit, C. Andrade, and C. Alonso, “Microstructural changes induced in Portland cement-based materials due to natural and supercritical carbonation,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 3101–3111, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Lim and P. Mondal, “Effects of incorporating nanosilica on carbonation of cement paste,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 3531–3540, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. T. Saito, E. Sakai, M. Morioka, and M. Daimon, “Carbonation reaction of calcium silicate hydrates by hydrothermal synthesis at 150°C in OPC-γ-Ca2SiO4-α-Quartz systems,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 333–341, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Zhengxin Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

663 Views | 371 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.