Research Article
Prediction of Tool Lifetime and Surface Roughness for Nickel-Based Waspaloy
Table 7
Comparison for the experimental and predictive cutting time for each set of the cutting parameters.
| The first group cutting parameters | V = 40 m/min, fz = 0.3 mm/tooth, ap = 0.3 mm | Experimental value (min) | 3.133 | 6.267 | 9.4 | 12.533 | 15.667 | Predictive value (min) | 3.992036 | 5.845427 | 7.791341 | 13.705577 | 15.719503 | Error (%) | 27.419 | 6.727 | 17.113 | 9.356 | 0.335 | Average magnitude of error (%) | 12.190 |
| The second group cutting parameters | V = 37.5 m/min, fz = 0.35 mm/tooth, ap = 0.25 mm | Experimental value (min) | 3.82 | 5.64 | 7.46 | 11.28 | 14.1 | Predictive value (min) | 4.335873 | 4.974936 | 6.271479 | 11.736453 | 15.077437 | Error (%) | 13.5 | 11.792 | 15.95 | 4.047 | 6.932 | Average magnitude of error (%) | 10.4458 |
| The third group cutting parameters | V = 35 m/min, fz = 0.4 mm/tooth, ap = 0.2 mm | Experimental value (min) | 2.564 | 5.127 | 7.691 | 10.255 | 12.818 | Predictive value (min) | 3.027042 | 4.607661 | 7.894739 | 9.680498 | 13.283241 | Error (%) | 18.059 | 10.129 | 2.649 | 5.602 | 3.630 | Average magnitude of error (%) | 8.014 |
|
|