Research Article

Optimization of Mechanical Crimping in the Terminal Crimping Process Using a Response Surface Methodology

Table 3

Analysis of variance.

SourceDFAdj SSAdj MSF value value

Model91766.97196.331397.77≤0.001
Linear32.330.785.53≤0.001
Crimp height (X)11.941.9413.84≤0.001
Crimp depth (Y)10.060.060.430.514
Crimp width (Z)10.330.332.330.129
Square31762.85587.624183.53≤0.001
Crimp height (X) crimp height (X)11258.101258.108957.07≤0.001
Crimp depth (Y) crimp depth (Y)1339.47339.472416.84≤0.001
Crimp width (Z) crimp width (Z)1460.68460.683279.84≤0.001
Two-way interaction31.790.604.24≤0.001
Crimp height (X) crimp depth (Y)10.730.735.180.024
Crimp height (X) crimp width (Z)10.440.443.130.078
Crimp depth (Y) crimp width (Z)10.620.624.420.037
Error19026.690.14
Lack-of-fit519.313.8696.870.531
Pure error1857.380.04
Total1991793.66