Anemia

Anemia / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 561567 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/561567

Kefyalew Addis Alene, Abdulahi Mohamed Dohe, "Prevalence of Anemia and Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in an Urban Area of Eastern Ethiopia", Anemia, vol. 2014, Article ID 561567, 7 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/561567

Prevalence of Anemia and Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in an Urban Area of Eastern Ethiopia

Academic Editor: Bruno Annibale
Received09 Apr 2014
Revised26 Jul 2014
Accepted02 Aug 2014
Published25 Aug 2014

Abstract

This research work presents the magnitude of anemia and its determinant factors among pregnant women. As far as this research is done in the eastern part of Ethiopia, where there is a different cultural issue related to pregnancy and dietary habit, it will help the researchers to know the problem in different parts of the country.

1. Background

Anemia, defined as a decreased concentration of blood hemoglobin, is one of the most common nutritional deficiency diseases observed globally and affects more than a quarter of the world’s population [18]. It is a major public health problem affecting all ages of the population with its highest prevalence among children under five years of age and pregnant women [2, 3]. Globally, anemia affects 1.62 billion people (25%), among which 56 million are pregnant women [1, 2].

Anemia during pregnancy is considered severe when hemoglobin concentration is less than 7.0 g/dL, moderate when hemoglobin falls between 7.0–9.9 g/dL, and mild from 10.0-11 g/dL [24]. Anemia during pregnancy is a major cause of morbidity and mortality of pregnant women in developing countries and has both maternal and fetal consequences [913]. It is estimated that anemia causes more than 115,000 maternal and 591,000 perinatal deaths globally per year [3].

In developing countries, the cause of anemia during pregnancy is multifactorial and includes nutritional deficiencies of iron, folate, and vitamin B12 and also parasitic diseases, such as malaria and hookworm. The relative contribution of each of these factors to anemia during pregnancy varies greatly by geographical location, season, and dietary practice. In Sub-Saharan Africa, iron and folate deficiencies are the most common causes of anemia in pregnant women [14]. Anemia has a variety of converging contributing factors including nutritional, genetic, and infectious disease factors; however, iron deficiency is the cause of 75% of anemia cases [2, 5, 815]. Iron deficiency anemia affects the development of the nation by decreasing the cognitive development of children and productivity of adults [2, 10].

Seventeen percent of Ethiopian women in the reproductive age group are anemic and 22% of these women are currently pregnant [16]. Despite its known effect on the population, there is very little data available in the study area. Therefore, this study is aimed at determining the prevalence of anemia in pregnant women and identifying its associated factors in the Somali Region of Eastern Ethiopia.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Setting and Design

A community based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2013 in Gode town, Eastern Ethiopia.

2.2. Study Population

The study population consisted of a sample of pregnant women who were residing in the town during the study period. Those pregnant women who were not long-term residents of the city (less than 6 months) were excluded.

2.3. Sampling Procedures

Sample size was determined based on single population proportion formula using Epi info version 7 with a 95% CI, 5% margin of error, and assumption that 22% of pregnant women are anemic [16]. Assuming a 10% nonresponse rate and a design effect of 2, a total sample size of 581 pregnant women was required. Multistage sampling technique was used to select the study participants. Four kebeles (villages) were selected from 6 kebeles using the randomized method. A proportional allocation was employed to obtain the sample size from each kebele. The starting point was randomly selected and a systematic random sampling method was used to select the study participants.

2.4. Data Collection

Data were collected using pretested interviewer administered questionnaire, which contains sociodemographic characteristics (age, education, occupation, marital status, and others), obstetric and gynecological history (trimester, gravidity, parity, ANC follow up, iron supplementation, and others), and dietary factors (type of stable diet, meal frequency, and intake of meat, tea, egg, and milk and milk products).

Blood hemoglobin concentration was measured using a HemoCue Hb 301, a precalibrated instrument designed for the measurement of hemoglobin concentration. Venous blood was drawn, through microcuvettes, and inserted into the HemoCue and the result was recorded. Mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) of the mothers was measured and recorded as an independent variable.

2.5. Data Processing and Analyses

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Description of means, frequencies, proportions, and rates of the given data for each variable was calculated. Bivariate analysis was done to see the association of each independent variable with the outcome variable. Those variables having value less than 0.2 were entered into the multivariate logistic regression model to identify the effect of each independent variable with the outcome variables. A value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and adjusted odds ratio with 95% CI was calculated to determine association.

2.6. Ethical Consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the University of Gondar. An official letter was obtained for Somali Regional Health Bureau and Gode City Administration Health Office and letters were prepared for the local authority of the selected kebeles. Written informed consent was obtained from each study participant after they were introduced to the purpose of the study and informed about their rights to interrupt the interview at any time. Confidentiality was maintained at all levels of the study. Mothers found to be anemic were referred to the nearest health center or hospital and the referral process was facilitated.

3. Results

3.1. Socioeconomic and Demographic Characteristics

Out of a total sample size (581) 577 pregnant women were included and there was a nonresponse rate of 0.7%. The mean ages of the mothers at present, at marriage, and at first pregnancy were 27.01 (±5.97), 17.52 (±2.10), and 18.38 (±2.32) years, respectively. Majority of the mothers were married (97.2%), Somali (98.9%), and Muslim (99.1%).

The average family size, number of pregnancies, deliveries, and children of the households were 6.9 (±2.86), 4.98 (±2.62), 3.83 (±2.55), and 3.61 (±2.38), respectively. About 261 (45.2%) of the mothers were in their second trimester, 247 (24.8%) were in the third trimester, and the remaining 69 (12.0%) were in the first trimester.

Most of the mothers were illiterate 507 (87.9%) and housewives 499 (86.5%). The family’s main sources of income were salaried jobs 301 (52.2%), private business 101 (17.5%), and remittance 52 (9%). More than half of the respondents 355 (61.5%) were at or below the middle wealth quintile (Table 1).


Variables Frequency () Number (%)

Age of the mother
 ≤2062 (10.7)
 21–25 137 (23.7)
 26–30187 (32.4)
 31–35 122 (21.1)
 >35 69 (12.0)
Marital status
 Married 561 (97.2)
 Divorced 13 (2.3)
 Widowed 3 (0.5)
Religion
 Muslim572 (99.1)
 Christian5 (0.9)
Ethnicity
 Somali 570 (98.8)
 Amhara5 (0.9)
 Oromo1 (0.2)
 Others 1 (0.2)
Educational status
 Unable to read and write 476 (82.5)
 Read and write only 31 (5.4)
 Primary school (1–8)37 (6.4)
 Secondary school 8 (1.4)
 College and above 25 (4.3)
Occupation
 Housewife 499 (86.5)
 Government employee 34 (5.9)
 Business 44 (7.6)
Family Size
 <5134 (23.2)
 5–7 211 (36.6)
 ≥8232 (40.2)
Age at marriage
 <16198 (34.3)
 16–18 283 (49.0)
 ≥1996 (16.6)
Source of income
 Salary 301 (52.2)
 Business 101 (17.5)
 Remittance 52 (9.0)
 Others 123 (21.3)
Wealth index (Quintiles)
 Lowest 114 (19.8)
 Second 127 (22.0)
 Middle 114 (19.8)
 Fourth104 (18.0)
 Highest 118 (20.5)

3.2. History of Malaria and Intestinal Parasite

Of the 577 respondents, 88 (15.3%) had a known history of intestinal parasite, 548 (95.0%) said they were using insecticide treated bed net (ITNs), and 366 (63.4%) had a known history of malaria. Of those with a known history of intestinal parasite 7 (8%) were infected during the current pregnancy, 39 (44.3%) were infected 1–3 months before the current pregnancy, and the remaining 42 (47.8%) were infected more than four months prior to the current pregnancy. Similarly, from those with known history of malaria 37 (10.1%) were infected during the current pregnancy, 131 (35.8%) were infected 1–3 months before current pregnancy, and the remaining 198 (54.1%) were infected more than four months before current pregnancy.

3.3. Environmental and Housing Characteristics of the Study Subjects

Of the 577 respondents 211 (36.6%) were living in a rented house, and the remaining 366 (63.4%) owned the house. Four hundred fifty one (78.2%) had private latrine, but only 26 (4.5%) had piped water. Only 18 (3.1%) had tap water, and only 2 (0.3%) had public tap water as their main source of drinking water. Half (56.5%) of the study participants obtained drinking water from a protected well/tanker and the remaining 231 (40%) drank water from arriver. Also, only 34 (5.9%) of the respondents had a farm or garden to cultivate and assist them in meeting their nutritional needs.

3.4. Behavioral Characteristics and Nutritional Status of Respondents

The most reported staple diet of the household was rice and spaghetti 504 (87.3%). More than half, 382 (66.2%), of the respondents eat three times per day.

The majority of the respondents 570 (98.8%) said they drink tea and 444 (77.9%) of them drink tea before meals, and 339 (59.5%) of them have tea more than two times per day. Five hundred fifty four (96%) and 384 (66.6%) had eaten meat and used fruits more than twice per week, respectively. More than half of the respondents, 348 (60.3%), said they use egg less than once per month, but 312 (54.1%) use milk and milk products daily, and 416 (72.1%) had eaten between 5 and 8 food groups in the last 24 hours prior to the interview.

Of the 577 respondents 177 (30.7%) reported involvement in physical work with 27 (15.3%) and 30 (16.9%) of them reporting very heavy and heavy physical work, respectively. One hundred seven (18.5%) reported consuming forbidden foods and 196 (34%) have reported eating charcoal or clay during pregnancy. More than half of 347 (60.1%) said they had visited a health facility for antenatal care (ANC) with 56 (16.1%), 116 (33.4%), and 175 (50.4%) of them reporting an initial ANC visit, a second ANC visit, and more than two ANC visits during a pregnancy. More than half of 388 (67.2%) reported receiving iron supplementation during the current pregnancy.

Nutritional status was evaluated by MUAC and 575 of the respondents were measured (excluding 2 with incomplete MUAC), and 29 (5%) had MUAC of less than 21 cm, 228 (39.7%) had MUAC between 21 and 23 cm, and the remaining 318 (55.3%) had an MUAC within normal limits (>23 cm) (Table 2).


Variables Frequency ( Number (%)

Trimester
 First trimester 69 (12.0)
 Second trimester 261 (45.2)
 Third trimester 247 (42.8)
Age at first pregnancy (years)
 <17126 (21.8)
 17–19 270 (46.8)
 ≥20 181 (31.4)
Number of pregnancies
 <3 166 (20.1)
 3–5228 (39.5)
 ≥6 233 (40.4)
Number of deliveries (parity)
 <2 121 (21.0)
 2–4 237 (41.1)
 ≥5219 (38)
Number of Children
 <2 126 (21.8)
 2–4247 (42.8)
 ≥5204 (35.4)
Child spacing
 Yes 42 (7.3)
 No535 (92.7)
Antenatal care
 Yes 347 (60.1)
 No230 (39.9)
ANC during current pregnancy
 Yes 322 (92.8)
 No25 (7.2)
Frequency of ANC (347)
 First ANC 56 (16.1)
 Second ANC 116 (33.4)
 Third ANC 175 (50.4)

3.5. Prevalence of Anemia

From the total 577 respondents 328 (56.8%) were anemic (95% CI: 52.9–60.8), 7 (1.2%) of them were severely anemic, 154 (26.7%) were moderately anemic, and 167 (28.9%) were mildly anemic. The mean hemoglobin level was 10.79 (±1.47) g/dL. More than half (76.8%) of the anemic study participants were from large families (>5 family members). Most of them (80.7%) were multiparous (≥2) and multigravidous (≥3). Majorities were married at age 18 years or younger (82.9%). Most of them (58.5%) were at or below the middle wealth quintile and were illiterate (89.9%).

3.6. Factors Associated with Anemia

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that trimester of current pregnancy, iron supplementation during pregnancy, wealth quintile, number of pregnancies, and MUAC were significantly associated with anemia in the study population (Table 4).

Pregnant women in the third and second trimesters were 3.32 (95% CI 1.84–6.0) and 2.87 (95% CI 1.61–5.17) times more likely to be affected by anemia as compared to pregnant women in the first trimester, respectively. Similarly, those pregnant women who had 3–5 pregnancies were 1.95 times more likely to be anemic, compared with those who had less than 3 pregnancies (AOR =1.95 (95% CI=1.19–3.19)).

Pregnant women who were not taking iron supplementation during pregnancy were 1.54 more likely to develop anemia (AOR = 1.54 (95% CI = 1.04–2.27)).

Pregnant women in the second wealth quintile were 57% (AOR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24–0.76) less likely to develop anemia, compared with those in the lowest wealth quintile. Similarly, pregnant women with MUAC ≥ 23 were 59% less likely to be anemic compared with those with MUAC < 23 (AOR = 0.41 (95% CI: 0.27–0.63)) (Table 3).


VariablesFrequency () Number (%)

Stable diet
 Rice and spaghetti 504 (87.3)
 Maize and sorghum 68 (11.8)
 Others 5 (0.9)
Meal frequency
 More than three times 120 (20.8)
 Three times 382 (66.2)
 Two times 63 (10.9)
 One time 12 (2.1)
Meat frequency
 One a week 137 (23.7)
 Twice a week 267 (46.3)
 More than twice per week 150 (26)
 Once per month 7 (1.2)
 Less than one time per month 16 (2.8)
Drinking tea
 Yes 570 (98.8)
 No7 (1.2)
Time for drinking tea
 Before meal 444 (77.9)
 After Meal 126 (22.1)
Fruit frequency
 Every day 28 (4.9)
 Once a week 67 (11.6)
 Twice a week 178 (30.8)
 More than twice per week 111 (19.2)
 Once per month 70 (12.1)
 Less than once per month 348 (60.3)
Egg frequency
 Every day 25 (4.3)
 Once a week 65 (11.3)
 Twice a week 48 (8.3)
 More than twice per week 21 (3.6)
 Once per month 70 (12.1)
 Less than once per month 348 (60.3)
Milk and milk product frequency
 More than two times per day 312 (54.1)
 Once per day 160 (27.7)
 Once per week 43 (7.5)
 Less than once per week 62 (10.7)
Food groups eaten in 24 hours
 1–4 141 (24.4)
 5–8 416 (72.1)
 >8 food groups 20 (3.5)
Physical work
 Yes 177 (30.7)
 No 400 (69.3)
Forbidden foods for pregnancy
 Yes 107 (18.5)
 No 470 (81.5)
Eating charcoal and clay
 Yes 196 (34)
 No 381 (66)
Iron supplementation
 Yes 388 (67.2)
 No189 (32.8)
Nutritional status (MUAC)
 <21 cm 29 (5)
 21–23 cm228 (39.7)
 >23 cm 318 (55.3)


Variables Anemia statusCOR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)
Anemic Normal

Trimester
 First trimester 24451.001.00
 Second trimester 1551062.74 (1.58–4.77)2.87 (1.61–5.17)
 Third trimester 149982.85 (1.63–4.98)3.32 (1.84–6.00)
Parity
 <2 63581.00
 2–4 150871.59 (1.02–2.47)
 ≥51151041.02 (0.65–1.59)
Family size
 <5 76581.00
 5–7 135761.29 (0.84–1.98)
 ≥8 1171151.75 (1.19–2.56)
Forbidden foods
 Yes 70371.00
 No2582120.64   (0.41–0.99)
ANC
 Yes 1841631.00
 No144860.74 (0.52–1.05)
Iron supplementation during pregnancy
 Yes 2071811.001.00
 No121680.72 (0.45–1.15)1.54 (1.04–2.27)
24 hr recall food groups
 1–4 94471.00
 5–8 2241920.58 (0.39–0.87)
 >8 10100.50 (0.2–1.29)
Wealth index
 Lowest 49651.001.00
 Second78490.40 (0.24–0.68)0.43 (0.24–0.76)
 Middle 65490.85 (0.50–1.43)0.989 (0.57–1.72)
 Fourth 59450.71 (0.42–1.20)0.69 (0.39–1.21)
 Highest 77410.70 (0.41–1.20)0.67 (0.37–1.19)
Gravidity
 <3 59571.001.00
 3–5 148801.79 (1.14–2.82)1.95 (1.19–3.19)
 ≥61211121.04 (0.67–1.63)1.14 (0.7–1.85)
MUAC
 <23107441.001.00
 ≥232192050.44 (0.30–0.66)0.41 (0.27–0.63)

4. Discussion

More than half (56.8%) of the pregnant women studied were anemic. This figure is lower than the prevalence of anemia in pregnant women of some other developing countries such as India and Pakistan [4, 15]. This may be due to the inclusion of more rural villages in the studies from Pakistan and India, which were not included in this study. This finding is much higher than the national prevalence of anemia in pregnant women, which is 22% [16], and also higher than the prevalence noted from the 2011 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey (EDHS) report, which found that 30.4% of Ethiopians were anemic [8]. This discrepancy could be due to the exclusion of agropastoralist zones and the time gap between the current study and the 2011 EDHS.

Gravidity and age of current pregnancy (trimester) were important variables, which have shown a significant association with anemia in the current study. The risk of developing anemia increases with the age of pregnancy (trimester). The risk of developing anemia was higher in third and second trimester when compared with those in the first trimester. This finding is consistent with a study done in Saudi Arabia, which found that the prevalence of anemia is higher in the third trimester in comparison with first trimester [11], and another study conducted in India, which also indicated that the prevalence of anemia was higher in pregnant women in the third and second trimesters [10]. Additionally, studies conducted in Malaysia, Vietnam, and Nepal found that increased gestational age is significantly associated with the risk of developing anemia [6, 17, 18]. This could be due to the fact that when the gestational age increases the mother becomes weak and the iron in the blood is shared with the fetus in the womb therefore decreasing the iron binding capacity of the mother’s blood.

The other important variable significantly associated with anemia is number of pregnancies (gravidity). The risk of developing anemia in pregnant women with 3–5 pregnancies is increased when compared with those who had less than 3 pregnancies. This finding is consistent with studies conducted in Saudi Arabia and India, which found that increased number of pregnancies and deliveries is positively associated with the risk of developing anemia [10, 11]. This could be due to the loss of iron and other nutrients during increased and repeated pregnancies and also the possibility of sharing of resources with the fetus. However, other studies conducted in Ethiopia and Nepal did not find association between gravidity and anemia [8, 18]. This could be due to the difference in sociocultural characteristics of the study populations.

Similarly the wealth status of the household was significantly associated with the development of anemia. Increased wealth quintiles from lowest to second lowest reduce the risk of developing anemia by 57%. This finding is consistent with the findings from other studies in low and middle-income countries, which found that the risk of anemia among women living in the lowest wealth quintile was increased when compared with those living in the fourth and fifth wealth quintiles. A study done in India showed that pregnant women from lower socioeconomic classes were at increased risk of developing anemia compared with those in higher socioeconomic classes [2, 10]. This could be due to the fact that those from lower socioeconomic status (SES) lack the ability to purchase the quality or quantity of foods compared with those from higher SES.

Many other studies on anemia in pregnancy conducted in Ethiopia, Pakistan, Nepal, Vietnam, and Malaysia [5, 6, 8, 17, 18] did not consider the effect of wealth index. This could be because the wealth index is calculated from different household assets.

Two other variables with significant association with anemia were iron supplementation during pregnancy and MUAC level. The risk of developing anemia increased in pregnant women who did not receive iron supplementation during pregnancy when compared with those who received iron supplementation. This finding is consistent with the findings from studies in Vietnam and India, which indicated that lack of iron supplementation is among the most significant risk factors for developing anemia during pregnancy [6, 10]. This is likely due to the fact that the requirement of iron increases for pregnant women compared with nonpregnant women, and if they do not receive iron supplementation, the iron they ingest from food sources is not adequate to meet their needs. The finding contrasts with a study done at Pakistan, which found that women who reported consuming iron supplementation had a significantly lower hemoglobin concentration. This may be due to a difference in methodology between the studies.

MUAC less than 23 is found to increase the risk of developing anemia. The current study has shown that pregnant women with MUAC ≥ 23 had 59% less risk of developing anemia. This finding is consistent with a study done in Nepal, which found that MUAC > 23.6 significantly decreased risk of developing anemia [18]. This can be explained by the fact that undernourished pregnant women have a higher probability of being micronutrient deficient and therefore iron deficient and anemic.

Other independent variables which are not significant factors in this study but found to be significant by other studies reviewed include age of the mother, age at pregnancy, age at marriage, number of deliveries, number of children, family size, educational status of the mother, and occupation of the mother [5, 9, 14]. This could be due to the difference between sociocultural and behavioral characteristics of the community in this study and previous studies.

This study was conducted at the community level and considered altitude as an independent variable to assess anemia. Limitations include the cross-sectional nature of the study and using patient report rather than laboratory data for the identification of previous malarial and parasitic infections. Also, the study did not include rural residents.

5. Conclusion

The prevalence of anemia among pregnant women in this study was high compared with women in other areas of Ethiopia. Trimester of current pregnancy, wealth quintile, gravidity, iron supplementation, and MUAC were found to be significantly associated with anemia. Iron supplementation and special care during late pregnancy are recommended to reduce anemia. Further research on risk factors of anemia, which include rural residents, should be conducted to strengthen and broaden these findings.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Kefyalew Addis Alene and Abdulahi Mohamed Dohe participated in all steps of the study from its commencement to writing it up. They have reviewed and approved the submission of the paper. These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

  1. WHO/CDC, Worldwide Prevalence of Anemia 1993–2005: WHO Global Database on Anemia, WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  2. Y. Balarajan, U. Ramakrishnan, E. Özaltin, A. H. Shankar, and S. V. Subramanian, “Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries,” The Lancet, vol. 378, no. 9809, pp. 2123–2135, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Salhan, V. Tripathi, R. Singh, and H. S. Gaikwad, “Evaluation of hematological parameters in partial exchange and packed cell transfusion in treatment of severe anemia in pregnancy,” Anemia, vol. 2012, Article ID 608658, 7 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Esmat, R. Mohammad, S. Behnam et al., “Prevalence of iron deficiency anemia among iranian pregnant women; a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Reproduction and Infertility, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  5. N. Baig-Ansari, S. H. Badruddin, R. Karmaliani et al., “Anemia prevalence and risk factors in pregnant women in an urban area of Pakistan,” Food and Nutrition Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 132–139, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  6. R. Aikawa, N. C. Khan, S. Sasaki, and C. W. Binns, “Risk factors for iron-deficiency anaemia among pregnant women living in rural Vietnam,” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 443–448, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. A. Khalafallah and A. E. Dennis, “Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy and postpartum: pathophysiology and effect of oral versus intravenous iron therapy,” Journal of Pregnancy, vol. 2012, Article ID 630519, 10 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Haidar, “Prevalence of anaemia, deficiencies of iron and folic acid and their determinants in ethiopian women,” Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 359–368, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. Akhtar and I. Hassan, “Severe Anemia during late pregnancy,” Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 2012, Article ID 485452, 3 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. G. Vivek, A. B. Halappanavar, P. R. Vivek, S. B. Halki, V. S. Maled, and P. S. Deshpande, “Prevalence of Anemia and its epidemiological,” Determinants in Pregnant Women, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 216–223, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  11. S. S. Elzahrani, “Prevalence of iron deficiency anemia among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics at Al-Hada Hospital,” Canadian Journal on Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  12. N. Raza, I. Sarwar, B. Munazza, M. Ayub, and M. Suleman, “Assessment of iron deficiency in pregnant women by determining iron status,” Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 36–40, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. Brooker, P. J. Hotez, and D. A. P. Bundy, “Hookworm-related anaemia among pregnant women: a systematic review,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 2, no. 9, article e291, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. J. Baker and E. M. DeMaeyer, “Nutritional anemia: Its understanding and control with special reference to the work of the world health organization,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 368–417, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  15. G. S. Toteja, P. Singh, B. S. Dhillon et al., “Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women and adolescent girls in 16 districts of India,” Food and Nutrition Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 311–315, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  16. Ethiopia, Demographic and Health Survey, Central Statistics Agency, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2011.
  17. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Population Census Commission, The 2007 Population and Housing census of Ethiopia Results for Somali Region Statistical Report, Central Statistical Agency, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2010.
  18. Z. Makhoul, D. Taren, B. Duncan et al., “Risk factors associated with anemia, iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in rural Nepali pregnant women,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 735–745, 2012. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Kefyalew Addis Alene and Abdulahi Mohamed Dohe. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

24941 Views | 8653 Downloads | 25 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.