Review Article
Improving Cognitive Function from Children to Old Age: A Systematic Review of Recent Smart Ageing Intervention Studies
Table 1
Scores of methodological quality.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: random allocation; Q2: treatment allocation concealed; Q3: groups/subjects similar at baseline regarding important prognostic values; Q4: eligibility criteria specified; Q5: blinded outcome assessor; Q6: care provider blinded; Q7: patient blinded; Q8: point estimates and measures of variability presented for the primary outcome measures; Q9: intention-to-treat analysis; Q10: details of random allocation methods; Q11: adequate description of the control/comparison group; Q12: between-group statistical comparison; Q13: reporting dropouts; Q14: reporting CONSORT statement. Y: yes; the study met the criteria of the question, N: no; the study did not meet the criteria of the question, and?: no information or the study was not the case with the question. Takeuchi et al. [38], who used processing speed training, published their findings in Journal of Neuroscience. Takeuchi et al. [62], who used working memory training with mental calculation, published their findings in PLoS One. |