Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Operations Research
Volume 2017, Article ID 6367037, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6367037
Research Article

Redesign of the Attention Process of Patients with Rheumatologic Diseases: Assessing the Performance with Analytic Hierarchy Process

1Departamento de Administración, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
2Instituto de Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia

Correspondence should be addressed to Iouri Gorbanev; oc.ude.anairevaj@rogiruy

Received 5 June 2017; Revised 24 August 2017; Accepted 10 September 2017; Published 26 November 2017

Academic Editor: Kwai S. Chin

Copyright © 2017 Iouri Gorbanev et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Taylor, The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper and Brothers, New York, NY, USA, 7th edition, 1911.
  2. M. Porter, La Ventaja Competitiva de las Naciones, Vergara, Madrid, Spain, 1991.
  3. D. Teece, “The foundations of enterprise performance: dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms,” Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 328–352, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. T. de Oliveira, L. Ensslin, S. Ensslin, and A. Dutra, “A constructivist approach to manage business process as a dynamic capability,” Knowledge and Process Management, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 54–66, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. T. de Oliveira et al., “Research Opportunities in Business Process Management and Performance Measurement from a Constructivist View,” Knowledge and Process Management, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 18–30, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Glavan, “Understanding process performance measurement systems,” Business Systems Research, vol. 2, no. 2, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. V. Yen, “An integrated model for business process measurement,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 865–875, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Hitpass, “Business Process Management,” in Fundamentos y Conceptos de Implementación, BHH Ltda, Santiago, Chile, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Sipahi and M. Timor, “The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications,” Management Decision, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 775–808, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Sarkis, L. Meade, and A. Presley, “An activity based management methodology for evaluating business processes for environmental sustainability,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 751–769, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. K. Sharma and R. Bhagwat, “An integrated BSC-AHP approach for supply chain management evaluation,” Measuring Business Excellence, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 57–68, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Saaty, “Analytic hierarchy process,” in Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, S. Gass and M. Fu, Eds., pp. 19–28, S.L. Springer, Bangkok, Thailand, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. Yin, “Case study research,” in Design and Methods, Sage, Newcastle, UK, 2nd edition, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  14. E. Triantaphyllou and S. Mann, “Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges,” International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 1995. View at Google Scholar