Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Operations Research
Volume 2018, Article ID 8290434, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8290434
Research Article

Measuring Conflicts Using Cardinal Ranking: An Application to Decision Analytic Conflict Evaluations

1Dept. of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Box 7003, SE-164 07 Kista, Sweden
2Dept. of Information Systems and Technology, Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden
3International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis, IIASA, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria

Correspondence should be addressed to Tobias Fasth; es.us.vsd@htsaf

Received 23 February 2018; Revised 28 May 2018; Accepted 11 July 2018; Published 27 September 2018

Academic Editor: Alessandra Oppio

Copyright © 2018 Tobias Fasth et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. French, D. Rios Insua, and F. Ruggeri, Decision Analysis, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 211–226, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. C. Bayley and S. French, “Designing a participatory process for stakeholder involvement in a societal decision,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 195–210, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Riabacke, J. Åström, and Å. Grönlund, “eParticipation galore? extending multi-criteria decision analysis to the public,” International Journal of Public Information Systems, vol. 70, no. 2, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, J. Idefeldt, and A. Larsson, “Using a software tool for public decision analysis: the case of nacka municipality,” Decision Analysis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 76–90, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, A. Ekengren, T. Hökby, and J. Lidén, “Decision process support for participatory democracy,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 15–30, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. K. Hansson, G. Cars, M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, and A. Larsson, “Diversity and public decision making. in world academy of science, engineering and Technology 71,” in Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on e-Democracy and Open Government, pp. 1678–1683, 2012.
  7. B. Enserink, “A quick scan for infrastructure planning: Screening alternatives through interactive stakeholder analysis,” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. S. Reed, A. Graves, N. Dandy et al., “Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1933–1949, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Efremov, D. R. Insua, and A. Lotov, “A framework for participatory decision support using Pareto frontier visualization, goal identification and arbitration,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 459–467, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Danielson and L. Ekenberg, “The CAR Method for Using Preference Strength in Multi-criteria Decision Making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 775–797, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. C. Rencher, Method of Multivariate Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  12. C. Bana e Costa, “The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: Case study,” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 111–125, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Ekenberg, K. Hansson, M. Danielson et al., Deliberation, Representation, Equity: Research Approaches, Tools and Algorithms for Participatory Processes, Open Book Publishers, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. E. Vilkkumaa, A. Salo, and J. Liesiö, “Multicriteria Portfolio Modeling for the Development of Shared Action Agendas,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 49–70, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Riabacke, A Prescriptive Approach to Eliciting Decision Information [Ph.D. thesis], Stockholm University, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, 2012.
  16. E. Jacquet-Lagrèze and Y. Siskos, “Preference disaggregation: 20 Years of MCDA experience,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 233–245, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Dias, V. Mousseau, J. Figueira, and J. Clímaco, “An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 332–348, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Ghaderi, F. Ruiz, and N. Agell, “A linear programming approach for learning non-monotonic additive value functions in multiple criteria decision aiding,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 259, no. 3, pp. 1073–1084, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. S. Greco, V. Mousseau, and R. Słowiński, “Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 416–435, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. J. S. Dyer and R. K. Sarin, “Measurable multiattribute value functions,” Operations Research. The Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 810–822, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. J. S. Dyer and R. K. Sarin, “Group preference aggregation rules based on strength of preference,” Management Science, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 822–832 (1980), 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  22. F. Eisenführ, M. Weber, and T. Langer, Rational Decision Making, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Riabacke, M. Danielson, and L. Ekenberg, “State-of-the-art prescriptive criteria weight elicitation,” Advances in Decision Sciences, vol. 2012, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. G. Stillwell, D. A. Seaver, and W. Edwards, “A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multiattribute utility decision making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 62–77, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. H. Barron, “Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weights,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 80, no. 1–3, pp. 91–103, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. H. Barron and B. E. Barrett, “The efficacy of SMARTER—simple multi-attribute rating technique extended to ranking,” Acta Psychologica, vol. 93, no. 1–3, pp. 23–36, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. W. Kirkwood and R. K. Sarin, “Ranking with partial information: a method and an application,” Operations Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 38–48, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  28. F. H. Barron and B. E. Barrett, “Decision quality using ranked attribute weights,” Management Science, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1515–1523, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Jia, G. W. Fischer, and J. S. Dyer, “Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 85–105, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Danielson, L. Ekenberg, and Y. He, “Augmenting ordinal methods of attribute weight approximation,” Decision Analysis, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, “How to make a decision,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer-Verlag, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. C. Bana e Costa and J.-C. Vansnick, “MACBETH—an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions,” International Transactions in Operational Research, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 489–500, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. C. A. Bana e Costa, J. De Corte, and J. Vansnick, “On the Mathematical Foundation of MACBETH,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, vol. 78 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, pp. 409–437, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Larsson, M. Riabacke, M. Danielson, and L. Ekenberg, “Cardinal and rank ordering of criteria - Addressing prescription within weight elicitation,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1299–1330, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. G. Jaspersen and G. Montibeller, “Probability Elicitation Under Severe Time Pressure: A Rank-Based Method,” Risk Analysis, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1317–1335, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. Lahdelma, P. Salminen, and J. Hokkanen, “Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 595–605, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. T. Clemen and J. E. Smith, “On the Choice of Baselines in Multiattribute Portfolio Analysis: A Cautionary Note,” Decision Analysis, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 256–262, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. E. P. Torrance, “Group Decision-Making and Disagreement,” Social Forces, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 314–318, 1957. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar