Research Article

Total Knee Arthroplasty Designed to Accommodate the Presence or Absence of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament

Table 2

Kinematics during the kneeling and lunge activities for the PCL-retained and PCL-resected groups (mean ± standard deviation, range).

Nonweight bearing kneelingWeight bearing lunge
PCL-retainedPCL-resectedPCL-retainedPCL-resected

Patients20132010
Skeletal knee flexion (°)131 ± 13
(109 to 160)
124 ± 11
(105 to 141)
0.15120 ± 11
(95 to 147)
123 ± 17
(87 to 145)
0.54
Implant valgus (°)−1 ± 2
(−3 to 2)
1 ± 3
(−3 to 8)
0.02−1 ± 1
(−2 to 1)
1 ± 2
(−5 to −1)
0.00
Tibial external rotation (°)−10 ± 4
(−18 to −3)
−10 ± 6
(−19 to −1)
0.75−11 ± 4
(−16 to −3)
−9 ± 4
(−18 to −4)
0.25
Medial condyle AP (mm)−2 ± 4
(−10 to 9)
2 ± 4
(−3 to 9)
0.020 ± 4
(−6 to 8)
−2 ± 4
(−9 to 3)
0.22
Lateral Condyle AP (mm)−10 ± 4
(−20 to −1)
−5 ± 4
(−9 to 1)
0.01−8 ± 4
(−15 to −1)
−9 ± 3
(−15 to −5)
0.41

Significant differences between the PCL-retained and PCL-resected groups were assessed using a Student’s -test.