Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Orthopedics
Volume 2014, Article ID 509592, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/509592
Clinical Study

Outcomes of Geriatric Hip Fractures Treated with AFFIXUS Hip Fracture Nail

1ST2 Plastic Surgery, St. Andrews Centre for Plastic Surgery and Burns, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 7ET, UK
2Macclesfield Hospital, Victoria Road, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 3BL, UK

Received 28 September 2014; Accepted 1 December 2014; Published 18 December 2014

Academic Editor: Boris Zelle

Copyright © 2014 Ahmed Mabrouk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. X. Huang, F. Leung, Z. Xiang et al., “Proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw fixation for trochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 805805, 8 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J.-S. Pu, L. Liu, G.-L. Wang, Y. Fang, and T.-F. Yang, “Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1441–1444, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Bonnaire, H. Zenker, C. Lill, A. T. Weber, and B. Linke, “Treatment strategies for proximal femur fractures in osteoporotic patients,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. S93–S102, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Appelt, N. Suhm, M. Baier, and P.-J. Meeder, “Complications after intramedullary stabilization of proximal femur fractures: a retrospective analysis of 178 patients,” European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 262–267, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. Hesse and A. Gächter, “Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 124, no. 10, pp. 692–698, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. J. Domingo, D. Cecilia, A. Herrera, and C. Resines, “Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 298–301, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Papasimos, C. M. Koutsojannis, A. Panagopoulos, P. Megas, and E. Lambiris, “A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 462–468, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. I. B. Schipper, E. W. Steyerberg, R. M. Castelein et al., “Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures: randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 86–94, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. E. Müller, S. Nazarian, P. Koch, and J. Schatzker, The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1990.
  10. R. Griffiths, J. Alper, A. Beckingsale et al., “Management of proximal femoral fractures 2011: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland,” Anaesthesia, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 85–98, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. R. Baumgaertner, S. L. Curtin, D. M. Lindskog, and J. M. Keggi, “The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series A, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 1058–1064, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Clifford, “Garden’s Alignment Index,” 2014, http://www.wheelessonline.com.
  13. M. Hrubina, M. Skoták, and J. Běkhoune, “Complications of dynamic hip screw treatment for proximal femoral fractures,” Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 395–401, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Windolf, D. A. Hollander, M. Hakimi, and W. Linhart, “Pitfalls and complications in the use of the proximal femoral nail,” Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, vol. 390, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Pavelka, J. Matejka, and H. Cervenková, “Complications of internal fixation by a short proximal femoral nail,” Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 344–354, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  16. R. E. Santos Pires, E. O. Santana, L. E. Nascimento Santos, V. Giordano, D. Balbachevsky, and F. B. dos Reis, “Failure of fixation of trochanteric femur fractures: clinical recommendations for avoiding Z-effect and reverse Z-effect type complications,” Patient Safety in Surgery, vol. 5, p. 17, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar