Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Retrospective Study Describing Principles and Advantages of the Technique

Table 2

Clinical data and outcome scores of patients evaluated at follow-up.

	Gender/Age	Fracture Type		F/U; (months)	Malunion	Constant Score		Oxford Shoulder Score
		Neer	AO/OTA			Absolute	Normalized
1	F/75	3-p	B2	54		85	107	48
2	F/55	3-p	B1	52	Tuberosity	83	100	45
3	F/77	3-p	B2	51		62	78	37
4	M/53	3-p	B2	50		89	98	47
5	F/60	3-p	B1	49		83	100	48
6	M/59	4-p	C1	49	Tuberosity	81	90	47
7	F/64	2-p	B2	47		66	81	41
8	F/57	2-p	A3	47		67	80	41
9	F/57	3-p	B1	44	Tuberosity	80	96	48
10	F/77	3-p	C1	43		59	74	40
11	F/55	3-p	B1	39	Tuberosity	78	93	37
12	F/69	2-p	A3	39		73	90	48
13	M/71	3-p	B1	37		72	83	45
14	M/52	2-p disl.	A1	37		95	105	48
15	M/62	2-p	A3	33		91	104	48
16	F/80	2-p	B2	32		77	97	43
17	F/77	3-p	B2	30	Varus	64	81	42
18	M/69	2-p	B2	29		83	95	48
19	F/66	3-p	B2	27		66	81	45
20	F/73	2-p	B2	26	Valgus	55	69	40
21	F/71	2-p	A3	25	Varus	67	84	31
22	F/50	3-p	B2	24		73	86	45
23	M/73	3-p	B1	23		87	101	48
24	F/52	2-p	B2	23		76	91	39
25	F/70	2-p	B1	23		59	72	41
26	F/75	3-p	B1	22		79	100	48
27	F/72	3-p	B2	21	Varus	77	97	44
28	F/71	2-p	B2	19		83	105	47
29	F/69	3-p	B1	16		77	95	42
30	F/72	3-p	B1	15	Varus	59	74	43
31	F/64	3-p	B1	15		72	88	40
32	F/49	2-p	B2	15		78	92	42
33	F/48	3-p	C2	13		85	101	44
34	F/60	3-p	B1	12		77	92	47
						75.2	90.5	43.7