Research Article  Open Access
Piyarut Moonsri, Artit Hutem, "Evaluation of Density Matrix and Helmholtz Free Energy for Harmonic Oscillator Asymmetric Potential via Feynmans Approach", Advances in Physical Chemistry, vol. 2014, Article ID 912054, 9 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/912054
Evaluation of Density Matrix and Helmholtz Free Energy for Harmonic Oscillator Asymmetric Potential via Feynmans Approach
Abstract
We apply a Feynmans technique for calculation of a canonical density matrix of a single particle under harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential and solving the Bloch equation of the statistical mechanics system. The density matrix and kinetic energy per unit length can be directly evaluated from the solving solutions. From the evaluation, it was found that both of the density matrix and kinetic energy per unit length depended on the parameter of the value of asymmetric potential , the value of axesshift potential , and temperature (T). Comparison of the Helmholtz free energy was derived by the Feynmans technique and the pathintegral method. The results illustrated are slightly different.
1. Introduction
We consider a quantum mechanical ensemble of identical systems in situations where the description is incomplete. When the description of the system is incomplete, the state of the system is described by means of what is called a density matrix. In the statistical point of view, a state of quantum ensemble is described by a density operator (or statistical operator) ; the corresponding matrix is called a density matrix. A knowledge of this matrix enables us to calculate the mean value of physical quantity of the system and also the probabilities of various values of such a quantity.
March and Murray used the Bloch equation to calculate the canonical density matrix in a single particle framework which may be related directly to the generalized canonical density matrix, containing the FermiDirac function [1]. Howard et al. used the Bloch equation evaluate the electron density and kinetic energy for the one dimensional potential. Howard et al. used tool employed is the Slater sum, which satisfies a partial differential equation [2].
For calculation of the canonical density matrix in terms of the Slater sum and kinetic energy per unit length in terms of the Slater sum see March and Nieto [3]. To study problems of the canonical ensemble, we focus on the calculation the canonical density matrix and the Helmholtz free energy of a single particle under asymmetric harmonic oscillator potential.
The scheme of the paper is as follows. In Section 2, there is detailing with the density matrix. In Section 3, we show the calculation of the canonical density matrix (or charge bondorder matrix) and the Helmholtz free energy by Feynmans approach. In Section 4, we representation of the evaluation of the density matrix and the Helmholtz free energy by the pathintegral method method. In Section 5 we make a presentation of numerical results for the Helmholtz free energy of a single particle under asymmetric harmonic oscillator potential. The conclusion and discussion are given in Section 6.
2. Statistical Density Matrix
A density matrix is a matrix that describes a quantum system in a mixed state, a statistical ensemble of several quantum states. This should be contrasted with a single state vector that describes a quantum system in a pure state. The density matrix is the quantummechanical analogue to a phasespace probability measure (probability distribution of position and momentum) in classical statistical mechanics. Explicitly, suppose a quantum system may be found in state with probability or it may be found in state with probability or it may be found in state with probability , and so on. The density matrix for this system is where need not be orthogonal and . By choosing an orthonormal basis , one may resolve the density operator into the density matrix, whose elements are For an operator (which describes an observable of the system), the expectation value is given by In the canonical ensemble, the probability that the system is in state is given by and the thermal average of an arbitrary operator is The operator is commonly referred to as density operator and its matrix representation as the density matrix. Here, is the partition function.
3. A Linear Harmonic Oscillator Asymmetric Potential by Feynmans Approach
Next, we consider the case of a linear harmonics oscillator of asymmetric potential, whose Hamiltonian is given by [4] we note that this is a timeindependent Hamiltonian of harmonic oscillator asymmetric axesshift potential system. Substituting in the timeindependent Hamiltonian equation (7) into the Bloch equation [3], we can rewrite the differential equation completely in terms of as We define some new dimensionless variable. The position variable is replaced with the dimensionless variable : Substituting in for in terms of , we can rewrite the differential equation completely in terms of and as Knowing the Gaussian dependence of the density matrix in case of the free particle, we try the following form: Substituting expansion equation (11) into (10) leads us to the equation Equating the coefficients for , , and on both sides of the last equation (12) gives respectively. Computing (13) is integrated to give
Equation (14) is the linear firstorder ordinary differential equation to give [5, 6] Equation (15) is integrated with respect to as where , , and are constants. Substituting , , and of (16), (17), and (18), respectively, into (11), we may rewrite density matrix as Thus, the Taylor series expansion of , about is given by we obtain the density matrix final form: The initial condition is or For low (high temperature) the particle should act almost like a free particle, as its probable kinetic energy is so high. Therefore, we expect that, for low , the density matrix for a harmonic oscillator will be given approximately by [7]
Comparing the value of , in (21) with (24) identifies the solution as
Substituting (25) into (19) and setting produce Using the identity of trigonometric and setting into (26), we can rewrite the canonical density matrix or charge bondorder matrix [8] as
The obtained results are neatly summarized in Figure 1. It is the probability density for finding the system at ; we note as a Gaussian distribution in . Let us define four new the variables , , , and as function of by we can rewrite the density matrix completely in terms of the new variable as The expectation value of in the density matrix can be determined from the definition of the expectation values as The average of the potential energy is thus
(a) Density Matrix, ,
(b) Density Matrix, ,
(c) Density Matrix, , ,
(d) Density Matrix, , ,
(e) Density Matrix, ,
The kinetic energy per unit length is defined from the canonical density matrix as [3] By substituting (29) into (32), we can write the kinetic energy per unit length completely as follows The obtained results from (33) are summarized in Figure 2.
(a) Kinetic Energy, ,
(b) Kinetic Energy, ,
(c) Kinetic Energy, ,
(d) Kinetic Energy, ,
(e) Kinetic Energy, ,
Now, the Helmholtz free energy of the harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential system is given by or
The density matrix of the system in the integration representation will be given by Substituting (29) into (36), we obtain for the partition function of the particle in harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential system Thus, we have the following results: This is the Helmholtz free energy for a onedimensional harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential , as already derived. When we write the Helmholtz free energy in new variable is , into (38), we obtain that One may summarize the numerical results of Helmholtz free energy for harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential by Feynmans approach in Section 5. In Section 5, comparison of Helmholtz free energy for harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential obtain from Feynmans approach and the pathintegral method . This work aims at computing the entropy () of the harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential using the Helmholtz free energy in (38). Using the relation the entropy of a system can be write as Equation (41) is plotted in Figure 3(a) assuming the value of axesshift potential equal and vary the value of asymmetric potential . From (41) are plotted in Figure 3 assuming the value of asymmetric potential equal and vary the value of axesshift potential . Figure 3 shows that, as increases, the depth of the entropy decreases and its minimum moves farther away the origin.
(a) Entropy ,
(b) Entropy ,
(c) Entropy ,
(d) Entropy ,
4. Evaluate Helmholtz Free Energy via PathIntegral Method ()
In the Helmholtz free energy the quantity of the thermodynamics of a given harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential system is derived from its the pathintegral method: In this case of the harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential is where setting , , and substituting (43) into (42), we can write classical to simply produce where , . The final the pathintegral method is In such case it is more useful to write the partition function of as where . Substituting (45) into (46) can obtain the partition function of pathintegral method () in case of harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential Substituting , , , , , and into (47) leads to Accordingly, the Helmholtz free energy the pathintegral method () is given by After introducing new variable of the Helmholtz free energy pathintegral method () as , , the Helmholtz free energy of the pathintegral method () is then transformed to This is known as the Helmholtz free energy of the pathintegral method (). We can calculate numerical of the Helmholtz free energy Feynmans ( approach in Section 3) and the Helmholtz free energy of the pathintegral method ()( in Section 4) for the harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential by mathematica program to give Tables 1 and 2 as shown in Section 5.


5. The Numerical Result
In this section, we have evaluated numerical of the Helmholtz free energy Feynmans () approach and the Helmholtz free energy of the pathintegral method ()( for the harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential is (39) and (50). By substituting into (39) and (50), we obtain the Helmholtz free energy Feynmans () approach as follows: and the Helmholtz free energy of the pathintegral method ()( For the beginning of the numerical shooting method, we need to input the parameters , , and and (39) and (50) into the mathematical program [9]. Next, we obtain the numerical values of and for the harmonic oscillator asymmetric potential as displayed in Tables 1 and 2.
From Table 1 we show that magnitude of the Helmholtz free energy decrease from to with increasing the temperature of system. From Table 2 we illustrate magnitude of the Helmholtz free energy increase from to with increasing the temperature of system.
Nevertheless, is not as useful as Tables 1 and 2 might indicate. The first, it can not be used when quantum mechanics exchange effect exist. The second, it fails in its present form when the potential has a very large derivative as in the case of hardsphere interatomic potential (see LennardJones potential [10]).
6. Conclusion
This work is interested in finding the canonical density matrix by Feynman’s technique and kinetic energy per unit length and evaluation of the Helmholtz free energy. The results show that the magnitude of the density matrix and the kinetic energy per unit length vary according to the parameters , , and , respectively. The magnitude of and for these cases is positive with the graph of and moving from right hand side to left hand side. Moreover, we found that as the values of have increased and the amplitude of and has decreased.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
Piyarut Moonsri and Artit Hutem wish to thank the Institute Research and Development, Chemistry Division and Physics Division, Faculty of Science and Technology, Phetchabun Rajabhat University, Thailand. This work is supported by the Institute Research and Development, Phetchabun Rajabhat University.
References
 N. H. March and A. M. Murray, “Relation between Dirac and canonical density matrices, with applications to imperfections in metals,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 830–836, 1960. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 I. A. Howard, A. Minguzzi, N. H. March, and M. Tosi, “Slater sum for the onedimensional sech^{2} potential in relation to the kinetic energy density,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 2411–2419, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 N. H. March and L. M. Nieto, “Bloch equation for the canonical density matrix in terms of its diagonal element: the Slater sum,” Physics Letters A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics, vol. 373, no. 1819, pp. 1691–1692, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. K. Pathria, Statistical Mechanics, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1996.
 G. B. Arfken and H. J. Weber, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, Elsevier Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 6th edition, 2005.
 K. F. Riley and M. P. Hobson, Mathematical Method for Physics and Engineering, Cambridge University Press, 3rd edition, 2006.
 R. P. Feynman, Statistical Mechanics, AddisonWesley, London, UK, 1972.
 I. N. Levin, Quantum Chemistry, Pearson Prentice Hall, 6th edition, 2009.
 R. L. Zimmerman and F. I. Olness, Mathematica for Physics, AddisonWesley, Reading, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 2002.
 A. Hutem and S. Boonchui, “Numerical evaluation of second and third virial coefficients of some inert gases via classical cluster expansion,” Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1262–1276, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Piyarut Moonsri and Artit Hutem. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.