Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Physical Chemistry
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 3240674, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3240674
Research Article

Energy Landscape of Pentapeptides in a Higher-Order Conformational Subspace

1York Centre for Complex Systems Analysis (YCCSA), University of York, York YO10 5GE, UK
2Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia

Received 8 February 2016; Accepted 4 April 2016

Academic Editor: Dennis Salahub

Copyright © 2016 Karim M. ElSawy. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. A. Dill and J. L. MacCallum, “The protein-folding problem, 50 years on,” Science, vol. 338, no. 6110, pp. 1042–1046, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. W. Englander and L. Mayne, “The nature of protein folding pathways,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, pp. 15873–15880, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. J. Pantazes, M. J. Grisewood, and C. D. Maranas, “Recent advances in computational protein design,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 467–472, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N.-W. Hsiao, T.-S. Tseng, Y.-C. Lee et al., “Serendipitous discovery of short peptides from natural products as tyrosinase inhibitors,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 3099–3111, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Eniade, M. Purushotham, R. N. Ben, J. B. Wang, and K. Horwath, “A serendipitous discovery of antifreeze protein-specific activity in C-linked antifreeze glycoprotein analogs,” Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 115–124, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. O. Pible and J. Armengaud, “Improving the quality of genome, protein sequence, and taxonomy databases: a prerequisite for microbiome meta-omics 2.0,” Proteomics, vol. 15, no. 20, pp. 3418–3423, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Nayeem, D. Sitkoff, and S. Krystek Jr., “A comparative study of available software for high-accuracy homology modeling: from sequence alignments to structural models,” Protein Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 808–824, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Baker and A. Sali, “Protein structure prediction and structural genomics,” Science, vol. 294, no. 5540, pp. 93–96, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. G. N. Ramachandran, C. Ramakrishnan, and V. Sasisekharan, “Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 7, pp. 95–99, 1963. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. J. Flory, Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1969.
  11. R. V. Pappu, R. Srinivasan, and G. D. Rose, “The Flory isolated-pair hypothesis is not valid for polypeptide chains: implications for protein folding,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 23, pp. 12565–12570, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Z. Ohkubo and C. L. Brooks III, “Exploring Flory's isolated-pair hypothesis: statistical mechanics of helix-coil transitions in polyalanine and the C-peptide from RNase A,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 13916–13921, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Hovmoller, T. Zhou, and T. Ohlson, “Conformations of amino acids in proteins,” Acta Crystallographica D: Biological Crystallography, vol. 58, pp. 768–776, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  14. R. J. Anderson, Z. Weng, R. K. Campbell, and X. Jiang, “Main-chain conformational tendencies of amino acids,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 679–689, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. V. Krivov and M. Karplus, “Hidden complexity of free energy surfaces for peptide (protein) folding,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 41, pp. 14766–14770, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. C. L. Brooks III, J. N. Onuchic, and D. J. Wales, “Statistical thermodynamics: taking a walk on a landscape,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5530, pp. 612–613, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. N. Onuchic, H. Nymeyer, A. E. García, J. Chahine, and N. D. Socci, “The energy landscape theory of protein folding: insights into folding mechanisms and scenarios,” Advances in Protein Chemistry, vol. 53, pp. 87–152, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. S. Cheung, L. L. Chavez, and J. N. Onuchic, “The energy landscape for protein folding and possible connections to function,” Polymer, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 547–555, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. G. Wolynes, “Energy landscapes and solved protein-folding problems,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 363, no. 1827, pp. 453–464, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. S. V. Krivov and M. Karplus, “Free energy disconnectivity graphs: application to peptide models,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 117, no. 23, pp. 10894–10903, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. O. M. Becker and M. Karplus, “The topology of multidimensional potential energy surfaces: theory and application to peptide structure and kinetics,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1495–1517, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Czerminski and R. Elber, “Reaction path study of conformational transitions in flexible systems: applications to peptides,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 5580–5601, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Magner, W. Szpankowski, A. Magner, and D. Kihara, “On the origin of protein superfamilies and superfolds,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, pp. 2045–2322, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  24. S. Govindarajan, R. Recabarren, and R. A. Goldstein, “Estimating the total number of protein folds,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 408–414, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Frauenfelder, F. Parak, and R. D. Young, “Conformational substates in proteins,” Annual Review of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, vol. 17, pp. 451–479, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Amadei, A. B. M. Linssen, and H. J. C. Berendsen, “Essential dynamics of proteins,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 412–425, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Duan, M. Li, L. Han, and S. Huo, “Euclidean sections of protein conformation space and their implications in dimensionality reduction,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 2585–2596, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. E. Sims, I.-G. Choi, and S.-H. Kim, “Protein conformational space in higher order ϕ-ψ maps,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 618–621, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. K. M. Elsawy, M. K. Hodgson, and L. S. D. Caves, “The physical determinants of the DNA conformational landscape: an analysis of the potential energy surface of single-strand dinucleotides in the conformational space of duplex DNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 18, pp. 5749–5762, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. W. Kabsch and C. Sander, “On the use of sequence homologies to predict protein structure: identical pentapeptides can have completely different conformations,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 1075–1078, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. U. Hobohm and C. Sander, “Enlarged representative set of protein structures,” Protein Science, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 522–524, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. W. Kabsch and C. Sander, “Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features,” Biopolymers, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2577–2637, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. E. G. Hutchinson and J. M. Thornton, “PROMOTIF—a program to identify and analyze structural motifs in proteins,” Protein Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 212–220, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. E. Jackson, A User's Guide to Principal Components, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  35. D. Bharanidharan and N. Gautham, “Principal component analysis of DNA oligonucleotide structural data,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 340, no. 4, pp. 1229–1237, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. E. Sims and S.-H. Kim, “Global mapping of nucleic acid conformational space: dinucleoside monophosphate conformations and transition pathways among conformational classes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 19, pp. 5607–5616, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Mesentean, S. Fischer, and J. C. Smith, “Analyzing large-scale structural change in proteins: comparison of principal component projection and Sammon mapping,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 210–218, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. H. Reijmers, R. Wehrens, and L. M. C. Buydens, “Circular effects in representations of an RNA nucleotides data set in relation with principal components analysis,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 61–71, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. J. Grant, A. P. C. Rodrigues, K. M. ElSawy, J. A. McCammon, and L. S. D. Caves, “Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures,” Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 21, pp. 2695–2696, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R Development Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2008, http://www.R-project.org.
  41. A. Kitao and N. Go, “Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 164–169, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. C. Gower, “Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis,” Biometrika, vol. 53, pp. 325–338, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  43. J. C. Gower, “Adding a point to vector diagrams in multivariate analysis,” Biometrika, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 582–585, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. L. S. D. Caves, J. D. Evanseck, and M. Karplus, “Locally accessible conformations of proteins: multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin,” Protein Science, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 649–666, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus, “CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 187–217, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. N. Foloppe and A. D. MacKerell Jr., “All-atom empirical force field for nucleic acids: I. Parameter optimization based on small molecule and condensed phase macromolecular target data,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 86–104, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. B. R. Gelin and M. Karplus, “Sidechain torsional potentials and motion of amino acids in porteins: bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 2002–2006, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. Bashford and D. A. Case, “Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, vol. 51, pp. 129–152, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. N. A. Baker, D. Sept, S. Joseph, M. J. Holst, and J. A. McCammon, “Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 18, pp. 10037–10041, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. A. Canutescu, A. A. Shelenkov, and R. L. Dunbrack Jr., “A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction,” Protein Science, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 2001–2014, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. C. B. Barber, D. P. Dobkin, and H. Huhdanpaa, “The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 469–483, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. P. K. Doye and D. J. Wales, “On potential energy surfaces and relaxation to the global minimum,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 105, no. 18, pp. 8428–8445, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. G. M. Verkhivker, P. A. Rejto, D. Bouzida et al., “Navigating ligand-protein binding free energy landscapes: universality and diversity of protein folding and molecular recognition mechanisms,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 336, no. 5-6, pp. 495–503, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Baumketner, J.-E. Shea, and Y. Hiwatari, “Improved theoretical description of protein folding kinetics from rotations in the phase space of relevant order parameters,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 1114–1120, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. Idiyatullin, I. Nesmelova, V. A. Daragan, and K. H. Mayo, “Heat capacities and a snapshot of the energy landscape in protein GB1 from the pre-denaturation temperature dependence of backbone NH nanosecond fluctuations,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 325, no. 1, pp. 149–162, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. O. M. Becker, “Quantitative visualization of a macromolecular potential energy “funnel”,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 398-399, pp. 507–516, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. O. M. Becker, “Principal coordinate maps of molecular potential energy surfaces,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1255–1267, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. S. T. Roweis and L. K. Saul, “Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding,” Science, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2323–2326, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. P. Das, M. Moll, H. Stamati, L. E. Kavraki, and C. Clementi, “Low-dimensional, free-energy landscapes of protein-folding reactions by nonlinear dimensionality reduction,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 26, pp. 9885–9890, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. N. Onuchic and P. G. Wolynes, “Theory of protein folding,” Current Opinion in Structural Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. P. G. Wolynes, J. N. Onuchic, and D. Thirumalai, “Navigating the folding routes,” Science, vol. 267, no. 5204, pp. 1619–1620, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng et al., “The protein data bank,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 235–242, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. S. Marqusee, V. H. Robbins, R. L. Baldwin, S. Marqusee, and R. L. Baldwin, “Unusually stable helix formation in short alanine-based peptides,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 14, pp. 5286–5290, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  64. Y. Zhang and J. Skolnick, “The protein structure prediction problem could be solved using the current PDB library,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 1029–1034, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. F. Avbelj and J. Moult, “Determination of the conformation of folding initiation sites in proteins by computer simulation,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 129–141, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. K. F. Han, C. Bystroff, and D. Baker, “Three-dimensional structures and contexts associated with recurrent amino acid sequence patterns,” Protein Science, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1587–1590, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus