Research Article  Open Access
A. Karsenty, A. Chelly, "Modeling of the Channel Thickness Influence on Electrical Characteristics and Series Resistance in GateRecessed Nanoscale SOI MOSFETs", Active and Passive Electronic Components, vol. 2013, Article ID 801634, 10 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/801634
Modeling of the Channel Thickness Influence on Electrical Characteristics and Series Resistance in GateRecessed Nanoscale SOI MOSFETs
Abstract
Ultrathin body (UTB) and nanoscale body (NSB) SOIMOSFET devices, sharing a similar W/L but with a channel thickness of 46 nm and lower than 5 nm, respectively, were fabricated using a selective “gaterecessed” process on the same silicon wafer. Their currentvoltage characteristics measured at room temperature were found to be surprisingly different by several orders of magnitude. We analyzed this result by considering the severe mobility degradation and the influence of a huge series resistance and found that the last one seems more coherent. Then the electrical characteristics of the NSB can be analytically derived by integrating a gate voltagedependent drain source series resistance. In this paper, the influence of the channel thickness on the series resistance is reported for the first time. This influence is integrated to the analytical model in order to describe the trends of the saturation current with the channel thickness. This modeling approach may be useful to interpret anomalous electrical behavior of other nanodevices in which series resistance and/or mobility degradation is of a great concern.
1. Introduction
Nanoscale silicononinsulator (SOI) metaloxidesemiconductor fieldeffect transistor (MOSFET) based devices are the building blocks of uptodate systems allowing ultrafast data processing. This is in accordance with efforts to develop new generation of ultrafast computers based on combined electronic and signal processing on one hand [1] and advanced generations of nanoscale devices (NSB) for communication systems [2, 3] on the other hand. In this paper, we report the influence of the silicon channel thickness on the electrical characteristics of SOI MOSFET NSB, and we present an accurate model permitting to evaluate the series resistance and the saturation current as a function of the thickness or of the gate voltage, when part of the aim is to explain the anomalous transport behavior of the thinner channels having a channel’s thickness as low as 1.6 nm and obtained by a selective gaterecessed process [4].
The excellent control of the short channel effects, achievable by means of UTB SOI MOSFET architectures, makes them good candidates for ultimate nanometrics scale. Consequently, the transport properties’ study of thin semiconductor films has attracted considerable attention in the recent years.
In this paper, we present the influence of the NSB’s channel thickness on the series resistance in order to complete the unified model of the NSB’s electrical characteristics. In addition to last years’ existing knowledge in series resistance, these novel interpretative approach and analytical model can be useful for the prediction of transport phenomena at the nanoscale and the correction of electrical characteristics.
2. Methodology
2.1. SIMOX Preferred Wafer Processing Technology
Several techniques were developed in the past to create silicononinsulator (SOI) devices [5–8], since their implementation was found promising [9–11] for ULSI [12], low power [13], military and space [14], and cost reducing [15] applications. Nowadays, SOI wafers are mainly fabricated using the UNIBOND line of SOI wafers and the smart cut process technologies, patented by SOITEC Company, allowing excellent thickness uniformity [16]. However, for this research purpose, the former SOITEC technology called SeparationbyIMplantedOxygen (SIMOX) was preferred because of the clear advantage of presenting an initial gradient of the SOI thickness across the same wafer. This desirable gradient is conserved during the processing of the nanoscale body (NSB) devices as shown in Figure 1, in which are presented spectrophotometry measurements of SOI thicknesses gradient across a diameter SIMOX test wafer after thinning using the gaterecessed process. Consequently, it is possible to study the thickness influence on the NSB electrical characteristics. In Figure 2, the tested NSB devices are presented with their respective channel thicknesses ranging from 1.6 to 4.6 nm as measured by spectrophotometry. The accuracy of the critical channel thickness of 1.6 nm was confirmed by in ex situ HRTEM measurement.
2.2. Accurate Calibration of the Oxidation Furnace
The most challenging step was the accurate controlled thinning process of the SOI layer using local oxidation in the sub 10 nm range of thickness, while the source and the drain regions remained in their original thickness. In order to check the capability of accurate thinning, preliminary tests of thinning were performed in order to reach thicknesses lower than 10 nm, when characterizing the furnace parameters like furnace temperature, duration of the oxidation, and growth rate [17].
2.3. Device Processing Using RecessedGate Channel Technology
The local oxidation was performed by using a nitride mask layer of 38 nm (nitride 1) grown on a thin oxide layer (PAD OX) of 15 nm. The role of the pad oxide was to serve as an interface between the nitride and the silicon to prevent mechanical stresses. A first etching of the nitride and pad oxide layer at the extremities of the active region allowed their oxidation into a 700 nm thick field oxide (FOX). A second etching, performed at the center of the nitride region, allowed exposure of the channel region, while the surrounding nitride capped the source and drain areas. Two steps of oxidation were then performed. First, a 75 nm thick sacrificial oxide layer, called channel oxide (CHAN OX), was grown in order to significantly decrease the channel’s thickness to about 10 nm, before removal. The second phase of the oxidation (25 nm thick), called gate oxidation (GOX), was a more accurate step making possible a final nanoscale thickness of the channel, in the range of 1.6 nm to 6.5 nm, and serving as the gate oxide itself, when the thickness distribution uniformity and the SiSiO_{2} interface quality [18] are serving as important parameters [19, 20]. In order to get reference devices, that is, having an initial silicon channel close to 46 nm, the nitride mask was not etched, so the gate insulator layer is made of the 38 nm thick nitride layer deposited on the 15 nm PAD OX layer.
2.4. Fabrication of the Contact Electrodes
Then, a polycrystalline silicon layer of 220 nm was deposited over the gate oxide, oxidized, and patterned to form the gate electrode. Before the source/drain/gate phosphorus implant, a thin layer nitride (nitride 2) of 30 nm was deposited in order to prevent further oxidation of the thin silicon layer during the implant’s thermal annealing. A Plasmaenhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) oxide (silox 2) of 350 nm thickness was deposited followed by an aluminum metallization step to define the contact areas.
2.5. TCAD Simulation of the Device Processing
In order to perform a deeper and accurate analysis of the process limitations, the layers deposition process was translated to a model of the device using TCAD (TSUPREM4) software. One of the main outputs of the program is the 2D device crosssection, which includes among others the exact boundaries of the various layers of materials in the structure.
In Figure 3, we present a crosssection of the NSB including the source, gate, and drain (resp., S, G, and D) parts and a zoom of the gaterecessed silicon channel. As presented in the upper insert, the active region (source, gate, and drain terminals) which is built of layers described previously, is terminated by aluminum contacts (layer 10) in the vertical axis and limited by field oxide (layer 07) borders in the horizontal axis. The buried oxide (layer 02) is serving as a barrier between the bulk silicon (layer 01) and the gaterecessed silicon channel (layer 03).
The lower insert of Figure 3 represents a zoomin of the gaterecessed channel, when the silicon layer was thinned from 46 nm to 1.6 nm minimal thickness, as confirmed by HRTEM picture in Figure 2. This points out the advantage of the recessed process in which only the silicon channel is thinned, while the source and the drain extensions remain in their original thickness. So the series resistance of the drain and of the source should not be affected a priori by the thinning process.
In addition to Figure 3, presenting a simulated TCAD crossview of the device layers, a complementary list of the process parameters was presented in summarizing Table 1.

3. Results
3.1.  Characteristics in the Linear Domain
Using the semiconductor characterization system (SCS4200) from Keithley Ltd.,  measurements (room temperature, dark conditions) were performed on a selection of four NSB devices (E15, G15, C12, and C03), having the same channel width and length ( μm/8 μm) but a channel thickness () below 5 nm: 1.6, 2.4, 2.9, and 4.9 nm, respectively. Since the front gate oxide (GOX) thickness is 26 nm, as checked by HRTEM and ellipsometry, the front gate capacitance () is evaluated to 138 nF/cm^{2}. Back gate contact was kept floating for all devices. The drain currents () versus gate voltage () characteristics (from −4 to V) were measured in the linear domain (constant low V) and are presented in Figure 4 for the four NSBs.
By increasing from −4 V to −1 V, slowly decreases and slightly depends on , indicating a leakage phenomenon (negative resistance) similar to the gateinduced drain leakage (GIDL) observed for both classic and SOIMOSFET devices [21].
For from −1 V to −0.5 V, the steep linear increasing observed at least for nm, which is combined to the low order of magnitude, characteristic of the subthreshold regime. We note that the subthreshold slope is strongly degraded by decreasing the channel thickness.
However, for positive values, above the apparent threshold voltage located around −0.5 V, the characteristics are bent and turned into a linear dependence on indicating a constant transconductance in the whole positive domain of . Since our devices are considered as long channel devices ( μm), the effective mobility () can be extracted from in the linear domain by the following equation based on the classic gradual channel approximation:
According the extracted values from Figure 4 for V and for other values (lower than 0.5 V to stay in the linear domain), we can estimate the effective mobility () independently of and for the four NSBs as seen in Figure 5.
Surprisingly the values were found lower than 10 cm^{2}/ and weakly decreasing with . However, as far as we know, such a low order of magnitude was never reported in the main works dealing with sub 5 nm nanoscale SOIMOSFET devices [22–24]. Moreover, the effective mobility is expected to decrease at low and high effective field values (due to the interface scattering degradation factor [25]), so should decrease with and not be a constant with as seen from Figure 4.
3.2. Effective Mobility versus Series Resistance at Zero
The electron mobility in similar SOIMOSFETs is known to be strongly degraded by decreasing the channel thickness below 5 nm. Several important works have attributed the degradation to a combination of Coulomb scattering generated by surface states [23], surface roughness [24–26], and enhanced phonon [27] scattering mechanisms. According to [23], the surface roughness is described as a quantum effect mechanisms dominating at low temperature but strongly dependent on the channel thickness below 4 nm even at room temperature. The mobility is found to decrease theoretically as a law.
Such a discrepancy with our extracted effective mobility behavior inclined us to interpret our measurements in terms of a parasitic drainsource series resistance that overwhelm the intrinsic channel conductance and “screen” the previously cited scattering mechanisms.
Indeed, it is well established that if source drain series resistance competes with the channel conductance a decreasing of the drain current can be measured [28]. In the linear domain, at zero , the drain current can be described by the following equation: where is the conductance of the channel.
Thus, by dividing the fixed value (0.1 V) by the intercept value of at zero a very large series resistance () can be calculated. By varying for low values (below 0.4 V), we got a linear dependence of with at zero , that is, confirmed explicitly by (3).
In Figure 6, the values, as extracted from Figure 4, and , evaluated from (1), are plotted versus the four selected channel thicknesses. The classic vs. hyperbolic decay due to the current spreading is plotted for reference but could not match the extracted values. As seen in the same figure, the best fit is found exponential as follows: with MΩ and nm.
In Figure 6, the dependence on is found to be far from the theoretical dependence due to the roughness scattering [23, 24]. Moreover, the remote Coulomb scattering due to interface charges and reported to decay exponentially with in the subdecananometer range [25] cannot match the extracted values of . The interpretation of dependence with will be examined later in the paper (Section 4).
3.3. Extraction of the Series Resistance Degradation Factor with
In Figure 4, for positive values, the linear trend of with can be described by the following expression: We can generalize (3) using a dependent series resistance . Since in the linear domain, has a Ohmic behavior with , and the expression can be extracted (5) as where is the series resistance degradation factor (units V^{−1}).
The decreasing of at high positive has been already observed in classic MOSFET and LDD device [29, 30]. Consequently, can be extracted from for a given and from Figure 4. In Figure 7, is plotted versus the four selected channel thicknesses.
An hyperbolic fit best fit the decay with the channel thickness as follows: with nm V^{−1}.
Finally, the drainsource series resistance can be expressed by the following expression depending on and :
3.4.  Characteristics and Model of the Saturation Current for NSB
In Figure 8 we present the measured  characteristics (sweeping from 0 to 15 V) for for NSB having, respectively, a channel thickness of 4.9 and 1.6 nm. On the one hand, for a given , the saturation current is decreased by decreasing the channel thickness . On the other hand, for a given , the saturation voltage is almost constant by decreasing the channel thickness. We propose a model to describe these saturation trends with .
3.5. Dependence of the Saturation Current on the Channel Thickness for NSB
Assuming that, for a given , the variation of the NSB’s saturation voltage is mainly due to the drop voltage, and we can write the following:
Since the variation of is found weak with the especially below 4 nm, we can derive from (9)
From (8) we can approximate (10) for and low by
By integrating (10) for we get finally the modeled saturation current as function of the channel thickness according to In Figure 9, the modeled saturation current from (12) is plotted versus the channel thickness for NSBs. We can notice a good agreement with the measured saturation current (for V and V) for the different NSB’s channel thicknesses.
4. Complementary Results for the Elucidation of Series Resistance
In order to corroborate our interpretation and to discriminate it from the carrier mobility, we added several results based on the classic technique [31, 32] and the gatetochannel capacitance measurement (or “split ” method) [33]. is the measured resistance of the device defined by the reciprocal slope of the  linear characteristics, that is, . We compared the measurements between two kinds of devices: NSB devices having a channel thickness of 1.6 nm and reference UTB devices, having a 46 nm channel thick. The channel width is fixed to 80 μm.
4.1. Technique
In Figure 10, we compared for both the devices, the measured taken at different gate lengths ( μm, 8 μm, and 100 μm), and for different positive gate voltages ( V, 1 V, and 4 V). For the UTBs, exhibits a linear growth trend with , and a decreasing trend with as expected from the classic MOSFET channel resistance [31, 32]. Surprisingly, for NSB devices, is found almost constant with . This result indicates that the contribution of the channel resistance may be negligible for our devices. Assuming that is a serial association of with the series sourcedrain resistance , can be then approximated by .
Moreover, as seen in Figure 10, for NSB devices, is found decreasing with . This is consistent with the trend already described in (6) for μm. Therefore, these results indicate that the NSB resistance is not related to the intrinsic channel resistance but is apparently overwhelmed by an external series resistance that is almost independent of . Although, series resistance is usually an association of contributions such as sheet contact resistance, spreading resistance, and other “wire resistance” [34, pages 223–225], none of these contributions exhibits the strong channel dependence like what is observed here. In our case, the measures resistance should be related to another scattering phenomenon.
4.2. GatetoChannel Capacitance versus Gate Voltage
In order to investigate the contribution of the inversion layer of the channel to the electrical conduction of the NSB, the gatetochannel capacitance () were measured versus for two frequencies ( kHz and MHz) and compared to UTB’s results. In this setup, the drain and source contacts are connected together to the voltage supply, while the substrate contact is grounded to shunt the sourcesubstrate and drainsubstrate capacitances. As presented in Figure 11, it clearly appears that below the threshold voltage (about −0.5 V) the UTB’s gatetochannel capacitance is limited by a large overlap (or fringing) capacitance 2 of about 4.5 pF and 3.9 pF at 1 MHz and 100 kHz, respectively. The overlap or fringing regions are located at the channel edges and/or the source and drain extension regions beside the channel. The positive shift of the capacitance with the frequency may be due to the influence of the cable capacitance on the offset capacitance value (significant at 1 MHz). Above , increases and saturates, since the contribution of the channel capacitance () is increasing and gets into its strong inversion value as observed in SOIMOSFET [35]. However, the hump amplitude (0.4 pF) is found lower than the value expected for the UTB’s front gate capacitance (0.8 pF). The similitude of the UTB curves for the both frequencies shows that the interface traps below the gate are not responding and then are negligible for these devices.
For the NSB device having the same dimensions than the previous UTB ( (μm)) but a channel thickness as low as 1.4 nm and below , is also limited by a large overlap (or fringing) capacitance (both extensions regions) of about 6 pF and 7.3 pF at 1 MHz and 100 kHz, respectively. The small difference of between NSB and UTB may be due to the additional parasitic capacitance due to the thinning process. Like UTB’s increases and saturates with hump amplitude of 0.7 pF still lower than the expected value for the NSB’s front gate capacitance (0.9 pF). However, steeply decreases for positive before saturating to a value lower than the initial value. Moreover, the maximum at zero (contribution of the channel) decreases strongly by increasing the frequency from 100 kHz to 1 MHz. This frequency dependence could be explained by the presence of charged interface states that contribute to an additive capacitive component to at lower frequency [34, 35]. This is corroborated also by the degradation of subthreshold slope, as seen in Figure 4 and by the negative voltage threshold that makes our devices to be “depletion type” devices. These interface traps, located below the gate and at the upper silicon/silicon oxide interface, may be introduced during the thinning (oxidation) step of the gaterecessed process. Consequently, these trapped charges may also contribute to the Coulomb scattering as mentioned above [23] and contribute to the exponential decay of the measured resistance.
In order to check the influence of a huge series resistance on the previous  graph a serial load resistance of 1 MΩ is connected between the voltage supply and the UTB’s source. From Figure 11, we can see that the capacitance hump is drastically reduced (to 0.05 pF) for both frequencies as expected from the capacitance relationship with series resistance assuming a parallel equivalent circuit [34, pages 88–90]. The overlap capacitance is reduced to 1.5 pF (compensated in the graph for comparison sake with unload UTB). So the series resistance may explain the decreasing of in the 01 V range for NSB devices in particular at 1 MHz but less at 100 kHz. One can interpret this difference by the fact that the surfaces states are more responsive at lower frequency and consequently could “shield” the series resistance effect. Moreover, since is decreasing with , its influence weakens at higher values, so it may explain the increase of at higher than 1 V at 1 MHz for NSB devices.
4.3. Mobile Charge Density and Effective Mobility Dependence with
The mobile charge density (/cm^{2}) of the channel can be evaluated by integrating the previous curves  after subtracting the values (to extract the channel contribution ) and by normalizing to the gate area (80 μm 8 μm). In Figure 12, is plotted versus for UTB and NSB at 100 kHz and 1 MHz. While for UTB, the mobile charge density is increasing linearly in strong inversion (above ), and it is decreasing steeply and vanishing for NSB. By combining with the measured conductance () for a given , we can extract the effective mobility according to [34, page 541]
For UTB, the mobility values extracted from (13) are compatible with the universal mobility curve [34, page 546] with an order of magnitude of 1000 cm^{2}/Vs. However, for NSB, the effective mobility values are smaller than 5 cm^{2}/Vs (but almost constant) with VGS in the 0–1.5 V range at 100 kHz (see insert in Figure 11). For 1 MHz, effective mobility is increasing with . These mobility values are compatible to these extracted. As already mentioned above, this value is a too low value compared to literature for the same kind of devices. Moreover, the increase of at high values observed for both frequencies is not compatible with the expected degradation of the mobility at high effective field as reported in the literature [21–27]. This reveals the limitation of the mobility extraction method based on the analysis in case of strong series resistance dependent on gate voltage. Consequently, in our case, the interpretation of the anomalously low conductance of the NSB relative to UTB could be better described by a series resistance model rather than by a conducting inverted channel for positive values. Another explanation of the exponential decay of the with may be related to a quantum “skineffect” phenomenon due to the electron wave function penetration at the oxidechannel interfaces [36], but here the trapping charge and coulomb scattering seem to better match our results.
5. Conclusion
Nanoscale SOI MOSFET devices were fabricated using a selective recess gate thinning process to get channel thicknesses scaling from 4.9 nm down to 1.6 nm. The electrical characteristics were measured and interpreted as a gate controlled series resistance. The resistance is found to decay exponentially with the channel thickness. An analytical model of the saturation current for the nanoscale devices was extracted accordingly. The model is found satisfying to fit the exponential dependence of the measured saturation current with the channel thickness. As suggested by the dependence on frequency, this degradation may be related to a high charge density trapped at the channelgate oxide interface. We admit that the exact origin of the conductance degradation is not trivial and more in depth work is needed. But, in our case, the series resistance interpretation was found more physically coherent than the extraction of the effective channel mobility from the split technique that may lead to erroneous values and anomalous trends with .
Conflict of Interests
The authors have no conflict of interests associated with this paper.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Albert Ciprut in the TCAD simulation work.
References
 D. Esseni, P. Palestri, and L. Selmi, “Nanoscale MOS transistors, semiclassical transport and applications,” Cambridge University Press, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Karsenty, A. Sa'ar, N. BenYosef, and J. Shappir, “Enhanced electroluminescence in silicononinsulator metaloxidesemiconductor transistors with thin silicon layer,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82, no. 26, pp. 4830–4832, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Abraham, A. Chelly, D. Elbaz, S. Schiff, M. Nabozny, and Z. Zalevsky, “Modeling of currentvoltage characteristics of the photoactivated device based on SOI technology,” Active and Passive Electronic Components, vol. 2012, Article ID 276145, 7 pages, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Chan, F. Assaderaghi, S. A. Parke, S. S. Yuen, C. Hu, and P. K. Ko, “Recess channel structure for reducing source/drain series resistance in ultrathin SOI MOSFET,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International SOI Conference, pp. 172–173, October 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Cristaloveanu and S. S. Li, Methods of Forming SOI Wafers—Electrical Characterization of S.O.I. Material and Devices, Ch 2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.
 S. Cristoloveanu, “Status, trends and challenges of silicononinsulator technology—SOI metamorphosis silicon,” IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Bruel, B. Aspar, B. Charlet et al., ““Smart cut”: a promising new SOI material technology,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International SOI Conference, pp. 178–179, October 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 B. Dance, “European SOI Comes of Age,” Semiconductor International, pp. 83–90, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Peters, “SOI takes over where silicon leaves off,” Semiconductor International, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Alles and S. Wilson, “Thin film silicon on insulator: an enabling technology,” Semiconductor International, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 67–74, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 A. AubertonHerve and T. Nishimura, “SOIbased devices. Status overview,” Solid State Technology, vol. 37, no. 7, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 A. J. AubertonHerve, J. M. Lamure, T. Barge, M. Bruel, B. Aspar, and J. L. Pelloie, “SOI Materials for ULSI Applications,” Semiconductor International, pp. 97–104, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 T. E. Thompson, “SOI sandwich promises fast, lowpower ICs,” Electronic Business Today, pp. 43–47, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Rhea, “DARPA low power program aims at mobile applications,” Military & Aerospace Electronics, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 P. H. Singer, “U. S. Chipmakers: PennyWise, MillionDollar Foolish,” Semiconductor International, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Bruel, B. Aspar, B. Charlet et al., ““Smart cut”: a promising new SOI material technology,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International SOI Conference, pp. 178–179, October 1995. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Karsenty, Study of the electrical and electrooptical phenomena in thin SOI MOS transistors [Ph.D. thesis], Hebrew University of Jerusalem, The Fredy & Nadine Hermann Graduate School of Applied Science, Microelectronics & ElectroOptics Divisions, 2003.
 L. Do Thanh and P. Balk, “Elimination and generation of SiSiO_{2} interface traps by low temperature hydrogen annealing,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, vol. 135, no. 7, pp. 1797–1801, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Cristoloveanu and T. Ouisse, in The Physics and Chemistry of SiO_{2} and the SiSiO_{2} Interface 2, C. R. Helms and B. E. Deal, Eds., pp. 309–318, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
 V. V. Afanos'ev, A. G. Revesz, and H. L. Hughes, “Confinement phenomena in buried oxides of SIMOX structures as affected by processing,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 695–700, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Wan, C. Le Royer, A. Zaslavsky, and S. Cristoloveanu, “Gateinduced drain leakage in FDSOI devices: what the TFET teaches us about the MOSFET,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 88, no. 7, pp. 1301–1304, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Uchida, H. Watanabe, A. Kinoshita, J. Koga, T. Numata, and S. Takagi, “Experimental study on carrier transport mechanism in ultrathinbody SOI n and pMOSFETs with SOI thickness less than 5 nm,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Devices Meeting (IEDM '02), pp. 47–50, December 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Uchida, J. Koga, and S. Takagi, “Experimental study on carrier transport mechanisms in double and singlegate ultrathinbody MOSFETs—Coulomb scattering, volume inversion, and δTSOIinduced scattering,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, pp. 805–808, December 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Uchida and S. Takagi, “Carrier scattering induced by thickness fluctuation of silicononinsulator film in ultrathinbody metaloxidesemiconductor fieldeffect transistors,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 82, no. 17, pp. 2916–2918, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Esseni, A. Abramo, L. Selmi, and E. Sangiorgi, “Physically based modeling of low field electron mobility in ultrathin single and doubleGate SOI nMOSFETs,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2445–2455, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Gámiz, J. B. Roldán, P. CartujoCassinello, J. A. LópezVillanueva, and P. Cartujo, “Role of surfaceroughness scattering in double gate silicononinsulator inversion layers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 1764–1770, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Gamiz, J. B. Roldán, and J. A. LópezVillanueva, “Phononlimited electron mobility in ultrathin silicononinsulator inversion layers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 83, pp. 4802–4806, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Lee, M. Shur, T. A. Fjeldly, and T. Ytterdal, Semiconductor Device Modeling For VLSI, Prentice Hall Series in Electronics and VLSI, C. S. Sodini Series, 1993.
 K. K. Ng and W. T. Lynch, “Analysis of the gatevoltagedependent series resistance of MOSFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 965–972, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Y. Kwong, C. Choi, R. Kasnavi, P. Griffin, and R. W. Dutton, “Series resistance calculation for source/drain extension regions using 2D device simulation,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1219–1226, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. G. J. Chern, P. Chang, R. F. Motta, and N. Godinho, “A new method to determine MOSFET Channel Length,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 170–173, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
 C. H. Chu Hao, B. CabonTill, S. Cristoloveanu, and G. Ghibaudo, “Experimental determination of shortchannel MOSFET parameters,” Solid State Electronics, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1025–1030, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
 K. Romanjek, F. Andrieu, T. Ernst, and G. Ghibaudo, “Improved split CV method for effective mobility extraction in sub0.1μm Si MOSFETs,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 583–585, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. K. Schroder, Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization, Ch 8, Wiley, 2nd edition, 1998.
 F. A. Ikraiam, R. B. Beck, and A. Jakubowski, “Modeling of SOIMOS capacitors CV behavior: partially and fullydepleted cases,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1026–1032, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. I. Khan, M. K. Ashraf, and A. Haque, “Influence of wave function penetration on short channel effects in nanoscale double gate MOSFETs,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Electron Devices and SolidState Circuits (EDSSC '07), pp. 109–112, December 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 A. Karsenty and A. Chelly. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.