Advances in Public Health

Advances in Public Health / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6623009 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6623009

Zemenu Tadesse Tessema, Amare Minyihun, "Utilization and Determinants of Antenatal Care Visits in East African Countries: A Multicountry Analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys", Advances in Public Health, vol. 2021, Article ID 6623009, 9 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6623009

Utilization and Determinants of Antenatal Care Visits in East African Countries: A Multicountry Analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys

Academic Editor: Hamidreza Karimi-Sari
Received28 Oct 2020
Revised23 Dec 2020
Accepted02 Jan 2021
Published13 Jan 2021

Abstract

Background. The health care a woman receives during pregnancy is important for her survival and baby, both at the time of delivery and shortly after that. In the context of high maternal morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, fewer than 80% of pregnant women receive antenatal care visit services. Receiving antenatal care visits at least four times increases the likelihood of receiving effective maternal health interventions through the antenatal period. This study aimed to identify the utilization and determinants of attending at least four visits in 12 East African countries. Methods. The study used the demographic and health survey data from 12 East African countries from 2008 to 2018. The DHS program adopts standardized methods involving uniform questionnaires, manuals, and field procedures to gather information comparable across countries globally. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to identify the determinants of completing at least four antenatal care services. With their 95% CI obtained from the adjusted multilevel logistic regression model, the adjusted odds ratio was presented to show the magnitude of the relationship between the independent variable and completing antenatal care visits. Results. The pooled utilization of attending at least four antenatal care visit in the East African region was 52.44% (95% CI: 52.13, 52.74), with the highest attending at least four or more antenatal care visit visits in Zimbabwe (75.72%) and the lowest attending at least four or more antenatal care visit visits in Ethiopia (31.82%). The significant determinants of completing at least four ANC visits were age category (24–34 (AOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.31) and 35–49 (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.32, 1.53)); being married women (AOR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.1.05, 1.16); education levels of primary education (AOR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.27), secondary education (AOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.47), and higher education (AOR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.62, 2.14); birth order (2–4 (AOR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.79) and 5+ (AOR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.68)); planned pregnancy (AOR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.86); contraceptive utilization (AOR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.29, 1.43); wealth status of middle (AOR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.17) and rich (AOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.32); having no problem accessing health care (AOR = 1.0.95, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.97); and living countries. Conclusions. The coverage of completing the recommended antenatal care visit was low in the region. Age, marital status, mother’s and partner’s education, women’s occupation, birth order, planned pregnancy, contraceptive utilization, wealth status, healthcare accessibility, and living countries were the major determinants of completing recommended antenatal care visits. Therefore, intersectoral collaboration to promote female education and empowerment, improve geographical access to health care, and strengthen implementation of antenatal care policies with active community participation is recommended. In addition, creating a conducive environment in entrepreneurial activities for poor women is needed.

1. Introduction

Antenatal care (ANC) coverage is an indicator of access to and use of health care during pregnancy. The antenatal period grants opportunities for pregnant women with interventions that may also be necessary for their infants’ well-being and infants. ANC frequently provides the first contact opportunity for a female to connect with services, thus imparting an entry factor for built-in care, merchandising healthful domestic practices, influencing care-seeking behaviors, and linking women with pregnancy complications to a referral system. Receiving antenatal care at least four times increases the likelihood of receiving effective maternal health interventions through the antenatal period [1, 2].

In 2017, approximately 295,000 maternal deaths occurred worldwide, and every day 810 women died from preventable motives associated with being pregnant and childbirth. The majority of these deaths (94%) happened in low-resource settings, and most may want to have been prevented. In the same year, sub-Saharan Africa alone accounted for roughly two-thirds (196,000) of maternal deaths, while Southern Asia accounted for almost one-fifth (58,000) [3].

According to the Fragile States Index of 2017, 15 countries have been viewed to be at an excessive risk of maternal death (South Sudan, Somalia, Central African Republic, Yemen, Syria, Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Chad, Afghanistan, Iraq, Haiti, Guinea, Zimbabwe, Nigeria, and Ethiopia). These 15 countries had MMRs in 2017, ranging from 31 (Syria) to 1150 (South Sudan) [4].

A recent multination randomized control trial governed by the WHO, and a scientific review showed that essential interventions would be provided over four visits at specified intervals, a minimum for healthy mothers with no underlying medical problems. This review has prompted the WHO to define the new approach of ANC-supported four goal-oriented visits. The recommended number of ANC visits for limited-resource settings depends not only on effectiveness but also on costs and barriers to ANC access [1, 5, 6]. The risk of maternal mortality is the highest for adolescent women younger than years old. The risks during pregnancy and childbirth are more significant among adolescent females aged 15–19 than females aged 20–24 [7, 8].

Women may die as a result of complications during the pregnancy and perinatal period. Most of these problems improve throughout being pregnant, and most are preventable or treatable. Other issues can also exist before being pregnant but are worsened for pregnancy duration, especially if not managed as part of the woman’s care [9]. Teenage girls who are pregnant will be less likely to use ANC compared with older pregnant women [10, 11].

There is a wide variance between industrialized (98%) and low-income (68%) countries in its coverage. Although ANC services’ coverage increases in many African countries, coverage alone does not provide sufficient information on the service [12]. There is a substantial-quality gap in ANC services in sub-Saharan Africa. While coverage of at least one ANC visit is relatively high at 71%, many women attending ANC do not receive the full range of evidence-based components during pregnancy. This quality gap demonstrates key missed opportunities within health systems [13, 14].

In many low-income countries, numerous obstacles exist in the provision of ANC services. Like other developing countries, an unsatisfactory proportion of women receive antenatal care from a trained health professional during their pregnancy time in East Africa [15, 16]. This is often related to an insufficient number of skilled healthcare providers, particularly in rural and remote areas. Socioeconomic and cultural influences are among important barriers. Providing qualified ANC services is a major problem for the country’s poor health system [17, 18].

However, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a new approach in 2016 that recommends eight ANC (antenatal care) contacts; focused antenatal care is still in practice in many African countries [19]. The four ANC visits’ minimum requirement is influenced by geographical, socioeconomic, religious, cultural, and demographic factors [20, 21]. Besides, the health system can also be affecting access to healthcare services for pregnant women. Identifying the region’s significant determinants and building a strong and integrated health system are important for improving maternal health outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the utilization and determinants of attending antenatal care at least four visits in 12 East African countries.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Source, Tool, and Sampling Procedure

The data were obtained from the MEASURE DHS program after preparing the concept note about the project. The DHS program adopts standardized methods involving uniform questionnaires, manuals, and field procedures to gather information comparable across countries globally. DHSs are nationally representative household surveys that provide data from a wide range of monitoring and impact evaluation indicators in population, health, and nutrition with face-to-face interviews of women aged 15 to 49. The surveys employ a stratified, multistage, random sampling design. Information was obtained from eligible women aged 15 to 49 years in each country [22]. Detailed survey methodology and sampling methods used in gathering the data have been reported elsewhere [23]. The Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data were pooled from the 12 East African countries from 2008 to 2017. The recent DHS of the country-specific data set was extracted during the specified period. The 12 East African countries in which data extracted include Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Comoros, Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Each country’s DHS data year was varied from 2008 (Madagascar) to 2018 (Zambia). From the 12 East African countries, only one year of DHS data with a limited sample were recently taken for this study (Table 1).


Eastern region of AfricaDHS yearStudy participants

Burundi20108,940
Ethiopia20167,590
Kenya201414,438
Comoros20121,891
Madagascar2008/098,526
Malawi2015/1613,515
Mozambique20117,726
Rwanda2014/152962
Tanzania2015/167,078
Uganda201110,152
Zambia20189,316
Zimbabwe2013/144,987
Total sample size100,224

2.2. Variables
2.2.1. Outcome Variable

The outcome variable for this study was whether a mother completed four or more antenatal care visits or not. The variable is generated using the WHO-recommended antenatal care service [24].

2.2.2. Independent Variables

Based on known facts and literature works [2528], the independent variables included in this study were a country, residence, age group, marital status, educational status, literacy level, husband education, occupational status, accessing health care, pregnant wontedness, birth order, contraceptive utilization, and wealth index.

2.3. Operational Definition
2.3.1. Accessing Health Care

Most studies have isolated the travel time and transport cost when looking at access to health facilities. In the DHS data, women were asked whether a range of factors would be a big problem for them accessing health care. We generated a binary composite variable using each country’s DHS standard questions. The following questions are included:(a)Getting permission to go for treatment (v467b = 1)(b)Getting money for treatment (v467c = 1)(c)Distance to the health facility (v467d = 1)(d)Not wanting to go alone (v467f = 1)(e)At least one problem accessing health care (one or more of the above)

The definition of a “serious” problem of accessing health care was defined as (e) At least one problem accessing health care (one or more of the above) [23].

2.3.2. Wealth Index

The wealth variable was generated from the wealth index for the households. In the data set, the index has five quintiles, such as the lowest quintile (poorest), 2nd quintile (poorer), 3rd quintile (middle), 4th quintile (wealthier), and the 5th quintile (wealthiest). In this study for ease of analysis, this variable was categorized as follows: “poorest” and “poorer” were coded as (1) “poor,” the middle was coded as (2) “middle,” and “wealthier” and “wealthiest” were coded as (3) “rich.”

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata, version 14.0. Multilevel models were fitted using “svy” survey commands to adjust for the variables of clustering survey design (Country), sampling weights, and standard errors (SE). A pooled analysis was conducted to increase the sample size of completing four or more antenatal care service users in the 12 East African Countries from 2008 to 2018. A stepwise backward elimination process was performed at each stage, and determinants associated with completing four or more antenatal care service users were retained. In the univariable analysis of a p-value, ≤0.25 were declared as a candidate variable for multivariable analysis [29]. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and associated 95% confidence interval (Cis) obtained from the adjusted multilevel logistic regression model were used to declare that determinates associated with completing four or more antenatal care visit services in the East African countries.

3. Results

The WHO East Africa region has 20 member states. In history, only 14 countries had DHS data; for this study, 12 countries were included. In two of the 14 countries, their DHS was conducted outside of the study period (Figure 1).

3.1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of Study Countries in East Africa

A total of 100,224 births born to women in East African countries were included in this study (Table 1). Of this, 52,331 (52.21%) completed the recommended at least four ANC visits in the 12 East African countries. The largest study participants, 13,515 (13.49%), were from Malawi, and the smallest study participants, 1,891 (1.89%), were from Comoros. The majority of 76,335 (76.16%) of respondents were rural residents. The study participants’ median age group was 28 years with an interquartile range of 24 to 34 years, with almost half of them 46,197 (46.47%) under the age group of 25 to 34 (Table 2).


VariablesFrequency (N = 100,224)Percent

Country
Burundi89408.92
Ethiopia75907.57
Kenya1443814.41
Comoros18911.89
Madagascar85268.51
Malawi1351513.49
Mozambique77267.71
Rwanda60596.05
Tanzania70787.06
Uganda1015210.13
Zambia93169.30
Zimbabwe49874.98

Residence
Urban2388923.84
Rural7633576.16

Age group
15–243089430.83
25–3446,19746.47
35–4923,13223.08

Marital status
Single3085330.78
Married69,37069.22

Educational status
No education2187121.83
Primary53,27153.16
Secondary21,28321.24
Higher37873.78

Husband education (N= 81,838)
No education1660420.29
Primary40,06548.96
Secondary2052025.07
Higher46485.68

Literacy level
Illiterate35,30935.25
Literate64,84664.75

Maternal occupation (92,572)
Unemployed2593628.02
Employed6663677.98

Birth order
122,14022.09
2–448,60048.49
5+29,48229.42

Pregnant wanted (N= 86,272)
Yes7822690.67
No80469.33

Contraceptive utilization (N= 92,661)
No19,30620.84
Yes73,35479.16

Wealth index
Poor4296042.86
Middle1950319.46
Rich37759

Accessing health care
Not serious problem4438744.22
Serious problem5583755.77

3.2. Pooled Prevalence Attending at Least Four or More ANC Visits

The pooled prevalence of hearing at least four ANC visits in East African countries was 52.44% (95% CI: 52.13, 52.74), with the highest attending at least four ANC visits in Zimbabwe (75.72%) and the lowest attending at least four ANC visits in Ethiopia (31.82%) (Figure 2).

3.3. Determinates of Recommended Antenatal Care Visits

The age group had a significant effect on the recommended antenatal care visit. The odds of completing at least four ANC visits among mothers of age group 24–34 and 35–49 were increased by 24% (AOR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.31) and 42% (AOR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.32, 1.53) compared with teenage mothers. Marital status is associated with the recommended antenatal care visits.

The odds of completing at least four ANC visits among married mothers increased by 11% compared with a single (AOR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.16). The odds of completing at least four ANC visits among mothers who had primary, secondary, and higher education levels increased by 20% (AOR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.27), 35% (AOR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.24, 1.47), and 91% (AOR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.62, 2.14) as compared with mothers who had no education, respectively.

The odds of completing at least four ANC visits among mothers whose husbands had primary, secondary, and higher education levels increased by 9% (AOR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.15), 22% (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.31), and 51% (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI:1.35, 1.70) as compared with mothers whose husband had no education, respectively. The odds of having at least four visits among women who had occupation increased by 24% (AOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.11) compared with women who had no occupation. Birth order had a significant effect on ANC visits. The odds of completing at least four ANC visits among children being 2–4 and 5+ order decreased by 25% (AOR = 0.75; 95% CI:0.70, 0.79) and 37% (AOR = 0.63; 95% CI:0.58, 0.68) as compared with first-order, respectively.

The odds of completing at least four ANC visits among mothers who do not want pregnancy decreased by 19% (AOR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.86) compared with mothers who want pregnancy. The odds of completing at least four ANC visits among mothers who use contraceptives increased by 36% (AOR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.29, 1.43) compared with mothers do not use contraceptives. The odds of completing at least four ANC visits among women with middle and rich wealth categories increased by 11% (AOR = 1.11; 95% CI:1.05, 1.17) and 25% (AOR = 1.25; 95% CI:1.18, 1.32) compared with women with poor wealth status, respectively.

Accessing health problems had a significant role in ANC visits. The odds of completing at least four ANC visits among women who face serious healthcare problems decreased by 7% (AOR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.97) compared with its counterpart. The country residence has a significant role in completing at least four ANC visits in the East African countries. Zimbabwe was taken as a reference because it recorded better performance on completing four or more ANC visits than other countries (Table 3).


VariablesCrude odds ratio (95% CI) valueAdjusted odds ratio (95% CI) value

Country
Burundi0.31 (0.27, 0.35)<0.0010.47 (0.46, 0.55)<0.001
Ethiopia0.14 (0.12, 0.17)<0.0010.21 (0.18, 0.25)<0.001
Kenya0.43 (0.38, 0.48)<0.0010.49 (0.42, 0.56)<0.001
Comoros0.30 (0.25, 0.36)<0.0010.44 (0.36, 0.53)<0.001
Madagascar0.37 (0.27, 0.35)<0.0010.40 (0.35, 0.47)<0.001
Malawi0.32 (0.29, 0.35)<0.0010.39 (0.34, 0.45)<0.001
Mozambique0.33 (0.29, 0.38)<0.0010.50 (0.43, 0.58)<0.001
Rwanda0.25 (0.22, 0.28)<0.0010.31 (0.27, 0.36)<0.001
Tanzania0.32 (0.28, 0.37)<0.0010.33 (0.26, 0.42)<0.001
Uganda0.47 (0.42, 0.53)<0.0010.60 (0.52, 0.69)<0.001
Zambia0.39 (0.35, 0.45)<0.0010.46 (0.40, 0.53)<0.001
Zimbabwe11

Residence
Urban11
Rural0.57 (0.54, 0.60)<0.0010.95 (0.89, 1.01)0.144

Age group
15–2411
25–341.08 (1.04, 1.12)<0.0011.24 (1.18, 1.31)<0.001
35–490.96 (0.92, 1.01)<0.0011.42 (1.32, 1.53)<0.001

Marital status
Single11
Married1.07 (1.03, 1.11)<0.0011.11 (1.05, 1.16)<0.001

Educational status
No education11
Primary1.60 (1.52, 1.68)<0.0011.20 (1.13, 1.27)<0.001
Secondary2.59 (2.44, 2.76)<0.0011.35 (1.24, 1.47)<0.001
Higher5.47 (1.84, 6.19)<0.0011.91 (1.62, 2.14)<0.001

Husband education
No education11
Primary1.42 (1.35, 1.52)<0.0011.09 (1.03, 1.15)<0.001
Secondary2.29 (2.15, 2.44)<0.0011.22 (1.14, 1.31)<0.001
Higher3.70 (3.33, 4.10)<0.0011.51 (1.35, 1.70)<0.001

Literacy level
Cannot read11
Can read1.69 (1.62, 1.72)<0.0011.03 (0.98, 1.08)0.203

Maternal occupation
Had no occupation1
Had occupation1.06 (1.01, 1.11)<0.0011.06 (1.01, 1.11)<0.001

Birth order
111
2–40.87 (0.83, 0.90)<0.0010.75 (0.70, 0.79)<0.001
5+0.65 (0.62, 0.68)<0.0010.63 (0.58, 0.68)<0.001

Pregnancy wanted
Yes11
No0.76 (0.72, 0.81)<0.0010.81 (0.75, 0.86)<0.001

Contraceptive utilization
No11
Yes1.59 (1.51, 1.66)<0.0011.36 (1.29, 1.43)<0.001

Wealth index
Poor11
Middle1.21 (1.15, 1.26)<0.0011.11 (1.05, 1.17)<0.001
Rich1.77 (1.70, 1.86)<0.0011.25 (1.18, 1.32)<0.001

Accessing health care
Not a serious problem11
Serious problem0.73 (0.70, 0.76)<0.0010.93 (0.89, 0.97)<0.001

CI = confidence interval; ANC = antenatal care.

4. Discussion

The pooled prevalence of attending at least four or more ANC visits in East African countries was 52.44% (95% CI: 52.13, 52.74), with the highest attending at least four or more ANC visits in Zimbabwe (75.72%) and the lowest attending at least four or more ANC visits in Ethiopia (31.82%). This might be due to the difference in their healthcare system and policy implementation that may differ in their healthcare access and community awareness towards antenatal care services. Almost half of the region’s women did not receive the minimum recommended four ANC visits, which is a conservative expectation compared with the recent recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO), a minimum of eight visits. The proportion of women with four or more ANC visits is considerably lower than the global average of 61.8%. Implementing the recent WHO recommendation of a minimum of 8 ANC visits is the major challenge for the region [1].

The age group had a significant effect on the recommended antenatal care visit. The odds of completing four and above ANC visits among mothers of age group 24–34 and 35–49 were more likely to complete antenatal care visits than the young mothers. This finding is similar to that of studies conducted elsewhere [25, 3032]. This may be clarified by the fact that earlier pregnancies have gained more experience and awareness about the benefits of visiting health facilities.

Marital status is associated with the recommended antenatal care visits. The odds of completing four or more antenatal care visits among married mothers increased by 11% compared with a single. This finding is also consistent with other studies [33, 34], as those married women have a probability of being supported by their husbands to complete their ANC visits. Besides, women who do not have partners could experience financial difficulty that might prevent them from attending ANC regularly.

The study showed that both women’s and their husbands’ education influence antenatal care visits’ completeness. This result is similar to the findings of other previous studies [25, 27, 31, 35]. This may be because education positively impacts healthcare service utilization and increment of knowledge about specific issues. Empowering women through education, household wealth, and decision-making increases the utilization of maternal healthcare service too.

Our findings suggest that women’s occupation influences the completeness of antenatal care visits. These findings may be related to income and societal influences that come with employment outside the home, which has also been found in other previous studies [30, 36, 37].

The result also revealed that women who had planned to become pregnant were more likely to have attended ANC at least four times relative to those who did not plan to become pregnant at all. This suggests that women with unplanned pregnancies could have been unwilling to seek or attend ANC. Besides, the absence of a pregnancy’ mindset, which is common in unexpected or unplanned pregnancy, could have negatively influenced women’s use of ANC services [28, 38, 39].

Mothers who use modern family planning were more likely to complete four or more ANC visits than the others. This is because mothers who were using family planning might have more awareness and knowledge about the health providers’ maternal health services. During counseling, women’s knowledge about available family planning services and the medical facilities that provide such services could be increased [40].

The result of the current study revealed that women with medium and rich household wealth index were more likely to complete the minimum of 4 ANC services compared with women with poor household wealth index. This is because women with medium and rich household wealth index were more likely to pay for care-seeking costs such as transportation, medications, and any associated costs and can easily get information about the benefit of completing the ANC visits. This concept was consistent with studies [26, 41, 42].

The finding also revealed that accessing serious health problems had a significant role in antenatal care visits. Completing four or more ANC visits among women who face a serious problem of accessing health care was less likely than women who did not face accessing health care. This is because assessing healthcare services is important for promoting and maintaining their health and reducing unnecessary disability and premature death. Besides, accessibility is related to transport issues, financial burden, and long distance to the health facility [43].

Country residence has a significant role in completing four or more ANC visits in the East African countries. Zimbabwe was taken as a reference because it recorded better performance on completing four or more ANC visits than other countries. Ethiopia recorded the lowest, completing four or more ANC visits, as compared with other countries. This is due to the difference in sociodemographic characteristics and different health systems. This difference might change the performance of completing four visits among pregnant women [44].

5. Strengths and Limitations of the Study

Findings from our study are supported by large data sets covering 12 countries in East African countries. The data were gathered following a common, internationally acceptable methodological procedure. Due to the survey’s representative nature, the findings are representative of the included countries and generalizable to women who gave birth. Despite these strengths, the survey is cross-sectional, and hence causal inference cannot be made. A wide variation in the year of the DHS for the different countries, ranged from 2008 to 2018; this may result in selection bias.

6. Conclusion

The coverage of completing the fourth visit of ANC was low in the region. The women’s age, marital status, mother’s and partner’s education status, women’s occupation, birth order, planned pregnancy, modern contraceptive utilization, wealth status, healthcare accessibility, and living countries were the major determinants of completing the four antenatal care visits. Therefore, intersectoral collaboration to promote female education and empowerment, improve geographical access to health care, and strengthen implementation of antenatal care policies with active community participation is recommended. In addition, creating a conducive environment in entrepreneurial activities for poor women is needed.

Abbreviations

AHR:Adjusted hazard ratio
ANC:Antenatal care
CI:Confidence interval
CHR:Crude hazard ratio
EAs:Enumeration areas
DHS:Demographic and health survey
IUGR:Intrauterine growth restriction
MDG:Millennium development goal
SSA:Sub-Saharan Africa
WHO:World Health Organization.

Data Availability

Data are available online and can be accessed at http://www.measuredhs.com.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

ZTT and AM were responsible for the conception of the work, design of the work, data acquisition, analysis, and data interpretation. Data curation, drafting the article, revising it critically for intellectual content, validation, and final approval of the version published were performed by ZTT and AM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the MEASURE DHS program for providing the data set.

References

  1. World Health Organization, WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  2. Ӧ. Tunçalp, J. Pena-Rosas, T. Lawrie et al., “WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience-going beyond survival,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 124, no. 6, pp. 860–862, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. World Health Organization, Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF. 2019, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  4. World Health Organization, Maternal Mortality, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017, http://int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/.
  5. E. Abalos, M. Chamillard, V. Diaz, Ӧ. Tuncalp, and A. Gülmezoglu, “Antenatal care for healthy pregnant women: a mapping of interventions from existing guidelines to inform the development of new WHO guidance on antenatal care,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 519–528, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Downe, K. Finlayson, Ӧ. Tunçalp, and A. Metin Gülmezoglu, “What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 529–539, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Ganchimeg, E. Ota, N. Morisaki et al., “Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among adolescent mothers: a World Health Organization multicountry study,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 121, pp. 40–48, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. Althabe, L. Gibbons, M. Berrueta et al., “Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in adolescent pregnancies: the Global Network’s Maternal Newborn Health Registry study,” Reproductive Health, vol. 12, no. 2, p. S8, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Say, D. Chou, A. Gemmill et al., “Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. e323–e333, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. C. Bwalya, K. S. Baboo, D. C. Sitali et al., “Experiences of antenatal care among pregnant adolescents at Kanyama and Matero clinics in Lusaka district,” Zambia, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 124, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. H. Fulpagare, “Antenatal care service utilization among adolescent pregnant women–evidence from,” Swabhimaan Programme in India, vol. 7, p. 369, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. AbouZahr and T. Wardlaw, Antenatal Care in Developing Countries: Promises, Achievements and Missed Opportunities-An Analysis of Trends, Levels and Differentials, 1990-2001, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.
  13. M. Kinney, J. Lawn, and K. Kerber, Science in Action: Saving the Lives of Africa’s Mothers, Newborns, and children, African Science Academy Development Initiative, Tema, Ghana, 2009.
  14. J. Lawn and K. Kerber, “Opportunities for Africa’s newborns: practical data, policy and programmatic support for newborn care in Africa,” Newborn, and C. T. Child Health, vol. 32, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  15. T. Anh, “Factors related to the acceptance of the new antenatal care protocol among health personnel in SuphanBuri Province, Thailand,” Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand, 2002, MPHM thesis. View at: Google Scholar
  16. Hunt, P. and J. Bueno de Mesquita, Reducing Maternal Mortality: The Contribution of the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health. 2010.
  17. N. N. Asundep, A. P. Carson, C. A. Turpin et al., “Determinants of access to antenatal care and birth outcomes in Kumasi, Ghana,” Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 279–288, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. O. Lincetto, Antenatal Care in Opportunities for Africa’s Newborns, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  19. WHO, Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience: Summary, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/259947/1/WHO-RHR-18.02-eng.pdf?ua=1.
  20. B. Simkhada, E. R. v. Teijlingen, M. Porter, and P. Simkhada, “Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 244–260, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. I. N. Okedo-Alex, “Determinants of antenatal care utilisation in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID e031890, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Z. T. Tessema and G. Tesema, “Pooled prevalence and determinants of skilled birth attendant delivery in East Africa countries: a multilevel analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys,” Italian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Croft and M. C. S. Rojas, Guide to DHS Statistics, Demographic and Health Surveys, 2018, http://www.DHSprogram.com.
  24. WHO, WHO Recommendation on Group Antenatal Care: The WHO Reproductive Health Library, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2016, https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/improving-health-system-performance/who-recommendation-antenatal-care-contact-schedules#:%7E:text=With%20the%20FANC%20model%2C%20the,if%20they%20experience%20danger%20signs.
  25. G. Saad–Haddad, J. Dejong, N. Terreri et al., “Patterns and determinants of antenatal care utilization: analysis of national survey data in seven countdown countries,” vol. 6, no. 1, 2016, https://www.researchgate.net/journal/2047-2986_Journal_of_Global_Health. View at: Google Scholar
  26. T. Tekelab, “Factors affecting utilization of antenatal care in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 4, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. F. Fagbamigbe and E. S. Idemudia, “Wealth and antenatal care utilization in Nigeria: policy implications,” Health Care for Women International, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 17–37, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. E. Sakeah, S. Okawa, A. Rexford Oduro et al., “Determinants of attending antenatal care at least four times in rural Ghana: analysis of a cross-sectional survey,” Global Health Action, vol. 10, no. 1, Article ID 1291879, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. H. Katz, Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians and Public Health Researchers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011.
  30. N. Regassa, “Antenatal and postnatal care service utilization in southern Ethiopia: a population-based study,” African Health Sciences, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 390, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  31. Z. Abosse and M. Woldie, “Factors influencing antenatal care service utilization in hadiya zone,” Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences, vol. 20, no. 2, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  32. E. B. Worku and S. A. Woldesenbet, “Factors that influence teenage antenatal care utilization in John Taolo Gaetsewe (JTG) district of northern Cape Province, South Africa: underscoring the need for tackling social determinants of health,” International Journal of MCH and AIDS, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 134, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  33. P. O. Owili, M. A. Muga, Y.-J. Chou, Y.-H. E. Hsu, N. Huang, and L.-Y. Chien, “Family structure types and adequate utilization of antenatal care in Kenya,” Family & Community Health, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 188–198, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. V. Doctor, “Intergenerational differences in antenatal care and supervised deliveries in Nigeria,” Health & Place, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 480–489, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. M. Tarekegn, “Determinants of maternal health service utilization in Ethiopia: analysis of the 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health,” Survey, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 161, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. O. Akinyemi, “Patterns and determinants of dropout from maternity care continuum in Nigeria,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 282, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Verney, A. R. Barbara, K. K. Jacqueline et al., “Factors associated with socio‐demographic characteristics and antenatal care and iron supplement use in Ethiopia,” Kenya, and Senegal, vol. 14, Article ID e12565, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Gupta, G. Yamada, R. Mpembeni et al., “Factors associated with four or more antenatal care visits and its decline among pregnant women in Tanzania between 1999,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 7, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  39. R. Haddrill, C. A. Mitchell, and D. O. C. Anumba et al., ““Understanding delayed access to antenatal care: a qualitative interview study,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 207, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. Habibov, H. Zainiddinov, and R. Healthcare, “Do family planning messages improve antenatal care utilization? Evidence from Tajikistan,” Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, vol. 13, pp. 29–34, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. G. Kumar, “Utilisation, equity and determinants of full antenatal care in India: analysis from the National Family Health,” Survey, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 327, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  42. J. Ataguba, “A reassessment of global antenatal care coverage for improving maternal health using sub-Saharan Africa as a case study,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 10, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  43. L. Nyathi, “Investigating the accessibility factors that influence antenatal care services utilisation in Mangwe district,” Zimbabwe, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. E. Nketiah‐Amponsah, B. Senadza, E. Arthur et al., “Determinants of Utilization of Antenatal Care Services in Developing Countries,” African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, vol. 4, 2013. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Zemenu Tadesse Tessema and Amare Minyihun. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views213
Downloads181
Citations

Related articles