Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Preventive Medicine
Volume 2017, Article ID 9780317, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9780317
Research Article

Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure

Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Akhil Kher; moc.liamg@09rehka

Received 12 January 2017; Revised 16 April 2017; Accepted 7 May 2017; Published 1 June 2017

Academic Editor: Gerardo E. Guillén Nieto

Copyright © 2017 Akhil Kher et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. W. Hesse, D. E. Nelson, G. L. Kreps et al., “Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first health information national trends survey,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 165, no. 22, pp. 2618–2624, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Fox and L. Rainie, “The online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves,” Pew Internet & American Life Project, pp. 1–23, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. F. Baker, B. M. Devitt, P. D. Kiely et al., “Prevalence of Internet use amongst an elective spinal surgery outpatient population,” European Spine Journal, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1776–1779, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. S. Wald, C. E. Dube, and D. C. Anthony, “Untangling the web-the impact of internet use on health care and the physician-patient relationship,” Patient Education and Counseling, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 218–224, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. R. Edmunds, R. J. Barry, and A. K. Denniston, “Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information,” JAMA Ophthalmology, vol. 131, no. 12, pp. 1610–1616, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Raj, V. L. Sharma, A. J. Singh, and S. Goel, “Evaluation of Quality and readability of health information websites identified through india’s major search engines,” Advances in Preventive Medicine, vol. 2016, Article ID 4815285, 6 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Memon, L. Ginsberg, N. Simunovic, B. Ristevski, M. Bhandari, and Y. V. Kleinlugtenbelt, “Quality of web-based information for the 10 most common fractures,” interactive Journal of Medical Research, vol. 5, no. 2, p. e19, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. P. Grewal and S. Alagaratnam, “The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 410–413, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. J. Keogh, S. M. McHugh, M. Clarke Moloney et al., “Assessing the quality of online information for patients with carotid disease,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 205–208, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Agarwal, D. R. Hansberry, V. Sabourin, K. L. Tomei, and C. J. Prestigiacomo, “A comparative analysis of the quality of patient education materials from medical specialties,” JAMA Internal Medicine, vol. 173, no. 13, pp. 1257–1259, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Mozaffarian, E. J. Benjamin, A. S. Go et al., “Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update,” Circulation, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. e338–e360, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Purcell, J. Brenner, and L. Rainie, Search Engine Use, Pew Research Center, 2012.
  13. M. Aitken, T. Altmann, and D. Rosen, Engaging Patients through Social Media.
  14. R. Flesch, “A new readability yardstick,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 221–233, 1948. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. P. Kincaid, R. P. Fishburne Jr., R. L. Rogers, and B. S. Chissom, “Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel,” Research Branch Report 56, Institute for Simulation and Training, 1975, http://stars.library.ucf.edu/istlibrary/56. View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Gunning, The Technique of Clear Writing, 36-37 (1952).
  17. M. Coleman and T. L. Liau, “A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 283-284, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. H. McLaughlin, “SMOG grading: a new readability formula,” Journal of Reading, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 639–646, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  19. National Institutes of Health, “How to Write Easy-to-Read Health Materials [Internet],” Available from: https://medlineplus.gov/etr.html.
  20. Readability-Score.com [Internet]. Available from: https://readability-score.com/.
  21. M. Murero, G. D'Ancona, and H. Karamanoukian, “Use of the Internet by patients before and after cardiac surgery: telephone survey,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 3, no. 3, article E27, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. M. U. Jayaweera and M. I. M. De Zoysa, “Quality of information available over internet on laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Journal of Minimal Access Surgery, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 321–324, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. B. H. Tulbert, C. W. Snyder, and R. T. Brodell, “Readability of patient-oriented online dermatology resources,” Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology, vol. 4, no. 3, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. M. Moody, K. K. Clemens, L. Storsley, A. Waterman, C. R. Parikh, and A. X. Garg, “Improving on-line information for potential living kidney donors,” Kidney International, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 1062–1070, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Küçükdurmaz, M. M. Gomez, E. Secrist, and J. Parvizi, “Reliability, readability and quality of online information about femoracetabular impingement,” Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 163–168, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Klil, A. Chatton, A. Zermatten, R. Khan, M. Preisig, and Y. Khazaal, “Quality of web-based information on obsessive compulsive disorder,” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, vol. 9, pp. 1717–1723, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. R. Edmunds, A. K. Denniston, K. Boelaert, J. A. Franklyn, and O. M. Durrani, “Patient information in graves’ disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: readability assessment of online resources,” Thyroid, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. N. Hutchinson, G. L. Baird, and M. Garg, “Examining the reading level of internet medical information for common internal medicine diagnoses,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 637–639, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. D. Berkman, D. A. Dewalt, M. P. Pignone et al., “Literacy and health outcomes,” Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, vol. 87, pp. 1–8, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Kutner, E. Greenberg, Y. Jin, and C. Paulsen, The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy, 2003.
  31. R. E. Rudd, B. A. Moeykens, and T. C. Colton, Health and literacy: a review of medical and public health literature.
  32. R. H. Carmona, “Health literacy: a national priority,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 21, no. 8, p. 803, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. World Health Organization, “Health Literacy and Health Behaviour,” WHO, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  34. D. Seubert, Health Communications Toolkits: Improving Readability of Patient Education Materials [Internet], Available from: www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/HealthCommunicationsToolkitsImprovingReadabilityPtEdMaterials.aspx.
  35. D. M. Dalton, E. G. Kelly, and D. C. Molony, “Availability of accessible and high-quality information on the Internet for patients regarding the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. e135–e140, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus