Research Article

Memory-Enhancing Activity of Palmatine in Mice Using Elevated Plus Maze and Morris Water Maze

Table 2

Effect of palmatine and other drugs employed on escape latency (EL) of mice using Morris water maze.

Treatments Dose (kg)−1EL (sec) Day-6EL (sec) Day-7 EL (sec) Day-8 EL (sec) Day-9

Control (vehicle) for 10 days 10 mL105.90 ± 3.2896.34 ± 3.4478.38 ± 3.7054.19 ± 3.44
Physostigmine for 10 days0.1 mg104.31 ± 3.06
101.25 ± 2.5174.09 ± 2.4533.5 ±2.66c
Scopolamine0.4 mg106.62 ± 18.1687.66 ± 3.75
69.63 ± 3.4944.44 ± 2.81b
Diazepam1 mg105.96 ± 2.5991.66 ± 2.48
69.47 ± 3.2142.56 ± 2.52a
Palmatine for 10 days0.1 mg103.93 ± 2.95100.93 ± 3.13
78.09 ± 4.01b44.22 ± 2.98
Palmatine for 10 days0.5 mg100 ± 3.2588.38 ± 3.84
61.56 ± 2.98c32.09 ± 2.4b
Palmatine for 10 days1 mg99.75 ± 2.8075.43 ± 3.54b49.78 ± 2.3126.06 ± 1.54c
Palmatine for 10 days + scopolamine on 10th day1 mg + 0.4 mg107.29 ± 3.0183.69 ± 3.4854.75 ± 2.2628.13 ± 1.33d
Palmatine for 10 days + diazepam on 10th day1 mg + 1 mg109.90 ± 2.2385.21 ± 2.8455.81 ± 3.3929.91 ± 1.59e

. Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM. Data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test.
(8, 279) = 1.264; (day 6);
(8, 279) = 7.147; (day 7);
(8, 279) = 11.079; (day 8);
(8, 279) = 14.251; (day 9);
a as compared to control;
b as compared to control;
c as compared to control;
d as compared to scopolamine treated group;
e as compared to diazepam treated group.