Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Pharmacological Sciences
Volume 2017, Article ID 3026370, 13 pages
Review Article

Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schlechter

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

Correspondence should be addressed to Newman Osafo; hg.ude.tsunk@mrahp.ofason

Received 5 June 2017; Revised 14 August 2017; Accepted 12 September 2017; Published 15 October 2017

Academic Editor: Antonio Ferrer-Montiel

Copyright © 2017 Newman Osafo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Ethnopharmacological Relevance. Cryptolepis sanguinolenta is a scrambling thin-stemmed shrub found in Africa. Traditionally in West Africa, it is employed in the treatment of malaria, diarrhea, and respiratory conditions. This review discusses the traditional importance as well as the phytochemical, ethnomedical, pharmacological, and toxicological importance of this plant. Materials and Methods. Excerpta Medica Database, Google Scholar, Springer, and PubMed Central were the electronic databases used to search for and filter primary studies on Cryptolepis sanguinolenta. Results. The detailed review of various studies conducted on C. sanguinolenta and some of its constituents gives an important body of proof of its potential therapeutic benefits and also of its use as a source of lead compounds with therapeutic potentials. Conclusion. The review on C. sanguinolenta is important in identifying grey areas in the research on this medicinal plant and also provides comprehensive data thus far to continue research on this plant.

1. Introduction

The African-indigenous, scrambling thin-stemmed shrub, Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schlechter (Apocynaceae), is a plant of interest in West African ethnomedicine. Traditionally, the shrub is used in the treatment of various diseases such as malaria, bacterial respiratory diseases, hypertension, and diarrhea and as a cicatrizant [14]. The plant has received a lot of research attention for decades, leading to the identification and characterization of certain secondary metabolites, some of which have served as lead compounds in drug development processes [59]. These studies have also led to the establishment of several pharmacological activities of the plant, including anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antidiabetic, antithrombotic, antihypertensive, and antipyrexic effects [1012]. However, no recent review exists on C. sanguinolenta, combining and detailing the phytochemical composition, the pharmacological activities, and the reported pharmacokinetic and toxicological studies, which has called for the need to compile all available data on C. sanguinolenta. This review therefore seeks to highlight the folkloric significance, phytochemical composition, and biological and pharmacological activities of C. sanguinolenta. This review will also aid future studies aimed at isolation, purification, and characterization of the various bioactive compounds responsible for the reported biological and pharmacological activities of this plant.

2. Ethnopharmacological and Other Local Uses

Cryptolepis sanguinolenta is widely used in the West African community and other localities in the management of various ailments, as summarized in Table 1. Its ethnomedicinal popularity has warranted the various activities of the plant to be documented in several research publications. The length of its branches and its twining and scrambling nature enable its use as a rope in the construction of houses. The pulverized root can also be used as a dye [13, 14].

Table 1: Ethnopharmacological use of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta.

3. Taxonomy and Local Names

Cryptolepis sanguinolenta belongs to kingdom Plantae, phylum Magnoliophyta, class Equisetopsida. It is in the subclass Magnoliidae and superorder Asteranae. The plant belongs to order Gentianales, family Apocynaceae, subfamily Periplocoideae. This plant belongs to the genus Cryptolepis and the species sanguinolenta [28, 29]. Table 2 contains the various local names by which the plant is referred to in different localities.

Table 2: Vernacular names of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta.

4. Ecology

Cryptolepis sanguinolenta is native to West Africa and is commonly found in tropical rainforests, thickets, and mountainous ecologies [21, 36]. In Ghana, it is mostly found in the month of June in areas of the Akwapim and Aburi mountains where there is enough rainfall [21, 33, 36]. The plant thrives well in the woody savannah and areas with adequate sunlight and water and, as such, can also grow in certain areas of Central Africa, specifically Congo-Brazzaville, but is completely absent in mushy and salty swamps of coastal regions [31, 33]. However, in certain areas such as around Lake Bosomtwe, in the Ashanti Region of Ghana, the plant flourishes in April and is sometimes the main vegetation cover on deserted farmlands [31, 37]. Cryptolepis sanguinolenta may also occur in dry and gallery forests, usually near water, from sea level up to 850 m altitude [13].

5. Plant Description

Cryptolepis sanguinolenta is a thin-stemmed twining and scrambling shrub with orange-colored sap in the cut stem which becomes red on ripening [7, 33, 38]. The leaves (Figure 1) are opposite, simple, and entire with an acute to shortly acuminate apex and a symmetrical base. The plant has cymose inflorescence up to 8 cm. The leaves are petiolate, glabrous, and elliptic to oblong-elliptic, up to 7 cm long and 3 cm wide. The inflorescence cymes, lateral on branch shoots, are few flowered, with a yellow corolla tube up to 5 mm long [13, 17, 18, 33]. Flowers are bisexual, regular, 5-merous, 1.5 cm long, and greenish yellow with a pedicel 0.5–1.5 cm long and sepals lanceolate and acute. The corolla is 5 mm long with star-like arranged lanceolate, 12 mm long and contorted to the left in bud. The fruits are paired in linear follicles and are horn-like. The seeds are oblong in shape, small and pinkish, 10–12 mm long, and embedded in a tuft of silky hairs [31, 33]. The dried leaves, stems, and roots have a sweet fragrance. The root varies from 0.4 to 6.6 cm in length and from 0.31 to 1.4 cm in width and has a bitter taste. The roots are rather tortuous and branched with little or no rootlets. The outer surface is yellowish brown and when dry shows longitudinal ridges with occasional cracks. The roots break easily with fractures leaving a smooth transverse surface, which is yellow in color. The sap is extremely bitter and is characterized by the rapidity with which it turns deep red on exposure to air [13, 18, 39, 40].

Figure 1: The leaves and flowers of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (adapted from the Useful Tropical Plants Database, 2014).

6. Morphoanatomical and Histological Evaluation

Pharmacognostic evaluation of plants is critical in the selection of plants so as to avoid fatalities associated with the use of inappropriate plant materials in herbal preparations. Morphoanatomical and histological profiles of plants may also be useful in the standardization and in the identification of adulterants in plant materials or herbal preparations. Ameyaw [31], in his analysis of the morphological characters of C. sanguinolenta from three different locations, identified that the shrub harvested from these different locations showed statistically significant (, , and ) variability, which he attributed to changes in edaphic and environmental factors such as soil characteristics. Morphoanatomical analysis included the leaf, pod, and seed indices and the leaf petioles (Table 3). The root’s histological features studied included the fiber index, vessel element index, and prismatic crystal index (Table 4).

Table 3: Mean dimensions of the leaf, seed, petiole, and pod indices of C. sanguinolenta (adapted from Ameyaw [31]).
Table 4: Mean dimensions of the fiber length, vessel element length, and prismatic crystal length (adapted from Ameyaw [31]).

7. Phytochemical Composition

Phytochemical analysis of various fractions of C. sanguinolenta has shown the presence of a variety of secondary metabolites. The methanol extract of the plant has been shown to contain alkaloids, tannins, and flavones [26, 41]. Unlike the analysis performed by Tona et al. [20], phytochemical screening by Claude et al. [26] did not indicate the presence of flavonoids in the root bark, probably due to the difference in the methods employed in the preparation of the plant material. Studies by Mills-Robertson et al. [42, 43] revealed the presence of reducing sugars, polyuronides, alkaloids, and anthocyanosides in the ethanol, water, and chloroform extracts with the water fraction containing triterpenes in addition. The major alkaloid in C. sanguinolenta root is the indoloquinoline cryptolepine (1) which was first isolated in 1931 and has since been reported to be present in the plant from Ghana and Nigeria [5, 16, 44]. Extensive research on cryptolepine has shown its anti-inflammatory, hypotensive, antithrombotic, antidiabetic, antibacterial, antiplasmodial, antipyretic, and renovascular vasodilatory effects [6, 4547]. Two research groups, Pousset et al. [48] and Sharaf et al. [49, 50], independently reported related alkaloids and named them isocryptolepine (2) and cryptosanguinolentine, respectively. Isocryptolepine is an angularly fused alkaloid with an indolo[3,2-c]quinoline ring system, whereas cryptolepine is a linearly fused alkaloid with an indolo[3,2-b]quinoline ring system [51]. Subsequently, Cimanga et al.’s group [52] and Sharaf et al.’s group [49], in independent studies, reported new linearly fused indolo[2,3-b]quinoline alkaloids and named them neocryptolepine (3) and cryptotackieine, respectively. Other alkaloids reported from the plant C. sanguinolenta include quindoline (4), the spirononacyclic alkaloid cryptospirolepine (5), cryptolepicarboline (6), cryptomisrine (7), 11-isopropylcryptolepine (8), cryptolepinone (9), and biscryptolepine (10). Paulo et al. [53] and Crouch et al. [54] also reported other isolated indole alkaloids including hydroxycryptolepine (11), cryptoheptine (12), and cryptoquindoline (13) (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Structures of alkaloids isolated from the root of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta.

8. Analytical Techniques

Various analytical procedures, qualitative and quantitative, have been employed in the analysis of the phytochemical composition of C. sanguinolenta, mostly its alkaloidal content. Ameyaw and Duker-Eshun employed the N/10 iodine solution and Mayer’s and Dragendorff’s reagents to confirm the presence of alkaloids in a hydroalcoholic extract of the plant [41]. Similarly, Tona and his team also employed Dragendorff’s reagent in the analysis of the plant alkaloids [20]. In a quantitative analysis of the alkaloidal content by Ameyaw and Duker-Eshun [41], the chloroform extract of the plant alkaloids was dried with anhydrous sodium sulphate, and the dry residue was weighed and its percentage was determined from the weight of the plant material used.

Paulo and his team [53] performed 1H- and 13C-NMR analysis of cryptolepine, quindoline, hydroxycryptolepine, cryptoheptine, and cryptoquinoline isolated from C. sanguinolenta. Following extraction and isolation of the alkaloidal extract of the plant material, the team performed fractionation by thin-layer chromatography on an acid alumina column to yield five fractions. Subsequent purification of the fractions by preparative thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel developed with CHCl3-MeOH at various percentages yielded quindoline and hydroxycryptolepine. Grellier et al. [55] also isolated quindoline and isocryptolepine but not hydroxycryptolepine by chromatographing over silica and subsequent elution with hexane and then with CH2Cl2. Isocryptolepine was separated by preparative silica gel thin-layer chromatography. Column chromatography (CC) of a second fraction, on a neutral alumina column with EtOAc-MeOH, led to the isolation of cryptoquindoline, cryptolepine, isocryptolepine, and neocryptolepine following respective developing techniques. Purification of another fraction by preparative TLC on silica gel, developed with an ammoniacal chloroform-methanol solvent system, yielded cryptoheptine. Paulo and his colleagues investigated the natural occurrence of cryptoquindoline by TLC-densitometry and ultraviolet spectrophotometry [53].

Tona et al. [20], after examining individual alkaloids in the alkaloid fraction obtained by a classical acid : base extraction procedure for alkaloids, analyzed the alkaloids by TLC in an ammoniacal chloroform-methanol solution similar to the method employed by Paulo et al. but with slight variation in the individual solvent proportion. TLC spots were developed by spraying with Dragendorff’s reagent [20, 53]. To detect flavonoids, TLC was developed in an aqueous alcohol-acid solvent system and the spots were visualized with 1% aluminium chloride solution in methanol under UV 366 nm as described by Harborne. Tannins were identified using 1% gelatin solution, saponins by froth test, and anthraquinones with 10% potassium hydroxide solution in methanol [20, 56, 57]. Tona et al. [20] used hexane : ethyl acetate mobile phase system and Liebermann-Burchard as a reagent to analyze terpenes and sterols.

Paulo et al. [53] studied the alkaloidal content of the leaf and root aqueous extract of C. sanguinolenta by comparing the chromatograms of extracts with those of isolated alkaloids using HPTLC in situ UV technique. Another analytical technique used by the team is recording infrared spectra in potassium bromide on a PerkinElmer 1420. The group obtained laser desorption ionization mass spectra (LDI-MS) with a 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid matrix using a time-of-flight instrument. In addition to the 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroanalysis performed in their earlier study, high-performance thin-layer chromatography was performed [53].

9. Pharmacological Activity

9.1. Antimalarial

Cryptolepis sanguinolenta is widely used in the Ghanaian community for the management of uncomplicated malaria. Komlaga et al. [58], in the analysis of the composition of various antimalarial herbal preparations, identified that the majority of the study preparations (47.8%) contain C. sanguinolenta. Among natural products, indole alkaloids represent an interesting class of compounds that contribute greatly to the therapeutic arsenal in malaria treatment [59]. Grellier et al. [55] performed a series of in vitro and in vivo inhibition experiments on the aqueous root extracts of C. sanguinolenta on various strains of Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum) with varying degrees of resistance to chloroquine: the CQ-sensitive strain F32/Tanzania (IC50 CQ = 0.025 μM) and the CQ-resistant strains FcB1/Colombia (IC50 CQ = 0.205 μM) and FcR3/Gambia (IC50 CQ = 0.422 μM). It was identified that the aqueous extracts significantly inhibited the in vitro growth of the P. falciparum strains irrespective of their degrees of resistance to chloroquine with IC50 ranging from 1 to 2 μg/ml. In vitro testing of cryptolepine showed that cryptolepine, whether in the hydrochloride form or not, had IC50 values in the same range, 0.2–0.6 μM, for the P. falciparum strains irrespective of the resistant levels [55]. Grellier and his team selected cryptolepine for further in vivo testing due to its impressive in vitro activity. It was identified that development of P. vinckei petteri and P. berghei parasites in mice was significantly inhibited by cryptolepine with the former demonstrating more sensitivity. Even with significant variability in the response to a single dose observed for both parasites in a single group of mice in three independent in vivo experiments, the results of this study strongly indicate the plants’ inhibitory effect on Plasmodium species. Evidence provided by other independent studies indicates the antiplasmodial in vitro (IC50 = 114 nM, SI = 9, CQR) and in vivo (mice, ED50 < 50 mg/kg p.o. and ED50 = 10 mg/kg i.p.) properties of the C. sanguinolenta derived alkaloid, cryptolepine [17, 52, 60].

Paulo and his team [53] also investigated the in vitro antiplasmodial activity of the leaf and root extracts of C. sanguinolenta as well as the antiplasmodial effect of its alkaloids by testing them against the multidrug-resistant strain K1 and chloroquine-sensitive T996 clone of P. falciparum. All extracts were identified to inhibit 90% of P. falciparum K1 growth at concentrations below 23 μg/ml with the root extracts demonstrating more activity than the leaf extracts. Ethanolic extracts of two out of three samples showed greater activity compared to their corresponding aqueous extracts [27]. Onyeibor et al. showed that cryptolepine and other derivative alkaloids from C. sanguinolenta inhibit hemozoin polymerization; this may in part explain the plants’ antiplasmodial activity [61].

In a study conducted to characterize the drug-likeness properties of cryptolepine and also to determine whether a safe and novel antimalarial combination could be developed in combination with the artemisinin derivatives against late stage gametocytes of P. falciparum (NF54), cryptolepine exhibited promising synergistic interactions in vitro with artesunate, artemether, dihydroartemisinin, and amodiaquine. The combination of cryptolepine with chloroquine and lumefantrine showed an additive effect, whereas antagonism was observed with mefloquine in an isobologram analysis. In vivo, Rane’s test in ICR mice infected with Plasmodium berghei NK-65 strains was used to build an isobologram. The isobologram built from cryptolepine-artesunate (1 : 1) and fractions of their ED50s using in vivo Rane’s test in ICR mice infected with Plasmodium berghei NK-65 strains showed the combination to exhibit synergy with an experimental potency of  mg/kg which was significantly lesser than the theoretical potency of  mg/kg. In the study, it was shown that the aqueous root extract of C. sanguinolenta and its major alkaloid, cryptolepine, had minimal inhibitory effects on the late stage Plasmodium falciparum NF54 gametocytes. Toxicological analysis at all doses of cryptolepine and in combination with 4 mg/kg artesunate showed no significant acute toxicity with presentation of no morphological changes in the kidney, spleen, stomach, and liver tissues. These findings provide enough basis for cryptolepine’s use as a potential lead compound for further development of antimalarial medication, alone or in combination with other antimalarials [62].

In a clinical trial involving 44 subjects with uncomplicated malaria, designed to test the efficacy of a teabag formulation of C. sanguinolenta containing 2.5 g root powder administered three times daily for five days, the formulation cleared P. falciparum parasitemia of 50% of the study subjects within three days and all study subjects by day 7. With the exception of hematological derangements following clinical manifestation of the disease, symptoms such as fever, chills, nausea, and vomiting resolved rapidly in 72 hours. The overall cure rate of the teabag formulation of C. sanguinolenta was 93.5% due to two cases of recrudescence on days 21 and 28 [63].

9.2. Antibacterial Activity

Various extracts of C. sanguinolenta have been extensively reported to possess antimicrobial properties against a variety of microbial species. The findings of Paulo et al. parallel those of Cimanga et al. in confirming the plant’s activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, an activity which the authors attribute to the presence of cryptolepine, the main alkaloid in C. sanguinolenta [64, 65]. Boakye-Yiadom [15] showed that less than 50 mg/ml of aqueous extract causes below moderate antibacterial activity, a finding that is consistent with a later work performed by Paulo et al. [64]. It might be imperative that the ethanol extract is used if antibacterial activity is desired. Mills-Robertson et al. [43], in a comparative study of the ethanol, hot water, and cold water extracts of C. sanguinolenta, identified the ethanol extract to be more active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria than the other extracts. However, in a later study, the authors identified the chloroform extract as most active followed by the aqueous extract and then ethanol, opposing their earlier findings [42]. The antibacterial activity is highly attributed to the indole alkaloid cryptolepine, which has been shown to cause morphological changes and cellular breakdown in Staphylococcus aureus [43, 66]. However, the similar microbial activity possessed by other alkaloid derivatives from C. sanguinolenta indicates that the plants’ antibacterial activity is not solely dependent on cryptolepine but on other alkaloids as well [64]. It is believed that the DNA intercalating and topoisomerase II inhibiting effects, as reported by Ansah et al. and others, may as well be the mechanism of action involved in antibacterial effects [64, 6771]. C. sanguinolenta has been found to be active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhi, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Bacillus subtilis [35, 72, 73]. Combination with other bactericidal plants such as Crateva adansonii in 1 : 2 or 2 : 1 can produce synergistic effects [35].

Cryptolepis sanguinolenta extracts were tested against the pan-sensitive H37Rv, the rifampicin-resistant TMC-331, and a wild strain of Mycobacterium avium isolated from a Ugandan patient. The total crude methanol extract showed the highest activity against H37Rv and TM-331 with complete clearance of quadrants at 50 mg/ml although it was not effective against wild strain Mycobacterium avium [26]. Gbedema et al. [74] reported the significant enhancement in amoxicillin’s activity against B. subtilis in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of C. sanguinolenta. In a study by Cimanga et al. [75], they identified that neocryptolepine and biscryptolepine, isolated from a hydroalcoholic extract of C. sanguinolenta, exhibited bacteriostatic effects rather than bactericidal effects on selected organisms. Neocryptolepine demonstrated greater inhibition of Gram-positive bacteria with weaker effects on Gram-negative ones. Biscryptolepine exhibited activity only against some Gram-positive bacteria but cryptoquindoline showed no activity against all the selected bacteria [75].

9.3. Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Activity

Cryptolepis sanguinolenta has been used ethnomedically in the treatment of various inflammatory conditions [21]. Research has shown that cryptolepine, the major alkaloid of the plant, inhibits in vitro nitric oxide production and DNA binding of nuclear factor-kappa B following inflammatory stimuli [76]. Olajide and his team identified that intraperitoneal administration of 10–40 mg/kg cryptolepine resulted in significant dose-dependent inhibition of the carrageenan-induced rat paw edema and carrageenan-induced pleurisy in rats. The alkaloid also dose-dependently caused analgesia and inhibited lipopolysaccharide-induced microvascular permeability in mice and writhing induced by intraperitoneal administration of acetic acid in mice. At the highest dose of 40 mg/kg, the C. sanguinolenta derived alkaloid exhibited significant anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect without inducing the formation of gastric lesions [76]. In a later study, Olajide and his team identified that C. sanguinolenta, at the doses used, produced dose-dependent inhibition of IL-1β-induced PGE2 release from SK-N-SH cells. Western blot experiments revealed that the extract at the doses used inhibited IL-1β-induced COX-2 and p38 expressions in these cells. This study provides evidence that C. sanguinolenta root extract inhibits the production of PGE2 in IL-1β-stimulated neuroblastoma cells through inhibition of COX-2 protein. The group suggested that the observed effects may be dependent on the inhibition of p38 MAP kinase activation [77]. In a study to elucidate the mechanism of action of C. sanguinolenta and its alkaloid cryptolepine in the inhibition of neuroinflammation, Olajide and his team showed that the plant extract and its derivative alkaloid both significantly inhibit TNF-α, IL-6, and PGE2 production in SK-N-SH cells and IL-1β-stimulated cells. Based on their findings, the team proposed that cryptolepine inhibits neuroinflammation through mechanisms involving inhibition of COX-2 and mPGES-1, probably mediated through NF-κB and p38 signaling [77]. Bamgbose and Noamesi [10] had earlier demonstrated that cryptolepine, the major alkaloid of C. sanguinolenta, directly inhibits PGE2 without affecting prostaglandin production in the lungs. However, unlike Olajide and his team [76], Bamgbose and Noamesi [10] did not attribute the effect observed to the inhibition of COX, probably due to the little evidence available on the isoenzymes of COX at the time [78]. The anti-inflammatory activity of the methanol root extract of C. sanguinolenta has also been demonstrated by Odoh et al. [79] in two separate experiments to determine the extracts’ effect in egg albumin, formalin, dextran, and carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats. The team identified that C. sanguinolenta at the doses administered significantly inhibited paw edema in a dose-dependent manner [79].

9.4. Antifungal Activity

In a study conducted, the indoloquinoline alkaloid of C. sanguinolenta, cryptolepine, inhibited different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans at μg/ml concentrations of 5–10, 10–20, 40–80, and 80–160 for S. cerevisiae NCPF 3139, S. cerevisiae NCPF 3178, C. albicans ATCC 10231, and C. albicans NCPF 3262, respectively. Time kill kinetics showed a reduction in viable count from 106 to <10 cfu/ml in 4 hours for C. albicans ATCC at an exposure level of 320 μg/ml. A 3 log cycle reduction was observed after exposing S. cerevisiae NCPF 3139 to 160 μg/ml of cryptolepine. It was identified that exposure to biocidal concentrations resulted in extreme disturbance of surface structure, including partial and total collapse resulting in lysis of the cells [66]. Independent studies by Boakye-Yiadom [15], Agboke et al. [35], and Silva et al. [72] provide similar evidence on the plants’ antifungal activity. In a study by Ekundayo and Ezeogu [73], both the methanol and the dichloromethane root extracts inhibited C. albicans growth with zones of inhibition of 8 mm and 10 mm, respectively. Agboke et al. [35] demonstrated the susceptibility of Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger to the crude extract of C. sanguinolenta using the agar diffusion method where the extract was able to inhibit the growth of both organisms at the same concentration of 12.5 mg/ml. Though a limitation of these studies is the absence of a positive control, their relevance is irrefutable.

9.5. Antiamoebic Activity

Entamoeba histolytica is among the most common pathogens responsible for diarrhea in the tropics and regions with poor sanitation [80]. Tona et al. [20] investigated the effect of the plant extract among other plants on Entamoeba histolytica strain isolated from patients with acute amoebic dysentery. C. sanguinolenta was shown to inhibit the growth of E. histolytica with a minimum inhibitory concentration of less than 7.81 μg/ml [18]. The study therefore provides both scientific backing for the ethnomedical use of C. sanguinolenta in the treatment of intestinal amoebiasis and basic evidence to warrant further study to fully elucidate its antiamoebic effects.

9.6. Anticancer Activity

The anticancer activity of C. sanguinolenta has been mainly attributed to its major alkaloid, cryptolepine, although other studies have implicated other synthetic derivatives of some alkaloidal isolates of C. sanguinolenta [78, 81, 82]. An extensive review on the anticancer activity of C. sanguinolenta and its alkaloid, cryptolepine, has been published by Ansah and Mensah who proposed, based on recent evidence, that a close relationship exists between the plant’s mechanism of cytotoxicity and its anti-inflammatory activity [78]. This review therefore will only look at a summary of it and other studies conducted after that period.

The major alkaloid of C. sanguinolenta, cryptolepine, has been shown to inhibit NF-κB in various cells and also to induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells [83, 84]. In their review, Ansah and Mensah [78] in summary reported that the cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory activity of Cryptolepis/cryptolepine are likely to be mediated by interference with NF-κB activity leading to downregulation of inflammatory and antiapoptotic genes such as COX-2, iNOS, TNF-α, and Bcl-2 genes. The inhibition of NF-κB also leads to the upregulation of the proapoptotic genes p53, p21, Bax, caspase, and cytochrome c [78]. In an independent study, Olajide et al. [85] investigated whether the apoptotic-inducing effect of cryptolepine was mediated through the NF-κB signaling pathway. The authors reported that cryptolepine dose-dependently inhibited A549 cell proliferation after 24 h of treatment with significant induction of caspase-3 and increase in relative luminescence in the cells. Protein analyses revealed that cryptolepine inhibited TNF-α-induced IκB phosphorylation and NF-κBp65 nuclear translocation. Pretreatment with cryptolepine reduced the levels of Bcl-2, cyclin D1, survivin, XIAP, and cIAP in cells stimulated with TNF-α. The result of the study shows that cryptolepine downregulates the expression of antiapoptosis proteins and induces apoptosis in A549 lung carcinoma cells by interfering with NF-κB signaling [85].

In a study by Pal and Katiyar [86], it was found that cryptolepine inhibits topoisomerase I and II activity with associated substantial DNA damage. Cryptolepine-induced DNA damage resulted in an increase in phosphorylation of ATM/ATR, BRCA1, Chk1/Chk2, and γH2AX and also the activation of p53 signaling cascade, as previously reported by Zhu and Gooderham [84], including enhanced protein expressions of the cyclin-dependent kinases p16 and p21. The DNA damage also resulted in downregulation of cyclin-dependent kinases, cyclin D1, cyclin A, cyclin E, and proteins involved in cell division such as Cdc25a and Cdc25b, leading to cell cycle arrest at S-phase. Disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential and release of cytochrome c were also reported. These cryptolepine-induced changes in human nonmelanoma skin cancer cells resulted in a significant reduction in cell viability and colony formation and increase in apoptotic cell death [86].

9.7. Anxiogenic and Sedative Activity

Normally, agents that prolong phenobarbitone-induced sleeping time are expected to be anxiolytics in animal models. However, in a study, the aqueous extract of C. sanguinolenta reduced spontaneous locomotor activity and prolonged phenobarbitone sleeping time in mice but induced anxiogenic behavior in the same study. The extract decreased rearing and head dipping and caused an increase in nose poking in mice, which is consistent with anxiogenic behavior [87]. The anxiogenic and sedative effects of C. sanguinolenta may indicate the different mechanisms by which the extract exerts its effect. This variability in effect may be explained on the basis of the phytochemical composition of the plant, mostly its indole alkaloids, each of which may exert its effect via a different mechanism.

9.8. Antioxidant Activity

Cimanga and his team [88] investigated the effects of C. sanguinolenta-isolated alkaloids on xanthine oxidase and the production of superoxide anions. From the results of the study, it was shown that cryptoquindoline, quindoline, cryptolepine, neocryptolepine, and biscryptolepine were devoid of effects on xanthine oxidase activity with no recognizable activity against superoxide anion production. However, 11-hydroxycryptolepine was identified to exhibit significant inhibition of xanthine oxidase and the production of superoxide anions. With 11-hydroxycryptolepine having a distinctive hydroxyl group as opposed to the other alkaloids, it is suggested that the presence of a hydroxyl group is important for the inhibition of xanthine oxidase and the production of superoxide radicals [88].

9.9. Antidiabetic Activity

In a study to investigate the antidiabetic effect of C. sanguinolenta, the ethanolic extract was identified to significantly decrease the intestinal absorption and transport of glucose, resulting in decreased plasma glucose concentration. This effect was coupled with an observed decrease in fasting lipid cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and also an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Histopathological analysis showed an increase in the sizes of the Islet of Langerhans and altered pancreatic β-cell counts. The results of the study suggest the beneficial effects of C. sanguinolenta in reducing plasma glucose concentration and lipid levels and improving pancreatic β-cell function, the effects of which are very critical in the prevention of microvascular and macrovascular diseases in patients with diabetes mellitus [89].

In a murine diabetes model, cryptolepine significantly lowered plasma glucose levels. It was identified that the glucose lowering effect of cryptolepine led to significant reduction in plasma insulin concentration which is associated with evidence of improved insulin-mediated glucose disposal. The authors also reported a cryptolepine-mediated increase in glucose uptake by the 3T3-L1 cells [24]. Following their earlier discovery of the antihyperglycemic effect of cryptolepine [22], Bierer and his colleagues measured the antihyperglycemic effects of a series of synthetic heterosubstituted cryptolepine analogs in a noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) model. From their study, Bierer and his colleagues were able to generate the first structure-bioactivity study about the cryptolepine nucleus [23].

To evaluate the relevance of cryptolepine, the major alkaloid of C. sanguinolenta in the long-term management of diabetes mellitus, Ameyaw et al. [90] examined the effect of the alkaloid in alloxan-induced diabetes. Cryptolepine treatment significantly ( ≤ 0.001) reduced fasting blood glucose and body weight and inhibited the latency to withdrawal from pain stimulus. The authors reported a decrease in plasma urea levels and elevation in plasma creatinine associated with diabetes mellitus. Similar to the reports by Cimanga et al. [88], it was identified that cryptolepine reversed diabetes-associated elevation of plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoproteins, with reduction in high-density lipoproteins. Cryptolepine exhibited dose-dependent regeneration of β-islet cells; however, it could not repair degenerated liver and kidney tissues. The alkaloid was realized to dose-dependently worsen diabetes-mellitus-associated reduced sperm quality. Evidence from this study depicts cryptolepine’s ability to inhibit hyperglycemia, weight loss, cold allodynia, neuropathic pain, and hyperlipidemia associated with diabetes mellitus. Regeneration of pancreatic β-islet cells by the alkaloid is very important in the management of diabetes mellitus. Cryptolepine, however, does not improve liver and kidney damage [90].

9.10. Antifertility and Reproductive Toxicity

The extract of C. sanguinolenta has been shown to reduce male and female fertility, terminate pregnancy when given before organogenesis, induce fetal mortality, and cause intrauterine growth restriction in animal studies. Fetal death may be a result of cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase with subsequent irreparable embryonic cell damage following the administration of the extract [91]. If this occurs at the very early stages of conception, resorption may occur, which may lead to reduced fertility.

In a reproductive toxicological study in male mice, C. sanguinolenta extract at all doses decreased male fertility, which was also reflected in the decreased female fertility index, with no significant differences in postimplantation losses between the observed treated groups [91]. The team reported a reduction in the mean weight of the left caudal epididymis and the testes following treatment with the extract, although the result was not significant () compared to the control. However, treatment with the extract resulted in a significant () reduction in sperm numbers. Cryptolepine, the major alkaloid, via its antimuscarinic effect, α-adrenoceptor antagonism, and cytotoxicity, may in part be responsible for the decrease in fertility in the male rodent population treated with C. sanguinolenta [68, 69, 92]. The genotoxic effect of the extract observed at high doses depicts the presence of a weak genotoxic principle within the plant. Administration of C. sanguinolenta extract to pregnant mice before organogenesis and throughout the gestational period resulted in higher incidences of intrauterine growth restriction and 40–46% incidence of abortion compared to 0% in the control group. Although no anatomical malformations in the limbs, spine, and palate were observed, mortality in offspring born to C. sanguinolenta extract treated mice was significantly higher: 12% compared to the 0.5% offspring mortality in the control.

The antifertility effect of C. sanguinolenta has also been demonstrated by Ameyaw et al. [90] and Akhigbe et al. [89]. These studies provide evidence that supports the hypothesis that C. sanguinolenta extract significantly suppresses sperm count. The ethanol extract of the plant has been reported to significantly decrease testosterone levels with an associated rise in the levels of luteinizing hormones. However, the extract appeared not to affect the levels of follicle stimulating hormones. Histomorphological analysis showed no alterations in the testicular tissues of rats treated with 50 and 150 mg/kg of the extract; however, mild distortion of the seminiferous tubules at a dose of 250 mg/kg was observed [89]. Similar to the report by Ansah and his team [91], Akhigbe et al. [89] also reported a nonsignificant change in testicular morphological parameters such as testicular weight, length, and diameter.

The ability of C. sanguinolenta to reduce fertility has been shown to be consistent with COX-2 inhibitors-mediated fertility reduction [91]. The antifertility effect may therefore be a result of inhibition of COX-2, which the extract has already been shown to inhibit in its anti-inflammatory activity. Though reproductive studies have not been conducted in humans, the results of these studies indicate the potential contraindication of C. sanguinolenta or any preparation containing C. sanguinolenta in pregnant women and women of reproductive age who want to conceive.

9.11. Ulcerogenicity

Cryptolepis sanguinolenta has been shown to increase basal acid secretion as well as histamine-induced gastric acid secretion. In a study by Ajayi et al. [93], the ethanol extract of C. sanguinolenta was identified to dose-dependently increase the number and sizes of gastric parietal cells, explaining the increase in gastric acid secretion after the administration of the extract, increasing the risk of gastric ulceration. However, Olajide and his team [11] employed a high dose of cryptolepine for analgesia and for preventing inflammation in mice without inducing gastric ulceration. This may imply that the gastric secretagogue action of the extract may not be a resultant effect of its major alkaloid, cryptolepine. Since this association is inconclusive, further studies need to be done to properly understand the effects of C. sanguinolenta and its derived alkaloids in the gastric mucosa. The study by Ajayi et al. [93] also demonstrated the appetite and weight gain stimulating effect of C. sanguinolenta.

9.12. Enzyme Activity

Treatment with cryptolepine, the major alkaloid of C. sanguinolenta, resulted in a further increase in the elevated levels of plasma aspartate transaminase associated with induction of diabetes mellitus in Sprague-Dawley rats. However, no significant effects on elevated levels of alanine transaminase and gamma-glutamyl transferase were observed [90]. However, in the absence of any disease, administration of the plant extract resulted in no changes in serum transaminases, suggesting the plants’ limited effect on the liver [88]. Concurrent administration of artesunate with C. sanguinolenta extract reduces the plasma concentration of artesunate leading to subtherapeutic drug levels and, ultimately, drug resistance. Coadministration of the two has been shown to induce the cytochrome P450 enzyme isoforms CYP1A and CYP2B1, leading to increased metabolism of artesunate. The extract, however, did not significantly affect the levels CYP2E1 in the presence of artesunate [69].

10. Pharmacokinetics

In vitro pharmacokinetic assays of cryptolepine in rat and human plasma demonstrated high passive permeability, low human p-glycoprotein efflux potential, good metabolic stability, and moderate protein binding by cryptolepine. Preliminary incubation in human and rat hepatocytes showed low to moderate hepatic extraction with nine metabolites identified in the hepatocytes of both organisms. The metabolites (Table 5) were proposed to have resulted from metabolic pathways involving oxidation (M2–M9) and glucuronidation (M1, M2, M4, M8, and M9). The metabolites M2, M6, and M9 were also identified in the rat urine and the M6 metabolite was also identified in rat plasma. M1 was only identified in human hepatocytes while the M8 and M9 metabolites were only identified in rat hepatocytes. These hepatocyte-associated metabolites together with enzyme phenotyping assay suggest the possible involvement of both cytosolic and microsomal liver enzymes in the metabolism of cryptolepine in the rat and human hepatocytes. Aldehyde oxidase, UDP-glucuronyltransferase, and the cytochrome P450 enzyme system may be among the enzymes implicated. In vivo rat pharmacokinetic profile of cryptolepine showed very high clearance and volume of distribution, a moderate half-life, low oral exposure, early time to peak, and a low peak concentration. Elimination was faster and systemic exposure to cryptolepine was low to moderate in rats with unchanged excretion of cryptolepine in the urine less than 0.1% of the administered dose. This indicates metabolism, unchanged drug, and/or biliary excretion as the main clearance pathway(s). Elimination of cryptolepine was faster with less than 0.1% of the administered dose excreted unchanged in urine [62].

Table 5: Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data for cryptolepine and the proposed metabolites (adapted from Donkor [62]).

11. Toxicological Assessment

In an in vitro study, the toxicological profiles of C. sanguinolenta and its major alkaloid, cryptolepine, were established using the Chinese hamster lung fibroblast (V79-MZ) cell line, human colon adenocarcinoma (HCT116) cell line, human ovary adenocarcinoma (SKOV3) cell line, and the human breast adenocarcinoma MCF7 and MDA MB 361 cell lines. The plant and its alkaloid both caused a dose- and time-dependent reduction in viability of the V79 cell line. The DNA histograms from flow cytometry analysis indicated that treatment with 5 μg/ml C. sanguinolenta extract or 0.5 μM cryptolepine for 24 hours did not appear to have any significant effect on the cell cycle distribution. However, after treatment with 50 μg/ml C. sanguinolenta extract or 5 μM cryptolepine, a gradual accumulation of sub-G1 cell population began to emerge in a dose-dependent fashion, accounting for about 55% of the population with these sub-G1 cells most likely being apoptotic [68]. A significantly different result, that is, 30% cell death, was observed with the Trypan Blue test, a finding which the authors attributed to the fact that a significant number of the dying cells excluded Trypan Blue and were probably early apoptotic. The authors then reported strikingly similar results on C. sanguinolenta and cryptolepine effects on the cycle distribution following a confirmatory test for apoptosis using light microscopy and Diff-Quick®. Treatment with the extract and the alkaloid profoundly inhibited the growth of V79 cells and almost all the organ-specific human cancer cell lines. In a V79 cell mutation assay (hprt gene), C. sanguinolenta extract only induced mutation at the highest dose employed with mutation frequency of approximately 4 and 38 mutant clones per 106 cells for control and the extract, respectively. Cryptolepine however at 0.5–5.0 μM was not mutagenic [68]. In his Ph.D. thesis, Mensah identified that Cryptolepis sanguinolenta at a dose beyond 100 mg/kg, administered orally, progressively induced an apoptotic-like cell death in the kidneys of mice [94]. These results indicate the cytotoxicity of C. sanguinolenta and its alkaloid cryptolepine with both probably weak mammalian mutagens and/or clastogens [68].

With the exception of a reduction in mean cell volume and an accompanied increase in mean cell hemoglobin concentration due to unchanged hemoglobin, all other hematological parameters and serum transaminases were unaffected following treatment of rats with C. sanguinolenta for two weeks [88]. A study by Ajayi et al. [93] also demonstrated the stability of most hematological parameters against treatment with the ethanolic extract of C. sanguinolenta. Both daily administration of C. sanguinolenta extract for two weeks and 30-minute administration prior to pentobarbitone administration dose-dependently prolonged rat sleeping time. The effect as explained by the authors is CNS-related as opposed to being enzymatic due to a decrease in locomotor activity observed at a dose of 500 mg/kg [88]. In contrast to their earlier study, Ansah and his team [30] identified a dose-dependent increase in platelet and granulocyte numbers following two weeks of administration of C. sanguinolenta. Similarly, the work done by Ajayi and his team [93] demonstrated the extracts’ selective stimulatory effect on bone marrow, evidenced as a selective rise in platelet and white blood cells. Administration of 2000 mg/kg of the extract was associated with marginal enlargement of the liver and kidney; however, this finding did not correlate with findings from biochemical and histopathological studies, which showed no changes in the renal and hepatobiliary systems. From these studies, it may be suggested that the root extract of C. sanguinolenta is generally safe at doses below 500 mg/kg and caution should be taken in administering doses above 500 mg/kg [30].

12. Conclusion

There have been documented folkloric uses of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta in the literature. Also, there has been a sizeable amount of research to back these diverse folkloric benefits of this plant. However, there is a significant gap remaining to be filled concerning research into this plant which holds importance in medicine.

Although there have been data pointing to the toxic potential of the plant, it still serves as a source of potential agent(s) which hold prospects in therapy, spanning from the antimalarial benefits to the possible application in cancer chemotherapy.

We therefore recommend further studies on C. sanguinolenta. This is informed by the global need for more effective, however less toxic, therapeutic agents. Future studies on C. sanguinolenta can screen for possible chemotherapeutic potential as well as anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity of the extract and its bioactive constituents, such as cryptolepine, as potential therapy in humans.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


  1. G. L. Boye and O. Ampofo, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Cryptolepine, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 1983.
  2. F. R. Irvine, Woody Plants of Ghana, Oxford University Press, London, UK, 1961.
  3. E. S. Ayensu, Medicinal Plants of West Africa, Reference publications Inc., Algonac, Mich, USA, 1978.
  4. O. B. Dokosi, Herbs of Ghana, African Universities Press, Accra, Ghana, 1988.
  5. E. Gellért, Raymond‐Hamet, and E. Schlittler, “Die Konstitution des Alkaloids Cryptolepin,” Helvetica Chimica Acta, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 642–651, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. Dwuma‐Badu, J. S. K. Ayim, N. I. Y. Fiagbe, J. E. Knapp, P. L. Schiff, and D. J. Slatkin, “Constituents of West African medicinal plants XX: quindoline from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 433-434, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Ajayi, R. Akhigbe, O. Adewumi, and S. Olaleye, “Haematological evaluation of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta stem ethanolic extract in rats,” International Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 56–61, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. C. W. Wright, “Plant derived antimalarial agents: new leads and challenges,” Phytochemistry Reviews, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Wiart, Lead Compounds from Medicinal Plants for The Treatment of Neurodegenerative Disesases, Academic Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2013.
  10. S. O. A. Bamgbose and B. K. Noamesi, “Studies on cryptolepine II: inhibition of carrageenan induced oedema by cryptolepine,” Planta Medica, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 392–396, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. A. Olajide, A. M. Ajayi, and C. W. Wright, “Anti-inflammatory properties of cryptolepine,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1421–1425, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Ajayi and R. Akhigbe, “Antifertility activity of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta leaf ethanolic extract in male rats,” Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. C. M. Jansen and G. H. Schmelzer, “Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schltr,” in Plant Resources of Tropical Africa (Prota), G. H. Schmelzer and A. Gurib-Fakim, Eds., 2010, View at Google Scholar
  14. J. E. Saxton, The Alkaloids, Chemistry and Physiology, R. H. F. Manske and H. L. Holmes, Eds., vol. 8, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  15. K. Boakye-Yiadom, “Antimicrobial properties of some west african medicinal plants II. Antimicrobial activity of aqueous extracts of cryptolepis sanguinolenta (lindl.) schlechter,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 78–80, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. L. Boye and O. Ampofo, “Medicinal plants in Ghana,” in Plants and Traditional Medicine, Wagner and N. R. Farnsworth, Eds., vol. 4, pp. 32-33, Academic Press, London, UK, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  17. C. W. Wright, J. D. Phillipson, S. O. Awe et al., “Antimalarial activity of cryptolepine and some other anhydronium bases,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 361–363, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. R. Mshana, D. K. Abbiw, E. Addae-Mensah et al., “Traditional medicine and pharmacopoeia: contribution to the revision of Ethnobotanical and Floristic Studies in Ghana,” Tech. Rep., Organization of African Unity/Scientific, Technical and Research committee, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  19. K. Kambu, Eléments de Phytothérapie Comparée: Plantes Médicinales Africaines, Centre de Recherches Pédagogiques, Kinshasa, Congo, 1990.
  20. L. Tona, K. Kambu, N. Ngimbi, K. Cimanga, and A. J. Vlietinck, “Antiamoebic and phytochemical screening of some Congolese medicinal plants,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 57–65, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Iwu, Handbook of African Medicinal Plants, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1993.
  22. D. E. Bierer, D. M. Fort, C. D. Mendez et al., “Ethnobotanical-directed discovery of the antihyperglycemic properties of cryptolepine: its isolation from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta, synthesis, and in vitro and in vivo activities,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 894–901, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. E. Bierer, L. G. Dubenko, P. Zhang et al., “Antihyperglycemic activities of cryptolepine analogues: an ethnobotanical lead structure isolated from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 41, no. 15, pp. 2754–2764, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Luo, D. M. Fort, T. J. Carlson et al., “Cryptolepis sanguinolenta: an ethnobotanical approach to drug discovery and the isolation of a potentially useful new antihyperglycaemic agent,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 367–374, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. N. Tackie, M. H. M. Sharaf, P. L. Schiff, G. L. Boye, R. C. Crouch, and G. E. Martin, “Assignment of the proton and carbon NMR spectra of the indoloquinoline alkaloid cryptolepine,” Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1429–1435, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Claude, B. Lydia, W. Paul et al., “Efficacy of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta root extract on slow-growing rifampicin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1140–1146, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. A. Paulo, E. T. Gomes, J. Steele, D. C. Warhurst, and P. J. Houghton, “Antiplasmodial activity of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta alkaloids from leaves and roots,” Planta Medica, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 30–34, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. J. T. Venter and R. L. Verhoeven, “A tribal classification of the Periplocoideae (Apocynaceae),” International Association for Plant Taxonomy, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 705–720, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Brink and E. G. Achigan-Dako, “Fibres,” in Plant Resources of Tropical Africa (Prota), p. 109, Earthprint Limited, Stevenage, UK, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  30. C. Ansah, H. R. Otsyina, M. Duwiejua et al., “Toxicological assessment of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta for possible use in veterinary medicine,” Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  31. Y. Ameyaw, “Morpho-histological characters for the identification of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schtr,” International Journal of Science and Nature, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 331–339, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  32. C. Thornell, “Wild plant names in the Mpiemo language,” Africa and Asia, vol. 4, pp. 57-58, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  33. V. Y. A. Barku, Y. Opoku-Boahen, and E. Y. Dzotsi, “Isolation and pharmacological activities of alkaloids from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl) schlt,” International Research Journal of Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 58–61, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  34. C. B. Yakubu, NIBIMA, A Wonder Plant for Malaria Treatment, African Media and Malaria Research Network, 3rd edition, 2006,
  35. A. A. Agboke, A. A. Attama, and M. A. Momoh, “Evaluation of the antimicrobial activities of crude extract of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta and Crateva adansonii leaves and their interactions,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 85–89, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Addy, “Cryptolepis: an African traditional medicine that provides hope for malaria victims,” HerbalGram, vol. 60, pp. 54–59, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  37. J. Hutchinson and J. M. Dalziel, Flora of Tropical West Africa, The Whitefrairs Press Ltd., London, UK, 1963.
  38. A. Paulo and P. J. Houghton, “Chemotaxonomic analysis of the genus Cryptolepis,” Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 155–166, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. L. Boye, Ghana Herbal Pharmacopoeia, The Advert Press, Osu, Ghana, 1st edition, 1992.
  40. A. Sofowora, Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in Africa, vol. 1, The Pitman Press Limited, Bath, UK, 2nd edition, 1984.
  41. Y. Ameyaw and G. Duker-Eshun, “The alkaloid contents of the ethno-plant organs of three antimalarial medicinal plant species in the eastern region of Ghana,” International Journal of Chemical Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 48–58, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  42. F. C. Mills-Robertson, S. C. K. Tay, G. Duker-Eshun, W. Walana, and K. Badu, “In vitro antimicrobial activity of ethanolic fractions of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, vol. 11, article 16, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. F. C. Mills-Robertson, F. A. Aboagye, G. Duker-Eshun, S. Kaminta, and S. Agbeve, “In vitro antimicrobial activity of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (periplocaceae),” African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 476–480, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. E. Delvaux, “Sur la Cryptolepine. (On Cryptolepine.),” Journal de pharmacie de Belgique, vol. 13, article 955, 1931. View at Google Scholar
  45. S. Y. Ablordeppey, P. Fan, S. Li, A. M. Clark, and C. D. Hufford, “Substituted indoloquinolines as new antifungal agents,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1337–1346, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. B. K. Noamesi and S. O. A. Bamgbose, “The alpha-adrenoceptor blocking properties of cryptolepine on the rat isolated vas deferens,” Planta Medica, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. N. Tackie, G. L. Boye, M. H. M. Sharaf et al., “Cryptospirolepine, a unique spiro-nonacyclic alkaloid isolated from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 653–670, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J.-L. Pousset, M.-T. Martin, A. Jossang, and B. Bodo, “Isocryptolepine from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Phytochemistry, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 735-736, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. H. M. Sharaf, P. L. Schiff Jr., A. N. Tackie, C. H. Phoebe Jr., and G. E. Martin, “Two new indoloquinoline alkaloids from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta: cryptosanguinolentine and cryptotackieine,” Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 239–243, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. H. M. Sharaf, P. L. Schiff Jr., A. N. Tackie et al., “The isolation and structure determination of cryptomisrine, a novel indolo[3,2-b]quinoline dimeric alkaloid from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 789–797, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. P. T. Parvatkar, P. S. Parameswaran, and S. G. Tilve, “Isolation, biological activities and synthesis of indoloquinoline alkaloids: Cryptolepine, isocryptolepine and neocryptolepine,” Current Organic Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1036–1057, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. Cimanga, T. De Bruyne, L. Pieters, A. J. Vlietinck, and C. A. Turger, “In vitro and in vivo antiplasmodial activity of cryptolepine and related alkaloids from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 688–691, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Paulo, E. T. Gomes, and P. J. Houghton, “New alkaloids from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1485–1491, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. C. Crouch, A. O. Davis, T. D. Spitzer et al., “Elucidation of the structure of quindolinone, a minor alkaloid of cryptolepis sanguinolenta: submilligram 1H‐13C and 1H‐15N heteronuclear shift correlation experiments using micro inverse‐detection,” Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1077–1080, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. P. Grellier, L. Ramiaramanana, V. Millerioux et al., “Antimalarial activity of cryptolepine and isocryptolepine, alkaloids isolated from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 317–321, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. B. Harborne, Phytochemical Methods, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1974.
  57. M. O. M. Tanira, A. K. Bashir, R. Dib, C. S. Goodwin, I. A. Wasfi, and N. R. Banna, “Antimicrobial and phytochemical screening of medicinal plants of the United Arab Emirates,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 201–205, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. G. Komlaga, C. Agyare, R. A. Dickson et al., “Medicinal plants and finished marketed herbal products used in the treatment of malaria in the Ashanti region, Ghana,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 172, pp. 333–346, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. Frederich, M. Tits, and L. Angenot, “Potential antimalarial activity of indole alkaloids,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. G. C. Kirby, A. Paine, D. C. Warhurst, B. K. Noamese, and J. D. Phillipson, “In vitro and in vivo antimalarial activity of cryptolepine, a plant‐derived indoloquinoline,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 359–363, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. O. Onyeibor, S. L. Croft, H. I. Dodson et al., “Synthesis of some cryptolepine analogues, assessment of their antimalarial and cytotoxic activities, and consideration of their antimalarial mode of action,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 2701–2709, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. A. F. Donkor, Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety evaluation of cryptolepine-artemisinin based combinations in the management of uncomplicated malaria [Ph.D. thesis], Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 2016.
  63. K. A. Bugyei, G. L. Boye, and M. E. Addy, “Clinical efficacy of a tea-bag formulation of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta root in the treatment of acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria,” Ghana Medical Journal, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. A. Paulo, A. Duarte, and E. T. Gomes, “In vitro antibacterial screening of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta alkaloids,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 127–130, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. K. Cimanga, L. Pieters, M. Claeys, D. Vanden Berghe, and A. J. Vlietinck, “Biological activities of cryptolepine, an alkaloid from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Planta Medica, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. A98–A99, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. I. K. Sawer, M. I. Berry, M. W. Brown, and J. L. Ford, “The effect of cryptolepine on the morphology and survival of Escherichia coli, Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 314–321, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. C. Ansah, A. Khan, and N. J. Gooderham, “In vitro genotoxicity of the West African anti-malarial herbal Cryptolepis sanguinolenta and its major alkaloid cryptolepine,” Toxicology, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 141–147, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. Ansah and N. J. Gooderham, “The popular herbal antimalarial, extract of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta, is potently cytotoxic,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 245–251, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. K. Bonjean, M. C. De Pauw-Gillet, M. P. Defresne et al., “The DNA intercalating alkaloid cryptolepine interferes with topoisomerase II and inhibits primarily DNA synthesis in B16 melanoma cells,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 15, pp. 5136–5146, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. J. N. Lisgarten, M. Coll, J. Portugal, C. W. Wright, and J. Aymami, “The antimalarial and cytotoxic drug cryptolepine intercalates into dna at cytosine-cytosine sites,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 57–60, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. L. Guittat, P. Alberti, F. Rosu et al., “Interactions of cryptolepine and neocryptolepine with unsual DNA structures,” Biochimie, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 535–547, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. O. Silva, A. Duarte, J. Cabrita, M. Pimentel, A. Diniz, and E. Gomes, “Antimicrobial activity of Guinea-Bissau traditional remedies,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 55–59, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. E. O. Ekundayo and L. I. Ezeogu, “Evaluation of antimicrobial activities of extracts of five plants used in traditional medicine in Nigeria,” International Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  74. S. Y. Gbedema, F. Adu, M. T. Bayor et al., “Enhancement of antibacterial activity of amoxicillin by some Ghanaian medicinal plant extracts,” International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 145–152, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  75. K. Cimanga, T. De Bruyne, L. Pieters et al., “Antibacterial and antifungal activities of neocryptolepine, biscryptolepine and cryptoquindoline, alkaloids isolated from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,” Phytomedicine, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 209–214, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. O. Olajide, A. Pinheiro de Oliveira, J. Unekwe, C. Wright, and B. Fiebich, “Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schltr. root extract inhibits prostaglandin production in IL-1b stimulated SK-N-SH neuronal cells,” Planta Medica, vol. 76, no. 12, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. O. A. Olajide, H. S. Bhatia, A. C. P. De Oliveira, C. W. Wright, and B. L. Fiebich, “Anti-neuroinflammatory properties of synthetic cryptolepine in human neuroblastoma cells: possible involvement of NF-κB and p38 MAPK inhibition,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 63, pp. 333–339, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. C. Ansah and K. B. Mensah, “A review of the anticancer potential of the antimalarial herbal cryptolepis sanguinolenta and its major alkaloid cryptolepine,” Ghana Medical Journal, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 137–147, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. U. E. Odoh, C. O. Ezugwu, and J. U. Adimegwu, “Phytochemical and anti-inflammatory activity of methanol root extract of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Periplocaceae),” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1580–1586, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  80. M. A. Efunshile, B. A. F. Ngwu, J. A. L. Kurtzhals, S. Sahar, B. König, and C. R. Stensvold, “Molecular detection of the carriage rate of four intestinal protozoa with real-time polymerase chain reaction: possible overdiagnosis of entamoeba histolytica in Nigeria,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 257–262, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. N. Wang, M. Świtalska, M.-Y. Wu et al., “Synthesis and in vitro cytotoxic effect of 6-amino-substituted 11H- and 11Me-indolo[3,2-c]quinolines,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 78, pp. 314–323, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. V. R. Gudivaka, Synthesis, analysis and biological evaluation of novel indoloquinoline cryptolepine analogues as potential antitumour agents [Ph.D. thesis], Kingston University, London, Uk, 2014.
  83. O. A. Olajide, E. H. Heiss, D. Schachner et al., “Synthetic cryptolepine inhibits DNA binding of NF-kappaB,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 15, pp. 43–49, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  84. H. Zhu and N. J. Gooderham, “Mechanisms of induction of cell cycle arrest and cell death by cryptolepine in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 132–139, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. O. A. Olajide, A. Olumayokun, and C. W. Wright, “Cryptolepine induced apoptosis in TNFalpha stimulated A549 lung carcinoma cells through NF-kappaB signalling pathway,” Proceedings of the British Pharmacological Society, vol. 11, no. 3, article 224, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  86. H. C. Pal and S. K. Katiyar, “Cryptolepine, a plant alkaloid, inhibits the growth of non-melanoma skin cancer cells through inhibition of topoisomerase and induction of DNA damage,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 12, article 1758, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. C. Ansah, E. A. Mfoafo, E. Woode, C. Opoku-Okrah, W. K. B. A. Owiredu, and M. Duwiejua, “Toxicological evaluation of the anti-malarial herb Cryptolepis sanguinolenta in rodents,” Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 335–343, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. K. Cimanga, Y. Li, T. De Bruyne et al., “Inhibitors of xanthine oxidase and scavengers of superoxide anions from Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schlechter (Periplocaceae),” Pharmacy and Pharmacology Communications, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 321–325, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. R. Akhigbe, O. Adewumi, L. Okeleji, K. Mujaidu, S. Olaleye, and A. Ajayi, “Effect of ethanolic extract of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta stem on in vivo and in vitro glucose absorption and transport: mechanism of its antidiabetic activity,” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 91, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. E. O. Ameyaw, G. A. Koffuor, K. K. Asare et al., “Cryptolepine, an indoloquinoline alkaloid, in the management of diabetes mellitus and its associated complications,” Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 263–273, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. C. Ansah, K. B. Mensah, E. Woode, and M. Duwiejua, “Reproductive and developmental toxicity of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta in mice,” Research Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. H. W. Rauwald, M. Kober, E. Mutschler, and G. Lambrecht, “Cryptolepis sanguinolenta: antimuscarinic properties of cryptolepine and the alkaloid fraction at M1, M2 and M3 receptors,” Planta Medica, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 486–488, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. A. Ajayi, R. Akhigbe, T. Iyiola, O. Adewumi, and S. Olaleye, “Gastric secretagogue action of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta in the perfused stomach of anesthetized rats,” International Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 62–67, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. K. B. Mensah, Reproductive and developmental toxicity of the aqueous root extract of the antimalarial herbal Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schltr (Periplocaceae) in experimental animals [Ph.D. thesis], Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana, 2011.