Research Article
Studying Ni(II) Adsorption of Magnetite/Graphene Oxide/Chitosan Nanocomposite
Table 1
Comparison of adsorption capacity of GO and GO-based materials for heavy metal ions removal.
| Adsorbent | Applied to metal ions | (mg.gā1) | Working conditions | Reusability | Reference |
| GO | Co(II) | 21.28 | pH5.5; 298K | None | [7] |
| Magnetic Chitosan - GO (MC-GO) | Pb(II) | 92% | pH5.0 | 78% after 4 cycles | [8] |
| Chitosan-GO | Cr(VI) | 104 | pH2.0 | 82% after 10 cycles | [9] |
| GO-Carbon Composite (GO - CC) | Pb(II) | 68.8 | ā | None | [10] |
| GO | Cu(II) | 277.77 | pH6.0, ambient temperature | Reduced by 4.5% after 5 cycles | [11] |
| rGO | Pb(II) Cd(II) Cu(II) Mn(II) | 413.22 162.33 55.34 42.46 | 298K | Decreased nearly by 20% after 3 cycles | [12] |
| GO | Cd(II) | 86.2 | pH 7, Room temperature | None | [13] |
| GO | Zn(II) | 208.33 | pH 7.0, 293K | Reduced nearly by 8% after 6 cycles | [14] |
| GOCC | Ni(II) | 138.31 | 293K | None | [15] |
| GO | Ni(II) | 38.61 | 298K, pH 6 | None | [16] |
| Graphene nanosheet/MnO2 | Ni(II) | 46.55 | Room temperature | 91% after 5 cycles | [17] |
|
|