Mechanisms of Metal Resistance and Homeostasis in Haloarchaea
Haloarchaea are the predominant microflora of hypersaline econiches such as solar salterns, soda lakes, and estuaries where the salinity ranges from 35 to 400 ppt. Econiches like estuaries and solar crystallizer ponds may contain high concentrations of metals since they serve as ecological sinks for metal pollution and also as effective traps for river borne metals. The availability of metals in these econiches is determined by the type of metal complexes formed and the solubility of the metal species at such high salinity. Haloarchaea have developed specialized mechanisms for the uptake of metals required for various key physiological processes and are not readily available at high salinity, beside evolving resistance mechanisms for metals with high solubility. The present paper seeks to give an overview of the main molecular mechanisms involved in metal tolerance in haloarchaea and focuses on factors such as salinity and metal speciation that affect the bioavailability of metals to haloarchaea. Global transcriptomic analysis during metal stress in these organisms will help in determining the various factors differentially regulated and essential for metal physiology.
Many metal ions have a key role in the physiology of cells. Metals such as calcium, cobalt, chromium, copper, iron, potassium, magnesium, manganese, sodium, nickel, and zinc are essential and serve as micronutrients. These metals act as the redox centers for metalloproteins such as cytochromes, blue copper proteins, and iron-sulfur proteins which play a vital role in electron transport . As the transition metals exist in numerous oxidation states, they efficiently act as electron carriers during redox reactions of electron transport chains to generate chemical energy [2, 3]. Metal ions also function as cofactors and confer catalytic potential and stability to proteins . Other metals like silver, mercury, lead, aluminum, cadmium, gold, and arsenic have no biological roles and are potentially toxic to microbes . The toxicity is exerted by the displacement of essential metals from native binding sites or through ligand interactions . Both essential and nonessential metals at high concentrations disrupt cell membrane, alter enzymatic specificity, hinder cellular functions, and damage DNA . Thus, as any disturbance in metal ion homeostasis could produce toxic effects on cell viability, the concentrations of metals within cells are stringently controlled. An increase in the ambient metal concentration leads to activation of metal resistance mechanisms to overcome metal stress. Metal homeostasis has been well studied in bacteria and eukaryotes and is attributed to differential regulation of transporters like -type ATPases, ABC transporters, cation diffusion facilitators (CDFs), and metallochaperones in response to metals [7–9]. Among the Archaea, thermophiles and hyperthermophiles of the Crenarchaeota and the methanogens and thermophiles of Euryarchaeota utilize -type ATPases and ABC transporters for metal transport and homeostasis [10, 11]. However, metal homeostasis in haloarchaea from the phylum Euryarchaeota has not been extensively studied .
Haloarchaea are members of the third domain of life, the Archaea, within which a total of 36 genera and 129 species have been identified to date . These organisms require between 10% and 35% salt for optimum growth and are the predominant microflora of hypersaline environments such as solar salterns, salt lakes, soda lakes, salt deposits, and so forth . However, some low salt tolerant haloarchaea can be found in estuarine environments . Estuaries serve as interfacial mixing zones between rivers and seawaters which determine the flux of chemical species into the ocean . Econiches like estuaries  and solar crystallizer ponds  may contain high concentrations of metals, since they serve as ecological sinks for metals and as effective traps for river borne metals . Anthropogenic activities like urbanization and industrialization, including mining, agriculture, and waste disposal, further contribute towards metal pollution at these sites [19, 20]. Haloarchaea have developed various mechanisms of resistance in order to thrive under metal stress [21–23]. However, studies on metal resistance in haloarchaea are still in their infancy.
Most of the reports until now are limited to MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) studies [24–26]. However, in a study on comparative gene analysis of the role of -type ATPases in maintaining metal homeostasis in bacteria and archaea, Coombs and Barkay (2005)  have shown that -type ATPases containing N-terminal metal-binding motifs are distributed across bacteria and archaea, including haloarchaea. These ATPases along with the ABC transporters, transcriptional regulators, and certain metallochaperones were found to be involved in metal resistance and homeostasis in the haloarchaeon Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 . Haloarchaea exhibit a high degree of variation in the concentration of metals that they can tolerate [22, 24–26]. Interestingly, at low concentrations, certain metal ions like Mn(II), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) were found to enhance growth [22, 24]. An in-depth study at molecular level may help in better understanding of this variation. This paper seeks to give an overview of the main molecular mechanisms involved in metal tolerance in haloarchaea and to outline the factors such as salinity and metal speciation that affect the bio-availability of the metals to haloarchaea. The need for further studies on metal homeostasis and resistance in haloarchaea is highlighted. The elucidation of complete pathways of metal resistance from uptake to transformation/detoxification and efflux will help to determine the final fate of metals. The final metal species could be either volatile or chelated intracellularly and thereby rendered nontoxic to the organism.
2. Bioavailability of Metals to Haloarchaea
For a metal to act either as a micronutrient or as a toxicant, it has to be available for uptake by the organism . The metal species determines the solubility, bio-availability, and membrane transport, besides influencing the phenomenon of adsorption, oxidation/reduction, and oceanic residence times . Metal speciation is governed by alkalinity, pH, hardness (presence of Ca/Mg), natural dissolved organic matter, redox potential, and salinity . Strongly complexed and thus nonlabile and particulate metal species are less available to organisms for uptake . As haloarchaea inhabit hypersaline environments with salinity in the range of 2%–35%, salinity is proposed to be the most important factor affecting bio-availability. The salt content in hypersaline econiches of solar salterns is about 10-fold of its concentration in seawater  due to evaporation. This process also concentrates other anions and cations present in the sea water including the metal salts fed through contaminated estuaries . The high chloride ion (Cl-) content in these environments results in the formation of metal chlorocomplexes.
The type of complex formed depends upon the chelating ligand, that is, organic or inorganic ligands, and the kind of heavy metal present in the system . Metals like Zn and Cu that have small ionic radii preferentially complex with hard donors containing oxygen like OH-, , , and to form inorganic complexes . Soft acceptors like Hg, Cd, and Ag are easily ionized and are thus, more likely to form chlorocomplexes. Although inorganic species exist in natural waters, organic metal species predominate . The complexation of metals with organic ligands reduces bioavailability as organic-metal complexes are not readily transported across cell membranes [30, 36]. Inorganic species, on the other hand, are readily available to the biota as the complexes are weak and dissociate rapidly to form free ions which bind to the transporters or are chelated by biotic ligands secreted by the organisms [37–40]. Table 1 shows the type of inorganic species formed at different salinities for five major metals.
While metal bio-availability, uptake, and toxicity decrease in presence of natural dissolved organic ligands, metals differ in their behavior at high salinities. For example, in case of cadmium, speciation is highly dependent on the complexing ligands. In river water it exists either as complex or free cation, and in oceanic waters it exists as highly soluble CdCl2, whereas in estuarine waters, it forms a strong CdCl+ complex which is biologically unavailable [41–43]. In case of silver, insoluble AgCl0 is formed in estuarine and oceanic waters, while under hypersaline conditions, soluble AgCl2-, , and complexes are formed . Soluble HgCl- and sparingly soluble HgCl2 are the predominant complexes of Hg at high salinities . HgCl2 and the soluble silver-chloro complexes are lipophilic and can easily diffuse through cellular membranes . Zn and Cu exist as ZnCl+ and CuCl+ which coprecipitate at higher salinities, due to decrease in the net negative charge on macromolecular suspended particles and therefore are not available for uptake. Unlike Zn(II) and Cu(II), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), and Mn(II) form weak complexes with Cl-, that easily dissociate and can be taken up by organisms . Table 2 summarizes the bioavailability of metal-chloro complexes.
The bioavailability of chlorocomplexes also depends upon the type of biotic ligands present. Biotic ligands are the receptors on an organism where metal binding takes place which results in the manifestation of its toxic effects . Metal receptors and ion transporters such as Na(II) and Ca(II) transporters present on fish gill surfaces, algal membranes, phytoplankton membranes, and so forth act as biotic ligands . Binding of metals to biotic ligands is unaffected by changes in salinity. However, metal complexes adsorbed to abiotic ligands such as sediments are desorbed with increase in salinity. Thus, biotic ligands render the metals unavailable to other organisms for uptake. For example, in case of silver, with increase in salinity, desorption of Ag(I) complexed with suspended sediments and formation of soluble chlorocomplexes, which are bioavailable have been observed. However, biosorbed Ag(I) is not influenced by the increase in salinity, and desorption of Ag(I) does not occur .
The toxicity of a metal to microorganisms does not have a linear relationship with its concentration, and it depends strongly upon chemical speciation [49, 50]. For certain metals such as Zn(II) and Cu(II), complexation with chloride ions may result in precipitation at high salinities. Therefore, these complexes are not available to micro-organisms for uptake. However, metals such as Hg(II), Ag(II), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), and Mn(II) either form lipophilic soluble chlorocomplexes or weak chlorocomplexes that dissociate easily and are thus available to organisms for uptake. Therefore, while studying metal resistance in haloarchaea, metal speciation and the bio-availability of metals should be taken into consideration.
3. Metal Resistance
Organisms inhabiting the metal polluted environments develop resistance mechanisms that enable efficient detoxification and transformation of toxic forms to nontoxic forms. The majority of bacteria and eukarya tolerate metals by a reduced influx/enhanced efflux [51, 52] or enzymatic detoxification sometimes followed by volatilization [6, 53]. Intracellular compartmentalization is observed only in eukaryotes . Figure 1 shows the various mechanisms of metal resistance exhibited by all the three domains of life.
Intracellular chelation (Figure 1) by a variety of cysteine- (Cys-) rich metal-binding peptides like glutathione (GSH) and proteins like metallothioneins (MTs) and phytochelatins (PCs) also confers resistance to metals in many microbes . MTs are genetically coded small molecular weight polypeptides that are classified based upon the number of Cys residues . They typically have two Cys-rich domains that bind heavy metals through mercaptide bonds, giving these proteins a dumbbell-shaped conformation comprising an N-terminal β-domain that usually binds 3 metal ions and a C-terminal α-domain that binds 4 metal ions [56, 57]. PCs comprise (γ-GluCys)n-Gly where is usually in the range of 2 to 5. They are enzymatically synthesized by PC synthase using GSH as the substrate [58, 59]. The thiol group of the cysteine residue in PCs sequesters heavy metals. Apart from these cysteine-rich peptides, cells may secrete other metal sequestering proteins like siderophores and DNA-binding protein from nutrient starved cells (Dps) (Figure 1). Siderophores are a class of low molecular weight iron chelating compounds which store iron and are overexpressed during conditions of stress or iron deficiency . They are chemically diverse and generally possess oxygen-donor-type chelating functional groups . Once chelated, the Fe-siderophore complex is transported to the periplasm through the energy-coupled transport involving TonB dependent transporters (TBDT) and the inner membrane TonB-complex, composed of TonB, ExbB, and ExbD. The Fe-siderophore can then be transported to the cytoplasm through ABC transporters like ferrichrome or permeases . TonB protein is responsible for transducing cytoplasmic membrane energy to the outer membrane which results in TonB associating with or changing its affinity towards the outer membrane, while ExbB/D components antagonize this association or affinity of TonB to cytoplasmic membrane . Siderophores have also been shown to chelate metals other than Fe . Dps are structurally homologous to ferritins, the primary iron storage/detoxification proteins, are usually expressed in response to excess of iron, and are found in all three domains of life . These proteins have pores that are lined with acidic residues that bind cations like Fe(II) . The binding of Fe(II) to Dps protects cells from oxidative stress by inhibiting the Fe-catalyzed production of hydroxyl radicals .
Haloarchaea have γ-glutamylcysteine (γ-GC) [67, 68] which is analogous to GSH and is involved in maintaining a reducing environment within the cell, overcoming oxidative and disulfide stress and detoxification of xenobiotics . The thiol group of cysteine in γ-GC can chelate the toxic metal ions thereby conferring resistance. A unique phenomenon observed in archaea is the heavy metal-induced multimerization of metal chelating proteins such as CutA- and DpsA-like proteins that result in the precipitation of the protein-metal ion complex . This precipitate resolubilizes and the multimers disintegrate when the metal stress decreases [70, 71]. Although these proteins are known to be involved in divalent metal tolerance in bacteria and eukaryotes, the multimerization of these proteins has been observed only in archaea. The aspartate residue in position 48 has been found to be critical for metal-induced multimerization and metal ion binding of CutA protein in Pyrococcus horikoshii. Substitution of Asp48 with alanine decreases the amount of aggregate formation . Similarly, the multimeric non-haem ferritin DpsA-like protein of Halobacterium salinarum ensued from an assembly of 12 units and was found to sequester iron in response to the oxidative stress exerted by excess iron . This protein was downregulated under iron-deficient conditions unlike the other dps that are upregulated under these conditions. It exhibits the features of non-haem bacterial ferritins that are expressed to sequester the excess iron. Their expression is repressed under conditions of iron starvation . Overexpression of siderophores in haloarchaea may increase chelation in case of iron deficiency. On the other hand, repression of these siderophores in presence of excess iron may avoid uptake [68, 74]. MTs are absent in archaea .
Biosorption of metals by the organisms at the surface or by the exopolysaccharides (EPS) secreted to form the biofilms enables organisms to tolerate metals [75, 76]. Biofilm forming organisms exhibit an altered phenotype with respect to growth rate and gene transcription . Haloarchaea synthesize EPS as a protective mechanism for survival under adverse conditions such as nutrient starvation, temperature fluctuation, and presence of toxic compounds . Similarly the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Archaeoglobus fulgidus, was found to form a biofilm in response to toxic concentrations of metals, where the toxic metal was proposed to be trapped within the EPS matrix . Thus, it is probable that under metal stress, haloarchaea may secrete EPS to make the cell impermeable to metals. In a study by Kawakami et al. (2007) , it has been found that Halobacterium salinarum CCM 2090 has a Ca(II)-dependent aggregation system, where the Ca(II) binds to certain aggregation factors present on the cell surface and induces ionic crossbridging between the EPS resulting in aggregation of the haloarchaeal cells. The presence of certain receptor proteins on the cell surface that interact with Ca(II) to form cell aggregates/flocs has also been demonstrated . Four haloarchaeal genomes, Haloquadratum walsbyi, Haloarcula marismortui, Haloterrigena turkmenica, and Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1, have been annotated with cbp encoding the cell surface calcium-binding acidic-repeat protein [80–83] that has been proposed to be the factor involved in Ca(II)-dependent aggregation, although its role in this process remains to be demonstrated. A similar dependence on Ca(II) and/or Fe(II) for biofilm formation is observed in Vibrio cholerae  and Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Ca(II) is the twentieth element found in the fourth row of the periodic table, which could be replaced by other transition metal ions such as Mn(II), Cr(II), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II), belonging to the same row. The distinctive electronic configuration of these metals, characterized by preferential filling of the 4s subshell before the 3d subshell, may be responsible for these metals substituting Ca(II) during aggregate formation . Thus, tolerance to these metals may be mediated through binding with EPS. This view is supported by the observation that there is no aggregation in presence of certain other metals lacking this electronic configuration, such as Mg(II) and Sr(II) (alkali earth metals), Mo(II), Cd(II) and Sn(II) (fifth period), and Hg(II) and Pb(II) (sixth period) . Aggregation in haloarchaeal cells results in formation of nonadherent floating multicellular aggregates which is different from biofilm formation, where the adherent multicellular structures are attached to diverse surfaces . Recently, biofilm formation involving EPS (glycoconjugates and extracellular DNA) matrix was demonstrated in five haloarchaeal genera, Halobacterium, Haloferax, haloalkaliphilic Halorubrum, psychrotolerant Halorubrum, and a new genus of psychrotolerant haloarchaea isolated from Deep Lake, Antarctica . Here Ca(II) ion did not have an effect on surface adhesion, suggesting the involvement of flagellar-twitching-motility-induced cellular aggregation and adhesion to substratum. Biofilm formation by other archaea like Pyrococcus furiosus, Sulfolobus solfataricus, and Methanococcus maripaludis involves cellular appendages such as archaeal type IV pili [88–90]. These are similar in structure and function to the type IV pili present in bacteria that facilitate cell-cell interactions, surface adhesion, and motility . Archaeal type IV pili have been shown to be involved in biofilm formation by Haloferax, Halobacterium, and Halorubrum [87, 92, 93]. The biofilm formed may trap the metals within the EPS matrix and prevent the diffusion of metals inside the cell, thus conferring resistance to haloarchaea.
Most bacteria carry the resistance determinants for metals as operons, on their plasmids . The metal resistance operons usually include genes for transporters and an enzyme for detoxification. Haloarchaea exhibit resistance mechanisms similar to those of bacteria. The ars operon conferring arsenite and arsenate resistance in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 is present on one of its two plasmids . A comparative genome analysis of bacteria and archaea revealed some common elements responsible for maintenance of metal homeostasis and resistance. -type ATPases involved in cation transport with a high diversity in the N-terminal metal-binding motifs were found to be distributed throughout the bacterial and archaeal lineages . Genome of Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 was found to carry two distinct phylogenetic clusters, CopA1 (Cu(II) influx) and CopA2 (Cu(II) influx and efflux). These clusters were also found to span the entire diversity of the bacterial domain. Coombs and Barkay (2005)  have proposed that variation in N-terminal metal-binding motifs does not affect the metal translocation function of -type ATPases and therefore concluded that divergence in consensus sequence of the N-terminal metal-binding motif might have been tolerated during evolution [10, 83]. But this is just one of the few studies on metal homeostasis in archaea. Similar studies understanding the phylogenetic variation within the family Halobacteriaceae will enable a better understanding of metal homeostasis, by giving a snapshot of substrate specificity, variation in active sites, and so forth .
3.1. Operons in Metal Resistance
Many metal resistance determinants have been characterized in the bacterial system [95–105], of which mer operon for mercury resistance , ars for arsenic resistance [97, 98], and cad operon for cadmium resistance  have been extensively studied. All archaea except haloarchaea have been shown to carry such metal resistance determinants [106, 107]. The most comprehensively studied among these are the mer operon of the thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus [108, 109], ars operon of acidophilic archaeon Ferroplasma acidarmanus Fer1  and Thermoplasma acidophilum , and the cop operon for copper resistance of Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 [112–114]. Although many heavy metal transporters like CbiNOQ, HemUV, NosFY, and so forth are present in haloarchaea, their arrangement in an operon has not been shown, except for the ArsA ATPase transporter as a part of ars operon for arsenic resistance in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 .
Most haloarchaea have large plasmids in addition to their genomes (chromosomes) known as minichromosomes/megaplasmids. These minichromosomes harbor genes for antibiotic resistance or metal resistance that may be essential for haloarchaeal survival . The pNRC100, one of the two minichromosomes of model organism Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1, harbors the arsADRC gene cluster, responsible for conferring arsenate (As(V)) and arsenite (As(III))/antimonite (Sb(III)) resistance . A fifth gene for arsenic resistance, arsB, is present on the main chromosome. The arsADRC operon was annotated for As(III) transport due to its homology to previously characterized genes , but later, by gene knockout studies, it was shown to confer resistance to As(III) and Sb(III) . As(V) can be taken up by the cells through phosphate transporters (pit/pst) and As(III) by aquaglycerophorins (glycerophorin membrane transport proteins)  or hexose transporters . As(V) is then converted to As(III) by arsenate reductase encoded by arsC . arsA codes for -type ATPase transporters that help in extrusion of As(III)/Sb(III) from the cell. arsR and arsD encode trans-acting repressors of the operon. ArsR and ArsD bind to As(III)/Sb(III) resulting in expression of the arsA and arsC. Arsenate reductase encoded by arsC is expressed weakly in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1, and therefore deletion of arsC and arsADRC was found to be ineffective in conferring arsenate sensitivity . The operon arsADRC was found to be inducible by arsenite and antimonite .
In bacteria, ArsB, an inner membrane protein, along with ArsA, the membrane-bound anion-transporting ATPase, forms the anion-conducting channel for arsenite extrusion . Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 also harbors both arsA in ars operon on the megaplasmid pNRC100 and arsB on the main chromosome. However, arsB was found to play no role in arsenic resistance in this organism. Thus, it has been proposed that Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 harbors a novel transporter unrelated to ArsB but with a similar function . Arsenic resistance in the Gram-negative acidophilic bacterium Acidthiobacillus ferrooxidans is determined by the chromosomally located arsCRBH operon comprising four genes . The unique and common feature between the arsADRC and arsCRBH operons is the bidirectional nature of translation; that is, the arsAD and arsCR genes are translated in an opposite direction to arsRC and arsBH, respectively [21, 121] (Figure 2).
In Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1, a second arsenite resistance operon, arsR2M, is present upstream of arsADRC on pNRC100 (Figure 2), where arsR2 is constitutively expressed while As(III)/Sb(III) induce the expression of arsM . The arsR2 is analogous to arsR and arsM encodes a putative As(III)-methyltransferase very similar to human methyltransferases and S-adenosyl methionine-dependent methyltransferases of Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum. ArsM is involved in converting As(III) to methylated species like dimethylarsinate (DMA), trimethylarsine oxide (TMAO), or trimethylarsine (TMA) gas . Deletion of arsM exhibited as increased sensitivity to arsenite but not towards arsenate or antimonite . Thus, two possible mechanisms of As(III) resistance have been proposed to be conferred by arsM. First, the generation of a concentration gradient results in the movement of methylated arsenite (negatively charged/uncharged) out of the cell. Second, the volatile trimethylarsine formed diffuses out of the cell thus eliminating As(III) [123, 124]. Although arsenite methylation as a resistance mechanism is present in bacteria, arsM gene functions independently and is not a part of ars operon . However, in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1, the arsM gene is present as a part of the arsR2M operon involved in arsenite resistance .
Mercury resistance in archaea and bacteria is conferred by the mer operon involved in detection, regulation, transport, and reduction of Hg(II) [125, 126]. One of the best studied mercury resistance operons in Archaea is the merRHAI operon of thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus [108, 109]. The operon is under the control of the regulator MerR, which represses the operon in absence of Hg(II) and enhances transcription in its presence. MerH is the metallochaperone with a TRASH (trafficking, resistance, and sensing of heavy metals) domain that binds Hg(II), and MerA is the mercuric reductase for reduction and detoxification to volatile Hg(0) [108, 109]. Some mer operons carry additional mer genes, notably merB, an organomercurial lyase, that cleaves the C-Hg bonds of organomercurials, and the released Hg(II) is reduced to Hg(0) by MerA . Among all haloarchaeal genomes sequenced to date, only Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 and Haloterrigena turkmenica have been annotated with merA and merB genes, respectively [83, 127].
3.2. Transporters in Metal Resistance
Membrane transporters may act as the first line of defense against toxic or heavy metals. In order to exert their toxicity, metals need to gain entry within the cell. Thus, the organism may downregulate the transporters responsible for influx or induce the expression of efflux pumps to enable faster removal of toxic metals from within the cell . The use of these membrane transporters and efflux pumps is one of the most common mechanisms of resistance to inorganic ions in microbes.
Both influx and efflux types of transporters for various metals have been annotated in all haloarchaeal genomes sequenced to date (Table 3). The following membrane transporters have been implicated in haloarchaeal metal resistance.
3.2.1. P1B-Type ATPases
The -type ATPases are a large family of integral membrane proteins driven by ATP hydrolysis . Members of this family are of vital importance to all kingdoms of life, as they generate and maintain electrochemical gradients across membranes by transporting cations and heavy metals . A wide variety of heavy metal ions like Mg(II), Ca(II), Cu(II), Ag(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) act as substrates to these ATPases . These transporters serve the purpose of uptake (import) of essential elements and efflux (export) of toxic elements, thus conferring resistance to the expelled metal ion [131, 132]. All haloarchaeal genomes have been annotated with metal transporting ATPases.
A putative Cd(II)-efflux ATPase was annotated on Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 genome . In a system level analysis of Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1, the functionality and role of such transporters in metal resistance was shown . They exhibited upregulation of yvgX, a -type ATPase, in response to Cu(II) and Zn(II) metal stress. In bacteria, the yvgX family is known to encode two kinds of CopA proteins, CopA1 and CopA2 . CopA1 is essential for copper influx and tolerance, while CopA2 is involved in the influx/efflux of Cu and its transport to Cu-containing enzyme cytochrome oxidase c [133, 134]. A diverse range of organisms contain CopA2-like proteins, suggesting that coding genes appeared early in evolution via gene duplication or horizontal transfer but were kept only in some organisms for a specific biological function . A comparative genome analysis for ATPases in bacteria and archaea showed the preference for CopA2 over CopA1 . It has been proposed that CopA2 may represent the ancestral form of CopA1 protein that may have coevolved with the other metal influx proteins . The yvgX of Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 was found to be more specific for Cu(II) efflux family as the ΔyvgX strain was susceptible to Cu(II) and not to Zn(II) or Co(II) and therefore belongs to the CopA2 family of proteins. CopA2 is also found in other haloarchaea like Haloarcula marismortui, Haloarcula hispanica, and Haloquadratum walsbyi .
The As(III)/Sb(III) transporting -type ATPase, ArsA discussed in Section 3.1, is present in almost all haloarchaea sequenced to date, including Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1, Halalkalicoccus jeotgali, Haloarcula hispanica, Natrialba magadii, Haloarcula marismortui, Haloquadratum walsbyi, and Natronomonas pharaonis . ArsB was found to play no role in arsenite resistance in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 .
Heavy metal cation-transporting CPx -type ATPases are of two types, that is, Cu-CPx-type-ATPases involved in efflux of monovalent cations, Cu(I) and Ag(I), and Zn-CPx-type ATPases involved in the efflux of divalent cations of Zn, Cd and Pb [137–139]. However, Cu-CPx-type ATPases have also been shown to be involved in uptake of copper to meet cellular demands [140, 141]. The cpx gene that encodes CPx -type ATPases was found to be downregulated by Fe(II), Cu(II), and Ni(II) to avoid influx in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 . This mechanism of resistance involving the downregulation of uptake systems avoids toxic metal buildup within the cell.
3.2.2. Cation Diffusion Facilitators (CDF Family) Metal Transporters
The CDF family of transport proteins is ubiquitously present in all three domains of life . Although CDFs are primarily Zn(II) efflux pumps, bacterial CDFs have been shown to transport Hg(II), Pb(II), Zn(II), Co(II), Fe(II), and Cd(II) from the cytoplasm to the outside of the cell or into subcellular compartments [132, 143]. Based upon their substrate specificity, CDFs have been classified as Zn(II)-CDF, Fe/Zn-CDF, and Mn-CDF . They usually possess six transmembrane domains (TMDs) with a cytoplasmic N- and C-terminal and a histidine loop of variable length between TMD IV and V [145, 146]. The amphipathic domains TMD I, II, V, and VI are involved in metal transfer and are the most conserved, while the hydrophobic TMD III and IV are critical for zinc specificity and mutations within these domains alter substrate specificity . All the proteins of this family of transporters possess a characteristic cation efflux C-terminal domain . These kinds of transporters serve as secondary cation filters in bacteria . The genome of Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 was annotated with putative CDF Cd (II) transporter ZntX, which confers resistance against Ni(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) besides Cd(II) . The role of Znt family of CDFs in Cu(II) and/or Zn(II) homeostasis and resistance has been discussed in detail by Haney et al. (2005) . The upregulation of ZntA in response to heavy metals (Cu and/or Zn) and poor growth of ΔzntA strain in presence of Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) have confirmed the role of this transporter in metal resistance . The broad specificity of this transporter to various metals has been putatively attributed to the preference of metals by zntA based on charge and species rather than size . Haloarcula hispanica and Haloarcula marismortui have also been annotated with ZntA for Zn(II) transport. A putative CDF family protein has also been found on the chromosome of Natrialba magadii for inorganic metal ion transport .
3.2.3. ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) Transporters
The multisubunit ABC transporters are one of the largest protein families with a variety of physiological functions. These transporters are ubiquitously present in all living forms from bacteria to eukaryotes including archaea. They are involved in various functions such as nutrient uptake , oligopeptide and protein transport , metal extrusion [151, 152], and drug efflux [153, 154].
Although many ABC transporter genes for a variety of substrates have been annotated in all the 10 haloarchaeal genomes sequenced to date, experimentally, very few have been shown to be functional. ABC transporters for sugar and polypeptide have been found in Haloferax volcanii , Haloarcula marismortui , Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 , Natronomonas pharaonis , and Haloquadratum walsbyi . All haloarchaea possess at least one copy of metal ion ABC transporter. Some of the ABC transporters in Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 with their functions are listed in Table 4. Many of the ABC transporters are metal ion transporters such as cbiNOQ for Co(II) transport , hemUV for iron uptake [158, 159], nosFY for copper , and zurMA for zinc transport (Figure 3). Although most of the ABC transporter proteins exhibit stringent specificity towards their substrate, a few, such as phosphate transporters, oligopeptide transporters, and dipeptide transporters, have been shown to have multiple specificities and were found to be differentially regulated by more than one metal ion. This has been proposed to facilitate transport of metal ions in addition to their usual function . Kaur et al. (2006)  have shown that deletion of transporters like phoX (phosphate transport), appA (peptide transport), and ycdH (Mn(II) transport) along with two putative subunits of Fe(II) transport system does not prove deleterious for Halobacterium sp. NRC-1. Due to the large repertoire of ABC transport proteins, they concluded that deletion/mutation of a single ABC transporter is easily managed by the organism by substituting the deleted/mutated ABC transporter product with functional ABC transporter product of similar role.
The differential regulation of all three classes of metal transporters discussed above is in congruence with the general norm of micro-organisms utilizing enhanced efflux or decreased influx to resist metals. However, the P1B-type ATPases and CDF family have a greater role in maintaining metal homeostasis than the ABC transporters in haloarchaea .
3.3. Transcriptional Changes in Response to Metal Stress
Under unfavourable conditions of growth, all organisms make adjustments at the system level to overcome the stress imposed by the stressor. Presence of heavy metals in their environment triggers global transcriptional regulations either to prevent their entry into the cell or to transform the metal to nontoxic form. This response can be transitory, with perturbations of a few genes within minutes of metal exposure, but once the cell acclimatizes to the new environment, the transcript levels of some early response genes return to preperturbation levels. The early response to a stressor usually results in the upregulation of transcription and translation. As a consequence, the transcripts damaged due to the stressor are replaced and new proteins are synthesized [161, 162].
In haloarchaea, only one study on transcriptional changes in response to heavy metal stress (Fe(II), Cu(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Zn(II), and Mn(II)) in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 has been reported . Besides studying the transcriptional changes by microarray analysis and mutant constructions, Kaur et al. (2006)  elucidated a systemic overview to metal stress response, thus providing a snapshot of various mechanisms involved in stress management. A total of 623 genes were found to be differentially regulated in presence of any of the six transition metals used for the study. Around 69% of these genes were early response genes; that is, they exhibited deviation from normal transcript levels within 0–25 minutes of metal exposure. However, 91% of these early response genes transcript levels reverted to preperturbation levels within 25–40 minutes. These included transcriptional regulator genes, transporter genes for phosphate, metals, and peptides, ribosomal protein genes, and protein export genes. Therefore, once the various damaged transcripts and proteins were replaced with the new proteins for managing metal stress and acclimatizing the cells to the new environment, the early response genes were found to revert to preperturbation levels .
One of the major toxic effects elicited by heavy metals is the rapid generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damages the cellular machinery [136, 163]. The ROS are usually scavenged by specific enzymatic detoxification systems like superoxide dismutases (SOD), peroxidases, dehydrogenases, and antioxidants like glutathione (GSH) . Therefore, it follows that the genes involved in oxidative stress management are differentially regulated early in the stress management. Model haloarchaeal genomes, including Halobacterium salinarum and Haloferax volcanii, have been annotated with SOD  and catalase-peroxidase (KatG) genes . Metal-induced ROS results in an early increase in the levels of transcripts of genes related to oxidative stress management like dehydrogenases and peroxidases in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 .
Few of the early response genes found to be differentially regulated were transcriptional regulators like tfbB and SirR. TfbB is the transcription initiation factor IIB. Its upregulation indicates a global response towards stress by increasing the rate of transcription to increase protein turnover. Similarly, the upregulation of SirR (silent information regulator) repressed the active uptake of Mn(II), thus providing the organism the ability to overcome the stress. Similar upregulation has also been observed in certain bacteria and yeast [167, 168]. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were shown to carry several copies of sirR genes that act as divalent metal cation-dependent transcriptional repressor . cbiN, cbiM, and cbiQ involved in cobalt transport and zurM, zurA, and ycdH that encode Mn/Fe ABC-transporters were predicted to be putatively regulated by sirR in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 . This was found to be consistent with the observation that sirR is essential for survival during metal-induced stress. This was evident from the upregulation of Mn(II) uptake genes zurM, zurA, and ycdH in ΔsirR strain as compared to parent strain in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1. Thus, in the haloarchaeon Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1, sirR acts as a Mn(II)-dependent autorepressor .
A putative Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) family protein VNG1197C was reported to upregulate the Cu(II)-P1B type ATPases gene yvgX in Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 . VNG1197C was found to be a Cu(II)-dependent transcriptional activator carrying a metal-binding TRASH (trafficking, resistance, and sensing of heavy metals) domain. Kaur et al. (2006)  proposed that putative metallochaperones VNG0702H and/or VNG2581H deliver Cu(II)/Zn(II) to the TRASH domain of VNG1197C. This binding activates the transcription of yvgX as well as the metallochaperones, thus providing Cu(II) resistance to Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1. A similar pattern involving a metallochaperone (CopM), a transcriptional regulator with C-terminal TRASH domain (CopT), and a P-type Cu(II) exporting ATPase (CopA) forming the cop gene cluster for Cu(II) resistance has been described in Sulfolobus solfataricus, a thermoacidophilic crenarchaeon [113, 114].
Thus, organisms have the ability to differentiate between metal ions and therefore elicit responses that enable better survival. These responses could be local or global but in effect would be to efficiently handle the stress. The transcriptional regulation exhibited by Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 is an example of how metal homeostasis is maintained. Transient changes in transcripts to resist metals may play a major role in haloarchaea.
Haloarchaea encounter metals in their natural environment and utilize some of these metals for various key physiological functions. However, at higher concentrations, these metals can be toxic, and thus haloarchaea exhibit metal resistance mechanisms. Knowledge about metal physiology in haloarchaea is cursory, and therefore global studies for gaining insights into the metabolic regulations in response to metal stress are required. Metal physiology studies in model haloarchaeon Halobacterium sp. strain NRC-1 show that they have the ability to elicit a tailor-made response to metal stress. Other genera of the halophilic Euryarchaeota have not yet been subjected to such detailed studies with regard to metal homeostasis and resistance. The development of standard molecular and genetic tools for haloarchaea may facilitate better understanding of the various components involved in metal resistance including detoxifying enzymes, metallochaperones, and metal chelators and transporters. While assessing metal resistance in haloarchaea, the metal speciation should be given importance, as the metal might be unavailable to the cell for uptake, thus giving a higher MIC value. Therefore, beside understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the resistance to metals, metal speciation and bio-availability studies should be carried out to obtain a complete picture. Further, this could facilitate the use of haloarchaea for bioremediation of metal-polluted hypersaline environments.
The authors thank the Ministry of Earth Science (MoES and the Government of India for their funding of the project MoES/11-MRDF/1/38/P/10-PC-III.
H. B. Gray and W. R. Ellis Jr., “Electron transfer,” in Bioinorganic Chemistry, I. Bertini, H. B. Gray, S. J. Lippard, and J. S. Valentine, Eds., pp. 315–364, University Science Books, Mill Valley, Calif, USA, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
A. W. Bott, “Redox properties of electron transfer metalloproteins,” Current Separations, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 47–54, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
A. Messerschmidt, R. Huber, K. Wieghart, and T. Poulos, Handbook of Metalloproteins, vol. 1–3, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
H. B. Gray, E. I. Stiefel, J. S. Valentine, and I. Bertini, Biological Inorganic Chemistry: Structure and Reactivity, University Science Books, Herndon, Va, USA, 2007.
A. Bolchi, R. Ruotolo, G. Marchini et al., “Genome-wide inventory of metal homeostasis-related gene products including a functional phytochelatin synthase in the hypogeous mycorrhizal fungus Tuber melanosporum,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 573–584, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bochiwal, Adaptation of Low-Salt Tolerant Haloarchaea in Estuarine Environments, University of Essex, Essex, UK, 2009.
E. R. Sholkovitz, “Flocculation of dissolved organic and inorganic matter during the mixing of river water and seawater,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 831–845, 1976.View at: Google Scholar
C. S. R. Kumar, M. M. Joseph, T. R. G. Kumar, K. R. Renjith, M. N. Manju, and N. Chandramohanakumar, “Spatial variability and contamination of heavy metals in the inter-tidal systems of a tropical environment,” International Journal of Environmental Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 691–700, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
P. M. Chapman and F. Wang, “Assessing sediment contamination in estuaries,” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
H. H. Tabak, P. Lens, E. D. Van Hullebusch, and W. Dejonghe, “Developments in bioremediation of soils and sediments polluted with metals and radionuclides-1. Microbial processes and mechanisms affecting bioremediation of metal contamination and influencing metal toxicity and transport,” Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 115–156, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Ross, “Retention, transformation and mobility of toxic metals in soils,” in Toxic Metals in Soil-Plant Systems, S. M. Ross, Ed., pp. 63–152, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1994.View at: Google Scholar
E. Bini, “Archaeal transformation of metals in the environment,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
S. N. Sehgal and N. E. Gibbons, “Effect of some metal ions on the growth of Halobacterium cutirubrum,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 6, pp. 165–169, 1960.View at: Google Scholar
J. J. Nieto, A. Ventosa, and F. Ruiz-Berraquero, “Susceptibility of halobacteria to heavy metals,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1199–1202, 1987.View at: Google Scholar
G. Popescu and L. Dumitru, “Biosorption of some heavy metals from media with high salt concentrations by halophilic archaea,” Biotechnology and Biotechnology Equipment, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 791–795, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
S. J. Markich, P. L. Brown, G. E. Batley, S. C. Apte, and J. L. Stauber, “Incorporating metal speciation and bioavailability into water quality guidelines for protecting aquatic ecosystems,” Australian Journal of Ecotoxicology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–122, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
P. G. C. Campbell, “Interactions between trace metals and aquatic organisms: a critique of the free-ion activity model,” in Metal Speciation and Bioavailability in Aquatic Systems, A. Tessier and D. R. Turner, Eds., pp. 45–102, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
S. DasSarma and P. Arora, “Halophiles,” in Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 458–466, Nature Publishing Group, London, UK, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
F. Pereira, K. P. Krishnan, R. K. Sinha, and S. Kerkar, “Insights on metal-microbe interactions in Bacillus sp. and Chromohalobacter sp. from a solar saltern,” Journal of Ecobiotechnology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
T. M. Florence, “Development of physico-chemical speciation procedures to investigate the toxicity of copper, lead, cadmium and zinc towards aquatic biota,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 141, pp. 73–94, 1982.View at: Google Scholar
M. J. Scoullos and A. S. Pavlidou, “Speciation studies of trace metals in the gulf of Elefsis, Greece,” Croatica Chemica Acta, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 289–307, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
W. G. Sunda and P. A. Gillespie, “The response of a marine bacterium to cupric ion and its use to estimate cupric ion activity in seawater,” Journal of Marine Research, vol. 37, pp. 761–772, 1979.View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Turner, “Speciation and cycling of arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury in natural waters,” in Lead, Mercury, Cadmium and Arsenic in the Environment, T. C. Hutchinson and K. M. Meema, Eds., pp. 175–186, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., New York, NY, USA, 1987.View at: Google Scholar
A. Jensen and F. Bro-Rasmussen, “Environmental cadmium in Europe,” Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 125, pp. 101–181, 1992.View at: Google Scholar
S. Luoma, “Fate, bioavailability and toxicity of silver in estuarine environments,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference: Transport, Fate and Effects of Silver in the Environment, A. Andren and T. Bober, Eds., pp. 11151–14155, University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, Madison, Wis, USA, September 1994.View at: Google Scholar
S. Noegrohati, “Sorption-desorption characteristics of heavy metals and their availability from the sediment of Segara anakan estuary,” Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 236–244, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
D. W. Engel, W. Sunda, and B. A. Fowler, “Factors affecting trace metal uptake and toxicity to estuarine organisms. I. Environmental parameters,” in Biological Monitoring of Marine Pollutants, F. J. Vernberg, A. Calabrese, F. T. Thurberg, and W. B. Vernberg, Eds., Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1981.View at: Google Scholar
P. R. Paquin, V. Zoltay, R. P. Winfield et al., “Extension of the biotic ligand model of acute toxicity to a physiologically-based model of the survival time of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to silver,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C, vol. 133, no. 1-2, pp. 305–343, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Sanders and G. R. Abbe, “The role of suspended sediments and phytoplankton in the partitioning and transport of silver in estuaries,” Continental Shelf Research, vol. 7, no. 11-12, pp. 1357–1361, 1987.View at: Google Scholar
R. Blust, M. Baillieul, and W. Decleir, “Effect of total cadmium and organic complexing on the uptake of cadmium by the brine shrimp, Artemia franciscana,” Marine Biology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 65–73, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
G. M. Gadd, “Interactions of fungi with toxic metals,” New Phytologist, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 25–60, 1993.View at: Google Scholar
S. Silver and L. T. Phung, “Heavy metals, bacterial resistance,” in Encyclopedia of Microbiology, M. Schaechter, Ed., pp. 220–227, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
G. M. Cherian and H. M. Chan, “Biological functions of metallothioneins- a review,” in Metallothionein III: Biological Roles and Medical Implications, K. T. Suzuki, N. Imura, and M. Kimura, Eds., pp. 87–109, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, The Switzerland, 1993.View at: Google Scholar
H. Glaeser, A. Coblenz, R. Kruczek, I. Ruttke, A. Ebert-Jung, and K. Wolf, “Glutathione metabolism and heavy metal detoxification in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Isolation and characterization of glutathione-deficient, cadmium-sensitive mutants,” Current Genetics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 207–213, 1991.View at: Google Scholar
W. E. Rauser, “Phytochelatins and related peptides. Structure, biosynthesis, and function,” Plant Physiology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1141–1149, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
J. B. Neilands, “Siderophores: structure and function of microbial iron transport compounds,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 45, pp. 26723–26726, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
F. A. Cotton and G. Wilkinson, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, John Wiley and sons, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 1980.
T. E. Letain and K. Postle, “TonB protein appears to transduce energy by shuttling between the cytoplasmic membrane and the outer membrane in Escherichia coli,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 271–283, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
A. R. Sundquist and R. C. Fahey, “The function of γ-glutamylcysteine and bis-γ-glutamylcystine reductase in Halobacterium halobium,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 719–725, 1989.View at: Google Scholar
L. Malki, M. Yanku, I. Borovok, G. Cohen, M. Mevarech, and Y. Aharonowitz, “Identification and characterization of gshA, a gene encoding the glutamate-cysteine ligase in the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 191, no. 16, pp. 5196–5204, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Reindel, S. Anemüller, A. Sawaryn, and B. F. Matzanke, “The DpsA-homologue of the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum is a ferritin,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1598, no. 1-2, pp. 140–146, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
B. P. Dave, K. Anshuman, and P. Hajela, “Siderophores of halophilic archaea and their chemical characterization,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 340–344, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
J. J. Harrison, R. J. Turner, and H. Ceri, “Metal tolerance in bacterial biofilms,” Recent Research Developments in Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 33–55, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
N. S. Baliga, R. Bonneau, M. T. Facciotti et al., “Genome sequence of Haloarcula marismortui: a halophilic archaeon from the dead sea,” Genome Research, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 2221–2234, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
K. Kierek and P. I. Watnick, “The Vibrio cholerae O139 O-antigen polysaccharide is essential for Ca 2+-dependent biofilm development in sea water,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 14357–14362, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. A. Nascimento and E. Chartone-Souza, “Operon mer: bacterial resistance to mercury and potential for bioremediation of contaminated environments,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 92–101, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
A. Gupta, L. T. Phung, D. E. Taylor, and S. Silver, “Diversity of silver resistance genes in IncH incompatibility group plasmids,” Microbiology, vol. 147, no. 12, pp. 3393–3402, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
G. Endo and S. Silver, “CadC, the transcriptional regulatory protein of the cadmium resistance system of Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pI258,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 177, no. 15, pp. 4437–4441, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
S. Nawapan, N. Charoenlap, A. Charoenwuttitam, P. Saenkham, S. Mongkolsuk, and P. Vattanaviboon, “Functional and expression analyses of the cop operon, required for copper resistance in Agrobacterium tumefaciens,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 191, no. 16, pp. 5159–5168, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. D. Stoppel and H. G. Schlegel, “Nickel-resistant bacteria from anthropogenically nickel-polluted and naturally nickel-percolated ecosystems,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2276–2285, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
M. Dopson, C. Baker-Austin, P. R. Koppineedi, and P. L. Bond, “Growth in sulfidic mineral environments: metal resistance mechanisms in acidophilic micro-organisms,” Microbiology, vol. 149, no. 8, pp. 1959–1970, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
J. Schelert, V. Dixit, V. Hoang, J. Simbahan, M. Drozda, and P. Blum, “Occurrence and characterization of mercury resistance in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus by use of gene disruption,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 2, pp. 427–437, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. G. Ettema, A. B. Brinkman, P. P. Lamers, N. G. Kornet, W. M. de Vos, and J. van der Oost, “Molecular characterization of a conserved archaeal copper resistance (cop) gene cluster and its copper-responsive regulator in Sulfolobus solfataricus P2,” Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 7, pp. 1969–1979, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. DasSarma, M. Capes, and P. DasSarma, “Haloarchaeal Megaplasmids,” in Microbial Megaplasmids, E. Schwartz, Ed., pp. 3–30, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
W. V. Ng, S. A. Ciufo, T. M. Smith et al., “Snapshot of a large dynamic replicon in a halophilic archaeon: megaplasmid or minichromosome?” Genome Research, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1131–1141, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
S. Dey and B. P. Rosen, “Dual mode of energy coupling by the oxyanion-translocating ArsB protein,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 385–389, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
B. G. Butcher, S. M. Deane, and D. E. Rawlings, “The chromosomal arsenic resistance genes of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans have an unusual arrangement and confer increased arsenic and antimony resistance to Escherichia coli,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1826–1833, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Qin, B. P. Rosen, Y. Zhang, G. Wang, S. Franke, and C. Rensing, “Arsenic detoxification and evolution of trimethylarsine gas by a microbial arsenite S-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 2075–2080, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. P. Begley, A. E. Walts, and C. T. Walsh, “Mechanistic studies of a protonolytic organomercurial cleaving enzyme: bacterial organomercurial lyase,” Biochemistry, vol. 25, no. 22, pp. 7192–7200, 1986.View at: Google Scholar
M. J. Fagan and M. H. Saier Jr., “P-type ATPases of eukaryotes and bacteria: sequence analyses and construction of phylogenetic trees,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 57–99, 1994.View at: Google Scholar
M. H. Saier Jr., “Computer-aided analyses of transport protein sequences: gleaning evidence concerning function, structure, biogenesis, and evolution,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 71–93, 1994.View at: Google Scholar
M. D. Snavely, J. B. Florer, C. G. Miller, and M. E. Maguire, “Magnesium transport in Salmonella typhimurium: 28Mg2+ transport by the CorA, MgtA, and MgtB systems,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 171, no. 9, pp. 4761–4766, 1989.View at: Google Scholar
Franke S, G. Grass, and D. H. Nies, “The product of the ybdE gene of the Escherichia coli chromosome is involved in detoxification of silver ions,” Microbiology, vol. 147, no. 4, pp. 965–972, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
L. Tong, S. Nakashima, M. Shibasaka, M. Katsuhara, and K. Kasamo, “A novel histidine-rich CPx-ATPase from the filamentous cyanobacterium Oscillatoria brevis related to multiple-heavy-metal cotolerance,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 18, pp. 5027–5035, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Anton, C. Große, J. Reißmann, T. Pribyl, and D. H. Nies, “CzcD is a heavy metal ion transporter involved in regulation of heavy metal resistance in Ralstonia sp. strain CH34,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 22, pp. 6876–6881, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
J. R. H. Tame, G. N. Murshudov, E. J. Dodson et al., “The structural basis of sequence-independent peptide binding by OppA protein,” Science, vol. 264, no. 5165, pp. 1578–1581, 1994.View at: Google Scholar
D. E. Salt and G. J. Wagner, “Cadmium transport across tonoplast of vesicles from oat roots. Evidence for a Cd2+/H+ antiport activity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 17, pp. 12297–12302, 1993.View at: Google Scholar
P. A. Rea, Z. S. Li, Y. P. Lu, Y. M. Drozdowicz, and E. Martinoia, “From vacuolar GS-X pumps to multispecific ABC transporters,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, vol. 49, pp. 727–760, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
H. W. Van Veen, A. Margolles, M. Müller, C. F. Higgins, and W. N. Konings, “The homodimeric ATP-binding cassette transporter LmrA mediates multidrug transport by an alternating two-site (two-cylinder engine) mechanism,” EMBO Journal, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2503–2514, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
A. L. Hartman, C. Norais, J. H. Badger et al., “The complete genome sequence of Haloferax volcanii DS2, a model archaeon,” PloS One, vol. 5, no. 3, p. e9605, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
J. R. Roth, J. G. Lawrence, M. Rubenfield, S. Kieffer-Higgins, and G. M. Church, “Characterization of the cobalamin (vitamin B12) biosynthetic genes of Salmonella typhimurium,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 175, no. 11, pp. 3303–3316, 1993.View at: Google Scholar
W. G. Zumft, A. Viebrock-Sambale, and C. Braun, “Nitrous oxide reductase from denitrifying Pseudomonas stutzeri .Genes for copper-processing and properties of the deduced products, including a new member of the family of ATP/GTP-binding proteins,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 591–599, 1990.View at: Google Scholar
N. Ercal, H. Gurer-Orhan, and N. Aykin-Burns, “Toxic metals and oxidative stress part I: mechanisms involved in metal-induced oxidative damage,” Current topics in medicinal chemistry, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 529–539, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
P. J. Hill, A. Cockayne, P. Landers, J. A. Morrissey, C. M. Sims, and P. Williams, “SirR, a novel iron-dependent repressor in Staphylococcus epidermidis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 4123–4129, 1998.View at: Google Scholar