Archaea

Archaea / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Biotechnological Uses of Archaeal Proteins

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 170571 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/170571

Archaeal Nucleic Acid Ligases and Their Potential in Biotechnology

Academic Editor: Frédéric Pecorari
Received13 Mar 2015
Accepted18 May 2015
Published01 Oct 2015

Abstract

With their ability to catalyse the formation of phosphodiester linkages, DNA ligases and RNA ligases are essential tools for many protocols in molecular biology and biotechnology. Currently, the nucleic acid ligases from bacteriophage T4 are used extensively in these protocols. In this review, we argue that the nucleic acid ligases from Archaea represent a largely untapped pool of enzymes with diverse and potentially favourable properties for new and emerging biotechnological applications. We summarise the current state of knowledge on archaeal DNA and RNA ligases, which makes apparent the relative scarcity of information on in vitro activities that are of most relevance to biotechnologists (such as the ability to join blunt- or cohesive-ended, double-stranded DNA fragments). We highlight the existing biotechnological applications of archaeal DNA ligases and RNA ligases. Finally, we draw attention to recent experiments in which protein engineering was used to modify the activities of the DNA ligase from Pyrococcus furiosus and the RNA ligase from Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus, thus demonstrating the potential for further work in this area.

1. Introduction

DNA and RNA ligases are ubiquitous enzymes that catalyse the formation of phosphodiester bonds between opposing 5′-phosphate and 3′-hydroxyl termini in nucleic acids [13]. Their activities are essential for central biological processes, including DNA replication and recombination, rearrangement of immunoglobulin genes, and RNA editing and repair. Their activities in vitro have also been exploited in numerous molecular biology protocols, making them critical tools for modern biotechnology.

Together with the RNA capping enzymes and tRNA ligases, DNA and RNA ligases constitute the nucleotidyl transferase superfamily [4]. All of the enzymes in this superfamily catalyse phosphodiester bond formation in a conserved, three-step mechanism that utilises either ATP, GTP, or NAD+ as a high-energy cofactor [46]. In the first step, nucleophilic attack on the α-phosphate of the cofactor by an active site lysine yields a ligase-AMP intermediate. Secondly, the AMP is transferred to the 5′-phosphate of one polynucleotide strand, resulting in an adenylated nucleic acid intermediate (with the active site lysine as the leaving group). Finally, the 3′-hydroxyl group of the second polynucleotide strand attacks the 5′-phosphate of the opposing strand, joining the two strands with a new phosphodiester bond and liberating AMP.

Species from the domain Archaea not only survive, but thrive, under conditions of extreme temperature, salinity, pH, and pressure. Evolution in these extreme environments has resulted in archaeal proteins that have properties of value to biotechnologists, including stability and activity under a range of comparatively harsh in vitro conditions. A familiar example is the widespread use of the Pyrococcus furiosus DNA polymerase in the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) [7], in which its thermostability and processivity also make it valuable for related protocols such as QuikChange mutagenesis [8, 9]. In this review, we turn the attention to archaeal nucleic acid ligases. We summarise the current state of knowledge about these enzymes, including their existing applications in biotechnology, and we argue that they offer a largely untapped pool of activities for use in “next generation” molecular biology protocols.

2. DNA Ligases

In vivo, DNA ligases catalyse the formation of phosphodiester bonds at single-stranded nicks in double-stranded DNA. This activity is critical for maintaining genomic integrity during DNA replication, DNA recombination, and DNA excision repair [2, 6]. They are essential in all organisms and they are conventionally classified into two families according to their cofactor specificity. ATP-dependent ligases (EC 6.5.1.1) are typically found in Eukarya, Archaea, and viruses (including bacteriophages), while the NAD+-dependent DNA ligases (EC 6.5.1.2) are typically found in bacteria and some eukaryotic viruses. There are, however, exceptions to this rule. Most notably, the archaeal species Haloferax volcanii possesses two active DNA ligases: one ATP-dependent (LigA) and the other NAD+-dependent (LigN) [10].

DNA ligases are essential for numerous applications in molecular biology and biotechnology. For decades, DNA ligases have been used to construct recombinant DNA molecules (i.e., cloning) and for genetic disease detection using the ligation chain reaction [11]. More recently, the DNA ligase from the bacterium, Thermus aquaticus (Taq), has become important for Gibson assembly. This is an isothermal, one-pot method for assembling overlapping DNA molecules without the use of restriction enzymes [12]. A number of next generation sequencing methods also depend on DNA ligases [13, 14], either for adapter ligation during sample preparation (e.g., Illumina and 454 sequencing) or for the sequencing reaction itself (SOLiD sequencing).

With its ability to ligate both cohesive- and blunt-ended, double-stranded DNA molecules [15], the most commonly used DNA ligase in biotechnology is the ATP-dependent enzyme from bacteriophage T4. However, it is only weakly active for the ligation of blunt-ended fragments [16] and it is irreversibly inactivated at 65°C. It is also inactive at NaCl concentrations above ~150 mM. We posit that thermostable archaeal DNA ligases could be well suited for use in some or all of the above applications. For example, the ligation chain reaction requires a ligase that is stable at temperatures above 90°C, and Archaea may provide biotechnologists with superior alternatives to Taq ligase for Gibson assembly.

3. Archaeal DNA Ligases

To date, fewer than 25 archaeal DNA ligases have been characterised to any extent at all, and in general data on them is limited compared with DNA ligases from other domains of life [17, 18]. Table 1 summarises the current state of knowledge and highlights the diverse range of properties possessed by archaeal DNA ligases. Data for T4 DNA ligase are also included, for comparison.


OrganismGrowth conditionsUniProt IDPDB IDCofactorReference

Bacteriophage
 Bacteriophage T4MesophileP00970ATP37°C[16, 37]
Crenarchaeota
Aeropyrum pernix HyperthermophileQ9YD18ATP, ADP70°C[38]
Desulfurolobus ambivalens Acidophile/thermophileQ02093NR[39]
Staphylothermus marinus HyperthermophileA3DP49ATP, ADP75°C[40]
Sulfolobus acidocaldarius Acidophile/thermophileQ4JAM1ATP85°C[41]
Sulfolobus shibatae Acidophile/thermophileQ9P9K9ATP, dATP60–80°C[42]
Sulfolobus solfataricus Acidophile/thermophileQ980T82HIX, 2HIVATPNR[28]
Sulfophobococcus zilligii HyperthermophileD2CJS7ATP, ADP, GTP75°C[22, 29]
Euryarchaeota
Archaeoglobus fulgidus HyperthermophileO296323GDEATPNR[25]
Ferroplasma acidarmanus AcidophileS0AR65ATP, dATP30°C[43]
Ferroplasma acidiphilum AcidophileQ2PCE4ATP, NAD+40°C[41]
Haloferax volcanii (LigA)HalophileD4GYZ4ATP NR[10]
Haloferax volcanii (LigN)HalophileD4GY98NAD+45°C[10, 44, 45]
Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ThermophileQ50566ATP, dATP60°C[46]
Picrophilus torridus AcidophileQ6L195ATP, NAD+65°C[41]
Pyrococcus furiosus HyperthermophileP567092CFMATP55°C[26, 27, 47]
Pyrococcus horikoshii HyperthermophileO59288ATP70–90°C[23]
Thermococcus sp. 1519ThermophileC0LJI83RR5ATP70°C[31, 48, 49]
Thermococcus fumicolans HyperthermophileQ9HH07ATP, NAD+65°C[19]
Thermococcus kodakaraensis ThermophileQ9HHC4ATP, NAD+65°C[20, 50]
Thermococcus onnurineus HyperthermophileB6YTR4ATP, NAD+80°C[21]
Thermococcus sibiricus HyperthermophileC6A2U94EQ5ATPNR[30]
Thermoplasma acidophilum AcidophileQ9HJ26ATP, NAD+65°C[41]

: temperature optimum for the DNA ligase in vitro; NR: not reported.

As noted above, DNA ligases are usually classified based on their strict cofactor specificity for either ATP or NAD+. Interestingly, a number of archaeal DNA ligases can utilise multiple cofactors. Sequence homology suggested that the DNA ligases from Thermococcus kodakaraensis, T. fumicolans, and T. onnurineus belong to the ATP-dependent family (EC 6.5.1.1); however, in vitro characterisation of each has shown that they are able to use either ATP or NAD+ as their cofactor [1921]. The ATP-dependent DNA ligase from Sulfophobococcus zilligii also shows relative activity of 63% when the cofactor is switched from ATP to GTP [22]. Other than the S. zilligii DNA ligase, activity with GTP has only been described for RNA capping enzymes [4]. A number of archaeal DNA ligases, including the S. zilligii enzyme, are also able to use ADP (Table 1).

One hypothesis for the undifferentiated nucleotide specificities of archaeal DNA ligases is that they have retained a trait from the ancient common ancestor of the ATP- and NAD+-dependent enzymes. This ancestor may have used ADP as a cofactor [23], as the ADP moiety is common to both ATP and NAD+. However, it has also been noted that direct evidence of ADP utilisation by DNA ligases is minimal [24]. Another proposal is that ATP is comparatively unstable at high temperatures, and this provided the selection pressure for evolution of thermophilic ligases with specificity for alternative cofactors such as ADP and GTP [22].

DNA ligases employ multidomain architectures in order to catalyse phosphodiester bond formation; however, there is variation in the number and identity of the domains they possess [14]. To date, the structures of six archaeal DNA ligases have been solved, from Archaeoglobus fulgidus [25], Pyrococcus furiosus [26, 27], Sulfolobus solfataricus [28], S. zilligii [29], Thermococcus sibiricus [30], and Thermococcus sp. 1519 [31]. Each enzyme comprises three domains: the adenylation domain (AdD), the oligonucleotide-binding domain (OBD), and the N-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD). The AdD contains the six motifs (I, III, IIIb, IV, V, and VI) that are characteristic of the nucleotidyl transferase superfamily [32]. The AdD and OBD are minimally required for activity and together they are referred to as the catalytic core. The N-terminal DBD is unique to the eukaryotic and archaeal DNA ligases and is thought to play roles in maintaining an active conformation of the catalytic core, as well as distorting the DNA substrate [33].

Elucidation of the unbound [34] and DNA-bound [35] structures of the ATP-dependent ligase from Chlorella virus has highlighted the importance of large conformational changes during the catalytic cycle of DNA ligases. During DNA binding the OBD translocates by >60 Å and rotates nearly 180° around a swivel point, in order to fit into the minor groove of the DNA substrate. No archaeal DNA ligases have had their structures solved in complex with DNA; however, OBDs have been captured adopting three different conformations (Figure 1). The S. solfataricus enzyme exhibited an open and extended conformation in which the OBD was turned away from the AdD (Figure 1(a)); the overall structure resembled that of the DNA ligase from bacteriophage T7 [36]. In contrast, the Thermococcus sp. 1519 ligase structure (Figure 1(b)) adopted an intermediate conformation in which the OBD was rotated anticlockwise around the AdD by ~90° compared to the open extended conformation, although this rotation was insufficient to introduce any hydrogen bonds or salt bridges between the OBD and the other domains. A further 120° rotation of the OBD yields a closed conformation, as observed in the structures of the DNA ligases from P. furiosus (Figure 1(c)), A. fulgidus, and T. sibiricus. In these structures a C-terminal helix (Figure 1), found after conserved motif VI, stabilises the closed conformation by mediating several ionic interactions between the OBD and the AdD [26]. This additional helix occupies the cleft between the AdD and OBD in the archaeal unbound structures, but it is displaced in the DNA-bound structure of human DNA ligase I [33].

The domain arrangements of the archaeal ligase structures all differ substantially from those of the DNA-bound structures obtained for human DNA ligases I and III [33, 51], where the three domains encircle the DNA substrate (Figure 1(d)). The emerging picture is one in which conformational flexibility is critical for the correct functioning of archaeal DNA ligases. However, to date, no structures of archaeal DNA ligases in complex with DNA have been solved; therefore it is unknown whether the differences in unbound structures (Figures 1(a)1(c)) correlate with differences in domain orientations when the DNA substrate is bound. The protein dynamics associated with catalysis at the growth temperatures of the host cells (70–100°C) also remain to be elucidated.

4. Biotechnological Applications of Archaeal DNA Ligases

Given their primary physiological role in DNA repair, it is unsurprising that most archaeal DNA ligases have only been assayed for their ability to seal single-stranded nicks in double-stranded DNA. Of more interest for biotechnological applications is the ability to ligate double-stranded, cohesive-, or blunt-ended fragments. These activities have been reported for four archaeal DNA ligases. The enzymes from Aeropyrum pernix, Staphylothermus marinus, Thermococcus sp. 1519, and T. fumicolans have all been shown to perform ligation of cohesive-ended fragments. In addition, the S. marinus and T. fumicolans DNA ligases could also join blunt-ended fragments [19, 40]. Thus, it seems likely that further characterisation of archaeal DNA ligases should yield a pool of enzymes with potential utility in molecular biology and biotechnology.

The most immediate applications for archaeal DNA ligases are likely to be those that exploit their high temperature optima (typically 50–100°C; Table 1). For example, the DNA ligase from Thermococcus sp. 1519 is most active at 60–70°C and it is able to ligate DNA fragments with long cohesive ends (12-nucleotide overhangs), but not fragments with shorter (4-nucleotide) cohesive ends or with blunt ends [48]. While it remains to be tested, this combination of properties would appear to make it a promising tool for Gibson assembly [12]. This protocol has rapidly emerged as the dominant method for restriction enzyme-independent assembly of DNA fragments in synthetic biology and it is currently performed at 50°C. We speculate that archaeal DNA ligases, such as the one from Thermococcus sp. 1519, may drive the development of new methods, with the promise that ligation at higher temperatures (60–70°C) would decrease the number of incorrect ligation events that arise from misannealing of fragments with short overhangs.

In a similar vein, the DNA ligase from Staphylothermus marinus has a half-life of almost 3 h at 100°C and catalyses a variety of ligation reactions with cohesive- and blunt-ended fragments [40]. This extremely thermostable enzyme could find utility in the ligase chain reaction (LCR) for detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms, as it is able to survive the high temperature denaturation steps (~95°C) in the thermal cycling protocol. More generally, it has been shown that thermostable proteins are ideal starting points for protein engineering, as they are more tolerant of mutations and thus yield more functional variants on mutation than their mesophilic homologues [52].

5. Engineering an Improved Archaeal DNA Ligase

Despite the ubiquity of DNA ligases in molecular biology, very few attempts have been made to enhance their properties by protein engineering. To date only the DNA ligase from bacteriophage T4 [53] and one archaeal DNA ligase, from Pyrococcus furiosus [27, 47], have been targeted.

Nishida and colleagues have successfully used their structural insights [26] to enhance the activity of the P. furiosus DNA ligase through structure-guided mutagenesis. In particular, they have targeted the C-terminal helix that interacts with the OBD and the AdD to stabilise the closed conformation of the enzyme (Figure 1(c)). To begin, five polar residues from the OBD (Asp540, Arg544, Gln547, Lys554, and Lys558), each of which contributed to interactions with the AdD, were mutated to alanine [47]. The hypothesis was that destabilising the interdomain interaction would facilitate increased motion of the OBD and thus increase activity by “unlocking” the enzyme. Of the five selected residues, mutation of Asp540, located at the N-terminus of the helical extension, exerted the greatest effect. Further mutagenesis at this position showed that the Asp540Arg (D540R) substitution gave optimal activity, over a broadened temperature range (20–80°C).

In proof-of-concept ligation-amplification experiments, the authors showed that the engineered ligase (with the D540R mutation) outperformed the wild type at two temperatures. At 60°C, maximum amplification of ligated DNA product was achieved after only 3 cycles with the mutant but took 10 cycles with the wild type enzyme. At 30°C, the engineered enzyme gave maximum product yield after 5 cycles of ligation-amplification, whereas the product yield with the wild type ligase was only ~30% as great, even after 10 cycles [47]. Further, a series of insightful biophysics experiments showed that the introduction of a positively charged arginine residue, in place of the negatively charged Asp540, had accelerated both the formation of the covalent ligase-AMP intermediate and binding of the nicked DNA substrate [47]. This work is also the basis of a granted US patent, number 8,137,943.

In a follow-up study, the same group has recently used further mutagenesis to eliminate the ionic interactions between the AdD and the OBD entirely [27]. P. furiosus DNA ligase carrying either three point mutations (D540R/K554A/K558A), or D540R plus deletion of the final four amino acids of the C-terminal helix, had further enhanced nick-joining activities. While it is yet to be tested with other archaeal DNA ligases, this design approach, releasing the interactions of the C-terminal helix with the AdD and OBD domains, appears as though it could be a generally applicable one for enhancing activity.

6. RNA Ligases

RNA ligases (EC 6.5.1.3) are RNA end-joining enzymes involved in RNA repair, splicing, and editing pathways. In contrast to the ubiquitous DNA ligases, RNA ligases have a narrower phylogenetic distribution. Sequence similarity searches have found RNA ligases in all three domains of life but only in a subset of species [54].

RNA ligases are typically classified into two broad families. The Rnl1 family includes the eponymous RNA ligase 1 (Rnl1) from bacteriophage T4 [3] and the tRNA ligases from fungi, yeasts, and plants [5, 55, 56]. These enzymes repair breaks that have been introduced into single-stranded RNA by site-specific nucleases. The Rnl2 family contains the bacteriophage T4 RNA ligase 2 (Rnl2) and the RNA-editing ligases from the protozoans Trypanosoma and Leishmania. These enzymes are primarily associated with sealing nicks in RNA made duplex by the presence of a bridging complementary strand [54, 57, 58]. While the RNA ligases share the same six conserved nucleotidyl transferase motifs as DNA ligases, their overall levels of sequence conservation are low. In general, this makes family classification both more difficult and less meaningful.

Like DNA ligases, RNA ligases are also important in molecular biology. T4 RNA ligases 1 and 2 have become essential for a subset of rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) protocols, 3′ RNA labelling, and most importantly, at present, the preparation of microRNA (miRNA) sequencing libraries. ATP-dependent RNA ligases capable of forming phosphodiester bonds between 5′-phosphate and 3′-hydroxyl termini are of most use in these protocols; therefore, they will be the focus of the following sections. For completeness, we also note that two noncanonical RNA ligases from the archaeal species Pyrococcus horikoshii have also been reported. The first is a putative 2′-5′ RNA ligase, the structure of which has been solved [59]. The second, RtcB, is an unusual ligase that joins either 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate or 3′-phosphate termini to 5′-hydroxyl termini. Its structure, its mechanism, and its interaction with a novel protein cofactor (Archease) have recently been characterised in detail [60, 61].

7. Archaeal RNA Ligases

The first detailed biochemical characterisation of an archaeal RNA ligase was reported in 2008, when an open reading frame from Pyrococcus abyssi, previously annotated as encoding a DNA ligase, was found to encode an RNA ligase instead [62]. Previously, it had been assumed that archaeal RNA ligases were likely to be Rnl2-like enzymes, as they showed similarly variant nucleotidyl transferase motifs as T4 Rnl2 [54]. However, the structure of the P. abyssi RNA ligase was a marginally closer structural homologue of T4 Rnl1 (secondary structure matching -score of 6.4, and RMSD of 2.78 Å over 200 aligned residues) than T4 Rnl2 (-score 6.2, RMSD 2.39 Å over 164 aligned residues) [62]. Further, the P. abyssi RNA ligase was active with single-stranded RNA substrates, but not double-stranded RNA, similar to T4 Rnl1.

Unlike the monomeric mesophilic ligases, X-ray crystallography revealed a homodimeric structure for the P. abyssi RNA ligase [62]. Each monomer comprised four domains: an N-terminal domain, a catalytic domain, a dimerisation domain, and a C-terminal domain (Figure 2). The catalytic domain showed structural similarities with other members of the nucleotidyl transferase superfamily. The N-terminal domain resembled that of T4 Rnl1 and has only been observed in these two enzymes to date. The C-terminal domain was all α-helical, had no structural homologues, and was not ascribed a function. The dimerisation domain had structural similarity to the copper-binding domain of the amyloid precursor protein, although the metal binding residues are absent in the ligase [62].

The role of dimerisation in the P. abyssi RNA ligase is not known. It has been proposed that it may be functionally important for facilitating two symmetric and simultaneous ligation events, such as splicing and intron circularisation [62]. More generally, oligomerisation is a common adaptation associated with thermophily in archaeal proteins [64]. This strategy is thought to increase the rigidity of the individual subunits and promote tighter packing of the hydrophobic core.

To date, the only other archaeal RNA ligase to be characterised biochemically is the one from the species Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum [63], which is now generally known as Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus [65]. The properties of the P. abyssi and M. thermautotrophicus RNA ligases are summarised in Table 2.


OrganismUniProt IDPDB IDCo-FactorPropertiesReference

Pyrococcus abyssi Q9UYG22VUGATP85–90°CEfficient at forming adenylated RNA but not so efficient at strand joining. Forms circular products.[62]

Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus O27289ATP65°CCircularises single-stranded RNA and single-stranded DNA.[63]

: temperature optimum for the RNA ligase in vitro.

8. RNA Ligases in Biotechnology

In addition to their roles in vivo, RNA ligases have become important tools in molecular biology [66]. Shortly after the discovery of T4 Rnl1, new protocols were established, including 3′-end biotin and fluorophore labelling [67], RNA ligase mediated rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RLM-RACE) [68], oligonucleotide synthesis [69], and 5′ nucleotide modifications of both RNA and DNA [70].

More recently RNA ligases have become essential for constructing sequencing libraries of microRNAs (miRNAs) and other small RNAs. During library preparation, T4 RNA ligases are used to join 5′- and 3′-adaptors to the RNA substrates, so that the adaptor sequences can be used for priming during reverse transcription and PCR [7173]. The emerging realisation that miRNAs, small regulatory RNAs involved in posttranscriptional regulation [74], have numerous biological functions and whose misregulation have been implicated in a number of diseases [75], has meant that high-throughput screening has become an invaluable tool for both the discovery and profiling of miRNA expression. Therefore RNA ligases capable of producing high quality sequencing libraries, representative of the original miRNA population in a sample, are of great interest.

Unfortunately, it has become increasingly apparent that miRNA sequencing datasets are prone to severe biases [76] and that the adaptor ligation step is a key contributor. One limitation is the unwanted production of circular by-products [66, 76]. The evolutionarily conserved function of RNA ligases in vivo is to seal nicks in RNA hairpin loops (such as those in cleaved tRNA molecules). In vitro, this results in a propensity to circularise the RNA substrates, preventing adaptor ligation. Another limitation with the T4 RNA ligases is that they are biased towards ligating particular RNA sequences [77, 78] which can lead to the miscalculation of miRNA abundance by up to 4 orders of magnitude [73]. This ligation bias is not a result of primary sequence preference but instead a bias against RNA secondary structure [79]. Therefore there is growing interest in characterising thermostable RNA ligases that are active at temperatures sufficient to denature RNA secondary structures [80].

9. Biotechnological Roles for Archaeal RNA Ligases

Archaeal RNA ligases have found some use in molecular biology protocols. The M. thermautotrophicus RNA ligase has the ability to adenylate both single-stranded RNA and single-stranded DNA (Table 2) and it has been used to 5′-adenylate single-stranded DNA adapters for use in the construction of miRNA sequencing libraries [81]. Previously either a chemical synthesis protocol [82] or a methodology involving T4 DNA ligase was used for this adenylation step [83]; however, T4 DNA ligase does not accumulate sufficient adenylated products and the synthesis method was expensive. On the other hand, the M. thermautotrophicus RNA ligase accumulates high quantities of the adenylated intermediates (AppRNA and AppDNA) when an excess of ATP is used in the reaction, making it an ideal substitute. This enzyme is currently available commercially as a component of a 5′ DNA adenylation kit (from New England Biolabs).

While the M. thermautotrophicus RNA ligase is highly active as a 5′ adenylation enzyme, a single point mutation (Lys97Ala) resulted in an enzyme that was unable to perform adenylation at all, but which retained the ability to form phosphodiester bonds [81]. This has enabled the development of a two-step protocol in which the wild type enzyme is used to adenylate DNA adapters in an initial reaction. The adenylated adaptors can then be incubated with the pool of target miRNA molecules and the mutated ligase. The result is ligation of preadenylated adaptors to the RNA substrates, with no possibility of circularising the (nonadenylated) RNA [81]. The ability of the M. thermautotrophicus RNA ligase (and the K97A mutant) to function at 65°C also helps to remove ligation bias associated with RNA secondary structures. In order to implement this protocol, the mutated enzyme is commercially available (as the Thermostable 5′ AppDNA/RNA Ligase from New England Biolabs).

10. Concluding Remarks

In this review, we have summarised the current literature on archaeal nucleic acid ligases. We have highlighted the relative dearth of knowledge on these enzymes, while discussing characteristics that are likely to make them valuable additions to the biotechnologist’s toolbox in future. In particular, archaeal enzymes are archetypically thermostable. DNA ligases that are stable and active at elevated temperatures are becoming critical for emerging technologies such as Gibson assembly (which underpins synthetic biology) [12], while thermostable RNA ligases offer the promise of constructing unbiased miRNA sequencing libraries [76]. Moreover, the thermostability of archaeal enzymes makes them ideal starting points for protein engineering [52]. Recent experiments to engineer the Pyrococcus furiosus DNA ligase [27, 47] and the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus RNA ligase [81] demonstrate the great potential for further work in this area.

Overall, the pool of archaeal nucleic acid ligases is diverse but currently undersampled. We anticipate that its further exploration will lead to the discovery of new enzymes with favourable properties for molecular biology and biotechnology, which in turn will drive the development of new methodologies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by a Smart Ideas Grant from the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. Wayne M. Patrick is the grateful recipient of a Rutherford Discovery Fellowship.

References

  1. B. Weiss and C. C. Richardson, “Enzymatic breakage and joining of deoxyribonucleic acid, I. Repair of single-strand breaks in DNA by an enzyme system from Escherichia coli infected with T4 bacteriophage,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1021–1028, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. R. Lehman, “DNA ligase: structure, mechanism, and function,” Science, vol. 186, no. 4166, pp. 790–797, 1974. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. Silber, V. G. Malathi, and J. Hurwitz, “Purification and properties of bacteriophage T4-induced RNA ligase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 3009–3013, 1972. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Shuman and B. Schwer, “RNA capping enzyme and DNA ligase: A superfamily of covalent nucleotidyl transferases,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 405–410, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. K. Wang and S. Shuman, “Structure-function analysis of yeast tRNA ligase,” RNA, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 966–975, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Shuman, “DNA ligases: progress and prospects,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 26, pp. 17365–17369, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. S. Lundberg, D. D. Shoemaker, M. W. W. Adams, J. M. Short, J. A. Sorge, and E. J. Mathur, “High-fidelity amplification using a thermostable DNA polymerase isolated from Pyrococcus furiosus,” Gene, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. Papworth, J. C. Bauer, J. Braman, and D. A. Wright, “Site-directed mutagenesis in one day with >80% efficiency,” Strategies, vol. 9, pp. 3–4, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  9. H. H. Hogrefe, J. Cline, G. L. Youngblood, and R. M. Allen, “Creating randomized amino acid libraries with the Quikchange multi site-directed mutagenesis kit,” BioTechniques, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1158–1165, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. Zhao, F. C. Gray, and S. A. MacNeill, “ATP- and NAD+-dependent DNA ligases share an essential function in the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 743–752, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. Barany, “Genetic disease detection and DNA amplification using cloned thermostable ligase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 189–193, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. G. Gibson, L. Young, R. Y. Chuang, J. C. Venter, C. A. Hutchison, and H. O. Smith, “Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases,” Nature Methods, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 343–345, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. A. Quail, I. Kozarewa, F. Smith et al., “A large genome center's improvements to the Illumina sequencing system,” Nature Methods, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1005–1010, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. G. J. Lohman, S. Tabor, and N. M. Nichols, “DNA ligases,” in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, vol. 94, unit 3.14, pp. 11–17, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  15. V. Sgaramella, J. H. van de Sande, and H. G. Khorana, “Studies on polynucleotides, C. A novel joining reaction catalyzed by the T4-polynucleotide ligase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1468–1475, 1970. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Sugino, H. M. Goodman, H. L. Heyneker, J. Shine, H. W. Boyer, and N. R. Cozzarelli, “Interaction of bacteriophage T4 RNA and DNA ligases in joining of duplex DNA at base-paired ends,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 252, no. 11, pp. 3987–3994, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  17. A. Wilkinson, J. Day, and R. Bowater, “Bacterial DNA ligases,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1241–1248, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. E. Tomkinson, S. Vijayakumar, J. M. Pascal, and T. Ellenberger, “DNA ligases: structure, reaction mechanism, and function,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 687–699, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J.-L. Rolland, Y. Gueguen, C. Persillon, J.-M. Masson, and J. Dietrich, “Characterization of a thermophilic DNA ligase from the archaeon Thermococcus fumicolans,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 236, no. 2, pp. 267–273, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Nakatani, S. Ezaki, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka, “A DNA ligase from a hyperthermophilic archaeon with unique cofactor specificity,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 182, no. 22, pp. 6424–6433, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. J. Kim, H. S. Lee, S. S. Bae et al., “Cloning, expression, and characterization of a DNA ligase from a hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus sp.,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 401–407, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Sun, M. S. Seo, J. H. Kim et al., “Novel DNA ligase with broad nucleotide cofactor specificity from the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfophobococcus zilligii: influence of ancestral DNA ligase on cofactor utilization,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 3212–3224, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. Keppetipola and S. Shuman, “Characterization of a thermophilic ATP-dependent DNA ligase from the euryarchaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 20, pp. 6902–6908, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Takano, A. Aoi, Y. Koga, and S. Kanaya, “Evolvability of thermophilic proteins from archaea and bacteria,” Biochemistry, vol. 52, no. 28, pp. 4774–4780, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. J. Kim, O. Kim, H.-W. Kim, H. S. Kim, S. J. Lee, and S. W. Suh, “ATP-dependent DNA ligase from Archaeoglobus fulgidus displays a tightly closed conformation,” Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 544–550, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Nishida, S. Kiyonari, Y. Ishino, and K. Morikawa, “The closed structure of an archaeal DNA ligase from Pyrococcus furiosus,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 360, no. 5, pp. 956–967, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Tanabe, S. Ishino, Y. Ishino, and H. Nishida, “Mutations of Asp540 and the domain-connecting residues synergistically enhance Pyrococcus furiosus DNA ligase activity,” FEBS Letters, vol. 588, no. 2, pp. 230–235, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. M. Pascal, O. V. Tsodikov, G. L. Hura et al., “A flexible interface between DNA ligase and PCNA supports conformational switching and efficient ligation of DNA,” Molecular Cell, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 279–291, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Supangat, Y. J. An, Y. Sun, S.-T. Kwon, and S.-S. Cha, “Purification, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of a multiple cofactor-dependent DNA ligase from Sulfophobococcus zilligii,” Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 1583–1585, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. T. E. Petrova, E. Y. Bezsudnova, B. D. Dorokhov et al., “Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of a thermostable DNA ligase from the archaeon Thermococcus sibiricus,” Acta Crystallographica, Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 163–165, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. Petrova, E. Y. Bezsudnova, K. M. Boyko et al., “ATP-dependent DNA ligase from Thermococcus sp. 1519 displays a new arrangement of the OB-fold domain,” Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 1440–1447, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Shuman, Y. Liu, and B. Schwer, “Covalent catalysis in nucleotidyl transfer reactions: essential motifs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA capping enzyme are conserved in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and viral capping enzymes and among polynucleotide ligases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 25, pp. 12046–12050, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. M. Pascal, P. J. O'Brien, A. E. Tomkinson, and T. Ellenberger, “Human DNA ligase I completely encircles and partially unwinds nicked DNA,” Nature, vol. 432, no. 7016, pp. 473–478, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Odell, V. Sriskanda, S. Shuman, and D. B. Nikolov, “Crystal structure of eukaryotic DNA ligase-adenylate illuminates the mechanism of nick sensing and strand joining,” Molecular Cell, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1183–1193, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. A. Nair, J. Nandakumar, P. Smith, M. Odell, C. D. Lima, and S. Shuman, “Structural basis for nick recognition by a minimal pluripotent DNA ligase,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 770–778, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. S. Subramanya, A. J. Doherty, S. R. Ashford, and D. B. Wigley, “Crystal structure of an ATP-dependent DNA ligase from bacteriophage T7,” Cell, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 607–615, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. J. S. Lohman, L. Chen, and T. C. Evans Jr., “Kinetic characterization of single strand break ligation in duplex DNA by T4 DNA ligase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 51, pp. 44187–44196, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S.-J. Jeon and K. Ishikawa, “A novel ADP-dependent DNA ligase from Aeropyrum pernix K1,” FEBS Letters, vol. 550, no. 1–3, pp. 69–73, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Kletzin, “Molecular characterisation of a DNA ligase gene of the extremely thermophilic archaeon Desulfurolobus ambivalens shows close phylogenetic relationship to eukaryotic ligases,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 5389–5396, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. S. Seo, Y. J. Kim, J. J. Choi et al., “Cloning and expression of a DNA ligase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Staphylothermus marinus and properties of the enzyme,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 519–530, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. Ferrer, O. V. Golyshina, A. Beloqui et al., “A purple acidophilic di-ferric DNA ligase from Ferroplasma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 26, pp. 8878–8883, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. X. Lai, H. Shao, F. Hao, and L. Huang, “Biochemical characterization of an ATP-dependent DNA ligase from the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus shibatae,” Extremophiles, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 469–477, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. R. Jackson, C. Noble, M. Lavesa-Curto, P. L. Bond, and R. P. Bowater, “Characterization of an ATP-dependent DNA ligase from the acidophilic archaeon ‘Ferroplasma acidarmanus’ Fer1,” Extremophiles, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 315–327, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. Poidevin and S. A. MacNeill, “Biochemical characterisation of LigN, an NAD+-dependent DNA ligase from the halophilic euryarchaeon Haloferax volcanii that displays maximal in vitro activity at high salt concentrations,” BMC Molecular Biology, vol. 7, article 44, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. Ortega, A. Laín, X. Tadeo, B. López-Méndez, D. Castaño, and O. Millet, “Halophilic enzyme activation induced by salts,” Scientific Reports, vol. 1, article 6, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. V. Sriskanda, Z. Kelman, J. Hurwitz, and S. Shuman, “Characterization of an ATP-dependent DNA ligase from the the thermophilic archaeon Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2221–2228, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Tanabe, S. Ishino, M. Yohda, K. Morikawa, Y. Ishino, and H. Nishida, “Structure-based mutational study of an archaeal DNA ligase towards improvement of ligation activity,” ChemBioChem, vol. 13, no. 17, pp. 2575–2582, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. V. A. Smagin, A. V. Mardanov, E. A. Bonch-Osmolovskaia, and N. V. Ravin, “Isolation and characteristics of new thermostable DNA ligase from archaea of the genus Thermococcus,” Prikladnaia Biokhimiia i Mikrobiologiia, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 523–528, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  49. E. Y. Bezsudnova, M. V. Kovalchuk, A. V. Mardanov et al., “Overexpression, purification and crystallization of a thermostable DNA ligase from the archaeon Thermococcus sp. 1519,” Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 368–371, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Nakatani, S. Ezaki, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka, “Substrate recognition and fidelity of strand joining by an archaeal DNA ligase,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 650–656, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. E. Cotner-Gohara, I.-K. Kim, M. Hammel, J. A. Tainer, A. E. Tomkinson, and T. Ellenberger, “Human DNA ligase III recognizes DNA ends by dynamic switching between two DNA-bound states,” Biochemistry, vol. 49, no. 29, pp. 6165–6176, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. W. Besenmatter, P. Kast, and D. Hilvert, “Relative tolerance of mesostable and thermostable protein homologs to extensive mutation,” Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 500–506, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. H. Wilson, S. K. Morton, H. Deiderick et al., “Engineered DNA ligases with improved activities in vitro,” Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 471–478, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C. K. Ho and S. Shuman, “Bacteriophage T4 RNA ligase 2 (gp24.1) exemplifies a family of RNA ligases found in all phylogenetic domains,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 20, pp. 12709–12714, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Abelson, C. R. Trotta, and H. Li, “tRNA splicing,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 21, pp. 12685–12688, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. Englert and H. Beier, “Plant tRNA ligases are multifunctional enzymes that have diverged in sequence and substrate specificity from RNA ligases of other phylogenetic origins,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 388–399, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. V. Blanc, J. D. Alfonzo, R. Aphasizhev, and L. Simpson, “The mitochondrial RNA ligase from Leishmania tarentolae can join RNA molecules bridged by a complementary RNA,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 34, pp. 24289–24296, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. S. Palazzo, A. K. Panigrahi, R. P. Igo Jr., R. Salavati, and K. Stuart, “Kinetoplastid RNA editing ligases: complex association, characterization, and substrate requirements,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. P. H. Rehse and T. H. Tahirov, “Structure of a putative 2′-5′ RNA ligase from Pyrococcus horikoshii,” Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 1207–1212, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. K. K. Desai, C. A. Bingman, G. N. Phillips Jr., and R. T. Raines, “Structures of the noncanonical RNA ligase rtcb reveal the mechanism of histidine guanylylation,” Biochemistry, vol. 52, no. 15, pp. 2518–2525, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. K. K. Desai, C. L. Cheng, C. A. Bingman, G. N. Phillips Jr., and R. T. Raines, “A tRNA splicing operon: archease endows RtcB with dual GTP/ATP cofactor specificity and accelerates RNA ligation,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 3931–3942, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. M. A. Brooks, L. Meslet-Cladiére, M. Graille et al., “The structure of an archaeal homodimeric ligase which has RNA circularization activity,” Protein Science, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1336–1345, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. C. Torchia, Y. Takagi, and C. K. Ho, “Archaeal RNA ligase is a homodimeric protein that catalyzes intramolecular ligation of single-stranded RNA and DNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, no. 19, pp. 6218–6227, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. C. J. Reed, H. Lewis, E. Trejo, V. Winston, and C. Evilia, “Protein adaptations in archaeal extremophiles,” Archaea, vol. 2013, Article ID 373275, 14 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. Wasserfallen, J. Nölling, P. Pfister, J. Reeve, and E. C. De Macario, “Phylogenetic analysis of 18 thermophilic Methanobacterium isolates supports the proposals to create a new genus, Methanothermobacter gen. nov., and to reclassify several isolates in three species, Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus comb. nov., Methanothermobacter wolfeii comb. nov., and Methanothermobacter marburgensis sp. nov.,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. E. Paredes, M. Evans, and S. R. Das, “RNA labeling, conjugation and ligation,” Methods, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 251–259, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. R. W. Richardson and R. I. Gumport, “Biotin and fluorescent labeling of RNA using T4 RNA ligase,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 11, no. 18, pp. 6167–6184, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. X. Liu and M. A. Gorovsky, “Mapping the 5′ and 3′ ends of Tetrahymena thermophila mRNAs using RNA ligase mediated amplification of cDNA ends (RLM-RACE),” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 4954–4960, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  69. S. Kaluz, M. Kaluzova, and A. P. F. Flint, “Enzymatically produced composite primers: An application of T4 RNA ligase—coupled primers to PCR,” BioTechniques, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 182–186, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  70. Y. Kinoshita, K. Nishigaki, and Y. Husimi, “Fluorescence-, isotope- or biotin-labeling of the 5′-end of single-stranded DNA/RNA using T4 RNA ligase,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 3747–3748, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. C. Lu, B. C. Meyers, and P. J. Green, “Construction of small RNA cDNA libraries for deep sequencing,” Methods, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 110–117, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. M. Hafner, P. Landgraf, J. Ludwig et al., “Identification of microRNAs and other small regulatory RNAs using cDNA library sequencing,” Methods, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. S. E. V. Linsen, E. de Wit, G. Janssens et al., “Limitations and possibilities of small RNA digital gene expression profiling,” Nature Methods, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 474–476, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. N. C. Lau, L. P. Lim, E. G. Weinstein, and D. P. Bartel, “An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Science, vol. 294, no. 5543, pp. 858–862, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. T.-C. Chang and J. T. Mendell, “MicroRNAs in vertebrate physiology and human disease,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, vol. 8, pp. 215–239, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. C. A. Raabe, T.-H. Tang, J. Brosius, and T. S. Rozhdestvensky, “Biases in small RNA deep sequencing data,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1414–1426, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. D. Jayaprakash, O. Jabado, B. D. Brown, and R. Sachidanandam, “Identification and remediation of biases in the activity of RNA ligases in small-RNA deep sequencing,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 21, article e141, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. M. Hafner, N. Renwick, M. Brown et al., “RNA-ligase-dependent biases in miRNA representation in deep-sequenced small RNA cDNA libraries,” RNA, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1697–1712, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. F. Zhuang, R. T. Fuchs, Z. Sun, Y. Zheng, and G. B. Robb, “Structural bias in T4 RNA ligase-mediated 3′-adapter ligation,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 7, p. e54, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. T. Blondal, A. Thorisdottir, U. Unnsteinsdottir et al., “Isolation and characterization of a thermostable RNA ligase 1 from a Thermus scotoductus bacteriophage TS2126 with good single-stranded DNA ligation properties,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 135–142, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. A. M. Zhelkovsky and L. A. McReynolds, “Structure-function analysis of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum RNA ligase - engineering a thermostable ATP independent enzyme,” BMC Molecular Biology, vol. 13, article 24, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. Q. Dai, M. Saikia, N.-S. Li, T. Pan, and J. A. Piccirilli, “Efficient chemical synthesis of AppDNA by adenylation of immobilized DNA-5′-monophosphate,” Organic Letters, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1067–1070, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. W. Chiuman and Y. Li, “Making AppDNA using T4 DNA ligase,” Bioorganic Chemistry, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 332–349, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Cecilia R. Chambers and Wayne M. Patrick. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1989 Views | 819 Downloads | 7 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.