Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Volume 2009, Article ID 510642, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/510642
Research Article

A Survey of Perioperative and Postoperative Anesthetic Practices for Cesarean Delivery

Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

Received 24 November 2009; Accepted 28 December 2009

Academic Editor: Warwick Kee

Copyright © 2009 Leinani Aiono-Le Tagaloa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. A. Martin, B. E. Hamilton, P. D. Sutton et al., “Births: final data for 2005,” National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1–103, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Carvalho, L. M. Roland, L. F. Chu, V. A. Campitelli III, and E. T. Riley, “Single-dose, extended-release epidural morphine (DepoDur) compared to conventional epidural morphine for post-Cesarean pain,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 176–183, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  3. U. M. Stamer, R. Wiese, F. Stuber, H. Wulf, and T. Meuser, “Change in anaesthetic practice for Caesarean section in Germany,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 170–176, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. P. Van Houwe, L. Heytens, and P. Vercruysse, “A survey of obstetric an anaesthesia practice in Flanders,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. K. Chan and K. P. Ng, “A survey of the current practice of obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia in Malaysia,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 137–140, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. A. Bucklin, J. L. Hawkins, J. R. Anderson, and F. A. Ullrich, “Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update,” Anesthesiology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 645–653, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. G. Jenkins and M. M. Khan, “Anaesthesia for caesarean section: a survey in a UK region from 1992 to 2002,” Anaesthesia, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 1114–1118, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. Carvalho, “Respiratory depression after neuraxial opioids in the obstetric setting,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 956–961, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. A. Shapiro, E. Zohar, R. Zaslansky, D. Hoppenstein, S. Shabat, and B. Fredman, “The frequency and timing of respiratory depression in 1524 postoperative patients treated with systemic or neuraxial morphine,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 537–542, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. T. T. Horlocker, A. W. Burton, R. T. Connis et al., “Practice guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of respiratory depression associated with neuraxial opioid administration,” Anesthesiology, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 218–230, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. E. T. Riley, S. E. Cohen, A. Macario, J. B. Desai, and E. F. Ratner, “Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 709–712, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Ng, J. Parsons, A. M. Cyna, and P. Middleton, “Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD003765, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  13. U. Santanen, P. Rautoma, H. Luurila, O. Erkola, and P. Pere, “Comparison of 27-gauge (0.41-mm) Whitacre and Quincke spinal needles with respect to post-dural puncture headache and non-dural puncture headache,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 474–479, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. A. Kathirgamanathan and N. Hawkins, “Reliability of the ‘pop’ sign as an indicator of dural puncture during obstetric spinal anaesthesia: a prospective observational clinical study,” Anaesthesia, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 802–805, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. P. E. Shenouda and B. J. Cunningham, “Assessing the superiority of saline versus air for use in the epidural loss of resistance technique: a literature review,” Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 48–53, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. S. Leo, Y. Lim, and A. T. H. Sia, “Analgesic efficacy using loss of resistance to air vs. saline in combined spinal epidural technique for labour analgesia,” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 701–706, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Van de Velde, “Identification of the epidural space: stop using the loss of resistance to air technique!,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 51–54, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. K. Howell, D. P. Prosser, and M. Harmer, “A change in resistance? A survey of epidural practice amongst obstetric anaesthetists,” Anaesthesia, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 238–243, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. A. Z. El-Behesy, D. James, K. F. Koh, N. Hirsch, and S. M. Yentis, “Distinguishing cerebrospinal fluid from saline used to identify the extradural space,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 784–785, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Ginosar, E. Mirikatani, D. R. Drover, S. E. Cohen, and E. T. Riley, “ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine coadministered with opioids for Cesarean delivery,” Anesthesiology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 676–682, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. Ben-David, G. Miller, R. Gavriel, and A. Gurevitch, “Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery,” Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 235–239, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. L. Bryson, R. MacNeil, L. M. Jeyaraj, and O. P. Rosaeg, “Small dose spinal bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery does not reduce hypotension but accelerates motor recovery,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 531–537, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. P. Vercauteren, H. C. Coppejans, V. L. Hoffmann, V. Saldien, and H. A. Adriaensen, “Small-dose hyperbaric versus plain bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 989–993, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. Carvalho, M. Durbin, D. R. Drover, S. E. Cohen, Y. Ginosar, and E. T. Riley, “The ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine with opioids for cesarean delivery,” Anesthesiology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 606–612, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. M. Palmer, D. Voulgaropoulos, and D. Alves, “Subarachnoid fentanyl augments lidocaine spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery,” Regional Anesthesia, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 389–394, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. Dahlgren, C. Hultstrand, J. Jakobsson, M. Norman, E. W. Eriksson, and H. Martin, “Intrathecal sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo added to bupivacaine for cesarean section,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1288–1293, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. B. Dahl, I. S. Jeppesen, H. Jorgensen, J. Wetterslev, and S. Moiniche, “Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials,” Anesthesiology, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 1919–1927, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. H. Pan, “Post cesarean delivery pain management: multimodal approach,” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 185–188, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. K. J. Regan and G. O'Sullivan, “The extension of epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section: a survey of current UK practice,” Anaesthesia, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 136–142, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. J. Allam, S. Malhotra, C. Hemingway, and S. M. Yentis, “Epidural lidocaine-bicarbonate-adrenaline vs levobupivacaine for emergency Caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial,” Anaesthesia, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 243–249, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  31. P. J. Angle, S. H. Halpern, B. L. Leighton, J. P. Szalai, K. Gnanendran, and J. E. Kronberg, “A randomized controlled trial examining the effect of naproxen on analgesia during the second day after cesarean delivery,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 741–745, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. M. S. C. Cardoso, J. C. A. Carvalho, A. R. Amaro, A. A. Prado, and E. L. Cappelli, “Small doses of intrathecal morphine combined with systemic diclofenac for postoperative pain control after cesarean delivery,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 538–541, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Bruce and W. A. Chambers, “Questionnaire surveys,” Anaesthesia, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1049–1051, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. Sheehan, “Email survey response rates: a review,” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, vol. 6, no. 2, article 3, 2001. View at Google Scholar