Sugammadex-Enhanced Neuronal Apoptosis following Neonatal Sevoflurane Exposure in Mice
In rodents, neonatal sevoflurane exposure induces neonatal apoptosis in the brain and results in learning deficits. Sugammadex is a new selective neuromuscular blockade (NMB) binding agent that anesthesiologists can use to achieve immediate reversal of an NMB with few side effects. Given its molecular weight of 2178, sugammadex is thought to be unable to pass through the blood brain barrier (BBB). Volatile anesthetics can influence BBB opening and integrity. Therefore, we investigated whether the intraperitoneal administration of sugammadex could exacerbate neuronal damage following neonatal 2% sevoflurane exposure via changes in BBB integrity. Cleaved caspase-3 immunoblotting was used to detect apoptosis, and the ultrastructure of the BBB was examined by transmission electron microscopy. Exposure to 2% sevoflurane for 6 h resulted in BBB ultrastructural abnormalities in the hippocampus of neonatal mice. Sugammadex alone without sevoflurane did not induce apoptosis. The coadministration of sugammadex with sevoflurane to neonatal mice caused a significant increase (150%) in neuroapoptosis in the brain compared with 2% sevoflurane. In neonatal anesthesia, sugammadex could influence neurotoxicity together with sevoflurane. Exposure to 2% sevoflurane for 6 h resulted in BBB ultrastructural abnormalities in the hippocampus of neonatal mice.
Sugammadex is a new selective neuromuscular blockade (NMB) binding agent [1, 2]. It is used only to reverse aminosteroid muscle relaxants . It is composed of eight sugar molecules in a doughnut shape, and it has been formulated to encapsulate NMB into its cavity in an irreversible form . Sugammadex is used by anesthesiologists to achieve immediate reversal of an NMB with few side adverse effects. Recently, sugammadex was shown to induce neuronal apoptosis in primary cultures .
Due to its charge and high molecular weight (2178), it is thought that sugammadex cannot pass through the blood brain barrier (BBB) and placenta . However, it may cross the BBB more easily under different clinical conditions such as brain injury  and sepsis [7, 8] and in the immature central nervous system .
Volatile anesthetics can influence BBB opening and integrity in aged rats [10, 11] and in brain injury . Volatile anesthetics at clinical concentrations induced neuronal apoptosis and cognitive disorders in neonatal and aged rodents [13–19]. We previously studied neuronal apoptosis and cognitive dysfunction in mice with neonatal sevoflurane exposure [14, 19]. That neuronal damage was due to exposure of the immature central nervous system .
The developing brain is vulnerable to sevoflurane exposure [14, 15, 19]. We postulated that sugammadex coadministration with neonatal sevoflurane may exacerbate neuronal apoptosis due to changes in BBB integrity. Therefore, in this study, we investigated whether neonatal sevoflurane exposure altered the integrity of the BBB and whether the intraperitoneal administration of sugammadex enhanced the neuronal damage associated with neonatal 2% sevoflurane exposure.
2. Materials and Methods
The Animal Care and Use Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University approved the current study protocol (0160072A).
Postnatal day-5 C57BL/6 mice (males and females, mean body weight: 2.7 g) were purchased as a litter with their mother (SLC Japan, Shizuoka, Japan). The mice were housed under a 12 h light : dark cycle (lights on from 08:00 to 20:00), and room temperature was maintained at °C. The same number of pups from each litter was used for the experiments to reduce variability related to the use of different litters (total number of pups used is 48, same number of males and females). All mice had ad libitum access to water and food.
Pups from the same litter were divided randomly into four groups: (1) nonanesthesia (NA group, control mice), (2) sugammadex treatment (sugammadex group, in which mice received an intraperitoneal injection of sugammadex), (3) 2% sevoflurane exposure (SEVO group, in which mice received 2% sevoflurane for 6 h), and (4) sugammadex combined with sevoflurane (sugammadex + SEVO group, in which mice received 2% sevoflurane for 6 h and an intraperitoneal injection of sugammadex).
2.2. Anesthesia Treatment
Sevoflurane anesthesia was performed as described previously . Briefly, postnatal day-6 mice were placed in a humid chamber immediately after removal from the maternal cage. Sevoflurane (2%) was administered for 6 h with 40% oxygen as the carrying gas. Control mice were exposed to 40% oxygen. Total gas flow was 1 L/min.
2.3. Sugammadex Treatment
Sugammadex was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and injected intraperitoneally with a single 30 mg/kg dose. Injection volume was 10 μL. The same volume of PBS was administered to control animals. Sugammadex was administered intraperitoneally 30 min before induction with 2% sevoflurane anesthesia.
2.4. Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analysis of the forebrain protein lysate was performed as described previously . The forebrains were removed quickly after 6 h of sevoflurane anesthesia. Primary antibodies included anti-cleaved caspase-3 (#9661, rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), anti-cleaved poly[adenosine diphosphate-ribose] polymerase (PARP) (#9544, rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-β-actin (AC-15, mouse monoclonal, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Secondary antibodies included horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked anti-rabbit IgG (ab98493, donkey polyclonal, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and HRP-linked anti-mouse IgG (NA9310, sheep, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, England). A mouse β-actin antibody was used as the loading control. The protein bands were visualized using a chemiluminescence detection system (SuperSignal West Pico; Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).
Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously . The tissues were perfused after 6 h of sevoflurane anesthesia. Briefly, vibratome sections (50 μm thick) were washed with PBS containing 0.3% Triton X-100, and endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 1% H2O2 applied for 30 min. Next, the sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-cleaved caspase-3 (#9661, rabbit polyclonal, Cell Signaling Technology) diluted in 1% blocking reagent (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in TBS/Tween 20. Secondary antibodies included HRP-linked anti-rabbit IgG (ab98493, donkey polyclonal, Abcam).
Cleaved caspase-3 signal was visualized with a DAB-nickel substrate (0.05% DAB, 0.05% NiSO4, 0.015% H2O2, 0.05% 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.7). The sections were mounted on slides and counterstained with hematoxylin.
2.6. Evaluation of BBB Integrity
The tissues were perfused with freshly prepared paraformaldehyde (4%) and glutaraldehyde (2.5%) after 6 h of sevoflurane anesthesia. The brains were removed and the hippocampus CA1 region was cut and stored in the same fixative overnight at 4°C. After dehydration through a graded methanol series, the brain regions were embedded in Epon 812 and polymerized overnight at 60°C. Ultrathin (90 nm) sections were cut with a microtome, double stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate according to standard procedures , and examined by transmission electron microscopy (H-7100; Hitachi, Ibaragi, Japan).
2.7. Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The protein expression levels detected by Western blot analysis are expressed as a percentage of the control (NA group). The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software package (SPSS ver. 24.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test was used for comparisons. value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3.1. Ultrastructure of the BBB
In the control group, the ultrastructure of the capillaries was continuous and integrated (Figure 1(a)), and the endothelial and perivascular spaces were normal. In comparison, the ultrastructural integrity of the BBB appeared to be disrupted, and the perivascular spaces were enlarged after 6 h of sevoflurane exposure (Figure 1(b)). In summary, 2% sevoflurane exposure for 6 h led to disruption of BBB ultrastructure in P6 mice.
Neonatal sevoflurane exposure for 6 h increased the concentration of cleaved caspase-3 (Figures 2(a) and 3) and another apoptosis marker, cleaved PARP (Figure 2(b)), compared with controls in P6 mice immediately after exposure. Sugammadex alone did not cause neuronal apoptosis. Interestingly, the intraperitoneal administration of sugammadex significantly enhanced neuronal apoptosis associated with neonatal 2% sevoflurane exposure (Figures 2 and 3). The increase in apoptosis was robust, and the apoptotic response to combined sugammadex and 2% sevoflurane exposure followed the pattern reported for other anesthetic drugs and ethanol [13–15, 22].
Exposure to 2% sevoflurane for 6 h resulted in BBB ultrastructural abnormalities in the hippocampus of neonatal mice. Furthermore, this study shows that the coadministration of sugammadex and sevoflurane to neonatal mice caused a significant increase in neuroapoptosis in the brain compared with exposure to 2% sevoflurane alone.
Sugammadex itself has no anesthetic effect and by itself did not cause neuronal apoptosis without neonatal sevoflurane exposure in this in vivo model. Volatile anesthetics can influence BBB opening and integrity in aged rats [10, 11]. In this study, we confirmed disruption of the BBB ultrastructure in neonatal mice exposed to sevoflurane. This study indicated that sugammadex passed through the BBB, which was disrupted by neonatal sevoflurane exposure, and that sugammadex induced neuronal apoptosis as seen in primary culture .
The sugammadex concentration achieved by intraperitoneal injection was slightly higher than that in clinical use in human patients (from 2 to 16 mg/kg, intravenous injection for humans). In this study, we chose 30 mg/kg because undiluted sugammadex could be used in most pups. Sugammadex is not metabolized and is eliminated only via the urine. Sevoflurane anesthesia is one of the most commonly used volatile anesthetics for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia during surgery. During surgery, including pediatric surgery, sugammadex is administered the anesthesiologist to reverse the NMB. Therefore, sugammadex and sevoflurane are present together during surgery. Nevertheless, because sugammadex forms a 1 : 1 complex with steroidal NMB drugs, most of the sugammadex remains free in the extracellular fluid. Sugammadex and sevoflurane might induce adverse effect on the brain.
We previously investigated neonatal sevoflurane neurotoxicity [14, 19] and found that 3% sevoflurane exposure for 6 h did not induce hypoxia or hypoventilation [14, 15]. Inhalation anesthetics show dose-dependent respiratory and circulatory depressive effects. Therefore, 2% sevoflurane is a safe concentration for both human children and mouse pups.
However, further study is required to investigate the mechanism by which sugammadex causes neuronal apoptosis. Palanca et al.  reported that sugammadex altered cholesterol homeostasis. Long-term memory impairment must be examined in a future study because we previously showed that high levels of apoptosis soon after anesthesia cause long-term memory impairment in adults [14, 19]. In addition, it will be necessary to investigate which concentrations of sugammadex and period of sevoflurane inhalation have the most harmful effects on the developing brain. Furthermore, it will be necessary to investigate measures to prevent neuronal apoptosis.
The results of this study suggest that sugammadex coadministered with neonatal sevoflurane exposure enhances neuronal apoptosis. Exposure to 2% sevoflurane for 6 h resulted in BBB ultrastructural abnormalities in the hippocampus of neonatal mice.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Maiko Satomoto conceived and designed the experiments; Maiko Satomoto and Zhongliang Sun performed the experiments; Maiko Satomoto and Zhongliang Sun analyzed the data; Yushi U. Adachi performed the statistical analysis; Maiko Satomoto wrote the manuscript; and all authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and editing the manuscript. Maiko Satomoto and Zhongliang Sun contributed equally to this work.
The authors thank Yuriko Sakamaki, Ayako Mimata, and Shizuko Ichinose (Research Center for Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan) for preparation of the specimens and technical assistance with transmission electron microscopy, Ayumi Sakata (Diversity Diamond Unit, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan) for her excellent technical help with this study, Masako Akiyama (URA, Research Administration Division, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan) for discussion about the statistical analysis, and Yukitoshi Izumi (Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, MO, USA) for discussion about this study. This work was supported by the Program for Women Researchers from the Tokyo Medical and Dental University in 2016, funded by “Initiative for Realizing Diversity in the Research Environment,” from MEXT, Japan, and The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan; Grants no. 16K10928.
W. T. Nicholson, J. Sprung, and C. J. Jankowski, “Sugammadex: a novel agent for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade,” Pharmacotherapy, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1181–1188, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Naguib, “Sugammadex: another milestone in clinical neuromuscular pharmacology,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 575–581, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Chambers, M. Paulden, F. Paton et al., “Sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular block after rapid sequence intubation: a systematic review and economic assessment,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 568–575, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Palanca, D. Aguirre-Rueda, M. V. Granell et al., “Sugammadex, a neuromuscular blockade reversal agent, causes neuronal apoptosis in primary cultures,” International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1278–1285, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. T. Farrar, Meeting of the Anesthetic and Life Support Drugs FDA Advisory Committee, Sugammadex, Silver Spring, Md, USA, 2008.
B. Obermeier, R. Daneman, and R. M. Ransohoff, “Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1584–1596, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Y. Deng, M. Fang, G. F. Zhu, Y. Zhou, and H. K. Zeng, “Role of microglia in the pathogenesis of sepsis-associated encephalopathy,” CNS and Neurological Disorders—Drug Targets, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 720–725, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Esen, T. Erdem, D. Aktan et al., “Effect of magnesium sulfate administration on blood-brain barrier in a rat model of intraperitoneal sepsis: a randomized controlled experimental study,” Critical Care, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. R18–R23, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. R. Saunders, G. W. Knott, and K. M. Dziegielewska, “Barriers in the immature brain,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–40, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hu, D. Guo, H. Wang et al., “Involvement of the blood-brain barrier opening in cognitive decline in aged rats following orthopedic surgery and high concentration of sevoflurane inhalation,” Brain Research, vol. 1551, pp. 13–24, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cao, C. Ni, Z. Li et al., “Isoflurane anesthesia results in reversible ultrastructure and occludin tight junction protein expression changes in hippocampal blood-brain barrier in aged rats,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 587, pp. 51–56, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Thal, C. Luh, E.-V. Schaible et al., “Volatile anesthetics influence blood-brain barrier integrity by modulation of tight junction protein expression in traumatic brain injury,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, article e50752, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Jevtovic-Todorovic, R. E. Hartman, Y. Izumi et al., “Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 876–882, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
M. Satomoto, Y. Satoh, K. Terui et al., “Neonatal exposure to sevoflurane induces abnormal social behaviors and deficits in fear conditioning in Mice,” Anesthesiology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 628–637, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kodama, Y. Satoh, Y. Otsubo et al., “Neonatal desflurane exposure induces more robust neuroapoptosis than do isoflurane and sevoflurane and impairs working memory,” Anesthesiology, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 979–991, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W.-X. Xiong, G.-X. Zhou, B. Wang et al., “Impaired spatial learning and memory after sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia in aged rats is associated with down-regulated cAMP/CREB signaling,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79408, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-M. Li, F. Su, M.-H. Ji et al., “Disruption of hippocampal neuregulin 1-ErbB4 signaling contributes to the hippocampus-dependent cognitive impairment induced by isoflurane in aged mice,” Anesthesiology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 79–88, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Luo, L. Yang, X. Chen, and S. Li, “Tau hyperphosphorylation: a downstream effector of isoflurane-induced neuroinflammation in aged rodents,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 94–96, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Sun, M. Satomoto, Y. U. Adachi, H. Kinoshita, K. Makita, and H. F. Galley, “Inhibiting NADPH oxidase protects against long-term memory impairment induced by neonatal sevoflurane exposure in mice,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 80–86, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Edwards, H. P. Shah, W. Cao, N. Gravenstein, C. N. Seubert, and A. E. Martynyuk, “Bumetanide alleviates epileptogenic and neurotoxic effects of sevoflurane in neonatal rat brain,” Anesthesiology, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 567–575, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ichinose, T. Muneta, H. Koga et al., “Morphological differences during in vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-, synovium-MSCs, and chondrocytes,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 210–221, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. F. Wozniak, R. E. Hartman, M. P. Boyle et al., “Apoptotic neurodegeneration induced by ethanol in neonatal mice is associated with profound learning/memory deficits in juveniles followed by progressive functional recovery in adults,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 403–414, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar