AIDS Research and Treatment

AIDS Research and Treatment / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 740545 |

Mark L. Rubinstein, D. Robert Harris, Bret J. Rudy, Bill G. Kapogiannis, Grace M. Aldrovandi, Kathleen Mulligan, "Exploration of the Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Metabolic Measures in Young People Living with HIV", AIDS Research and Treatment, vol. 2014, Article ID 740545, 8 pages, 2014.

Exploration of the Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Metabolic Measures in Young People Living with HIV

Academic Editor: Robert R. Redfield
Received18 Mar 2014
Revised30 May 2014
Accepted08 Jun 2014
Published09 Jul 2014


We conducted cross-sectional, multicenter studies in HIV-positive young women and men to assess metabolic and morphologic complications from tobacco smoking in 372 behaviorally infected HIV-positive youth, aged 14–25 years. Measurements included self-reported tobacco use, fasting lipids, glucose, fat distribution, and bone mineral density (BMD; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans). Overall, 144 (38.7%) self-reported smoking tobacco and 69 (47.9%) of these reported smoking greater than five cigarettes per day. Smokers versus nonsmokers had lower mean total cholesterol (146.0 versus 156.1 mg/dL; ) and lower mean total body fat percent (24.1% versus 27.2%, ). There was no difference between smokers and nonsmokers in fasting glucose or BMD. There appear to be only minimal effects from tobacco smoking on markers of cardiac risk and bone health in this population of HIV-positive youth. While these smokers may not have had sufficient exposure to tobacco to detect changes in the outcome measures, given the long-term risks associated with smoking and HIV, it is critical that we encourage HIV-positive youth smokers to quit before the deleterious effects become apparent.

1. Introduction

Tobacco smoking is still the number one cause of preventable mortality in the United States (US) [1]. Unfortunately, the prevalence of smoking among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) is much greater than among the general population. In fact, it is estimated that 45% to 74% of adult PLWHA smoke [25], compared with 21% of the general population of US adults [6]. Furthermore, as PLWHA live longer, the morbidity and mortality associated with HIV infection has shifted towards heart disease and cancer, both of which are dramatically increased with tobacco smoking [7, 8]. Tobacco smoking is the most important modifiable lifestyle factor contributing to cardiovascular disease among HIV-positive patients [9].

One of the factors associated with the increase in cardiovascular risk among smokers is increased dyslipidemia [10, 11]. Tobacco smoking is also related to cardiovascular risk through its association with insulin resistance and impaired glucose tolerance [12, 13]. Of great importance to PLWHA, all of these cardiovascular effects may be further compounded by the fact that some of the medications used to manage HIV, including protease inhibitors, are associated with increased lipid levels and the development of impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance [14].

In addition to its effects on cardiovascular risk factors [10], tobacco smoking is also associated with increased risk of bone fracture in both HIV-negative [15] and HIV-positive populations [16]. The association between tobacco use and bone mineral density (BMD) is influenced by both dose and duration of smoking [1720]. In fact, tobacco smoking is a risk factor for osteoporotic fractures, independent of body mass and of BMD [20]. Similar to the cardiovascular risk factors discussed above, HIV and some of the medications used to manage it have also been associated with a reduced BMD [21, 22]; thus smoking may compound these effects.

Although studies in adults provide evidence that smoking is associated with markers of accelerated risk for cardiovascular disease and decreased bone mass, it is uncertain whether these abnormalities are found in adolescents and young adult smokers. More importantly, HIV itself, as well as many of the medications used to treat HIV, is also associated with these same metabolic complications in HIV-infected youth and, as such, the combination of smoking and HIV may be even more damaging. This analysis aims to examine the effects of smoking on the lipid, glucose, and bone density profiles of adolescent and young adult smokers with HIV/AIDS, using merged data collected in two studies of the metabolic effects of HIV infection and its therapies in adolescents and young adults.

2. Methods

2.1. Subjects

Studies were conducted at 18 clinical sites on behalf of the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN). Separate cross-sectional surveys were conducted in young women (ATN study 021a [23]) and young men (ATN study 021b [22]) to assess metabolic and morphologic complications in behaviorally HIV-positive youth, aged 14–25 years. Eligible youth were recruited consecutively from the clinic populations. All clinical sites were located in urban areas. The data obtained from these two surveys were combined for this analysis. In the original studies, participants were classified on the basis of current antiretroviral therapy (ART) as follows: antiretroviral naïve (); receiving an ART regimen that contained a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) but no protease inhibitor (PI) for 3 months (); receiving an ART regimen that included a PI but no NNRTI for 3 months (); or receiving a non-PI/non-NNRTI containing regimen for 3 months (, all female). Those included in the non-PI groups must have had no more than 6 months exposure to a PI in total and none in the preceding year; those in the non-NNRTI groups must have had no more than 6 months total exposure to an NNRTI and none in the preceding year. All participants had acquired HIV infection through risk behavior, were Tanner stage 4 or 5, and had accessible medical and medication histories. Exclusion criteria from both studies included type 1 diabetes mellitus and use of androgens or systemic glucocorticoids. Women were required to have a negative pregnancy test at the time of study unless surgically sterilized.

2.2. Informed Consent

The research design and procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards at each clinical site. Appropriate written informed consent/assent was obtained before enrollment.

2.3. Experimental Procedures

Fasting (8 hours) blood samples were collected for determination of lipids, glucose, insulin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Participants then underwent a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test, with consumption of a 75-gram glucose load and collection of samples for measurement of glucose and insulin. Height and weight were measured following standard protocols. Separate dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the left hip, spine, and whole body were performed with central analysis at Tufts University by readers who were blinded to ART regimen. Machine-generated Z-scores (using sex-specific standard deviations adjusted for race/ethnicity and age) for spine (L1-L4) and hip BMD were used. Z-scores for total body bone mineral content (BMC) were calculated using norms developed at Baylor University [24]. Total and regional fat and lean body mass (LBM) were obtained from the whole-body DXA scans and normalized for height squared.

All participants underwent detailed medical and health histories, including current and previous drug use. Dietary intake, alcohol use, and exercise and smoking habits were assessed using the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire (NutritionQuest, Berkeley, CA). Current tobacco use was queried in the Food Frequency Questionnaire as follows: the participant was first asked “do you smoke cigarettes now”; if the answer was “yes,” the questionnaire then asked “on average about how many cigarettes a day do you smoke now,” with answers categorized as “1–5, 6–14, 15–24, 25–34, and 35 or more.”

2.4. Laboratory Analyses

HIV-1 RNA levels (Roche AMPLICOR v1.5 assay) and CD4 T-cell counts were measured locally at each site. All other laboratory samples were batched at the end of each study and analyzed at Quest Diagnostics, Baltimore, MD, and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, Chantilly, VA. Total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by enzymatic techniques, and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was calculated in those with triglyceride levels <400 mg/dL [25]. Specimens for glucose determination, which were collected on sodium fluoride/potassium oxalate, were assessed by the hexokinase technique. Serum insulin was measured by immunoassay and hsCRP was measured by a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay.

2.5. Data Analyses

Data collected from all HIV-positive participants in the parent studies were included in this analysis. The distribution of continuous measures according to smoking status was examined on the basis of means, standard deviations (SD), and medians, with values provided to assess the significance of the associations with smoking status using Student’s two-sample -test. Frequencies and proportions are reported for categorical measures according to smoking status, with values obtained using Fisher’s exact test. In addition to examining associations of smoking status with metabolic and body habitus measures, associations of smoking status with other lifestyle factors, such as use of alcohol and recreational drugs, were explored.

Generalized linear regression modeling was used to examine the association of cigarette smoking with study outcomes, adjusting for covariates selected for inclusion in the model using a stepwise forward selection approach. Candidate covariates, including antiretroviral therapy type, were screened for possible inclusion in the modeling on the basis of their bivariable associations with smoking status, with an alpha level of ≤0.10 used for selection. Covariates whose distributions would pose problems for the modeling due to missing data or small cell sizes in the bivariable analyses were excluded from consideration. Covariates that are traditionally considered for adjustment (i.e., age, sex, race, and height) were included in the modeling regardless of the significance of their bivariable associations with smoking status. HIV-specific candidate covariates included HIV RNA, CD4 measures, CDC disease classification, and the type of ART regimen subjects who were receiving at the time of study enrollment, as well as whether or not their current ART regimen included ritonavir, a PI that has been widely associated with lipid abnormalities [14]. The modeling also considered individual substance use, including use of alcohol, cannabinoids (marijuana or hash), and stimulants (cocaine, crack, amphetamine sulphate, methamphetamine, or other stimulants). The possibility of a dose-response relationship between the average number of cigarettes smoked per day and the study outcomes was also explored in the modeling by separating tobacco users into those who reported smoking ≤5 cigarettes/day and those reporting >5 cigarettes/day. Data from one participant who was using a statin were excluded from the modeling analyses.

3. Results

In this population of HIV-positive participants, 144 (38.7%) self-reported smoking tobacco, and 69 (47.9%) of these reported smoking greater than 5 cigarettes per day (CPD). Demographic and HIV disease-related characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. Reported time since first HIV-positive diagnosis did not differ significantly between smokers and nonsmokers (). However, smokers had a significantly higher mean log10 viral load (HIV RNA level), and a smaller proportion of the smokers had HIV RNA ≤400 copies/mL ( for both measures). Mean CD4 T lymphocyte counts did not differ significantly between smokers and nonsmokers (). There were no significant differences between groups in use of different classes of antiretroviral therapies ().

VariableSmokers ( )Nonsmokers ( ) value1

Age in years: mean (SD)21.6 (2.0)20.8 (2.3)<0.001
Race: (%)
 Black/African American 89 (62.7)168 (74.3)0.05
 White 19 (13.4)17 (7.5)
 Other/mixed race 34 (23.9)41 (18.1)
Hispanic ethnicity: (%)38 (26.4)48 (21.1)0.26
Years since HIV-positive diagnosis: mean (SD)2.5 (2.2)2.2 (2.0)0.30
Current log10 viral load (copies/mL): mean (SD)3.4 (1.0)3.2 (1.1)0.02
Current viral load ≤400 copies/mL: (%)49 (34.5)109 (48.2)0.01
Current CD4 count (cells/mm3): mean (SD)495 (273)536 (319)0.18
Current antiretroviral use by drug class: (%)
 ART-naive84 (58.3)106 (46.5)0.17
 NNRTI, no PI27 (18.8)59 (25.9)
 PI, no NNRTI27 (18.8)51 (22.4)
 Non-PI, non-NNRTI26 (4.2)12 (5.3)
Use alcohol: (%)123 (85.4)136 (59.6)<0.001
Use marijuana, hash: (%)120 (83.3)95 (41.7)<0.001
Use crack: (%)6 (4.2)3 (1.3)0.09
Use cocaine: (%)43 (29.9)18 (7.9)<0.001
Use methamphetamine: (%)20 (13.9)10 (4.4)0.002
Exercise regularly: (%)61 (42.4)98 (43.0)0.91

SD = standard deviation.
1 values obtained from Student’s -test for continuous measures and Fisher’s exact test for categorical measures.
2This antiretroviral drug class was used only in the study of females.
3.1. Lifestyle

Use of alcohol, cannabinoids, cocaine, and methamphetamines was reported significantly more frequently by smokers than nonsmokers (). Less than half of smokers and nonsmokers reported regularly exercising (42.4 versus 43.0%, resp.; ).

3.2. Fasting Lipids

Mean total cholesterol was significantly lower among smokers than nonsmokers (146.0 versus 156.1 mg/dL; ) (Table 2). These results remained significant after adjusting for possible confounders (). HDL cholesterol tended to be lower in smokers, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance in the unadjusted () or adjusted () analyses. The mean level of LDL cholesterol was similar between smokers and nonsmokers (). Mean non-HDL cholesterol levels were also significantly lower in smokers than nonsmokers (107.2 versus 114.0 mg/dL; ). These results were not significant after adjusting for relevant confounders.

Metabolic factorSmokers
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)
Unadjusted value1Adjusted value2

Total cholesterol (mg/dL)146.0 (29.5)
156.1 (33.4)
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)61.9 (34.7)
68.8 (35.6)
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)64.1 (28.8)
66.9 (31.6)
Non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)107.2 (27.4)
114.0 (33.0)
Triglycerides (mg/dL)100.0 (53.3)
98.8 (63.3)
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)88.5 (7.5)
88.2 (8.1)
2-hour glucose (mg/dL)87.8 (26.5)
93.0 (24.0)
Fasting insulin (µIU/mL)9.4 (7.4)
10.6 (11.3)
2-hour insulin (µIU/mL)42.4 (46.5)
49.6 (46.4)
hsCRP (mg/dL)3.50 (6.52)
2.96 (5.91)
BMI (kg/m2)25.0 (6.5)
25.8 (6.2)
Total body fat percent24.1 (13.1)
27.2 (13.2)
Total body fat (kg/m2)6.4 (5.1)
7.3 (5.0)
Trunk fat (kg/m2)3.0 (2.5)
3.4 (2.5)
Lower extremity (leg) fat (kg/m2)2.4 (2.1)
2.9 (2.1)
Total lean body mass (kg/m2)17.3 (2.5)
17.3 (2.5)

SD = standard deviation.
1 values obtained from Student’s -test.
2 values obtained from generalized linear regression modeling; smoking status, race, height, gender, and age at enrollment were included in all of the models, regardless of their significance, while current antiretroviral regimen and current use of marijuana, stimulants, or alcohol were included only if they contributed significantly to the model.
3.3. Fasting Glucose/Insulin

Mean fasting glucose levels were similar between smokers and nonsmokers. The 2-hour glucose was lower in smokers, although only of borderline significance in the adjusted model (87.8 versus 93.0 mg/dL; ) (Table 2). Similarly, there was no difference in mean fasting insulin or 2-hour insulin levels for smokers compared to nonsmokers ().

3.4. Body Composition/Bone Mass

Adjusting for covariates, mean body mass index (BMI) was similar in smokers and nonsmokers (25.0 versus 25.8 kg/m2; ). However, differences in body composition were noted. Mean total body fat percent was significantly lower in smokers (24.1% versus 27.2%; ); this difference persisted with adjustment for relevant confounders (). Most of this difference appears to be related to lower extremity fat where smokers had 2.4 compared with 2.9 kg/m2 in nonsmokers ( in unadjusted and adjusted analyses). Considering the number of cigarettes smoked per day (Table 3), the difference in mean total body fat percent among smoking categories was only of borderline significance (), yet pairwise comparisons indicated that the mean level was significantly lower among those who smoked an average of 5 or fewer cigarettes per day than among nonsmokers (23.0% versus 27.2%; ). Lean body mass did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers in either the unadjusted or adjusted analyses (Table 2). There were no differences between smokers and nonsmokers in any measure of BMD or BMC (, data not shown).

Outcome measure≤5 CPD
Mean (SD)
>5 CPD
Mean (SD)
Mean (SD)

HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)60.5 (33.9)
63.1 (35.8)
68.7 (35.6)
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)65.0 (28.1)
63.1 (29.6)
67.0 (31.6)
Non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)105.7 (28.6)
108.5 (26.5)
114.0 (33.1)
Triglycerides (mg/dL)97.4 (50.7)
102.5 (56.8)
98.8 (63.5)
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)88.4 (8.0)
88.9 (6.8)
88.2 (8.1)
2-hour glucose (mg/dL)85.8 (26.1)
90.3 (27.2)
93.1 (24.0)
Fasting insulin (µIU/mL)9.0 (6.5)
9.8 (8.4)
10.6 (11.3)
2-hour insulin (µIU/mL)46.9 (57.0)
38.5 (33.1)
49.8 (46.5)
hsCRP (mg/dL)2.8 (5.9)
4.3 (7.2)
3.0 (5.9)
BMI (kg/m2)24.6 (6.5)
25.5 (6.6)
25.8 (6.2)
Total body fat percent23.0 (12.6)* 
25.3 (13.7)
27.2 (13.2)
Total body fat (kg/m2)6.0 (4.7)
6.9 (5.5)
7.3 (5.0)
Trunk fat (kg/m2)2.7 (2.3)
3.3 (2.7)
3.4 (2.5)
Lower extremity fat (kg/m2)2.4 (2.0)
2.5 (2.3)
2.9 (2.1)
Total body lean (kg/m2)17.3 (2.4)
17.4 (2.7)
17.3 (2.5)

SD = standard deviation.
1 values obtained from generalized linear regression modeling (GLM).
*Significantly different compared to nonsmokers ( ).

4. Discussion

We examined the effects of tobacco smoking on markers of cardiovascular and bone health among a sample of behaviorally infected young HIV-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Although total cholesterol was lower among smokers, much of this difference may have been accounted for by the lowering of HDL cholesterol. In fact, similar to findings in adult tobacco smokers [26, 27], we found a trend toward lower HDL cholesterol among this group of young smokers, albeit of borderline significance. Roughly half of these smokers smoked fewer than 5 CPD and, given their age, had likely been smoking for fewer years than many of those included in the adult studies, which may account for the weak association of smoking with HDL cholesterol in our study population.

This group of young smokers had a lower total body fat percentage and less leg fat than nonsmokers. Studies in adults typically report lower BMI in smokers and increases in weight and fat with smoking cessation [2830]. Some studies in adults have suggested that smoking is associated with a pattern of central adiposity, based on higher waist circumferences and lower hip circumferences [28, 29]. Using DXA, a more sensitive measure of fat distribution, we observed no significant difference between smokers and nonsmokers in central (trunk) fat but significantly lower leg fat. These observations could reflect a relative preservation of central fat among HIV-positive young smokers. DXA cannot distinguish between intra-abdominal and subcutaneous fat in the trunk region, so we cannot exclude the possibility that smokers and nonsmokers may differ with regard to intra-abdominal fat.

Unlike findings reported in adult smokers [12, 13], there did not appear to be any difference in glucose tolerance or insulin resistance in these adolescent and young adult smokers, even after adjusting for possible confounders. We also did not find appreciable differences in bone mass between smokers and nonsmokers. As with the lipid findings, it is possible that these youth had not had sufficient exposure to tobacco smoking to adversely affect their glucose and insulin profiles or their bone density.

Taken together, our findings suggest that tobacco smoking has had little to no effect on the metabolic and bone density profiles of these youth. Whether or not this is due to the lower cumulative exposure to tobacco smoke compared with the older smokers reported in the adult studies is uncertain. Clearly longitudinal studies with greater exposure to tobacco are required to examine these parameters over time. However, given the known risks of tobacco smoking and the combined effects of HIV and smoking observed in studies in adults, there are notable implications for secondary prevention of such long-term untoward effects among this young population facing a long life with HIV, its therapies, and associated comorbidities. Our results provide an opportunity to capitalize on the potential long-term benefits that could be achieved by targeting HIV-infected smoking youth with efficacious smoking cessation interventions, early in this window in which there is little evidence that any appreciable harm has already occurred. Offering HIV-infected youth information on the combined risk from smoking and HIV, along with noting the fact that there is still time to make lifestyle changes (i.e., quit smoking) before significant damage is done, may prove a powerful motivator.

Limitations. A potential limitation of our study is that we relied on self-reported smoking status. However, prior data from a similar sample of HIV-positive adolescents showed a high concordance between self-report and cotinine, a biomarker of tobacco exposure [31]. We did not collect data on years from initiation of cigarette smoking and so we cannot make inferences about the duration of smoking on the metabolic profile of HIV-positive tobacco smokers. As such, the apparent lack of effects of tobacco smoking on the metabolic profiles of these participants may reflect a relatively limited exposure to tobacco. It is also possible that some of the differences observed would become more pronounced over time. All clinical sites were located in large urban areas, so these results may not be representative of HIV-infected youth in general. Finally, although we did not have data on actual CPD smoked, but rather a less precise measure of smoking categories (i.e., ≤5 CPD, 6–14 CPD, 15–24 CPD, 25–34 CPD, and ≥35 CPD), the trends observed from using the smoking categories suggest that there is little dose-response effect from tobacco on these young smokers.

5. Conclusion

In summary, there appear to be only minimal effects from tobacco smoking on markers of cardiac risk and bone health in this population of HIV-positive youth. It may be that these HIV-positive smokers had not had sufficient exposure to tobacco to detect significant changes. However, given the long-term risks associated with smoking and the likely compounding effects of HIV and treatments for HIV, it is critical that we find effective targeted interventions to encourage HIV-positive youth smokers to quit smoking before the deleterious effects become apparent.

Conflict of Interests

All authors reported no conflict of interests.


This work was supported by The Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN) from the National Institutes of Health (U01 HD 040533 and U01 HD 040474) through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (B. G. Kapogiannis, R. Hazra, and C. Worrell), with supplemental funding from the National Institutes on Drug Abuse (N. Borek) and Mental Health (P. Brouwers, S. Allison). Additional support for this study was provided at four of the participating sites by Grants from the National Center for Research Resources and Clinical and Translational Science Awards, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services as follows: Children’s National Medical Center, M01RR020359; University of Maryland School of Medicine, M01 RR165001; University of Pennsylvania/Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, NCRRUL1-RR-024134; and University of California, San Francisco, UL1 RR024131. The Tulane University Health Sciences Center utilized its Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTRC) for the study; the center was supported in whole or in part by funds provided through the Louisiana Board of Regents RC/EEP (RC/EEP-06). The study was scientifically reviewed by the ATN’s Therapeutic Leadership Group. Network, scientific, and logistical support was provided by the ATN Coordinating Center (C. Wilson, C. Partlow) at The University of Alabama in Birmingham. Network operations and analytic support was provided by the ATN Data and Operations Center at Westat (J. Korelitz, B. Driver). The authors acknowledge the contribution of the other ATN 021A and 021B protocol team members (P. Emmanuel, J. Sleasman, C. Worrell, R. Fielding, D. Monte, S. Stoszek, D. S. Hardin, W. A. Meyer III, C. M. Wilson, and N. Liu) and investigators and staff at the following sites that participated and enrolled subjects into this study: Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA; Children’s Diagnostic and Treatment Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL; Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, CA; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Children’s Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL; Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC; John H. Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County and the Ruth M. Rothstein CORE Center, Chicago, IL; Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY; Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA; University of California at San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, CA; University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL; University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR; and University of South Florida, Tampa, FL; The authors thank Justin Wheeler and Andrea Miller at the Body Composition Analysis Center at Tufts University, who read the DXA scans and tabulated the data. The investigators are particularly indebted to the youth who participated in the ATN 021 studies.


  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 1997–2001,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 54, no. 25, pp. 625–628, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  2. J. E. Burkhalter, C. M. Springer, R. Chhabra, J. S. Ostroff, and B. D. Rapkin, “Tobacco use and readiness to quit smoking in low-income HIV-infected persons,” Nicotine and Tobacco Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 511–522, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. R. Gritz, D. J. Vidrine, A. B. Lazev, B. C. Amick III, and R. C. Arduino, “Smoking behavior in a low-income multiethnic HIV/AIDS population,” Nicotine and Tobacco Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. M. Mamary, D. Bahrs, and S. Martinez, “Cigarette smoking and the desire to quit among individuals living with HIV,” AIDS Patient Care and STDs, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. S. Webb, P. A. Vanable, M. P. Carey, and D. C. Blair, “Cigarette smoking among HIV+ men and women: examining health, substance use, and psychosocial correlates across the smoking spectrum,” Journal of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 371–383, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. “Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2006,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 56, no. 44, pp. 1157–1161, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  7. C. Lewden, D. Salmon, P. Morlat et al., “Causes of death among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: Emerging role of hepatitis and cancers, persistent role of AIDS,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. J. Palella Jr., R. K. Baker, A. C. Moorman et al., “Mortality in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: changing causes of death and disease in the HIV outpatient study,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Grinspoon and A. Carr, “Cardiovascular risk and body-fat abnormalities in HIV-infected adults,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 48–62, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. L. Benowitz, “Cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology and implications for treatment,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 91–111, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. Frey, D. D. Waters, D. A. Demicco et al., “Impact of smoking on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary disease receiving contemporary medical therapy (from the treating to new targets [TNT] and the incremental decrease in end points through aggressive lipid lowering [IDEAL] trials),” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. C. Frati, F. Iniestra, and C. R. Ariza, “Acute effect of cigarette smoking on glucose tolerance and other cardiovascular risk factors,” Diabetes Care, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 112–118, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Attvall, J. Fowelin, I. Lager, H. von Schenck, and U. Smith, “Smoking induces insulin resistance—a potential link with the insulin resistance syndrome,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 233, no. 4, pp. 327–332, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Grunfeld, D. P. Kotler, D. K. Arnett et al., “Contribution of metabolic and anthropometric abnormalities to cardiovascular disease risk factors,” Circulation, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. e20–e28, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. P. Dimai and M. Chandran, “Official Positions for FRAX clinical regarding smoking from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 190–193, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. A. Womack, J. L. Goulet, C. Gibert et al., “Increased risk of fragility fractures among HIV infected compared to uninfected male veterans,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 2, Article ID e17217, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. M. Vogel, J. W. Davis, A. Nomura, R. D. Wasnich, and P. D. Ross, “The effects of smoking on bone mass and the rates of bone loss among elderly Japanese-American men,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1495–1501, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. H. Bjarnason and C. Christiansen, “The influence of thinness and smoking on bone loss and response to hormone replacement therapy in early postmenopausal women,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 590–596, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Tamaki, M. Iki, Y. Fujita et al., “Impact of smoking on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in elderly men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) study,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. V. Yoon, N. M. Maalouf, and K. Sakhaee, “The effects of smoking on bone metabolism,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 2081–2092, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Anastos, D. Lu, Q. Shi et al., “The association of bone mineral density with HIV infection and antiretroviral treatment in women,” Antiviral Therapy, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1049–1058, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  22. K. Mulligan, D. R. Harris, P. Emmanuel et al., “Low bone mass in behaviorally HIV-infected young men on antiretroviral therapy: adolescent trials network study 021B,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 461–468, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Mulligan, D. R. Harris, D. Monte et al., “Obesity and dyslipidemia in behaviorally HIV-infected young women: adolescent trials network study 021,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 106–114, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. J. Ellis, R. J. Shypailo, D. S. Hardin et al., “Z score prediction model for assessment of bone mineral content in pediatric diseases,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1658–1664, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. W. T. Friedewald, R. I. Levy, and D. S. Fredrickson, “Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 499–502, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  26. W. Y. Craig, G. E. Palomaki, and J. E. Haddow, “Cigarette smoking and serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations: an analysis of published data,” British Medical Journal, vol. 298, no. 6676, pp. 784–788, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. H. Criqui, R. B. Wallace, G. Heiss, M. Mishkel, G. Schonfeld, and G. T. Jones, “Cigarette smoking and plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study.,” Circulation, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. IV70–IV76, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  28. D. Canoy, N. Wareham, R. Luben et al., “Cigarette smoking and fat distribution in 21,828 british men and women: a population-based study,” Obesity Research, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1466–1475, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Akbartabartoori, M. E. J. Lean, and C. R. Hankey, “Relationships between cigarette smoking, body size and body shape,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 236–243, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Kleppinger, M. D. Litt, A. M. Kenny, and C. A. Oncken, “Effects of smoking cessation on body composition in postmenopausal women,” Journal of Women's Health, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1651–1657, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. L. Nichols, A. Lowe, X. Zhang et al., “Concordance between self-reported substance use and toxicology among HIV-infected and uninfected at risk youth,” Drug and Alcohol Dependence, vol. 134, pp. 376–382, 2014. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Mark L. Rubinstein et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.