Prescribing Optimal Nutrition and Physical Activity as “First-Line” Interventions for Best Practice Management of Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation Associated with Osteoarthritis: Evidence Synthesis
Low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress underlie chronic osteoarthritis. Although best-practice guidelines for osteoarthritis emphasize self-management including weight control and exercise, the role of lifestyle behavior change to address chronic low-grade inflammation has not been a focus of first-line management. This paper synthesizes the literature that supports the idea in which the Western diet and inactivity are proinflammatory, whereas a plant-based diet and activity are anti-inflammatory, and that low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress underlying osteoarthritis often coexist with lifestyle-related risk factors and conditions. We provide evidence-informed recommendations on how lifestyle behavior change can be integrated into “first-line” osteoarthritis management through teamwork and targeted evidence-based interventions. Healthy living can be exploited to reduce inflammation, oxidative stress, and related pain and disability and improve patients’ overall health. This approach aligns with evidence-based best practice and holds the promise of eliminating or reducing chronic low-grade inflammation, attenuating disease progression, reducing weight, maximizing health by minimizing a patient’s risk or manifestations of other lifestyle-related conditions hallmarked by chronic low-grade inflammation, and reducing the need for medications and surgery. This approach provides an informed cost effective basis for prevention, potential reversal, and management of signs and symptoms of chronic osteoarthritis and has implications for research paradigms in osteoarthritis.
Best practice guidelines for chronic osteoarthritis focus on self-management, that is, weight control and physical activity, and on pharmacological support for inflammation and pain [1–5]. Despite such guidelines, authorities in the field report a lack of efficacy of current treatments and associated adverse effects , with some proposing even greater attention to self-management . Further, although low-grade inflammation underlies chronic osteoarthritis comparable to other conditions with significant lifestyle-related components often presenting concurrently with osteoarthritis, this inflammation has not been a focus of best practice guidelines, particularly of its nonpharmacologic management.
To establish the prescription of optimal nutrition and physical activity as ‘‘first-line’’ interventions for low-grade inflammation associated with chronic osteoarthritis, we have synthesized three primary lines of support: (1) the literature that supports that the western diet and inactive lifestyle are proinflammatory, and a plant-based diet and regular physical activity are anti-inflammatory; (2) the literature supporting that low-grade inflammation is common across lifestyle-related conditions including osteoarthritis; and (3) evidence-informed recommendations for effecting lifestyle behavior change that can be readily integrated by health practitioners into ‘‘first-line’’ management. We conclude with implications for clinical practice and research with respect to its paradigm and avenues for future investigation.
2. Low-Grade Inflammation and Lifestyle
Human lifestyles have changed dramatically over millennia. With technological and economic advancements in western countries particularly over the past 60 years, lifestyle-related conditions are the leading causes of premature death . With globalization, western diets coupled with inactivity have contributed largely to lifestyle-related conditions which are increasingly prevalent in middle- and low-income countries . Some authorities have not only argued that western diets have contributed to poor chronic health outcomes, but that national food guidelines such as those in the United States have legitimized poor nutrition for several decades further contributing to the pandemic of lifestyle-related conditions . In particular, poor nutritional quality has been reported to contribute to obesity , a primary risk factor for osteoarthritis , in addition to calorie density.
The factors associated with the typical western lifestyle that impact people’s health have been elucidated by cross-cultural studies including seminal work related to Mediterranean diet and exercise patterns and Asian lifestyles. The Mediterranean diet known to be health protective is largely plant based, favors olive oil over animal fats, and is high in fiber, vegetables, and fruits . The China study [19–22] is a prime example. This comprehensive series of studies has shown the serious health consequences of high consumption of meat, dairy, fat, and refined grains and sugar (proinflammatory), and low consumption of whole grains, vegetables and fruits, and legumes and pulses (anti-inflammatory). This unnatural diet for humans contributes to low-grade systemic inflammation and oxidative tissue stress and irritation, placing the immune system in an overactive state, a common denominator of conditions with lifestyle components including arthritis . Both high carbohydrate and high fat consumption contribute to inflammatory and oxidative stress even in healthy people . This effect could accentuate inflammatory conditions such as lowering the threshold for local inflammation in arthritis. Diet-induced weight loss in people who are overweight reduces chronic low-grade inflammation as evidenced by signification reduced C-reactive protein, an inflammation biomarker .
In addition, sedentary living and inactivity are hallmarks of western culture. Evidence supports that inactivity is proinflammatory and augments oxidative stress , whereas activity when not excessive is anti-inflammatory [26, 27]. More commonly understood about exercise, however, is that inactivity weakens muscles and contributes to joint stress, in addition to reducing stimulation of synovial fluid which cushions the joints and protects the joint spaces . Activity and exercise continue to be primarily recommended and prescribed to people with arthritis to offset these adverse effects. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise, however, have been well established, and that for maximal anti-inflammatory benefit, broad-based training needs to include resistance and aerobic training [26, 27, 29]. Exercise induced analgesia  and stiffness associated with osteoarthritis may reflect both its anti-inflammatory and mechanical effects; however, exercise’s anti-inflammatory effects are not discussed in established practice guidelines [1–5]. In sum, the western lifestyle is inherently unhealthy, and lifestyles with nonwestern diets and greater activity levels are typically associated with better health outcomes, for example, traditional Asian and Mediterranean lifestyles [18, 31].
Other lifestyle traits common in western culture are also known to be proinflammatory. Smoking, for example, remains prevalent despite some success in recent decades in reducing its prevalence through public health campaigns. The chronic low-grade inflammation associated with smoking [32, 33] has been linked with inflammatory states associated with ischemic heart disease , rheumatoid arthritis , and osteoarthritis . Low-grade inflammation has been associated with chronic sleep deprivation and stress [37–40] which are also common in western cultures. Given the well-documented link between low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress, and sleep deprivation and stress , a case can be made for assessing and addressing these in the initial assessment and in first-line management of chronic osteoarthritis. In addition, sleep deprivation and stress are common arthritic complaints secondary to discomfort and pain, lending further support for assessing sleep and stress in people with chronic osteoarthritis and intervening as indicated.
Thus, prescribing healthy living strategies in general as well as optimal nutrition (of which weight loss is an additional benefit) and regular physical activity are warranted as being first-line interventions in clinical practice guidelines for conditions such as osteoarthritis associated with chronic low-grade inflammation. These conditions are described in the next section and often coexist as comorbidities in people with osteoarthritis.
3. Low-Grade Inflammation and Lifestyle-Related Conditions Including Osteoarthritis
Figure 1 illustrates the interactive relationship among osteoarthritis, obesity, and physical inactivity. Obesity is an independent risk factor for osteoarthritis . Although the mechanisms for this association are not completely understood, biomechanical loading and metabolic inflammation associated with excess adipose tissue and lipids may have a role. Pain associated with osteoarthritis leads to increasingly less activity and psychosocial and physical disability. Physical inactivity is an independent risk factor for inflammation due to the reduced expression of systemic and cellular anti-inflammatory mediators. Physiologic cyclic loading of cartilage tissue reduces the expression of proinflammatory mediators and decreases cytokine-induced extracellular matrix degradation. Physical inactivity reduces daily energy expenditure thereby promoting weight gain and continuation of the cycle. Emerging evidence indicates that osteoarthritis likely impedes the management of chronic metabolic conditions associated with prolonged negative lifestyle habits such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease, because of its negative impact on physical activity.
Table 1 shows evidence for chronic low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress in people with osteoarthritis. Multiple comorbidities that share comparable underlying chronic low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress often coexist in individuals with chronic osteoarthritis, Examples of these conditions and synthesis of the evidence appear in Table 2, for example, atherosclerosis, chronic cancer, chronic obstructive lung disease, diabetes, hypertension, insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, ischemic heart disease, obesity, and stroke. Almost 20 percent of American adults report having physician-diagnosed arthritis, and this is expected to increase over the next two decades . Based on the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and National Health Interview Survey in the United States, individuals with osteoarthritis have a high incidence of other lifestyle-related conditions with inflammatory components that often present comorbidly with osteoarthritis (see examples in Table 2). Our search strategy used keywords including lifestyle-related conditions, chronic low-grade or chronic systemic inflammation. This synthesis of evidence reflects the literature indexed in established electronic data bases (MEDLINE and PubMed) and primarily published over the past five years. However, in several instances, important related work that was published earlier has been included in this evidence synthesis. The literature extracted represents a breadth of scholarly paradigms including clinical trials, cross-sectional population-based studies, experimental trials based on basic science and models and histological evidence, expert narrative reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, and systematic reviews.
Although the degree to which the typical western lifestyle explains the prevalence of osteoarthritis is unclear, maximizing healthy living may have the greatest potential for minimizing its risk, its impact, and long-term outcomes including life-long health and wellbeing compared with invasive interventions including drugs and surgery and their related sequelae and side effects.
Overweight is now considered a leading condition associated with marked inflammation followed by arthritis, heart disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus . The mechanism whereby overweight contributes to inflammation is reported to involve high fat content of the diet . Thus, promoting healthy weight through healthy nutrition in addition to regular physical activity and exercise is critically important to promote a maximally anti-inflammatory systemic environment to offset low-grade inflammation as well as to achieve weight loss.
4. Integration of Lifestyle Behavior Change into ‘‘First-Line’’ Management
For lifestyle behavior change to constitute ‘‘first-line’’ management as the literature would support, the health care team overall needs to share this goal and practice in partnership rather than in the conventional siloed care. The three primary health professions excluding, dentistry and pharmacy, include physicians, nurses, and physical therapists. Traditionally, physicians are highly trained in administration of invasive interventions, that is, drugs and surgery. Nurses have assumed a role in patient education over the years along with psychosocial considerations of patient care. Of the established health professions, physical therapy is the leading nonpharmacologic profession that is particularly well positioned to assume such an education role for patients related to healthy lifestyles and exercise [91, 92].
Consistent with the 21st century epidemiological trends, physical therapists are moving toward a model of care based on health (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) [91, 93], which includes initiating and supporting behavior change such as optimal nutrition, weight reduction, reduced sedentary activity, and increased physical activity. With respect to nutrition, basic assessment can be done and education undertaken regarding patients’ knowledge with the inflammatory characteristics of their diets and incorporating anti-inflammatory foods (see Table 3).
In addition, in the interest of best practice, as primary nonpharmacologic practitioners, contemporary physical therapists are integrating into practice health education including initiating and supporting smoking cessation, improved sleep hygiene, and stress management . Given that smoking, poor sleep, and stress are all associated with low-grade inflammation and hyperimmune response, team members such as nutritionists and health counselors could be used to greater advantage on the health care team to promote effective health education related to health behavior change. In acute conditions, such education needs to be introduced potentially with pharmacologic intervention to reduce inflammation and pain expediently. However, as the acute episode subsides and the condition stabilizes, medication needs to be reduced as much as possible, and perhaps completely, as health living practices take maximal effect.
The benefits of healthy living have no better been exemplified than in an elegant but simple study reported by Ford and colleagues . In their study of over 23,000 people between 35 and 65 years old, they reported that over an eight-year period, people who did not smoke; had a body mass index of less than 30 kg·m2; were physically active for at least 3.5 hours weekly; and ate healthily reduced their risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus by 93%, myocardial infarction by 81%, stroke by 50%, and cancer by 36%. Even if not all four health behaviors were present, risk of developing a chronic lifestyle-related condition decreased commensurate with an increase in the number of positive lifestyle factors. Furthermore, health-related quality of life increased with the number of healthy lifestyle behaviors that participants reported. In the process of conducting the present review of the literature, we identified no medication that was associated with such outcomes and such low risk of side effects, if any.
In the interest of best practice, healthy living recommendations need to be prescribed as uniquely for their direct effects on the pathoetiology of osteoarthritis, and prescribed as aggressively as first-line medications. Although general health recommendations are important for health promotion and disease prevention generally, the tenets of healthy living need to be systematically targeted to the patient’s signs and symptoms and prescribed accordingly including long-term followup and support. Not doing so deprives the patient of evidence-informed best practice osteoarthritis management and care.
Consistent with healthy living as a first-line approach, patients’ health behaviors need to be assessed in a measurable, reproducible, and standardized manner. In addition to questionnaires and self-reports, despite their limitations, inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein may be useful to objectively measure the effects of lifestyle behavior change rather than simply as an index of cardiovascular and diabetes risk [96–99].
To address the reports of health care practitioners about lack of knowledge and confidence to effect health behavior change, they have a range of evidence-based interventions at their disposal that are not time or resource intense [100–102]. In addition, the 5’s approach of behavior change, for example, has some evidence base and has been endorsed by the World Health Organization . Its simplicity makes it attractive to health professionals, that is, assess: evaluate behavior change status (and progress), advise: personally relevant behavioral recommendations, agree: set specific collaborative, feasible goals, assist: anticipate barriers, problem-solve solutions, and complete action plan, and arrange: schedule followup, contacts, and resources.
In the interest of best practice, lifestyle behaviors need to be systematically assessed in every patient and monitored across the health professions the patient is seeing. Healthy living recommendations need to be prescribed as uniquely for their direct effects on the pathoetiology of osteoarthritis as medications are, and as aggressively if first-line management is to truly reflect evidence-based practice. Although general recommendations are important for health promotion and disease prevention generally, healthy living recommendations must be systematically targeted to the patient’s signs and symptoms. In addition to integrating dietary and activity recommendations, smoking cessation, sleep hygiene, and stress reduction should be included in the interest of comprehensive effective care. Not doing so deprives the patient of best practice osteoarthritis management in relation to potential comorbidities that commonly present in this cohort.
5. Implications: Clinical and Research
The evidence supporting lifestyle behaviour change to address low-grade inflammation in people with osteoarthritis often with coexistent lifestyle-related risk factors and low-grade inflammatory conditions (specifically, anti-inflammatory nutritional regimens, and moderate physical activity) is unequivocal. The evidence is sufficiently compelling for related healthy living assessment and recommendations be a component of first-line best practice in the management of the signs and symptoms of people with osteoarthritis. Assessments need to include lifestyle profiles related to body mass index, waist girth, and waist-to-hip ratio; physical activity and exercise, as well as smoking, sleep patterns, and stress (as these three latter factors have also been reported to be proinflammatory). When quantified in standardized ways, these profiles can serve as clinical outcomes to assess health behavior change interventions. The health behaviour change literature has exploded over the past two decades, yet health professions report lack of confidence in effecting health behavior change in their patients, and lack of resources including time . Although much needs to be done, evidence-based interventions can be readily integrated into the framework of clinical practice and patient visits [101, 104], for example, brief advice, referral to others professionals, and followup). Physical therapists are particularly well positioned for initiating and supporting health behavior change in that patient visits tend to be prolonged and protracted over time, elements that are critical to effective long-term sustained health behavior change.
Studies are needed to examine the differentiating characteristics of those people with osteoarthritis who respond primarily to optimal nutrition and moderate physical activity, and those who do not. In addition, the elements of an anti-inflammatory nutrition regimen and moderate physical activity program need to be refined in terms of their prescriptive parameters, specifically, which elements should be a primary focus for which patients. Another line of studies is needed to examine the effect of such healthy lifestyle choices that increase inflammation threshold, on the need for medication and, if medication is indicated, how might its potency and dosage be reduced. The interactions among healthy lifestyle behaviors and pharmacokinetics need to be elucidated. Given that chronic systemic low-grade inflammation has been reported to be a common denominator of lifestyle-related conditions, studies are needed to establish the degree to which their risk factors and manifestations are reduced in people with chronic osteoarthritis whose first-line management includes prescribing optimal nutrition and physical activity for their anti-inflammatory effects. Furthermore, the impact of low-grade inflammation can be more far reaching than physical complaints alone, in that even healthy older adults report poorer health commensurate with level of inflammatory markers . Lastly, all indicators support that the approach to chronic progressive conditions such as osteoarthritis needs to be holistic and interprofessional . Research is needed to capture the breadth of this evidence-informed practice approach.
Based on the extant literature, exploitation of anti-inflammatory lifestyle behavior change as ‘‘first-line’’ intervention in the management of chronic osteoarthritis could well constitute best practice. Chronic low-grade inflammation that has been reported in chronic osteoarthritis is comparable to other lifestyle-related conditions supporting a common mechanism of action. Addressing chronic low-grade inflammation by focussing on lifestyle factors that contribute directly to it holds the promise of increasing a patient’s inflammatory threshold, reducing rate of disease progression, reducing weight, and maximizing health by minimizing a patient’s risk or manifestations of other lifestyle-related conditions. Even in part, such outcomes could minimize demands on physicians for short-term symptom reduction, and management of the patient’s comorbidity related to lifestyle-related conditions. ‘‘First-line’’ lifestyle interventions to address chronic low-grade inflammation provides an informed cost-effective basis for the 21st century prevention, potential reversal, and management of chronic osteoarthritis. Exploitation of such ‘‘first-line’’ intervention, however, needs to be a goal shared and supported by all healthcare team members.
M. C. Hochberg, R. D. Altman, K. T. April et al., “American College of Rheumatology 2012. Recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee,” Arthritis Care Research, vol. 64, pp. 465–474, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
N. E. Lane and J. M. Thompson, “Management of osteoarthritis in the primary-care setting: an evidence- based approach to treatment,” American Journal of Medicine A, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 25S–30S, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
Osteoarthritis, “National clinical guideline for care and management in adults,” The National Collaborative Centre for Chronic Conditions. Royal College of Physicians of London, http://bookshop.rcplondon.ac.uk/contents/pub242-66a1af7e-27ae-4121-bd84-6b503c80a64e.pdf, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
W. Zhang, G. Nuki, R. W. Moskowitz et al., “OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Part III: changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 476–499, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Barr and P. G. Conaghan, “Osteoarthritis: a holistic approach,” Clinical Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 153–155, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
N. Hairon, “New guidance on osteoarthritis focuses on patient education,” Nursing times, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 21–22, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
D. L. Cecil, K. Johnson, J. Rediske, M. Lotz, A. M. Schmidt, and R. Terkeltaub, “Inflammation-induced chondrocyte hypertrophy is driven by receptor for advanced glycation end products,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 12, pp. 8296–8302, 2005.View at: Google Scholar
J. Rojas-Rodríguez, L. E. Escobar-Linares, M. Garcia-Carrasco, R. O. Escárcega, S. Fuentes-Alexandro, and A. Zamora-Ustaran, “The relationship between the metabolic syndrome and energy-utilization deficit in the pathogenesis of obesity-induced osteoarthritis,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 860–868, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Smith, S. Triantafillou, A. Parker, P. P. Youssef, and M. Coleman, “Synovial membrane inflammation and cytokine production in patients with early osteoarthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 365–371, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
E. Dean, S. Al-Obaidi, A. D. de Andrade et al., “The first physical therapy summit on global health: implications and recommendations for the 21st century,” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 531–547, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Chronic Diseases, http://www.who.int/topics/chronic_diseases/en/, 2005.
P. Carrera-Bastos, M. Fontes-Villalba, J. H. O. Keefe, S. Lindeberg, and L. Cordain, “The western diet and lifestyle and diseases of civilization,” Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, vol. 2, pp. 15–35, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
G. Engström, M. Gerhardsson de Verdier, J. Rollof, P. M. Nilsson, and L. S. Lohmander, “C-reactive protein, metabolic syndrome and incidence of severe hip and knee osteoarthritis. A population-based cohort study,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 168–173, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. C. Campbell, “A study on diet, nutrition and disease in the People's Republic of China. Part I,” Boletin de la Asociacion Medica de Puerto Rico, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 132–134, 1990.View at: Google Scholar
T. C. Campbell and C. Junshi, “Diet and chronic degenerative diseases: perspectives from China,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 59, supplement 1, pp. 1153S–1153S, 1994.View at: Google Scholar
T. C. Campbell and T. M. Campbell, The China Study, Benbella Books, Dallas, Tex, USA, 2006.
T. C. Campbell, B. Parpia, and J. Chen, “Diet, lifestyle, and the etiology of coronary artery disease: the Cornell China Study,” American Journal of Cardiology B, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 18T–21T, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
B. J. Nicklas, W. Ambrosius, S. P. Messier et al., “Diet-induced weight loss, exercise, and chronic inflammation in older, obese adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 544–551, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
M. Gleeson, N. C. Bishop, D. J. Stensel, M. R. Lindley, S. S. Mastana, and M. A. Nimmo, “The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 607–615, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Exercise helps ease arthritis pain and stiffness, http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/arthritis/AR00009, 2012.
N. P. Walsh, M. Gleeson, R. J. Shephard et al., “Position statement. Part one: immune function and exercise,” Exercise Immunology Review, vol. 17, pp. 6–63, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
M. Gurevich, P. M. Kohn, and C. Davis, “Exercise-induced analgesia and the role of reactivity in pain sensitivity,” Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 549–559, 1994.View at: Google Scholar
R. B. Singh, G. Dubnov, M. A. Niaz et al., “Effect of an Indo-Mediterranean diet on progression of coronary artery disease in high risk patients (Indo-Mediterranean Diet Heart Study): a randomised single-blind trial,” The Lancet, vol. 360, no. 9344, pp. 1455–1461, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Baka, E. Buzás, and G. Nagy, “Rheumatoid arthritis and smoking: putting the pieces together,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 238, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
T. Pedersen, “Lack of sleep, stress leads to inflammation in older adults,” Psychology Central, http://psychcentral.com/news/2012/03/02/lack-of-sleep-stress-leads-to-inflammation-in-older-adults/35490.html, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
G. Candore, C. Caruso, E. Jirillo, T. Magrone, and S. Vasto, “Low grade inflammation as a common pathogenetic denominator in age-related diseases: novel drug targets for anti-ageing strategies and successful ageing achievement,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 584–596, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. T. Juel, Z. Ali, L. Nilas, and C. S. Ulrik, “Asthma and obesity: does weight loss improve asthma control? A systematic review,” Journal of Asthma and Allergy, vol. 5, pp. 21–26, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
E. F. M. Wouters, N. L. Reynaert, M. A. Dentener, and J. H. J. Vernooy, “Systemic and local inflammation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is there a connection?” Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 638–647, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Chang, C. J. Hsieh, J. C. Huang, and I. C. Huang, “Acute and chronic fluctuations in blood glucose levels can increase oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 49, no. 1 Supplement, pp. 171–177, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
B. C. van Bussel, S. S. Soedamah-Muthu, R. M. Henry et al., “EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study Group, Unhealthy dietary patterns associated with inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in type 1 diabetes: The EURODIAB study,” Nutrition and Metabolism in Cardiovascular Disease. In press.View at: Google Scholar
D. Kadetoff, J. Lampa, M. Westman, M. Andersson, and E. Kosek, “Evidence of central inflammation in fibromyalgia-increased cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-8 levels,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 242, no. 1-2, pp. 33–38, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
E. Ortega, M. E. Bote, E. Giraldo, and J. J. García, “Aquatic exercise improves the monocyte pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine production balance in fibromyalgia patients,” Scandinavian Journal of Medical Science and Sports, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 104–112, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Piya, P. G. McTeman, and S. Kumar, “Adipokine inflammation and insulin resistance: the role of glucose, lipids and endotoxin,” Journal of Endocrinology. In press.View at: Google Scholar
E. Vizzardi, I. Bonadei, B. Piovanelli et al., “Helicobacter pylori and ischemic heart disease,” Panminerva Medica, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 193–202, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
H. T. Kang, J. K. Kim, J. Y. Shim, H. R. Lee, J. A. Linton, and Y. J. Lee, “Low-grade inflammation, metabolic syndrome and the risk of chronic kidney disease: the 2005 Korean national health and nutrition examination survey,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 630–635, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Luis-Rodríguez, A. Martínez-Castelao, J. L. Górriz, F. De-Álvaro, and J. F. Navarro-González, “Pathophysiological role and therapeutic implications of inflammation in diabetic nephropathy,” World Journal of Diabetes, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7–18, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
M. Hulsmans, B. Geeraert, D. De Keyzer et al., “Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-3 is a key inhibitor of inflammation in obesity and metabolic syndrome,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID e30414, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
M. G. Rico-Rosillo and G. B. Vega-Robledo, “New trends in macrophages, inflammation and adipose tissue,” Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
N. Tajik, S. A. Keshavarz, F. Masoudkabir et al., “Effect of diet-induced weight loss on inflammatory cytokines in obese women,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigations. In press.View at: Google Scholar
L. Beck, Foods that Fight Disease. A Nutrition Guide for Staying Healthy for Life, Penguin Canada, Toronto, Canada, 2010.
J. Daniluk, Meals that Heal Inflammation. Embrace Healthy Living and Eliminate Pain, One Meal at a Time, Random House Canada, Toronto, Canada, 2011.
A. W. Weil, Anti Inflammatory Diet and Pyramid, http://www.drweil.com/drw/u/ART02012/anti-inflammatory-diet, 2012.
Meeting the challenge of living well at a glance 2012, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/AAG/arthritis.htm, 2012.
W. Frerichs, E. Kaltenbacher, J. P. van de Leur, and E. Dean, “Can physical therapists counsel patients with lifestyle-related health conditions effectively? A systematic review and implications,” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 571–587, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
World Health Organization, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, http://www.sustainable-design.ie/arch/ICIDH-2PFDec-2000.pdf, 2002.
E. S. Ford, M. M. Bergmann, J. Kröger, A. Schienkiewitz, C. Weikert, and H. Boeing, “Healthy living is the best revenge: findings from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition-potsdam study,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 169, no. 15, pp. 1355–1362, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Ridker, “High-sensitivity C-reactive protein: potential adjunct for global risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease,” Circulation, vol. 103, no. 13, pp. 1813–1818, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
E. Dean, Z. Li, W. P. Wong, and M. E. Bodner, “Cardiology best practice-effective health education meets biomedical advances: reducing the ultimate knowledge translation gap,” in Novel Strategies in Ischemic Heart Disease, U. Lakshmanadoss, Ed., pp. 301–318, InTech Publishing, Rijeka, Croatia, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
“The 5 A's Cycle,” World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/diabetesactiononline/about/WHO%205A%20ppt.pdf, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
T. van Achterberg, G. G. J. Huisman-De Waal, N. A. B. M. Ketelaar, R. A. Oostendorp, J. E. Jacobs, and H. C. H. Wollersheim, “How to promote healthy behaviours in patients? An overview of evidence for behaviour change techniques,” Health Promotion International, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 148–162, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Barr and P. G. Conaghan, “Osteoarthritis: a holistic approach,” Clinical Medicine, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 153–155, 2012.View at: Google Scholar