Table of Contents
Volume 2013, Article ID 256493, 2 pages

Rheumatoid Arthritis in Minorities

1Center for Autoimmune Diseases Research (CREA), School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24 No. 63-C-69, 11001000 Bogotá, Colombia
2Rheumatology Unit, Riesgo de Fractura S. A.-CAYRE I.P.S., 11001000 Bogotá, Colombia
3Rheumatic and Autoimmune Diseases Unit (UNERA), Mount Sinai Hospital, Miguel Cordero 6-111 y Avenida Solano, EC010150 Cuenca, Ecuador

Received 15 April 2013; Accepted 15 April 2013

Copyright © 2013 Juan-Manuel Anaya et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) is a rapidly growing region with almost 600 million inhabitants composed of Mexico, Central and South America, and the islands of the Caribbean [1, 2]. The Americas were first inhabited by people crossing the Bering Land Bridge from northeast Asia into Alaska well over 10,000 years ago. Native Americans descend from at least three streams of Asian gene flow [3]. Europeans arrived after 1492 following Christopher Columbus’s voyages. African people were captured and taken to America by the transatlantic slave trade from the 16th to the 19th centuries. Hence, the population of LAC comprises a variety of ancestries, ethnic groups, and races, making the region one of the most diverse in the world. The specific composition varies from country to country: many have a predominance of European-Native American, or Mestizo, population; in others, Native Americans are a majority; some are dominated by inhabitants of European ancestry; some countries’ populations are primarily Mulatto [4]. To a less extent, Black, Asian, and Zambo (mixed Black and Native American) are also identified regularly [4]. Noteworthy, ethnic self-identification is culturally and biologically complex and is not correlated with self-reported ancestry which should be no longer evaluated by questionnaire but rather by the use of ancestry informative markers (AIMs) at the molecular level [5].

The term majority refers to a group that controls economic, political, and social resources regardless of the population size. In this sense, LAC still meets most of the Feagin defining features of minority, including suffering discrimination and subordination, physical or cultural traits that set them apart, and a shared sense of collective identity and common burdens as well as socially shared rules [6]. LAC remains one of the world’s most unequal regions [7]. Enormous cultural differences in health perceptions in LAC exist which correlate with individuals’ economic and health conditions [8]. Lower-income groups recognize more health problems but are less tolerant to some of them than the rich [8].

There is an increased prevalence of chronic diseases in LAC which has been attributed to diverse causes, including ancestry, socioeconomic status (SES), the ageing of the population, and lifestyle factors such as smoking, physical inactivity, and excess of alcohol intake [8, 9]. Higher SES has been characterized by lower levels of Native American ancestry [9]. The prevalence of some autoimmune rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is higher than expected among some Amerindian groups highlighting ancestry as a factor influencing the risk of acquiring autoimmune diseases [10, 11].

In spite of setbacks, LAC is making important progress in research. The “Grupo Latino Americano de Estudio de Artritis Reumatoide (GLADAR)” is an example among several others ( From 2000 to 2010, LAC has seen a high growth of more than 9% per year in scholarly output, resulting in a nearly 70% increase in its share of world papers over the same period, to reach just under 4.4% of the world’s annual output of scholarly papers in 2010 [12]. Latin American research is growing fast and becoming more visible on a global scale. And this is not the only bibliometrically-observed improvement to LAC’s scholarly output over the last few years. LAC’s relative citation impact, albeit still under world average, has been improving by 1.6% per year from 2000 to 2010 and from about 70% of world average in 2000 to more than four-fifths in 2010 [12]. Improving research and human resources capacity in the region will require increasing research partnerships within and outside the region, between rich and poor countries, promoting collaborations between LAC research institutions and universities to boost postgraduate programs, and aligning research investments and outputs with the current burden of disease [7].

This issue of Arthritis offers five papers from LAC. The effect of illness on workers participation and productivity, more than any other consequence of disease, is important to a wide range of stakeholders both within and outside the healthcare sector. R. C. del Moral and colleagues from Argentina report how patients with RA with higher disease severity show higher work productivity compromise.

Three reports from the Center for Autoimmune Diseases Research (CREA) in Colombia are presented. J. C. Roldan et al. evaluated the global prevalence of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) in RA, stressing that AITD should be systematically assessed since it is a risk factor for developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in RA. A systematic literature review in Latin America on CVD in RA, led by J. C. Sarmiento-Monroy, indicates a high prevalence of CVD in LA patients (35.3%). Main nontraditional risk factors associated to CVD in this population are HLA-DRB1 shared epitope alleles, rheumatoid factor, markers of chronic inflammation, long duration of RA, steroids, familial autoimmunity, and thrombogenic factors. Authors propose to evaluate cardiovascular risk factors comprehensively in the Latin RA patient and to generate specific public health policies in order to diminish morbimortality rates. J. Amaya-Amaya and colleagues report the usefulness of patients-reported outcomes (PROs) in RA focus group. Authors evaluated 135 patients with RA during two different sessions of focus group interviews. Agreement was found between objective measurements assessed by the physician and subjective assessments done by the patients regardless of gender, educational level, and duration of disease. Application of PROs in daily routine offers enormous benefits with patients’ adherence to treatment and cost reductions as the most important.

Finally, an elegant work from A. C. Machado-Díaz and colleagues from Cuba shows an increase of proinflammatory soluble interleukin-15 receptor alpha (IL-15Rα) in patients with RA as compared with osteoarthritic patients. In addition, their results evidence the presence of IL-15Rα in synovial fluids and suggest that its pro-inflammatory effect could be related to the induction of IL-6.

We hope readers of Arthritis will enjoy this special issue and be aware of the importance and promises to investigate factors influencing health in minorities. As García Marquez said “solidarity with our dreams will not make us feel less alone, as long as it is not translated into concrete acts of legitimate support for all the peoples that assume the illusion of having a life of their own in the distribution of the world” [13].

Juan-Manuel Anaya
Adriana Rojas-Villarraga
Rubén Darío Mantilla
Claudio Galarza-Maldonado


  1. E. González Burchard, L. N. Borrell, S. Choudhry et al., “Latino populations: a unique opportunity for the study of race, genetics, and social environment in epidemiological research,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 2161–2168, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Reich, N. Patterson, D. Campbell, A. Tandon, S. Mazieres, N. Ray et al., “Reconstructing Native American population history,” Nature, vol. 488, no. 7411, pp. 370–374, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Sans, “Admixture studies in Latin America: from the 20th to the 21st century,” Human Biology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 155–177, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. Rojas, M. V. Parra, O. Campo et al., “Genetic make up and structure of Colombian populations by means of uniparental and biparental DNA markers,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. R. Feagin and C. B. Feagin, Racial and Ethnic Relations, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2012.
  7. S. M. Barreto, J. J. Miranda, J. P. Figueroa, M. I. Schmidt, S. Munoz, P. P. Kuri-Morales et al., “Epidemiology in Latin America and the Caribbean: current situation and challenges,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 557–571, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Lora, “Health perceptions in Latin America,” Health Policy and Planning, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 555–569, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. D. D. Campbell, M. V. Parra, C. Duque, N. Gallego, L. Franco, A. Tandon et al., “Amerind ancestry, socioeconomic status and the genetics of type 2 diabetes in a Colombian population,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID e33570, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. D. Mezey, The Encyclopedia of Elder Care, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  11. M. H. Cardiel, “Present and future of rheumatic diseases in Latin America. Are we prepared to face them?” Reumatología Clínica, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 279–280, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Huggett, “The rise of Latin American science,” Research Trends, no. 31, 2012, View at Google Scholar
  13. G. García Marquez, “The Solitude of Latin America”, Nobel Lecture, December 1982,