Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Arthritis
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 915142, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/915142
Research Article

Adherence to Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

1The Parker Institute, Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Copenhagen F, Denmark
2Department of Health Science and Technology, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark
3Aalborg University Hospital, Clinical Institute, 9100 Aalborg, Denmark
4Department of Rheumatology, Region Hospital, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark
5Clinic of Rheumatology, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
6Copenhagen Centre for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Glostrup Hospital, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
7Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2900 Gentofte, Denmark
8Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA
9Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

Received 22 December 2014; Accepted 29 January 2015

Academic Editor: Shinichi Kawai

Copyright © 2015 Henning Bliddal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. C. Arnett, S. M. Edworthy, D. A. Bloch et al., “The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 315–324, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Aletaha, T. Neogi, A. J. Silman, J. Funovits, D. T. Felson, and C. O. Bingham III, “2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 1580–1588, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. Emery, “Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis,” British Medical Journal, vol. 332, no. 7534, pp. 152–155, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. S. Smolen, D. Aletaha, J. W. J. Bijlsma et al., “Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 631–637, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. S. Smolen, R. Landewé, F. C. Breedveld et al., “EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 964–975, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Salliot and D. van der Heijde, “Long-term safety of methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature research,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 1100–1104, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. M. Soliman, D. M. Ashcroft, K. D. Watson, M. Lunt, D. P. M. Symmons, and K. L. Hyrich, “Impact of concomitant use of DMARDs on the persistence with anti-TNF therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 583–589, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Choquette, O. Thomas, and M. Arundine, “Lower than expected levels of DMARD acquisition immediately preand post biologic initiation in rheumatoid arthritis patients (abstract),” Arthritis & Rheumatology, vol. 64, supplement 10, p. 1841, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. D. Choquette, J.- P. Raynauld, B. Haraoui, and D. Sauvageau, “AB0458 Better retention rate at 5 years of anti-TNF agents used in conjonction with methotrexate over time in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: real-life data from rhumadata computarized database,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 71, supplement 3, p. 663, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. F. Andersen, M. Madsen, J. Jørgensen, L. Mellemkjær, and J. H. Olsen, “The Danish National Hospital Register: a valuable source of data for modern health sciences,” Danish Medical Bulletin, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 263–268, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Mosbech, J. Jørgensen, M. Madsen, K. Rostgaard, K. Thornberg, and T. D. Poulsen, “The national patient registry. Evaluation of data quality,” Ugeskrift for Laeger, vol. 157, no. 26, pp. 3741–3745, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. E. Charlson, P. Pompei, K. A. Ales, and C. R. MacKenzie, “A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation,” Journal of Chronic Diseases, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 373–383, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Kanamiya, M. Naito, M. Hara, and I. Yoshimura, “The influences of biomechanical factors on cartilage regeneration after high tibial osteotomy for knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis: clinical and arthroscopic observations,” Arthroscopy, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 725–729, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus